[HN Gopher] A Circumplanetary Disk Around PDS70 C [pdf]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A Circumplanetary Disk Around PDS70 C [pdf]
        
       Author : leephillips
       Score  : 68 points
       Date   : 2021-08-19 12:53 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.eso.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.eso.org)
        
       | baking wrote:
       | https://www.almaobservatory.org/en/press-releases/astronomer...
        
       | rendall wrote:
       | Would someone who has knowledge in this domain be willing to
       | explain the significance of this? To me, it just describes 2
       | protoplanets in a dust disk, but I'm sure it has some importance
       | to astronomers in order to hit front page of HN
        
         | dcuthbertson wrote:
         | From a layperson's perspective (I am not an astronomer at all),
         | it sounds like they found 2 Saturn-like planets in the making.
         | They're still forming from their dust disks. That in itself is
         | cool.
        
         | baking wrote:
         | No expertise in the matter, but I assume the question is how
         | our solar system formed with gas giants in the outer orbits and
         | rocky planets in the habitable zone and how common this might
         | be around other stars. The final paragraph of the conclusion
         | has some hints.
         | 
         | I am particularly interested in why we are on a planet that is
         | so rich in phosphorus and the final phrase about "delivery of
         | chemically enriched material to planetary atmospheres" is a
         | real tease.
        
           | svachalek wrote:
           | The Bae et al paper linked in that paragraph
           | (https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ab46b0)
           | (note Bae is cited second on OP paper) actually has quite a
           | bit more to do with the way planets settle into orbits, based
           | on study of this same system. As a fellow layman I haven't
           | read it in detail but it looks fascinating, will check it out
           | later.
           | 
           | These are really interesting papers and full of pics and
           | diagrams, although the math is beyond me.
        
         | wthomp wrote:
         | Many circumstellar disks have been detected, but this is the
         | first unambiguous detection of a circumplanetary disk. This is
         | believed to be material swirling around a protoplanet,
         | accreting on to it, and perhaps, forming moons. The actual
         | processes of how planets form out of protoplanetary disks are
         | still not well understood, so observations like this will help
         | narrow things down. Quite impressive that they were able to
         | resolve it with ALMA.
        
       | marcodiego wrote:
       | My hardwired brain: an old disk from the 70's with an obscure c
       | compiler was found!
        
         | raducu wrote:
         | I thought it was an (artificial) orbital ring.
        
         | bregma wrote:
         | It should be rewritten in Rust.
        
       | willemojnr wrote:
       | According to Wikipedia, "For the first time, we can conclusively
       | see the tell-tale signs of a circumplanetary disk, which helps to
       | support many of the current theories of planet formation."
       | 
       | I'm confused though... doesn't our own Saturn have a
       | circumplanetary disk?
        
         | leephillips wrote:
         | Do not read Wikipedia.
         | 
         | What is new here is the clear observation of a circumplanetary
         | disk around an exoplanet. Such disks are where moons are
         | formed, so this is the first observation of a moon-forming
         | process outside of our solar system.
        
           | junon wrote:
           | > so this is the first observation of a moon-forming process
           | outside of our solar system
           | 
           | Is that really true? We've never seen moons forming elsewhere
           | in the universe?
        
             | koheripbal wrote:
             | Correct. The ability to infer this from observational data
             | was only possible with the technique pioneered in this
             | paper.
             | 
             | Remember that we cannot even see exo-planets visually (with
             | one or two very nearby exceptions).
        
               | svachalek wrote:
               | According to Wikipedia, there are not even any confirmed
               | exomoons yet. So it's interesting that a disk was
               | observed first, although given size/brightness that's
               | probably not a surprising result.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-08-19 23:02 UTC)