[HN Gopher] Berlin, a divided city. The events of 60 years ago
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Berlin, a divided city. The events of 60 years ago
        
       Author : samizdis
       Score  : 87 points
       Date   : 2021-08-13 09:27 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.dw.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.dw.com)
        
       | silvio wrote:
       | On the topic of a city divided in two, I highly recommend the
       | novel 'The City & The City' by China Mieville. It's an excelllent
       | detective thriller that reminds you that the strongest and
       | tallest walls are always in our minds.
        
       | zwieback wrote:
       | Berlin had the most memorable wall but the entire country was
       | divided by a wall as well.
       | 
       | My mom's family abandoned their house and factory and fled to the
       | west when the Russians took their property and punished them for
       | being capitalists. Since the wall wasn't up yet they left through
       | Berlin, which was like a porthole to the west at the time.
        
         | sdoering wrote:
         | I grew up on the western side of the Iron curtain. Not far from
         | the border. My father was born in East Germany and had fled
         | with his mother, ssister and brother before the wall was up.
         | 
         | They could only take one suitcase to make it look like they
         | were visiting western Germany only. So he and his family came
         | to the west.
         | 
         | His life went in a way so that he got a job near the border as
         | it was back then in north eastern Bavaria.
         | 
         | Not far from where I grew up there was another village divided
         | by a wall: Little Berlin [1]
         | 
         | It was interesting as a child to grow up near a divided village
         | and country. And seeing the border fall.
         | 
         | I still remember my dad, tears streaming down his face while
         | watching people standing on the Berlin Wall when it fell. I
         | remember him welcoming the trains from the West German Embassy
         | with the GDR people shortly before that. [2]
         | 
         | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%B6dlareuth?wprov=sfla1
         | 
         | [2]:
         | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fl%C3%BCchtlingsz%C3%BCge_aus_...
         | (German only)
        
         | bosie wrote:
         | if the wall wasn't up by then, why did they have to go through
         | berlin?
        
           | zwieback wrote:
           | It was a shorter path, they would have had to travel much
           | farther to get to West Germany than to West Berlin. At the
           | time the commuter trains in Berlin were still going back and
           | forth between the sectors and too busy to be checked
           | thoroughly.
        
           | nibix wrote:
           | The border between West and East Germany was already heavily
           | fortified in 1952. So, during the nine years until 1961, West
           | Berlin was indeed a kind of porthole to the west.
           | 
           | The reasons why the East German government did not close the
           | border within Berlin are complex. For example the Sowjets
           | first had the goal to make Berlin an independent but unified
           | city. But there were also economical and logistical issues:
           | The border would cut important railway transport routes for
           | East Berlin, for which a replacement was only completed in
           | 1961.
        
       | FabHK wrote:
       | Some Berlin Wall trivia:
       | 
       | * The wall was not between East and West Berlin, but between West
       | Berlin and the GDR, entirely enclosing West Berlin, naturally.
       | (45 km bordered East Berlin, 113 km Potsdam, the state around
       | Berlin.)
       | 
       | * Just two months before the wall was built, at a press
       | conference, Walter Ulbricht, then head of the GDR, said that
       | nobody had the intention of building a wall. "Niemand hat die
       | Absicht, eine Mauer zu errichten."
       | 
       | * It wasn't just a wall, but an entire corridor 50m to several
       | hundred metres wide (on the "Eastern" side), consisting of a
       | smaller wall ("Hinterlandmauer"), sometimes corridors for K-9s
       | (German shepherds, naturally), anti-tank obstacles ("Czech
       | hedgehog"), observation towers (302 by the time the wall came
       | down), control strips "Kontrollstreifen" of freshly harrowed sand
       | so trespassers would leave tracks, then "the wall", then a few
       | more metres GDR, then the actual legal border. (However, no
       | "Selbstschussanlagen SM-70", shotguns rigged to fire
       | automatically - those were only deployed at the border to West
       | Germany.)
       | 
       | * There were 2300 border troops deployed at any time, mostly in
       | pairs to control each other, but rotating, so that they couldn't
       | form a bond. They were under an order to shoot trespassers, the
       | infamous "Schiessbefehl".
       | 
       | * Some 100 to 200+ people died trying to cross the wall. It is
       | surprisingly hard to put an exact number on it.
       | 
       | * There were some "enclaves" (exclaves?) like the Lenne-Dreieck
       | (Lenne-triangle): on the "western" side of the wall, but
       | officially belonging to the East, so effectively a no-man's land.
       | 
       | * One of the iconic events precipitating the fall was in Sept
       | 1989. Many (thousands) of East Germans had traveled to Prague,
       | Czechoslovakia (not part of the USSR, but of the Eastern Bloc),
       | and climbed over the fence of the West German embassy there,
       | camping on the grounds. On 30 Sept, the foreign minister of West
       | Germany (after long negotiations with USSR foreign minister
       | Shevardnadse), Hans-Dietrich Genscher, appeared on the balcony to
       | tell those refugees that they could go on to West Germany. The
       | rest of the speech was basically drowned out by cheering as soon
       | as the crowd heard "Ausreise". See here from about 1:20.
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov9IHjX8UF4
       | 
       | * Then, on 9 Nov 1989, the wall fell, and it was a surprisingly
       | silly culmination of the revolution. The East German authorities
       | knew that they couldn't carry on, and were planning to gradually
       | open the borders from December onwards (given that people could
       | flee via Czechoslovakia anyway). They started working on
       | legislation, and there was lots of discussions going back and
       | forth (would people that left be allowed to return, etc.) On Nov
       | 9, they sent the first secretary of the party (Sozialistische
       | Einheitspartei Deutschlands) in East Berlin, Gunter Schabowski,
       | on a press conference to talk about these plans, but he hadn't
       | attended the deliberations and was basically reading from some
       | notes he had been handed. An Italian reporter asked about it the
       | border, and Schabowski announced these plans for liberalisation,
       | live on TV. He was then asked when these would go into effect,
       | and he shuffled around in those papers and said "as far as I
       | know, that's applicable now, immediately". People stormed the
       | border ("first gradually, then suddenly"), and the rest was
       | history. See around 0:40 here:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mn4VDwaV-oo
        
       | rkachowski wrote:
       | I live in Berlin, I tried to cycle home yesterday past Bernauer
       | Strasse (pictured) but the police had completely blocked off the
       | whole region with barricades and around 20 police wagons.
       | 
       | I'm pretty sure the irony of commemorating the Berlin wall and
       | its fall via people with guns stopping the public from crossing
       | was lost on them.
        
         | seanmcdirmid wrote:
         | Maybe that was the point? To temporarily re-divide the city as
         | part of the ceremony?
         | 
         | If not intentional now, I can see that kind of thing happening
         | in the future.
        
         | bogomipz wrote:
         | Can you say what was the reason that they were there? A
         | protest?
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | nibix wrote:
           | The official commemoration ceremony with all German top
           | politicians took place at Bernauer Strasse. That was probably
           | the reason why the street was blocked by police.
           | 
           | https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/gedenken-an-mauerbau-
           | steinmei...
        
             | rkachowski wrote:
             | Thanks for the link, I couldn't find anything on Berliner
             | Zeitung and cynically assumed it was something to do with
             | Elon Musk being in town.
        
         | nbadg wrote:
         | Out of curiosity, when? I walked down Bernauer Strasse with my
         | dog (from the Hundeplatz at Mauerpark to Nordbahnhof; I live
         | relatively close-by) and didn't see anything unusual. I don't
         | keep track of time well on a Friday at the dog park, but I'd
         | guess that would have been around 20:00, give or take.
        
           | rkachowski wrote:
           | 9:30
        
         | sarabande wrote:
         | There is/was a (right-wing) NPD political assembly that is
         | being protested by the Green Party, supposedly in the area of
         | the wall. I'm guessing this is the reason for the hordes of
         | police.
         | 
         | https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/corona-demo-rechtsext...
        
           | tpmx wrote:
           | That story is from last year. (August 25, 2020)
           | 
           | > I'm guessing this is the reason for the hordes of police.
           | 
           | Somehow I doubt it.
        
         | sdoering wrote:
         | Thanks for sharing this story. Made me smile. Nice ironic
         | touch.
        
         | tpmx wrote:
         | ~15 years ago I randomly wandered into an antifa vs police
         | standoff in Berlin, just as it was forming. Surreal experience.
         | Everyone knew where they were supposed to be, except for me. It
         | felt like they had done it so many times before.
         | 
         | I got out of there just in time. It's the only time I've seen
         | large scale street violence. I don't think it belongs in a
         | civilized society.
        
           | deanCommie wrote:
           | > It's the only time I've seen large scale street violence. I
           | don't think it belongs in a civilized society.
           | 
           | "...more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a
           | negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive
           | peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says
           | "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree
           | with your methods of direct action;" [1] - Martin Luther
           | King, Jr.
           | 
           | I wasn't there on the street with you 15 years ago. I don't
           | know what the protestors were protesting (though "antifa",
           | depending on how you use the term may suggest they were
           | protesting a fascist/neo-nazi group).
           | 
           | But i include this quote only to say that you have to be
           | careful to consider whether society is as civilized as those
           | in power believe it is, and whether it can always be improved
           | through other "civilized" manners.
           | 
           | [1] http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/060.html
        
             | leereeves wrote:
             | That quote could be [mis]used to defend any movement, but I
             | don't recall MLK leading people in helmets, carrying
             | shields, to violently confront police, without even making
             | a clear statement of what they want.
             | 
             | MLK was very clear about what he meant by "justice", never
             | tried to hide his identity, and didn't respond with
             | violence.
             | 
             | "Antifa", on the other hand, aren't even honest about what
             | they want. They call themselves anti-fascist, but they are
             | anarchists, who dishonestly label any authority "fascist".
        
               | adventured wrote:
               | Anarchists of that sort are only such until they acquire
               | structural power, then they immediately become the new,
               | organized, violently oppressive authoritarian power. It's
               | why Antifa so resembles the fascism they claim to oppose.
               | That exact switch happened repeatedly across the 20th
               | century. An organized anarchist movement is something
               | close to an oxymoron, a facade at best, for people
               | lusting for the power to implement their own vision of
               | how things should be (while using that particular appeal
               | to lure followers). The people that were responsible for
               | installing Lenin's famines and ultimately Stalin, would
               | of course tell you they also meant well (akin to someone
               | claiming they mean you no harm while they break your
               | skull).
        
           | ostenning wrote:
           | Nothing has changed, I witnessed a fairly violent antifa
           | against police just recently
        
       | samizdis wrote:
       | DW anniversary special:
       | 
       |  _60 years ago, the Berlin Wall went up, dividing the city -- and
       | more_
       | 
       | https://www.dw.com/en/60-years-ago-the-berlin-wall-went-up-d...
       | 
       |  _The East German secret police and the Berlin Wall_
       | 
       | https://www.dw.com/en/the-east-german-secret-police-and-the-...
       | 
       |  _Underground pop art thrived in East Germany_
       | 
       | https://www.dw.com/en/underground-pop-art-thrived-in-east-ge...
        
       | keewee7 wrote:
       | The East German authorities called the wall "Anti-Fascist
       | Protection Border".
       | 
       | >The Eastern Bloc portrayed the Wall as protecting its population
       | from fascist elements conspiring to prevent the "will of the
       | people" from building a socialist state in East Germany.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Wall
        
         | jasonvorhe wrote:
         | What's your point though? That building walls is a useless
         | endeavour or that anti-fascism is evil becay an anti-democratic
         | state abused the term for propaganda reasons?
         | 
         | If it's the latter, I hope you'll never look into the historic
         | use of terms such as democracy, freedom/liberty or "free
         | elections".
        
           | argvargc wrote:
           | Not the OP but I think you've made their point quite well.
        
           | MichaelMoser123 wrote:
           | The point of the wall was to prevent the population of the
           | GDR from running away from socialism; Between 1959-1960 they
           | collectivized agriculture, this means that all the
           | independent farmers were forced to join big state owned
           | farms; the system did not work properly and resulted in
           | shortages. All this resulted in the flight of more than a
           | million citizens from the GDR to the west between 1959 and
           | 1961; about two and a half million fled between 1949 and
           | 1961; The east german rulers stopped this flight by errecting
           | a hightly unpopular wall; East Berlin before the wall was a
           | very open city - for example you could live in the east and
           | work in the western part of the city. Now they had to justify
           | the whole project with ideology constructs - and the ultimate
           | trick was to apply Goodwin's law, and that was done before
           | the invention of the internet.
        
         | mostertoaster wrote:
         | What has been will be again, what has been done will be done
         | again; there is nothing new under the sun.
        
       | xx511134bz wrote:
       | Odd/amusing point, the Stasi referred to the wall as the
       | "antifascist defense border". Although these days, I'm a bit torn
       | on the term as I see rent prices jacked up across the world by
       | whomever can borrow money at the lowest rate.
       | 
       | The Stasi and the Berlin Wall | DW Documentary
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haxkWC6MgcQ
        
         | ArtWomb wrote:
         | Highest recommendation for Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck's
         | film _The Lives of Others_ (2006) ;)
        
         | inglor_cz wrote:
         | I suspect that real estate prices are dragged up by fear of
         | inflation. People in my country buy whatever has a roof,
         | because they do not want their savings to go to waste.
        
           | Spooky23 wrote:
           | It's all about the cheap money.
           | 
           | I just refinanced my house for a rate that is effectively
           | negative in real terms right now.
        
             | inglor_cz wrote:
             | We had even slightly lower interest rate on mortgages in
             | 2017 and the market was nowhere as hot as today.
             | 
             | I am sort-of familiar with real estate market in Prague and
             | Ostrava, two very different cities.
             | 
             | Apartments in Ostrava were hard to sell even with low
             | interest rates, because the city lost 10 per cent of its
             | population - a typical rust belt phenomenon. Even just two
             | years ago, an apartment put on market in Ostrava could be
             | there for half a year before attracting a serious buyer.
             | 
             | They are now hot like hell and more than twice as much
             | expensive.
        
             | spaetzleesser wrote:
             | Agreed. Some people/institutions have access to more money
             | than can be productively used so they bid up anything that
             | has the potential to make money, be it startups, Bitcoin or
             | housing.
        
           | adsche wrote:
           | Is the real estate market (esp. for renting out) actually
           | dominated by private investors and their savings? Here in
           | German cities, it _feels_ like it 's dominated by faceless
           | investors and corporations but I have no data to back that
           | up.
        
             | inglor_cz wrote:
             | In March-May 2021, I was looking for an apartment or
             | smaller house in my city of birth, Ostrava. The market was
             | crazy, but the prospective buyers looked like regular
             | people. Sometimes 15-20 of us met in a single location and
             | had to be shepherded through the dwelling in groups.
        
             | f6v wrote:
             | 99.99% for-rent apartments I've seen in Western Europe were
             | owned by some huge company. That's a stark contrast to
             | Eastern Europe where you're much more likely to rent a
             | privately owned property.
        
               | sandworm101 wrote:
               | How many of those are actually privately owned but are
               | only _managed_ by the big bad corporation? It is often
               | very hard to tell the difference.
        
               | buran77 wrote:
               | This may be because of local laws or city council rules.
               | In many cities the developer of a complex today is forced
               | by law to have a certain percentage of the development
               | dedicated for rental (Munich I think may be the leader
               | here with a proposed 80% for rental). The only way to
               | achieve this is to have the apartments owned by the
               | developer or handed over to another management company
               | (or investor) for rental only.
               | 
               | It's also why you sometimes see a development with a
               | several rows of houses meant for sale flanked by one or
               | more apartment buildings with a far smaller footprint but
               | enough floors to equal roughly the same usable area in
               | order to get the project approved.
        
               | johannes1234321 wrote:
               | actually in Germany 60% of the appartments are owned by
               | private individuals 10% state/local governments, 10%
               | coops (Genossenschaft), and the reminder corporations.
               | (While statistics differ a bit depending on where you
               | draw the line between some private owner and a
               | corporation for auch a statistic)
               | https://www.savills.de/insight-and-opinion/savills-
               | news/2756... is one survey with some numbers
        
               | buran77 wrote:
               | The laws I mentioned are relatively new [0]. So for now
               | it's hard to compete in numbers with a century of already
               | built apartments. And eventually all "for rent" units do
               | go on the market for sale.
               | 
               | But it's also easy to see why for someone looking for
               | rent in many big cities today it looks like most
               | apartments are owned by big management companies. New
               | developments in "hot" cities with high demand and such
               | laws _are_ owned by a management company because that 's
               | the only way it works. You'd see entire buildings owned
               | by the developer. It will take decades for those new
               | apartments to go into private ownership.
               | 
               | [0] https://www.thelocal.de/20210708/explained-munichs-
               | radical-n...
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | pydry wrote:
         | IIRC west germany did end up welcoming some nazis back into
         | government positions so from their standpoint it probably
         | seemed fairly reasonable. There were still Nazis everywhere in
         | postwar berlin.
        
           | sdoering wrote:
           | They did. Same with the US inviting Third Reich scientists.
           | Or BND, CIA, MI5 and others inviting HVA (Stasi foreign spy
           | agency) people into their ranks.
           | 
           | What, except maybe that states are immoral and opportunistic,
           | does these things tell us?
           | 
           | I am not sure. Maybe I am missing net positive things as
           | outcomes from these behaviors. But to me neither example is
           | good.
        
             | ipaddr wrote:
             | Using those scientists to made the bomb to end the war was
             | one positive outcome.
        
           | heraclius wrote:
           | In that were the real concern, the DDR would have restricted
           | travel from the West to the East by residents of the West,
           | but not travel by its own residents to the West and return
           | journeys--yet it prohibited the latter.
           | 
           | Moreover the DDR cannot seriously have had such concerns,
           | since it too e.g. employed former Nazi officers in its army.
        
           | flohofwoe wrote:
           | East Germany did that too in the early years for building up
           | their "inofficial army" (called "Kasernierte Volkspolizei")
           | before the "official" NVA (National People's Army) was
           | founded in 1956. After that they mostly got rid of old Nazis
           | in the army though, at least the high-ranking ones. In
           | general, the more specialist and "valuable" an old Nazi was,
           | the more it was likely that his history was quickly
           | forgotten, also in the East.
        
         | aerosmile wrote:
         | The Russians' usage of the term antifascist certainly didn't
         | age well, but it's worth noting that "fascists" is how all
         | people in the world referred to certain Germans and Italians
         | for a period of 25 years all up until 1945 (and the affected
         | folks didn't mind that - in fact, the term was invented in
         | Italy in 1915 and then adopted by Mussolini in 1918 and by
         | Hitler in 1923 [0]). So for Russians to refer to Germans who
         | didn't join them as fascists is just a continuation of how the
         | term had been used for a long time.
         | 
         | By 1961, it was definitely unfair to continue using the term in
         | its original meaning, and at this point it was certainly the
         | Russian government pushing their agenda a lot more strongly
         | than the general population would have on its own. But it's not
         | like everyone was strictly opposed to it either - the horrors
         | of the war had created in Eastern Europe such deep resentment
         | towards Germany that it would take a lot more than 16 years to
         | get over that. In fact, my grandpa lived until the 90s and
         | still called every German a fascist.
         | 
         | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
        
           | fsckboy wrote:
           | > the term antifascist certainly didn't age well
           | 
           | antifa?
           | 
           | the political left has never stopped using the term fascist
           | as a pejorative, it's thrown around quite liberally even
           | today
        
             | seanmcdirmid wrote:
             | Where is the line at to be drawn between nationalism and
             | fascist ultra nationalism? The rise in nationalism in many
             | countries is one thing, but as that nationalism becomes
             | stronger it is too easy to see it as drifting into fascist
             | territory.
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | f6v wrote:
             | Sometimes I get lost in public discussions these days.
             | Everyone is "fascist", "far-right", and "leftist" at the
             | same time.
        
               | aerosmile wrote:
               | Far-left and far-right ideologies have more in common
               | than many people realize (including the people within
               | those factions). They are both based on the principle on
               | low tolerance, and as such they are well-aligned on the
               | idea of strict enforcement of their ideologies.
               | 
               | There are some hilarious misconceptions that members of
               | those factions have about their own ideologies. Far-left
               | is against the police brutality, but there is a 100 year
               | history of perfect correlation between leftist regimes
               | and policy brutality.
               | 
               | Far-right is against government interventions in all
               | economic matters, but that also has never materialized
               | anywhere else.
               | 
               | The bottom line is that anything that's far-something
               | requires suppression of the society's natural tendency to
               | return to the center.
        
               | TheOtherHobbes wrote:
               | The Wilson and Attlee governments in the UK would be very
               | surprised to hear there's a "100 year history of perfect
               | correlation".
               | 
               | They were certainly leftist. Many would consider them far
               | leftist today. (Of course they weren't, but that doesn't
               | mean the label wouldn't be applied.)
               | 
               | Neither was legendary for police brutality. That came
               | later, with Thatcher's response to the Miner's Strike and
               | the poll tax riots - among others.
        
               | blix wrote:
               | I have a hard time considering a government that ruled
               | over and fought bitterly to protect a global capitalist
               | empire as truly 'leftist,' unlike the UK's geopolitical
               | enemies of the time.
               | 
               | It is also likely that subjects of certain British
               | colonies would have a substantially different opinion on
               | police violence.
        
               | aerosmile wrote:
               | My bad, I meant to say far-left instead of leftist.
               | Hopefully that sentiment is evident throughout the rest
               | of my comment.
        
               | cronix wrote:
               | Far-left and far-right intersect at totalitarianism.
        
               | user-the-name wrote:
               | That sounds entirely like a problem with you not making
               | any effort to understand what is discussed rather than
               | anyone else's problem.
        
               | f6v wrote:
               | Or maybe it's people who didn't do well in school don't
               | know what a fascist regime looks like.
        
             | aerosmile wrote:
             | I said specifically "the Russians' usage of the term..."
        
       | codeulike wrote:
       | The idea of a city split into two by ideologically opposing
       | factions, and the split being marked by a big wall, sounds like
       | sci-fi now.
       | 
       | Also, the idea that a physical barrier could affect the spread of
       | information.
       | 
       | Its interesting how much of 20th century history centers on
       | Berlin.
       | 
       | There's a wall museum in Berlin, well worth visiting.
       | 
       | Edit: thanks for the reminders about contemporary split cities,
       | sobering to think about those
        
         | pomian wrote:
         | Mexico USA border seems to a pretty strong example of a
         | contemporary wall. Imagine what would happen if it was
         | completely removed?
        
           | gadders wrote:
           | The Berlin Wall was to stop people escaping. The US border
           | Wall is to stop people coming in.
        
           | nautilius wrote:
           | You mean all 700 miles of it along 2000 miles of border? I
           | would guess nothing at all would change. No comparison to the
           | German wall with minefields, self shooting devices, etc.
        
         | kunagi7 wrote:
         | > The idea of a city split into two by ideologically opposing
         | factions, and the split being marked by a big wall, sounds like
         | sci-fi now.
         | 
         | Say welcome to the "Peace lines" or "Peace walls" [0] in
         | Belfast and other cities in North Ireland. There's also
         | Jerusalem, Nicosia and more places with walls around certain
         | areas.
         | 
         | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_lines
        
         | mbg721 wrote:
         | Having the subway run under the other side's territory and just
         | skip stations is the part that really feels sci-fi/cyberpunk to
         | me.
        
         | inglor_cz wrote:
         | "sounds like sci-fi now"
         | 
         | Sci-fi is usually about _future_. With 8 billion people in the
         | world and growing, I can definitely see some other places
         | divided by walls so that hostile factions do not mix.
         | 
         | There are "peace lines" in contemporary Belfast and Derry still
         | in existence.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_lines
        
         | marc__1 wrote:
         | _> the idea of a city split into two_
         | 
         | We see this more often than not. The modern version just omit
         | the walls
         | 
         | https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/upshot/2020-electio...
         | 
         |  _> physical barrier could affect the spread of information_
         | Don 't you think that there is a component of physical barrier
         | in today's internet? while this may sound odd for the
         | Americans, this is very typical in many parts of the world
         | (East Europe, Asia and parts of Africa and Latin America)
        
         | perihelions wrote:
         | _" The idea of a city split into two by ideologically opposing
         | factions, and the split being marked by a big wall, sounds like
         | sci-fi now."_
         | 
         | Current reality in Nicosia (capital of Cyprus, a EU nation).
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Buffer_Zone_in_...
         | 
         | > _" The Turkish army has built a barrier on the zone's
         | northern side, consisting mainly of barbed-wire fencing,
         | concrete wall segments, watchtowers, anti-tank ditches, and
         | minefields. The zone cuts through the centre of Nicosia,
         | separating the city into southern and northern sections. In
         | total, it spans an area of 346 square kilometres (134 sq mi),
         | varying in width from less than 20 metres (66 ft) to more than
         | 7 kilometres (4.3 mi).[2][3][4] Because of this, after the fall
         | of the Berlin Wall in 1989, Nicosia remains the last divided
         | capital in Europe.[5][6]"_
        
           | mattr47 wrote:
           | Big difference between Berlin and Nicosia/Lefkosa. I lived
           | for 2 years (2010-2012) in the North as a westerner and while
           | the division certainly affects the Island, it is nothing like
           | Berlin in the Cold War.
           | 
           | Healing and forgiveness, on both sides, must occur before
           | reunification.
        
             | SerLava wrote:
             | >Healing and forgiveness, on both sides, must occur before
             | reunification.
             | 
             | I have an instinctive reaction to that type of language now
             | - it makes me wonder if one side has dramatically more
             | fault than the other
        
               | Landefeld_1 wrote:
               | 'Fallacy' ? Take two opposing Counterparts, teached by
               | history. 'Farmers and the church were the first, who
               | thought something like welfare, the farmer were
               | "addicted" to the help of others to bring in the harvest,
               | often village people to construct and
               | harvest...historical the church seemed to be addicted to
               | grace -which the people had to obey [turns-in-a-circle]
               | to fulfill the will of "god" (abstract: a 3rd person). So
               | it today those two (farmers and the church) seem to be
               | the first who drag money out of it (the social).'
               | 
               | A few post above someone wrote something that "'fascist'
               | refer to Germans who didn't join communism"
               | 
               | And that one may say, extremists are 'well-aligned on the
               | idea of strict enforcement of their ideologies'
               | (Quoting).
               | 
               | So take a look at history
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwardian_era
               | 
               | And add that Wilhelm II (Germany) was an grandchild of
               | the british Queen Victoria. And, that socialdemocracy as
               | domestic policy was concerned the biggest threat of his
               | time (under his politics)
               | 
               | Bismarck (his predecessor) for example whereas is
               | considered as the father of the 'modern' welfare state.
               | 
               | Maybe a try to show how easy it was to distract me, with
               | a simple 'governments pushing their agenda a lot more
               | strongly than the general population would have on its
               | own'. (-;
        
           | usr1106 wrote:
           | Korea. While it's not in the middle of the capital, it's not
           | that far. And the border is much tighter than the Berlin wall
           | has ever been.
        
             | flohofwoe wrote:
             | I don't know about that, trying to cross the border had/has
             | a high chance of being shot to death, both in the GDR and
             | (AFAIK) in North Korea. East Germany even had automated the
             | whole killing part:
             | 
             | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selbstschussanlage
             | 
             | (I haven't found the matching article on the English
             | Wikipedia, sorry)
        
               | fsckboy wrote:
               | matching article in English
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring-gun
               | 
               | (on most wiki pages you can find matching articles in
               | other languages near the bottom of the column of links
               | under the wikipedia logo on the far left of the desktop
               | version)
        
         | newacct583 wrote:
         | > The idea of a city split into two by ideologically opposing
         | factions, and the split being marked by a big wall, sounds like
         | sci-fi now.
         | 
         | Jerusalem says hi.
        
         | flohofwoe wrote:
         | > Also, the idea that a physical barrier could affect the
         | spread of information.
         | 
         | It didn't, radio waves didn't stop at the wall ;)
         | 
         | My dad told stories of communist youths tearing down people's
         | "west antennas" and there were also attempts to jam western TV
         | and radio stations, but this was in the early 60's or so. Later
         | it was more or less tolerated (to watch western TV and listen
         | to western radio), even though officially a taboo.
        
           | est31 wrote:
           | Yeah they could send to most of the east except for a few
           | regions that got dubbed "valley of the clueless".
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tal_der_Ahnungslosen
        
           | tylersmith wrote:
           | Slightly off topic but the German band Rammstein, whose
           | members prodominately grew up in East Berlin, have a great
           | song called "Radio" about how the information leakage from
           | the west to the east over radio helped encourage the cultural
           | changes required to unify Germany. It's interesting to me to
           | hear from the source how valuable it was/is.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-08-14 23:01 UTC)