[HN Gopher] Quaternion Quantum Mechanics [video]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Quaternion Quantum Mechanics [video]
        
       Author : miej
       Score  : 40 points
       Date   : 2021-08-03 11:15 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | wwarner wrote:
       | I think it's a cool idea, but it's one of many that start with a
       | lattice model of space.
        
         | miej wrote:
         | haven't done the math, myself - are there significant problems
         | with a lattice model of space?
        
           | eurasiantiger wrote:
           | It implies an _a priori_ background structure. Hilbert spaces
           | are usually preferred, as the complex state of a wavefunction
           | kind of implies that representation.
        
             | miej wrote:
             | so i think that's actually part of what I found notable
             | about one of the posed hypotheses nearer the end of the
             | video - the complex nature of the wavefunction essentially
             | gets transformed into a 'more intuitive' lattice node
             | space-like rotation within the Kleinert elastic crystal
             | model. which, as someone who spent a short time 'getting
             | used to' qm, seems very tempting.
             | 
             | plus, dont Hilbert spaces assume they are infinitessimally
             | detailed (ie: complete)? which seems like it could lead to
             | potential collisions with set-theoretic geometry, eg
             | possibly some potential for a physical manifestation of the
             | banach-tarski paradox, which would clearly violate
             | conservation laws
        
         | bawana wrote:
         | what other models start with a lattice assumption of space? I
         | have been working on the math for a a model of space that is
         | just a lattice, bosons are a vibration on the lattice, hadrons
         | are twists on the lattice, gravity is stretching/compression of
         | the lattice.
        
           | wwarner wrote:
           | Lee Smolin, Stephen Wolfram and, though I am not an expert,
           | I'm pretty sure many more.
        
             | leephillips wrote:
             | Gerard 't Hooft has been working on something like that,
             | too.
        
       | adamnemecek wrote:
       | Reasoning about space and time is just so much nicer in geometric
       | algebra. There's a new cool community on geometric algebra
       | https://bivector.net/
       | 
       | The founder (Steven De Keninck aka enki) gave a talk at
       | Siggraph2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tX4H_ctggYo
       | 
       | You should join the discord https://discord.gg/vGY6pPk
        
       | codewiz wrote:
       | Scott Manley's explanation of the ISS accident also introduces
       | quaternions as a coordinate system for objects in space that
       | solves the gimbal lock problem and has other desirable algebraic
       | properties:
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDBt9rZhMb4
        
       | superjan wrote:
       | I recall from quantum physics classes a long time ago that some
       | elementary particles are not identical to themselves 360 degrees
       | rotated. You need a 720 rotation for that. I recently learned
       | that quaternions have that same property. Would there be a
       | relation?
        
         | miej wrote:
         | yep, this exact thing is discussed in the later part of the
         | video. it's used to hypothesize a qm interpretation where the
         | complex components could actually be more physically
         | interpretable as (quaternion-based) rotations of the kleinert
         | crystal model
        
           | superjan wrote:
           | When was that then? I saw the spin animation, she did not
           | refer to it then ... although I was baking cookies at the
           | same time so I might have missed a remark here or there.
        
             | miej wrote:
             | vaguely a combination of 12:02-ish with 48:26-ish. my
             | understanding was the general idea of the spin animation
             | was proposed to be localized and manifest to some region of
             | the kleinert crystal roughly corresponding to a given
             | particle. so basically an internal torsion co-located with
             | the phonon behavior that defines the paricle in that
             | framework
        
         | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-08-03 23:02 UTC)