[HN Gopher] I was a teacher for 17 years, but couldn't read or w...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       I was a teacher for 17 years, but couldn't read or write
        
       Author : ptr2voidStar
       Score  : 199 points
       Date   : 2021-08-01 01:11 UTC (21 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.co.uk)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.co.uk)
        
       | 1MachineElf wrote:
       | His says his writing level is roughly 6th grade, and the story
       | reads like it too. I believe it. Illiteracy was the standard for
       | humanity not long ago, and yet there were still teachers.
        
         | dorkwood wrote:
         | The story was written by the journalist, Sarah McDermott, and
         | not by John Corcoran himself.
        
         | mkl wrote:
         | Despite the first person perspective, at the bottom it says
         | "Written by Sarah McDermott". Maybe he dictated it, or parts of
         | it.
        
       | cfn wrote:
       | I knew someone more or less like him. My friend went through high
       | school and later even got into university. He was able to read
       | but very slowly and he read everyday. He had this very large (and
       | complicated) romance with him and he would read one page per day
       | pointing at each word painfully slowly. I have no idea if he
       | managed to understand the story or if it was just an exercise.
       | Just like the person in the article, he was very popular with
       | girls and managed to pull a number of similar stunts to go
       | through tests and exams.
       | 
       | Eventually he dropped out of university and got a job. This was
       | the 90s and he started playing with computers and something just
       | clicked inside. Sudenly he could read normally and became quite
       | proficient with computers back then. I suppose it was some kind
       | of learning disability that went away with time and persistence
       | on his part.
       | 
       | It also shows that schools are not equiped to deal with learning
       | disabilities and push those pupils forward in the hope the
       | problem goes away. BTW, this was in Europe, so it is not a US
       | specific problem.
        
         | camjohnson26 wrote:
         | The author of the article was eventually diagnosed as dyslexic.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Corcoran_(author)
        
       | Ichthypresbyter wrote:
       | A friend who worked as a doctor in the Fens of East Anglia said
       | that many of the older farmers she treated (in the early 2010s)
       | were essentially illiterate. If she gave them a form or a letter,
       | they would hand it to their wife to read because they considered
       | reading to be women's work.
        
       | hogFeast wrote:
       | > If he had called on me I was going to get out of my chair and
       | take two steps, grab my chest, drop to the floor and hope they
       | called 911.
       | 
       | Used this tactic many times myself. You pull it once, they call
       | 911. You pull it twice, they usually do it again. You pull it
       | three times...an awkward silence fills the room...after the sixth
       | time, my boss just carried on with the meeting, and I stopped
       | getting invited. I think they call this life hacking.
       | 
       | I now do it everywhere...in the line at the DMV _clutches heart_
       | , wife nagging _clutches heart_ , kid wants new shoes _clutches
       | heart_. People say you can 't outrun your problems...in reality,
       | all you need to do is stay calm, pretend to have a heart attack,
       | and your problems just melt away. I think I am going to write a
       | self-help book.
        
         | going_ham wrote:
         | Can you elaborate how you fake the heart attack when you are in
         | different situations? Your idea seems really interesting as a
         | life hack. There must be specific ways to clutch your heart?
        
           | amelius wrote:
           | Put a self-inflating armband around your upper arm (like
           | those in blood-pressure meters), let it inflate without
           | anyone noticing, and the pulse in that arm will disappear.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | hackeraccount wrote:
       | There a funny short story I read in H.S. - The Verger by Somerset
       | Maugham - about a guy who's in a position not unlike this. He's
       | illiterate but competent. He doesn't bother to hide it though and
       | is fired from is job as a verger because of that. It's a short
       | read as I remember so I won't ruin the end but the punch line
       | really stuck with me for some reason.
        
       | xyzzy21 wrote:
       | The extreme of "Those who can't do, teach"???
        
       | high_byte wrote:
       | waiting for the next article, "I was CTO for 17 years, but
       | couldn't code"
        
         | arp242 wrote:
         | I know you're joking, but I have actually had coworkers who
         | literally could not program at all. And I'm not talking about
         | high-pressure situations like interviews, non-realistic
         | examples like algorithms, or a one-off fluke: they consistently
         | couldn't program even the most basic of stuff.
         | 
         | How these people managed to stay employed as programmers is
         | doing non-programming tasks and such, and copy/paste from Stack
         | Overflow.
        
           | high_byte wrote:
           | haha that was expected. I'm waiting to hear about imposter
           | managers. and no, not imposter-syndrome managers, and not
           | managers who are not expected to know how to code. I mean
           | actual imposters who are expected to code, can't, and still
           | nailed high profile positions.
        
         | siva7 wrote:
         | the role of a CTO isn't either about coding ;)
        
           | high_byte wrote:
           | and a teacher's isn't about reading :D
        
       | BrandoElFollito wrote:
       | This also shows how poor the school system was it they did not
       | uncover his illiteracy earlier. In France at least there was such
       | an amount of loud reading at school that it would be hard to
       | hide.
       | 
       | I ready the article with a strong dislike for the guy since I
       | knew he was a teacher. I was pissed off for the pupils.
       | 
       | But it was not that bad, he was a teacher of PE where beside a
       | limited technical knowledge (at the level he was in) the
       | important part are social skills. So maybe it was for the better
       | after all.
        
       | larusso wrote:
       | First time I read about this (Not from the US). I wonder what's
       | with his Highschool/College degree? I mean by his own words he
       | said that he cheated big time.
        
         | hliyan wrote:
         | Also not from the US, but I think read about him many many
         | years ago in Reader's Digest. It was a long form that had a lot
         | more information. I recognized the story because of this
         | anecdote:
         | 
         | "I passed my blue book out the window to him and he answered
         | the questions for me."
         | 
         | But the Reader's Digest version mentioned that he was dyslexic
         | (which I don't think the BBC article mentions) and that he
         | taught almost exclusively using audio/visual presentations,
         | activity based learning and guest speakers.
        
           | denton-scratch wrote:
           | It does sound like he was dyslexic ("for me it was like
           | opening a Chinese newspaper "). But the speed at which he
           | eventually acquired reading and writing doesn't seem
           | consistent with dyslexia; I figure there was some other
           | problem interfering with hiis literacy.
        
             | archibaldJ wrote:
             | Computationally we don't understand what dyslexia is.
             | Neuroplasticity is happening all the time. Perhaps at one
             | point something changes and he has the ability to aquire
             | the writing form of a language agian.
             | 
             | Similiar to in mathematics where it's a very different
             | process reasoning with symbols v.s. trying to visualize the
             | mathematical construct through communication. Maybe it's
             | difficult to aquire the writing form of graph theory when
             | you are 19. But when you try to do that again at 25
             | suddenly you can read all of Paul Erdos' papers less
             | daunthingly.
        
               | denton-scratch wrote:
               | > Perhaps at one point something changes and he has the
               | ability to aquire the writing form of a language agian.
               | 
               | That sounds like what I was wondering. Perhaps something
               | "snaps" into or out of place "catastrophically" (in the
               | sense of almost discontinuously, in the context of the
               | usual timescale of psychological changes). For example,
               | it sounds like his loss of fear occurred pretty suddenly.
               | 
               | I feel a bit awkward speculating about the mind of
               | someone who I know of from just a single essay. That
               | said, he's published a scathingly-honest record of his
               | fascinating history with writing, and presumably he wants
               | it read and discussed. And it's about him, so we discuss
               | him, I guess.
        
             | nindalf wrote:
             | He says it took him 7 years to feel literate. Does that
             | seem quick to you?
        
               | philliphaydon wrote:
               | This was after he finished his job. I assume he was
               | spending a lot of time learning during those 7 years.
               | Good on him tho.
        
       | ghoshbishakh wrote:
       | I still don't get it. How is it possible that he managed to go
       | through the system.
        
         | booleandilemma wrote:
         | He mentions he got girls to do his homework for him. When half
         | the population wants to see you succeed you're going to have an
         | easy time.
        
         | IntrepidWorm wrote:
         | Case and point: I wear glasses. In fact, I'm almost blind
         | without them: my effective vision ends at about 3 feet. Though
         | I am able to perceive distinction between large objects and
         | people, everything dissolves into a fuzzy mess. In American
         | public schools (in the northeast US, at least) in the early
         | 90s, schools would test student vision every year during
         | elementary/primary school years. They would use the traditional
         | eye test sheet, with strings of letters in smaller and smaller
         | font vertically stacked, to be read at a distance.
         | 
         | It took them 5 years to figure out that I couldn''t see
         | anything other than what was immediately in front of me. I was
         | a smart kid, and never had problems in the classroom as I sat
         | in the front row and listened very carefully to what was going
         | in.
         | 
         | I would memorize the eye test sheet while standing in line at
         | the nurses office, waiting to be tested. They never suspected
         | anything was amiss, and routinely reported to my parents that I
         | had perfect vision.
         | 
         | I was finally discovered when my father, trying to be clever
         | while we were out shopping, asked me about an ice cream parlor
         | in the distance. Despite the name of the shop being written
         | clearly above the shopfront, I bombed the question and my
         | father realized that I couldn''t see what he was talking about.
        
           | inglor_cz wrote:
           | "I would memorize the eye test sheet"
           | 
           | There were so many of us...
        
           | Aerroon wrote:
           | I have poor vision as well. We didn't have eye sight tests. I
           | couldn't see anything written on the blackboard for at least
           | a few years. I realized I had poor vision and even timidly
           | asked about it a few times. It went nowhere and just like any
           | kid, I felt like it was my own personal moral failing that I
           | couldn't see well enough. (Every failing as a kid feels like
           | that.)
           | 
           | The result was that I spent a few years not being able to see
           | what was written on the blackboard. I had to mostly figure it
           | out by myself. The worst were the tests that teachers only
           | wrote on the blackboard. I'd inevitably have to quietly ask
           | someone around me to tell me what the questions were. I don't
           | think I failed a single test because of it even though
           | talking was forbidden.
           | 
           | The funny part was that when my parents eventually took me to
           | an optometrist they tried to convince me that wearing glasses
           | won't be that bad. I distinctly remember that situation
           | because I kept thinking "I _asked_ for them _years_ ago! "
           | 
           | Eventually my eyesight became bad enough again that the
           | glasses I had didn't cut it anymore. I fell a little bit back
           | into my old habits, but it wasn't as bad as before. Sitting
           | closer and all of that helped immensely.
        
           | arp242 wrote:
           | Why would you memorize the eye tests? You were afraid that
           | your low vision was "discovered"? Wouldn't that be a good
           | thing?
           | 
           | I'm actually really confused by your story to be honest, I
           | think there's some part that I'm missing somehow.
        
             | ThePowerOfDirge wrote:
             | These "anecdotes" make my blood boil.
        
               | arp242 wrote:
               | That seems excessively strong. There's probably just an
               | assumption about something somewhere I'm not getting
               | because of different cultural context or the like.
        
           | fastaguy88 wrote:
           | I did very well in elementary school, though by 4th or 5th
           | grade I often asked to be seated near the front because of
           | the "glare" on the black board. I did not realize I could not
           | see until a science class about clouds, and I could not tell
           | that the sky was overcast, not blue. I was also surprised to
           | see that street lights were points, not large haloes.
           | 
           | I've heard many similar stories from nearsighted friends.
        
         | code_duck wrote:
         | His success at gaming the system has plenty of applicability to
         | modern issues with coordinated cheating, purchasing papers,
         | plagarism and so forth. Sports stars who somehow go through
         | school without learning anything academic is a serious issue in
         | the modern day as well. That higher view of the issue like a
         | more interesting topic than the sensational extent to which he
         | fit the bill by falling short of even literacy.
         | 
         | As for him, he was apparently resourceful and charismatic, good
         | at sports, had adequate innate math skills and was dedicated to
         | gaming the system.
         | 
         | "So I was going to be a teacher's pet and do everything
         | necessary to pass that system. I wanted to be an athlete - I
         | had athletic skills, and I had maths skills"
         | 
         | "I ran around with college kids, I dated the valedictorian -
         | the student with the highest grades who gives a speech at the
         | graduation ceremony, I was the homecoming king"
        
         | Broken_Hippo wrote:
         | A combination of cheating, life hacks, folks enabling him, and
         | being labeled as a bad - and then good - student, which
         | diverted people's attention away from his lack of reading.
         | 
         | And to be fair: Some of this was the time period. We catch a
         | few more learning disabilities now (not enough, though) and
         | have more tools to help. We just didn't screen so much in the
         | 50s.
        
         | IntrepidWorm wrote:
         | Because despite his illiteracy, he is a clever and resourceful
         | person- with enough cleverness and a bit of luck, its possible
         | to do lots of stuff like this. He was able to circumvent the
         | barriers imposed by illiteracy through deception, careful
         | manipulation, or outright swindling. While iliteracy is
         | definitely a huge concern in the world, I hope I'm not the only
         | one out there to admire him for grifting his way through
         | multiple schools and jobs...!
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | wyclif wrote:
       | I used to be an ESL teacher for foreign students transitioning to
       | English in the USA before I was in tech. I've also taught high
       | school English, Latin, and History. These days the only English
       | teaching I do is helping adults learn to read. John Corcoran's
       | story is incredibly inspiring and courageous. It's hard to
       | imagine the amount of courage it took for him to go public with
       | his illiteracy. It's never too late to right a wrong in your
       | life. If you know an adult who cannot read, please encourage them
       | to seek help. There are many people who are generous in donating
       | their time to teaching reading skills in a non-judgemental and
       | caring way.
        
       | jmercouris wrote:
       | Incredible, but I still can't help but feel like he is an idiot.
       | 
       | Noticing an obvious deficiency in your life and doing nothing
       | about it is in fact idiotic.
        
         | inglor_cz wrote:
         | "Noticing an obvious deficiency in your life and doing nothing
         | about it is in fact idiotic."
         | 
         | So, how many people are overweight and fat these days?
         | 
         | Maybe some things aren't easy to solve. If someone told me to
         | learn writing in Chinese, I would be very creative in finding
         | ways how to do without. It is just too hard for me at 43 years
         | of age.
         | 
         | People with certain disabilities may find English spelling (a
         | notoriously tricky terrain full of illogical exceptions)
         | similarly overwhelming.
        
         | SamPatt wrote:
         | He did fix the deficiency. It just took longer than most.
        
         | xupybd wrote:
         | Sometimes we hide something as a child and it gets so ingrained
         | in us that we don't question the child's logic. We just live
         | life hiding something that a child decided had to be hidden.
        
       | CTDOCodebases wrote:
       | I once worked with a Chef that couldn't read. He made it through
       | culinary school, had his own catering company at one point and
       | owned two residential properties. He was a charismatic guy but
       | very cunning and deceptive. I figured it out after a couple of
       | weeks working with him. I tried to offer him help but he just
       | brushed it off and said that he was dyslexic. Smart phones have
       | many features that make it easy for illiterate people to survive.
        
       | timonoko wrote:
       | On Google translate you can test new phonetic spelling. "Wii shal
       | miit tu dei in Nyy Jork" works best in Polish, Icelandic and
       | Finnish. I suggest we just ignore weird sounds like th and d and
       | just use "th" as "tho" sounds reasonably good in those languages.
        
         | timonoko wrote:
         | Correction: those languages seem to have already "th" == "th".
        
           | tuukkah wrote:
           | That's weird as "th" is pronounced "th" in Finnish and there
           | is no "th" sound:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_phonology#Consonants
        
             | juki wrote:
             | "th" isn't really used in Finnish (at least in modern
             | kirjakieli). Even loan words just drop the "h" (e.g.
             | "termostaatti"). There probably are some exceptions, but
             | none that I can think of right now.
        
               | sampo wrote:
               | Finnish has only 3 words, all loanwords that didn't drop
               | the h: thai (+ thai food, thai boxing etc), theeta (name
               | of the Greek letter) and thorax (medical term, common
               | word is rintakeha).
               | 
               | https://www.kielitoimistonsanakirja.fi/#/th?searchMode=al
               | l
        
               | tuukkah wrote:
               | That's surprising to me, perhaps because "th" appears in
               | inflected words such as "ovathan", dialectal words such
               | as "vasthaan", compound words such as "oluthana" and
               | names such as "Elisabeth" or "Porthania".
               | 
               | Also, I wonder what's the share of the pronounciations
               | "t", "th" and "th" in the word "theremin".
               | 
               | (You can download a list of word forms encountered in
               | some selected written texts here:
               | https://kaino.kotus.fi/sanat/taajuuslista/parole.php)
        
               | sampo wrote:
               | I only searched for 'th' in the beginning of the word. We
               | can add these to the previous result:
               | 
               | triathlon, smoothie, maybe also apartheid
               | 
               | Also the dictionary finds huithapeli, hathataa,
               | rustholli, but I don't think these have 'th' as a
               | phoneme.
               | 
               | https://www.kielitoimistonsanakirja.fi/#/*th*?searchMode=
               | onl...
        
               | tuukkah wrote:
               | Nice new findings in the dictionary!
               | 
               | What do you mean by having 'th' as a phoneme? If you mean
               | the sound "th", I don't think any of the words are
               | pronounced with one in Finnish, typically. Rather, they
               | have a "t" sound followed by a "h", or just a "t".
        
         | nindalf wrote:
         | Is this comment chain supposed to be related to the story about
         | the teacher who couldn't read? Seems like a software bug.
        
           | timonoko wrote:
           | Yes. I forgot to explain.
           | 
           | I learned to read in one month like any other Finnish child
           | ever. But it took a month longer to understand what I was
           | reading. Like my small brain was using all its capacity in
           | pronunciation and I forgot what I just said.
           | 
           | English is like Chinese, you have to learn all pictorials and
           | their meanings. Learning the pronunciation is different
           | process. That is why English takes years and years to learn.
        
         | nayuki wrote:
         | It would be nice if they used IPA instead of yet another
         | informal nonstandard system.
        
           | timonoko wrote:
           | If you try "Wii shal miit tu dei in Nyy Jork" in Google, it
           | works quite well in Inglish too, except tho "Nyy Jork".
           | 
           | It would be easy to organize meeting of all Anglos and accept
           | this as an alternate spelling. Polish have some weird
           | sibilants, so that it could be the starting point.
        
             | krisoft wrote:
             | > It would be easy to organize meeting of all Anglos
             | 
             | You must be surelly joking there. :)
        
           | arp242 wrote:
           | I can understand what's intended with "Wii shal miit tu dei
           | in Nyy Jork" without even knowing what system is being used.
           | In IPA this is "Sael mi:t t@'deI In nju: jo:k", and I have no
           | idea what that says at all.
           | 
           | I find IPA fairly inaccessible for the casual user. There's a
           | reason other systems exist.
        
       | marviio wrote:
       | My grandfather was a teacher and in the 50s he started noting
       | that trouble learning to read/write wasn't linked to lack of
       | intelligence. He started groups for kids (mostly guys) with what
       | we now call dyslexia and tried to help them. He had to invent
       | material and methods.
       | 
       | On his eightieth birthday some of his students, now in their 50s,
       | told how they had always felt stupid until he showed them they
       | were not. Now they had businesses and successful careers.
        
       | pfrrp wrote:
       | Great story. He's an excellent speaker and very charismatic.
       | 
       | For those interested he has a non profit focused on teaching
       | reading and writing: https://www.johncorcoranfoundation.org/
        
       | sparrish wrote:
       | The first failure of his illiteracy sits solely with his parents.
       | 
       | So many of us parents put the burden of our children's learning
       | on teachers when the responsibility is squarely ours.
       | 
       | If my son is in 5th grade and can't read, it's my responsibility
       | to teach him or get him the help he needs to be able to learn.
        
       | john579 wrote:
       | No one noticed for 17 years because none of his students could
       | read or write either. They probably got a better education as a
       | result.
        
       | gnicholas wrote:
       | (2018)
        
       | mmmuhd wrote:
       | I told my friends about this article,they replied no this could
       | never happen in the US, this could only happen in countries like
       | Nigeria. What a world we live in.
        
       | jasonhansel wrote:
       | Here's a question: what can be done to make tech more accessible
       | for illiterate people? That seems to be a side of accessibility
       | that usually gets overlooked.
        
         | ajsnigrutin wrote:
         | Put symbols and images on stuff... like we already do on most
         | devices. Play, stop, pause, fastforward and reverse are
         | pracitcally never written out in text.
         | 
         | In reality, teaching them to read first, would be best.
        
       | cwdegidio wrote:
       | My grandfather, born in the back hills of West Virginia, was
       | forced to leave school when he was around 6 years old to chop
       | lumber so his family had enough to survive. After he left WV, he
       | worked a press at a forge and was a landscaper at night an on the
       | weekends. He never has learned how to read, and sadly he is in
       | the early stages of dementia so I think that ship has sailed.
       | But... he was always a whiz with finances.
       | 
       | He was the kind of guy that can take a dollar on Monday and give
       | you back $100 on Friday. He owns, I believe at this point, 8
       | properties including his own home.
       | 
       | I always regret not staying back home for a bit to try and help
       | him, but I think by the time I would have been in a place to do
       | it he would have told me he had just accepted the fact he would
       | never learn to read. I can't imagine going through life like he
       | did, how much I would hav missed.
       | 
       | But it also was always an inspiration to me. Every time I would
       | feel my motivation for something academic or professional start
       | to wane, I remind myself that this man who gave me and my
       | siblings anything to help us succeed didn't get to do 90% of the
       | things I take for granted.
       | 
       | It's really sad to see some folks on this thread call this man an
       | idiot. From first hand experience, that's not necessarily the
       | case and often people like him become far more clever than I'll
       | ever be as a means of survival.
        
         | inglor_cz wrote:
         | One of my grandfathers was illiterate as well. Not a finance
         | whiz, but not stupid either. He was a rural blacksmith and he
         | was rather good with engines and small appliances, repairing
         | them for paying customers.
         | 
         | This is also a good moment to meditate on "right of repair". As
         | recently as approx. 1970, most of the machinery in daily use
         | could be repaired by a skillful, even though illiterate,
         | person. The advent of semiconductors did away with that and
         | nowadays even highly qualified people struggle to update a
         | firmware against the vendor's wishes.
        
           | everyone wrote:
           | You are implying finance people are intelligent???
        
             | inglor_cz wrote:
             | Please read the original comment I am replying to. It had
             | nothing to do with finance industry and everything to do
             | with small-scale household economy.
        
           | cwdegidio wrote:
           | It's interesting you mention this. I got a chance to visit
           | the family holler (rural mountain farmstead) when I was a
           | teenager. Everyone back there was still driving old pickups,
           | most of their tools were pretty old as well. You could tell a
           | lot of things were kept just because of that very idea that
           | they could repair them.
           | 
           | I know my grandfather, growing up as poor as he did, NEVER
           | threw anything broken away until he was absolutely convinced
           | that it could not be repaired. I wouldn't be suprised if most
           | of his gardening equipment was from the 60's and 70's.
        
         | beckman466 wrote:
         | > I can't imagine going through life like he did, how much I
         | would hav missed.
         | 
         | Yeah your granddads story is impressive. I cannot imagine not
         | being able to read and write.
         | 
         | > He was the kind of guy that can take a dollar on Monday and
         | give you back $100 on Friday. He owns, I believe at this point,
         | 8 properties including his own home.
         | 
         | So he owned other peoples homes? Ugh I hate this system. Why is
         | absentee ownership a thing, why is it seen as 'success'?
         | Lording over others isn't 'success' in my book. I think it's
         | inhumane for some to be able to extract a toll from others for
         | such a basic need. Yes the system makes it legal, but
         | 'landlords' shouldn't kid themselves that they are providing
         | value to others.
        
           | hutzlibu wrote:
           | "Yes the system makes it legal, but 'landlords' shouldn't kid
           | themselves that they are providing value to others."
           | 
           | A landlord who takes care of building and maintainig the
           | house etc. is not providing value?
           | 
           | You think that happens automatically?
           | 
           | I mean sure, it would be nice to live in a world where
           | everyone is wealthy and capable enough to own and maintain
           | their home. But there are actually people who like to rent to
           | not have that responsibility. They just pay money regulary
           | and have a home. And there are surely lots of sharks in the
           | housing and renting market, but that does not mean renting
           | per se is evil.
        
             | Kye wrote:
             | >> _" A landlord who takes care of building and maintainig
             | the house etc"_
             | 
             | How many actually do this? I don't know anyone who
             | complains about landlords who do something useful. For
             | example: there are people who build/buy and maintain
             | properties to house queer people who've been kicked out of
             | their homes after coming out or being outed. Often _by_
             | landlords.
             | 
             | No one would hate landlords as a class if useful ones were
             | at all representative.
        
               | AuryGlenz wrote:
               | If you saw a typical apartment unit after people moved
               | out you wouldn't be asking that.
               | 
               | My parents own a 12 unit apartment building in a small
               | town, and my dad is up there multiple times a week.
               | There's regular stuff like cleaning hallways, and then
               | there's stuff like "the tenant on the top floor installed
               | a dishwasher themselves and it leaked while they were
               | gone flooding their unit and the one beneath it."
               | 
               | After most people move out the carpet needs to be
               | replaced and the walls repainted at the minimum.
        
               | Kye wrote:
               | Respect is a two-way street. How many of those problems
               | came from the ways people coped with absent landlords not
               | fixing things? How many calls to fix the dishwasher
               | preceded the self-install? How many of those people are
               | on their nth slumlord and long past giving the new one
               | the benefit of the doubt? You only have one side of the
               | story from one apartment building.
               | 
               | Maybe your parents are good ones. Nothing I've heard from
               | the other side gives me reason to trust this account.
        
               | chiph wrote:
               | "Absent" landlord here. I pay a management firm to handle
               | repairs. If I find out they aren't responding to tenant
               | maintenance requests, I'm going to start looking to
               | replace them with another firm.
               | 
               | But I love my management firm. They get me discounts on
               | appliances, repairs, carpet & paint because they have
               | agreements with local suppliers. If I had been the one to
               | call for a quote to replace the air conditioner, not only
               | would it have been much pricier, I would have gone to the
               | back of the line (because of COVID equipment
               | shortages...) to get the work scheduled. Instead, it was
               | replaced in only 2 days, they did a great job, and it's
               | more efficient - saving my tenant money on their utility
               | bills.
               | 
               | Are there slumlords out there? Of course. But you're
               | painting with a pretty broad brush here and it's unfair.
        
               | Kye wrote:
               | Why is my broad brush unfair and not that of the person I
               | replied to? That's quite a thing to skip over. Mine is at
               | least based on much more than one 12 unit building. Your
               | bias is showing.
        
             | yesenadam wrote:
             | > But there are actually people who like to rent
             | 
             | I've never met any. Have you?
             | 
             | I guess maybe rich people who could afford to buy but
             | choose not to, like to rent. I live in Sydney, don't know
             | anyone who owns their house or even dreams of it one day.
             | Saying there are people who like renting, sounds to me like
             | saying there are people who like pain, or a terminal
             | illness, or a death sentence. But hey, at least our money
             | is going every week to people who already own more than one
             | house?
        
               | stadium wrote:
               | I have a residential realtor friend who rents their
               | family house. Yes, he earns his living selling houses,
               | and rents his own house to live in, and they have lived
               | there a few years. good schools, friends, like the
               | neighborhood, etc.
        
               | telesilla wrote:
               | I've lived in many countries and while I own a home in my
               | original country to retire to (should that happen), I
               | need places to rent when I don't want to be there. And my
               | home is rented at those times, sometimes for years.
        
               | beckman466 wrote:
               | > while I own a home in my original country to retire to
               | 
               | You're proving their point...?
               | 
               | From OP:
               | 
               | > I guess maybe rich people who could afford to buy but
               | choose not to, like to rent.
               | 
               | > at least our money is going every week to people who
               | already own more than one house
        
               | telesilla wrote:
               | Where would I, or some other temporary migrant, live if
               | not in someone's house who rented it to me? My owning a
               | home is irrelevant.
        
               | beckman466 wrote:
               | > Where would I, or some other temporary migrant, live if
               | not in someone's house who rented it to me? My owning a
               | home is irrelevant.
               | 
               | Why does the housing need to be supplied by private
               | landlords? There are places that have a lot of social
               | housing, like Sweden. Let the government build and own
               | property, it works well. It also means people from
               | different backgrounds and occupations can all live
               | together, instead of e.g. redlining, which devastates
               | minority communities.
               | 
               | As it stands now only the rich are able to move into
               | cities, with low-wage workers having to commute from far
               | outside the city, which is a pretty disgusting shift if
               | you think about it. Imagine having a crappy cleaning job,
               | cleaning offices at night, and you have to travel hours
               | for your job because you live so far out [1]. It's a
               | reality for more and more people, as the assault on labor
               | intensifies.
               | 
               | [1] https://taliajane.medium.com/a-week-in-new-york-city-
               | on-13-5...
        
               | wsatb wrote:
               | I prefer to rent, and am not rich. I live in a large
               | metro area in the US where rent is not insanely high,
               | though. As someone who is single, it comes with a lot
               | more freedom and less to worry about. Probably not the
               | best long-term, but it's less stress in my life in my
               | opinion, so the trade off is currently worth it.
        
               | yesenadam wrote:
               | Ok, well, if not rich, it sounds like you have the choice
               | of buying or renting. Lucky you! I don't know anyone who
               | has that choice. The person I responded to initially only
               | meant, I guess, that some people who have the choice,
               | prefer renting. Hm..but they were also talking as if
               | people without the choice, like renting:
               | 
               | > it would be nice to live in a world where everyone is
               | wealthy and capable enough to own and maintain their
               | home. But there are actually people who like to rent
               | 
               | It just sounds like landlord's rationalizations. Also,
               | the landlords here don't "take care of building..the
               | house"--that happened 100-150 years ago or so.
        
               | wsatb wrote:
               | I don't think we really disagree, I think we just live in
               | very different places. My point was that renting has
               | benefits in some places, whereas you implied it does not.
        
               | spicybright wrote:
               | I strongly doubt GP has a choice. Not rich + insane rent
               | means he's probably building up saving too slowly for a
               | house near where his social group is.
               | 
               | It sounds like you've been burned by a landlord in the
               | past and are taking it out on all of them unfairly.
               | 
               | I hate the concept of a landlord, paying a lot without
               | building any equity, unlike a mortgage on property. But
               | I've never had one that does absolutely nothing.
               | 
               | Between tenants, my landlords vacuumed, repainted,
               | sometimes re-carpeted if needed, removed old tenants
               | belongs left behind, etc.
               | 
               | I've had landlords be good about replacements of major
               | appliances too. One thing I learned is you need to be
               | assertive and advocate for yourself. Persistence and
               | following up until they do something is key.
               | 
               | But I've had multiple washing machines, laundry machines,
               | and garbage disposals be replaced for no charge to me,
               | without me doing anything but letting them into the
               | house.
               | 
               | I'm still getting a bit ripped off with inflated rent,
               | but that type of convenience takes a lot off my plate.
        
               | ksaj wrote:
               | I rent, and am plenty fine with it. One thing I like is
               | that we get a yearly home inspection. Some people surely
               | dislike the thought of people trouncing through their
               | inner sanctum, but what it means is that every year they
               | find things that need fixing, and fix them. Last year we
               | got a new (and better) stove out of it. The year before
               | we got our washer/drier dismantled, fully cleaned, and
               | rebuilt with a few new parts, and a new water heater.
               | 
               | They want to keep their units in good condition, and I
               | don't have to do much of the hard work to keep it that
               | way. Air filters are pretty much the only utility
               | maintenance we have to do.
               | 
               | Also, if you have rowdy neighbours, there isn't a whole
               | lot you can do about that if you own and they aren't
               | actually breaking any laws. Our landlord has been rapid
               | at addressing neighbour complaints. However, I have
               | rented a number of different places, and this particular
               | landlord is the first and only one I've had that actively
               | tries to maintain peace and order as well.
        
               | _-david-_ wrote:
               | >Also, the landlords here don't "take care of
               | building..the house"--that happened 100-150 years ago or
               | so.
               | 
               | So landlords haven't painted, repaired the roof, added
               | appliances, etc in 100 years?
        
           | CryptoPunk wrote:
           | >>So he owned other peoples homes? Ugh I hate this system.
           | Why is absentee ownership a thing, why is it seen as
           | 'success'?
           | 
           | The more investment capital goes into real estate, the more
           | impetus there is to expand housing supply, and thus the more
           | affordable rental rates, which is the cost of having housing,
           | is.
           | 
           | There are of course numerous other factors involved in
           | determining housing costs, like the municipal government's
           | permit processing efficiency, zoning restrictions on building
           | density, accessibility of residential neighborhoods to job
           | centers via road networks and public transportation, etc, but
           | ceteris paribus, more investment increases housing supply and
           | reduces rental rates.
           | 
           | Beware of the anti-profit bias:
           | 
           | https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/08/04/we-have-an-ingrained-
           | an...
        
           | SuoDuanDao wrote:
           | This attitude expanded just a little also applies to farmers
           | who produce a surplus. They're also extracting a toll from
           | others for a basic need. When it's actually used to guide
           | policy farmers get kicked off their land and everyone fucking
           | starves.
        
           | winrid wrote:
           | Owning a property has risk. By renting you are paying to
           | defer risk.
        
             | HowTheStoryEnds wrote:
             | Only true in those instances where rent is significantly
             | cheaper than mortgage + maintenance costs.
        
               | Akronymus wrote:
               | Shouldnt it be the other way around?
        
             | beckman466 wrote:
             | Landlording is a weapon the property-owning classes use to
             | get away with not doing anything. [1] It's the same with
             | the other type of property: intellectual property. Big
             | companies buy patents and trade secrets to monopolize
             | knowledge to starve the commons, imposing their non-modular
             | single-use black-box products on the working class. Society
             | would be so much more effective and beautiful if knowledge
             | was free and land registries were 1000% more transparent
             | (they should be completely open).
             | 
             | Is it really a democracy when only a small group of people
             | have a bird's eye view of the systems and programs that run
             | society? Does Bezos work 2,687,125 harder than warehouse
             | workers? Fuck no, yet: _"Bezos' net worth is 2,687,125
             | times the median US household income and equivalent to
             | 0.85% of US GDP"_. Those numbers aren 't even recent by the
             | way, they're from 2018.
             | 
             | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWSVG9nsRa4
        
               | CryptoPunk wrote:
               | Real estate is a man-made resource that is created
               | through investment of capital. It doesn't emerge
               | otherwise. Without the freedom to invest in property,
               | there would be less housing, and higher housing costs.
        
               | ricardobeat wrote:
               | How exactly would housing costs rise without property
               | investment? I'd expect the opposite, as you see in
               | countries that have rent and ownership controls.
        
               | CryptoPunk wrote:
               | With less investment, you would have less money going
               | into building housing.. Profit-motivated investment is
               | the primary way in which market needs are met. When it's
               | impeded by regulatory restrictions, market needs are met
               | less.
               | 
               | >>I'd expect the opposite, as you see in countries that
               | have rent and ownership controls.
               | 
               | The highest rental rates in the world are in the US city
               | with the most ownership controls to prevents developers
               | and landlords from profiting: San Francisco.
               | 
               | Rent control makes housing less affordable:
               | 
               | https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/RentControl.html
        
               | beckman466 wrote:
               | > The highest rental rates in the world are in the city
               | with the most ownership controls to prevents developers
               | and landlords from profiting: San Francisco.
               | 
               | Correlation is not causation. The reason rents are high
               | in San Francisco is because it's where the 'owners' of a
               | bunch of high-tech Intellectual Property live. Labor
               | aristocrats have to move there to be able to work on that
               | tech. That is what has driven up the rents.
        
               | CryptoPunk wrote:
               | >>Correlation is not causation. The reason rents are high
               | in San Francisco is because it's where the 'owners' of a
               | bunch of high-tech Intellectual Property live.
               | 
               | San Francisco does not have the highest average incomes
               | in the world. What puts SF at the top of the rent
               | rankings is the combination of high average incomes, and
               | the most restrictive housing market in the US.
               | 
               | I recommend you read the article I provided on rent
               | control.
        
               | beckman466 wrote:
               | > San Francisco does not have the highest average incomes
               | in the world.
               | 
               | Are you joking? I seriously can't tell.
               | 
               | Focusing just on worker's wages, when there are
               | billionaire property owners (specifically owners of IP)
               | living around the corner from you, is just ignorant and
               | disingenuous if this really is your argument.
               | 
               | Steve Jobs famously paid himself $1 a year, remember? I
               | mean, that's probably why he wore those hippy sandals
               | right? He just couldn't afford more because of his measly
               | wage? A few tech CEO's will pull down the average if they
               | all pull off this wonderful tax trick.
               | 
               | Honestly I don't understand why you use these arguments
               | and sources, they seem to me to be completely
               | incompatible with reality.
               | 
               | > I recommend you read the article I provided on rent
               | control.
               | 
               | You keep mentioning rent-control, but I have never said
               | that it's the measure I am for. You do realize rent-
               | control is not the only policy that a city or government
               | can use and enforce right?
               | 
               | I think this 2019 documentary called Push (by Fredrik
               | Gertten) does a great job of showing what is happening to
               | the working classes and their lack of options for
               | affordable housing:
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWSVG9nsRa4
        
               | CryptoPunk wrote:
               | >>Focusing just on worker's wages, when there are
               | billionaire property owners (specifically owners of IP)
               | living around the corner from you, is just ignorant and
               | disingenuous if this really is your argument.
               | 
               | Average incomes within the city are the overwhelming
               | determinant of the demand side of housing supply and
               | demand.
               | 
               | A dozen billionaires are not going to materially affect
               | the availability of housing, even if they all buy huge
               | estates. Average income determines what the vast majority
               | of the city's renters are able to afford to pay for rent.
               | 
               | In any case, San Francisco is not even in the top 10 for
               | number of billionaires among cities:
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_by_number_of
               | _bi...
               | 
               | >>Honestly I don't understand why you use these arguments
               | and sources, they seem to me to be completely
               | incompatible with reality.
               | 
               | I suggest you actually read the article I linked to. It
               | describes what economists at large think of rent control,
               | and what studies on the effects of rent control have
               | found.
               | 
               | >>You keep mentioning rent-control, but I have never said
               | that it's the measure I am for. You do realize rent-
               | control is not the only policy that a city or government
               | can use and enforce right?
               | 
               | I brought up rent control because you wrote the
               | following, which implies cities with rent control have
               | had a positive experience with it:
               | 
               | >>I'd expect the opposite, as you see in countries that
               | have rent and ownership controls.
        
               | ricardobeat wrote:
               | "Economists at large" being a hand picked few and US-
               | centered. Rent control can take many forms: rental caps,
               | incentives/benefits, zoning and housing policies, etc.
               | The view that it's solely a supply-demand equation is way
               | too simplistic. Rent prices are currently falling as much
               | as 10% in Amsterdam despite an extremely strained housing
               | market with a 50k+ deficit on units available vs demand.
        
               | frogpelt wrote:
               | You make it sound like you don't think people (or
               | corporations) should be able to own property.
               | 
               | I hate to burst your bubble, but someone is going to own
               | the property. And if you insist on it being the
               | government, you are going to severely disappointed by
               | what happens next.
        
               | wizzwizz4 wrote:
               | > _You make it sound like you don 't think people (or
               | corporations) should be able to own property._
               | 
               | Ideas aren't property. Copyright law, patent law,
               | trademark law, service mark law... they _used to be_ very
               | different to property law, and for good reason.
               | "Intellectual property" is the power to silence your
               | critics, sue your competitors and profit from other
               | people 's work - if you have enough money to throw your
               | weight around. (Contrast with copyright, which lets you
               | get a cut from those publishing your work; or trademark,
               | which protects your professional reputation...)
        
         | hellbannedguy wrote:
         | The cleverest, wealthy guys, I know, barely finished high
         | school.
         | 
         | I'm talking self made guys, and not guys from wealthy
         | sympathetic families whom fund their kids until something turns
         | a profit. Jonny at Dentek--you don't count, but daddy was a
         | wiz.
         | 
         | If I had a child, buying real-estate, and learning the stock
         | market, would be right up there with the three R's.
        
           | NonContro wrote:
           | What you are describing is rent-seeking. Its easy to make
           | money when house values and the stock market are expanding
           | greater than the cost of money, particularly when you buy in
           | at the start of the bubble.
           | 
           | Typically the limitation for real estate ownership is lack of
           | access to credit, or a stable job enabling you to stay in one
           | place.
        
             | SaintGhurka wrote:
             | By that definition, wouldn't saving for retirement be rent-
             | seeking?
        
             | abakker wrote:
             | Not all investing is rent seeking.
             | 
             | Rent seeking REQUIRES manipulation of public policy to
             | benefit you.
             | 
             | Being a landlord at the 5 building scale gives you no
             | leverage in public policy. It makes you a capitalist.
        
               | wizzwizz4 wrote:
               | Rent-seeking behaviour isn't always about manipulating
               | public policy. If public policy _allows_ you to commit
               | rent-seeking behaviour, you can still choose not to carry
               | it out. (Of course, you could make a lot more money by
               | rent-seeking from those who have no other options...)
               | 
               | But yes, your main point is valid: it is entirely
               | possible to (e.g.) be a landlord without being abusive.
               | Heck, you can even give your tenants a better deal than
               | they could've got otherwise, if the circumstances are
               | right. The issue is that this behaviour (in many places)
               | is _actively disincentivised_ , so unethical people can
               | push out the ethical ones.
        
       | rubyn00bie wrote:
       | I dream of having the confidence of a white man for only one day.
       | Like, I've been writing code for twenty years, and I feel like an
       | imposter still. I can't even fucking imagine being able to wake
       | up in the morning, living a lie like this, fucking up kids
       | educations because your too much of a pathetic child to admit
       | your own failings?! I find this article to be pretty disgusting
       | to be honest.
        
         | avianlyric wrote:
         | > fucking up kids educations
         | 
         | Please provide evidence. Last I checked most schools have
         | exams, and teachers performance is monitored. You don't become
         | a teacher, and suddenly face no further professional
         | evaluation.
        
           | rubyn00bie wrote:
           | What? It's the article. Damn, racism making your memory shit?
           | The guy couldn't read. Are you serious? There's obviously
           | enormous failings in whatever evaluation process exists. Like
           | you're telling me to provide evidence when you just read
           | evidence. There's no chance he didn't negatively affect
           | students educations. They had a teacher who couldn't read!
           | Did he ever fail one? It's comical the level of willful
           | ignorance on HN.
           | 
           | At least you bigots are exposing yourselves instead of
           | staying hidden. I appreciate it.
        
         | xupybd wrote:
         | He probably dreams of having the confidence of an abel person.
         | Dyslexia is no easy ride. Yes on one dimension he is privileged
         | on another he is not.
         | 
         | I'm not sure he messed up these kids. He may have taught them
         | well without the ability to read or write.
         | 
         | He is no doubt a fraud however. Especially with his collage
         | degree.
        
         | TheRealNGenius wrote:
         | That's a pretty racist thing to say. Their race has nothing to
         | do with their story. Would your comment have applied if this
         | person was the same race as you?
         | 
         | You can't imagine their struggle because you didn't read what
         | they wrote. You just glanced at the picture plastered at the
         | top. Just cause you don't know how to read/write != you have
         | jeopardized a kid's education.
        
           | rubyn00bie wrote:
           | Lmao. You really think race had nothing to do with their
           | story? You are naive, dear child.
        
             | EvilEy3 wrote:
             | Racist crap.
        
             | TheRealNGenius wrote:
             | It's pretty clear who's "too much of a pathetic child to
             | admit [their] own failings"
        
               | rubyn00bie wrote:
               | I'm glad you've found the errors of your ways so quickly.
               | May you be less ignorant and a better person for all.
        
         | inglor wrote:
         | IMO this comment takes a very cynical and US centric view of
         | things.
         | 
         | I've found this story was well written and pretty inspiring.
         | Just because people are privileged doesn't mean they don't
         | struggle or that their struggles can't teach us things.
         | 
         | It's surprising to see this sort of toxicity in hacker news.
        
           | rubyn00bie wrote:
           | You're surprised someone didn't find it inspiring? Really?
           | C'mon it's a story about a guy who committed fraud, screwed
           | up kids education, and then got an applause for it? This is a
           | picture perfect case of white privilege. I'm not at all
           | surprised at the comments like yours on HN. This is a place
           | dominated by white people and they don't like to be
           | uncomfortable.
        
             | kzrdude wrote:
             | Maybe it could be called fraud when he was adult.
             | 
             | But this story starts with a child who can't read and is
             | ashamed to admit it, and it's nothing strange, it is human.
        
               | rubyn00bie wrote:
               | You're excusing 17 years of fraud bu saying we're all
               | human. It's pretty gross that you're willing to excuse
               | this because he was ashamed. Loads of people live with
               | shame, loads of people don't commit 17 years of fraud and
               | get applause for it.
               | 
               | This whole thread wreaks of white privilege. I for once
               | am actually enjoying the downvotes because each one is a
               | little tear from a racist I'm enjoying. Mmmm. Nothing
               | like making all white bros on HN feel a modicum of
               | anything besides comfort.
        
       | TheRealNGenius wrote:
       | Totally believable. I've had math teachers say they can't write,
       | and language teachers say they can't math
        
       | alexashka wrote:
       | Rather than learning how to read, it'd do everyone a whole lot
       | more good to admit that some people are not cut out for school
       | and to send them off to work when they're teenagers.
       | 
       | This poor guy has felt bad his entire life when he could've been
       | an excellent coal miner instead.
       | 
       | Every place I've worked is filled with people like this guy to
       | one extent or another - fearful parents pushing their kids to go
       | to school and pretend to be something they're not. Then people
       | who have an affinity for thinking have to navigate these insecure
       | idiots (sorry, medical term) their entire careers.
       | 
       | It makes workplaces hell for everyone involved, both the idiots
       | and the capable.
       | 
       | People ought to do what they are capable of doing. People ought
       | to be treated with dignity and respect. If we get that far this
       | century, boy, that'd really be something.
        
         | ramblerman wrote:
         | > It makes workplaces hell for everyone involved, both the
         | idiots and the capable.
         | 
         | I think your attitude is what makes the hell tbh.
         | 
         | We should definitely teach everyone to be literate, and not
         | just decide they should be "excellent coal miner"s instead.
        
           | Ntrails wrote:
           | Slight devils advocate. Is everyone happier with mandatory
           | schooling for longer? It isn't that we shouldn't give
           | everyone the chance to learn, but maybe some people really
           | would be happier dropping out at 14 and just getting a job.
           | Being at school where all you do is fail does not make for a
           | good life experience!
           | 
           | I think the answer is probably that we don't want parents
           | pulling kids out of school early just to earn money for the
           | family? So legally requiring they stay at school longer
           | protects.
           | 
           | Just a thought
        
             | arp242 wrote:
             | My grandfather went to school until he was 14, but he was
             | also highly literate, had a keen technical insight, and was
             | generally fairly smart.
             | 
             | He wasn't unhappy in life, or the way his career as a
             | factory worker turned out. At least, as near as I can
             | determine those kind of things: he was an old-fashioned
             | kind of man who didn't have a heart to heart with his
             | grandchildren. He never ate pizza in his life, and refused
             | to eat it when I offered to take him out to try it.
             | 
             | But at the same time I've always felt he could have
             | achieved much more if he continued school. The reason he
             | didn't was because his family was poor and another child
             | working was needed to put bread on the table. A big reason
             | this mandatory schooling exists is for these kind of
             | reasons.
             | 
             | That being said, I do think there's too much emphasis on
             | degrees; not having a college degree is almost something
             | you're embarrassed of. My brother did basically a useless
             | "animal care" study because he felt like he had to do _A_
             | study (note: it 's not a useless education, but there are
             | tons of people doing it and very few jobs, almost no-one
             | who graduates gets a job in that field and the impression I
             | had from his friends is that it's mostly the kind of thing
             | people do when they don't know what else to do).
        
             | moonchild wrote:
             | 14-year-olds are likely not equipped to make such a
             | decision. If all you're doing at school is failing, then
             | the school itself should provide better support mechanisms.
        
               | Ntrails wrote:
               | Better support to what end? Walking out of school age 16
               | with 4 GCSE passes is not much of an improvement on 2,
               | and maybe we should accept that there exist people who
               | cannot via standard schooling do better than that? Maybe
               | those two additional years of special measures is not
               | better than a couple of years learning on a job?
               | 
               | Unless your claim is that with sufficient support
               | _everyone_ can leave school at 16 with good grades, which
               | is simply not a school of thought I ascribe to.
        
         | opheliate wrote:
         | My (much) older brother has severe dyslexia. He's bright, and
         | now owns his own business, but in his school, they'd already
         | reached the capacity for SEN provision, and he was refused a
         | diagnosis. He could have massively improved his literacy if
         | help was just available, but at that time, it simply wasn't.
         | Branding anyone who doesn't immediately take to school an
         | "idiot" is incredibly myopic.
        
           | alexashka wrote:
           | Replace the word idiot with 'fool' and see if your point
           | still applies.
           | 
           | In other words, the problem is not stupid people (or people
           | with learning disabilities, which I happen to have btw), who
           | undoubtedly exist. The problem is foolish people who think
           | they can cheat their way through life.
           | 
           | My contention is that we're sinking under the weight of
           | foolish people cheating their way into positions they have no
           | business being in.
           | 
           | Foolish as in lacking wisdom. Not foolish as in lacking
           | ability to do calculus. We have plenty of calculus, we
           | severely lack wisdom :)
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | kzrdude wrote:
         | He's not an idiot, he would have gotten much further, and had a
         | better life, if school had helped him to learn to read and
         | write. Some children need extra help/support lessons (and
         | nowadays usually get it).
        
       | novalis78 wrote:
       | In 2008 when my kids went to VPK in Florida I was surprised to
       | find out why they memorized words instead of learning how to
       | read. The lady I spoke about this was a veteran teacher of 25
       | years. She said it was all BS and that a decade or two earlier
       | they had used a book called 'Learn how to read in 100 lessons'.
       | With that systems, she said, they never had anyone fail. Every
       | child that passed through learnt reading. She said it was like a
       | miracle. But, at some point, the higher ups fell into the trap of
       | having to introduce new regiments and systems because of ever
       | changing fashions. They were forced to introduce silly
       | approaches, changing them every few years, leading to kids
       | suddenly unable to read. Whenever she met parents she would tell
       | them about this book and everyone had success with it and was as
       | shocked as I was how it worked and how it was missing from the
       | school curriculum. I ended up teaching all of my children how to
       | read with it. It's one of the most precious experiences. They all
       | learnt to read at a very early age. There are many stories like
       | this about writing and early math. Many years later, I read the
       | episode In Feynman's book 'Surely you must be joking' on his
       | encounter with school text books and his disappointment - to say
       | it lightly. One great experiment I can highly recommend is
       | collecting textbooks from the 20th century and compare the
       | decades and (basic) skills taught.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | frogpelt wrote:
         | Is this it?
         | 
         | https://www.amazon.com/Teach-Your-Child-Read-Lessons/dp/0671...
        
       | hmwhy wrote:
       | Maybe I'm joining the large amount of comments at the bottom for
       | once, but this article is not just about someone who ended up
       | being a teacher due to serendipity -- he committed crimes to get
       | there.
       | 
       | I'm all for supporting people with disability, and there is no
       | doubt that it requires courage to admit to being a fraud after so
       | many years -- but being dyslexic shouldn't be an excuse for
       | anyone to commit crimes and get away with it (please read what he
       | actually did if you haven't -- it wasn't a simple case of
       | cheating).
       | 
       | I have personally seen a lot of academic misconducts that went
       | unpunished that makes cheating in exams seem seem mundane. Fake
       | results that academics don't own up to/just blame their students
       | when proven wrong; made-up results so that a thesis would look
       | better; lying about publications to get scholarships, etc. Nobody
       | ever gets punished and some would eventually go on to hold
       | important positions.
       | 
       | Reading the "supportive" comments in this thread is pretty
       | demoralising for me.
        
         | BeFlatXIII wrote:
         | It's a natural consequence of a culture that praises
         | competition. "If you're not cheating, you're not trying" is the
         | motto of those who only have a tenuous chance at success. No
         | point accepting your "just" lot in life: may as well cheat if
         | the consequences from cheating aren't that much worse than the
         | expected quality of a life lived legitimately.
        
         | hliyan wrote:
         | I agree in principle. But I think there has to be a difference
         | in punishment between unrepentant perpetrators who get caught,
         | and perpetrators who come forward on their own volition. If I
         | remember the original Reader's Digest article, this person was
         | already held to account many years ago -- he lost all his
         | credentials, qualifications and not to mention respect and
         | credibility. Even the original story was published much later.
         | If we continue to pounce on people like this many years after
         | the fact, we're only discouraging others with a guilty
         | conscience to come forward.
        
           | hmwhy wrote:
           | Thank you very much for taking the time to address my
           | comment, it has given me some food for thought.
        
           | baron816 wrote:
           | Yeah, this is kind of a Frank Abagnale type story. He did
           | some incredible yet dishonest and criminal things, but
           | redeemed himself later in life. I'm sure this guy bullied a
           | lot of people to get them to help him cheat. He spent 40
           | years pretty much as an asshole--he had stolen a life that he
           | hadn't earned, and had deprived his students of a qualified
           | educator.
           | 
           | Maybe the moral of the story is that people can change and
           | become positive contributors to society. Think of all the
           | people who have been locked up for decades for crimes they
           | committed as teenagers. They were just thrown away by society
           | without a chance for redemption. This is part of what Black
           | Lives Matter means to me--there's a primitive impulse in
           | people's brains to say they're criminals and they won't
           | amount to anything and just cause harm. This guy got a chance
           | that was denied to millions of black youths.
        
             | dwohnitmok wrote:
             | Speaking of... there seems to be a good chance that Frank
             | Abagnale lied about lying and his biggest con has been
             | making a career out of convincing people of his non-
             | existent previous cons (which in retrospect isn't all that
             | surprising I suppose, there's no a priori reason to believe
             | that an ex-conman has been honest about his ex-cons).
             | 
             | It seems that he had only one big true con: where he conned
             | a woman's family into taking care of him and stealing money
             | from them while he essentially stalked her, was found out
             | and then sent to prison.
             | 
             | https://whyy.org/segments/the-greatest-hoax-on-earth/
        
         | arp242 wrote:
         | This guy was born in 1939. These events happened in the 50s.
         | It's been a long time, and at no point is the article saying of
         | even implying it's a good thing: it's just some young person
         | struggling to get by doing what he could because he thought it
         | was the only way to get anywhere in life.
         | 
         | I don't understand why some people feel the need to be so damn
         | judgemental and moralistic about things.
        
         | jccalhoun wrote:
         | Honestly, it sounds unbelievable. I absolutely can believe that
         | people go through life without learning to read. I'm a college
         | teacher and I've met them.
         | 
         | The lengths he went to in college, however, seem so incredible
         | that I am skeptical. Stories like Richard Montainez's claims of
         | inventing flaming hot cheetos and Frank Abagnale's claims of
         | impersonating have been found out to be false so I need actual
         | proof before I believe these kinds of stories are true.
        
         | tashi wrote:
         | I haven't seen any comments that praise him for cheating or
         | stealing or faking his way through being a teacher. The only
         | praise I see is for his learning to read and then coming out to
         | tell his story.
        
         | iammisc wrote:
         | I agree, what this man did was criminal. It doesn't matter how
         | he felt about it, or the great redemptive arc the story talks
         | about (him learning to read eventually), the truth is he short-
         | changed a lot of children on a proper education.
        
       | daniel-s wrote:
       | Can someone who has read the whole thing spoil it and tell me how
       | someone illiterate wrote a big, long article for the BBC?
        
         | namenotrequired wrote:
         | He did learn to read and write eventually.
         | 
         | But going by the last line, this article was written by a
         | certain Sarah McDermott and not by John Corcoran
        
         | aymendjellal wrote:
         | He eventually learned how to read later in his life (after his
         | teaching career!) by seeking help at his local library adult
         | literacy initiative.
        
         | edge17 wrote:
         | last line,
         | 
         | Written by Sarah McDermott.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-08-01 23:02 UTC)