[HN Gopher] Room C, where my little ballerina danced
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Room C, where my little ballerina danced
        
       Author : ambitiousfox
       Score  : 59 points
       Date   : 2021-07-27 16:55 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (jenniferbrogdon.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (jenniferbrogdon.substack.com)
        
       | CobrastanJorji wrote:
       | Some of the parents in that room are full time parents. They are
       | engaged with their child from the moment the child wakes them up
       | until the moment that child goes to bed, and then they'll
       | probably be engaged again when that child wakes up in the middle
       | of the night. Just like I need breaks from work to function
       | better during the non-breaks, those parents need time for their
       | brains to relax a bit. That's super normal.
        
       | ygmelnikova wrote:
       | At least it's not like the early 70s where 50% of mothers stayed
       | home. Ugh! Thank goodness mom can work now, up the family income
       | and help drive the price of housing through the roof!
       | 
       | And kids need a boat, right? Liam's parents have boat.
        
       | zz865 wrote:
       | Modern Parenting sucks. My Great Grandparents worked 7 days a
       | week on their farm and had 13 children. You really think they'd
       | be watching each one do ballet? The kids had a great time playing
       | on the streets with their siblings and friends. They are mostly
       | still close - sounds like a great childhood. Modern children are
       | way over scheduled I feel sorry for them.
        
         | Falling3 wrote:
         | Hellooo, False Dichotomy.
        
           | rfrey wrote:
           | It's not a false dichotomy at all. The discussion is about
           | constant parental attention to childrens' activities; your
           | parent points out a situation with the _complete absence_ of
           | such attention, and happy children nonetheless, as a
           | counterpoint to the narrative. It 's a good point and it's
           | unfair to flippantly dismiss it.
        
       | christophilus wrote:
       | Addiction to devices is real. If that is the main criticism of
       | this article, then I agree that it requires vigilance.
       | 
       | But I think it's unrealistic to expect parents to be fully
       | present 100% of the time. It is important to be fully present
       | _enough_ of the time.
       | 
       | I wonder if the author would equally criticize the use of novels
       | or sketch pads.
       | 
       | In my mind, there is a big difference between being fully present
       | for a performance / competition vs being fully present for a
       | practice. The first feels important. The second feels like being
       | expected to attentively watch your kid playing in a playroom.
        
         | lthornberry wrote:
         | It's not only not realistic, it's not good for kids. They need
         | time that's not observed by their parents to grow and develop
         | as autonomous individuals.
         | 
         | Also, I find watching my daughter's dance practice boring, and
         | I feel zero guilt for that. I'd rather read a book while she
         | dances, and focus on her when I can actually play with her.
         | 
         | The author is not a better parent than me, or than the other
         | moms she's criticizing. She can feel smug if she wants, but I'm
         | very confident in that.
        
       | MisterBastahrd wrote:
       | There are two sides to this.
       | 
       | The first side to this is that kids want their parents to show an
       | interest in their activities. The ballerina activities in this
       | article are about practice. Not a performance. Practice.
       | Expecting grown adults to sit there and be transfixed every
       | minute by a clumsy child doing clumsy child things is a venture
       | into virtue-signaling. If the parents were doing that in the
       | audience in front of their kids while their kids were performing,
       | THEN it's an issue. This is NOT an issue.
       | 
       | Kids also need space. They need space to express themselves as
       | individuals, and they also need space to learn to enjoy
       | activities because THEY like them. Omni-present parents don't
       | allow them the freedom to do this.
       | 
       | If you exposed little girls to what we consider to be "normal
       | dancing," and also exposed them to ballet... but told them they
       | could dress up like ballerinas for either, the vast majority of
       | them are NOT choosing ballet.
       | 
       | Ballet is a form of dance that parents choose to show to other
       | parents that THEY made it.
        
       | gilbetron wrote:
       | As a parent, I had to learn _not_ to pay much attention. Some,
       | yes, but my son did better, focused more, and was less emotional
       | if he knew I wasn 't watching. Like with all things, it's a
       | balance. You want to enjoy what you can, because they grow fast.
       | You want them to become independent, so you need to not pay
       | attention all the time. You want them to know that you love them,
       | so you want to pay _some_ attention. You don 't want them to
       | believe they are the center of the world, so you honestly need to
       | ignore them, too. If you don't give yourself some downtime, you
       | become a worse parent over the medium term. The worst part is
       | that the specific weights for the various options are always
       | changing as they develop.
       | 
       | Parenting is tough, and the only key indicator I've found is that
       | if something is difficult to do, it is more likely to be the
       | better course of action ;)
        
         | Steltek wrote:
         | You nailed it! Paying attention means they're waving at you and
         | shouting rather than listening to the instructor or following
         | the cues. And you want to be a "teammate" in their activities
         | to max out the "quality" in quality time but then they end up
         | depending on you more often than not.
        
       | ygjb wrote:
       | I absolutely love it when I am present for when my kids start
       | learning something. It's delightful to watch them learn and
       | figure things out and take their first steps. Sometimes whatever
       | they are learning is something they enjoy, and sometimes it's
       | not. For my son the first time he realized he was consistently
       | hitting the ball in baseball was great. For my daughter it was
       | getting control of the ball in soccer. The novelty is delightful.
       | 
       | One thing I learned over time though, is that when I am present
       | is that my presence is a distraction. It wasn't something I
       | figured out - my son straight up told me. When I am there at a
       | practice, he is constantly checking if I am watching, because he
       | wants to make sure he is doing well (not because I am a crazy
       | perfectionist parent - I hope... ) because he wants to show off.
       | By not being fully engaged and present I give him the freedom to
       | practice and make the mistakes that are _necessary_ for bridging
       | a basic skill to mastery.
       | 
       | I enjoy watching them learn, but not at the cost of my children
       | being distracted from the task at hand. I will be present for
       | every performance, and every game, but if I am going to a
       | practice, I will generally drop the kids off and take a walk to
       | give them space to mess up without being concerned what I am
       | going to think or how I might respond.
        
         | ambitiousfox wrote:
         | The article said she watched from the lobby's screen. Her
         | daughter couldn't see her watching. That makes sense for you
         | though.
        
       | talentedcoin wrote:
       | I have to say, nobody should take parenting advice from HN.
       | 
       | To those defending paying attention to your phone instead of your
       | kid -- get a grip and get your priorities straight. Your kids are
       | only young for so long and then it's over forever. The article
       | here is trying to remind you that each moment is precious,
       | whether you realize it or not.
        
         | lupire wrote:
         | Why are you wasting time on HN instead of watching your kids?
        
       | annoyingnoob wrote:
       | They do grow up fast. Things change when you have more than one,
       | you may find that you cannot devote yourself to everything your
       | kids are doing. You still care, you still support them, but you
       | can't do everything.
        
         | criddell wrote:
         | I think this was more of a comment on parents who would rather
         | scroll Instagram than watch the dance lesson in front of them.
         | Let me assure you, they do exist (and I've been guilty of it
         | too).
        
           | zeroonetwothree wrote:
           | We shouldn't make parents feel guilty about stuff like this.
           | Are we pretending that they are somehow mistreating their
           | children because they didn't watch their lesson? If they are
           | happy with their choices why judge them.
        
           | balfirevic wrote:
           | There is nothing wrong with that. Fuck this guilt-tripping.
        
       | alex_c wrote:
       | After having a kid, I learned many surprising things about
       | parenthood and about myself.
       | 
       | One is the absolute joy of watching my little one do... pretty
       | much anything. It's an infinitely more powerful drug than
       | anything social media or entertainment companies have managed to
       | invent so far.
       | 
       | Two is how much less judgemental I feel towards other parents,
       | especially how reluctant I am to draw conclusions over small
       | interactions where I don't know anyone's circumstances.
       | 
       | Needless to say, this article brought up very conflicting
       | feelings for me!
        
       | softwaredoug wrote:
       | I'm going to take a different PoV to defend the typers/phone
       | talkers :) They're not bad parents.
       | 
       | A lot of these kinds of things are weekly practices during the
       | work day. Parents have to drive their kids 20-30 minutes to these
       | events. You're usually stuck in a waiting room, trying to just
       | keep your head above water on work stuff you're missing to
       | maintain a career and support your family.
       | 
       | I wish we could revel in every small thing our kids do, but
       | indeed, that's not realistic. Working at home there are _many_
       | times I wish I could spend with my kids I can't. It's heart
       | crushing.
       | 
       | This kind of article just piles on the guilt. Sometimes we just
       | need to work to earn for our family. We do this so later we can
       | spend dedicated time with our kids another time..
        
         | nostromo wrote:
         | Thank you. We are constantly guilting parents about
         | _everything_ -- it 's tiresome.
         | 
         | A friend of mine was distraught when she decided to stop breast
         | feeding and to move to formula for a host of reasons (pain,
         | difficulties meeting other demands, etc.).
         | 
         | But the media has propagated this meme that using formula is
         | _so much worse_ than breast feeding, when there 's no solid
         | evidence that is the case. [1]
         | 
         | Making parents feel terrible about all of these unmet
         | expectations of being the _perfect parent_ is actively harmful
         | for their mental health. Guilt-ridden parents aren 't good for
         | anyone. It's the parenting equivalent of young people comparing
         | their lives to the fake lives they see on Instagram -- holding
         | themselves to an impossible standard.
         | 
         | 1. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/everybody-calm-down-
         | abo...
        
         | rapind wrote:
         | > Sometimes we just need to work to earn for our family.
         | 
         | I think this is situational. If you're barely scraping by then
         | absolutely. If you're fairly well off though you're just
         | working to buy a bigger house, better phone, faster car, etc.
         | To each their own, but for me personally I've reduced work to
         | hang out with my kids (and I'm not wealthy by first world
         | standards).
         | 
         | I don't think there's any point in guilting people about it
         | though. Just be aware that you often can subsist on less to
         | free up time, if that's appealing. I think a lot of us just do
         | the thing (9-5 or w/e) because everyone else is and it seems
         | normal.
        
           | nineplay wrote:
           | > I've reduced work to hang out with my kids (and I'm not
           | wealthy by first world standards).
           | 
           | Perhaps you have some tips but reducing work is very hard to
           | manage in my experience.
           | 
           | Salaried positions are a crapshoot - many of them like to say
           | they support work-life balance but it rarely turns out that
           | way.
           | 
           | Most employers ( again, IME ) who hire contractors are not
           | looking for anything less than 40 hours/week.
           | 
           | You can set yourself up as a contractor and take the jobs you
           | want, but besides the obvious loss of health insurance and
           | retirement benefits, there's time spent finding customers and
           | the lack of steady pay has its own costs.
           | 
           | I'd love to reduce hours, but I've never found a way to make
           | it work.
        
             | triceratops wrote:
             | > many of them like to say they support work-life balance
             | but it rarely turns out that way
             | 
             | Just work the required number of hours and then stop
             | answering e-mail. Financial security helps with that,
             | because at most they'll let you go for "not being a team
             | player" - these are bad workplaces and you should be happy
             | to leave them.
             | 
             | More likely though, your perceived worth at work will
             | improve because you don't appear insecure about your
             | position.
        
             | rapind wrote:
             | > I'd love to reduce hours, but I've never found a way to
             | make it work.
             | 
             | How seriously have you tried? I don't know you or your
             | situation but often when someone says this they just mean
             | "that sounds nice, but...". If it's something you really
             | want, treat it like a job to figure it out. I'm glad I put
             | in the effort and time to work it out. It's a mix of
             | reducing / eliminating expenses and trying different
             | things. There are so many options once you (and your
             | partner) decide you want it more than a million dollar
             | house etc. The specifics depend on the individual.
             | 
             | Most of the things we collectively (society) spend money on
             | are unnecessary and often even detrimental to contentment.
             | For the things that are necessary, there are often cheaper
             | options. I'm not referring to some kind of new age self
             | help nonsense. Just look how your grandparents or great
             | grandparents lived during the depression.
        
               | nineplay wrote:
               | Budget isn't a problem. I'd happily take a pay cut, my
               | expense are minimal. There just aren't that many
               | employers interested in hiring someone for fewer hours.
        
           | l30n4da5 wrote:
           | > If you're fairly well off though you're just working to buy
           | a bigger house
           | 
           | I'd settle for just paying off the house I currently own,
           | thanks.
        
             | loloquwowndueo wrote:
             | Well if you're paying it off you don't really own it do you
             | :)
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | ygmelnikova wrote:
           | This.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | zeroonetwothree wrote:
         | Exactly. Weekly ballet practice is very repetitive. Sure it
         | might be nice to watch the first couple times but soon it's not
         | very interesting. Are you actually going to remember every
         | single one?
         | 
         | It's much better to have a variety of experiences with kids
         | than to amass sheer quantity of hours. I look back on my
         | childhood and I remember the special things my parents did with
         | me, I don't count up how many hours they watched my random
         | activities.
        
           | silicon2401 wrote:
           | > Are you actually going to remember every single one?
           | 
           | You won't, but many kids will remember that single time their
           | parents weren't there for them, or that single time that
           | something did happen that they didn't like. Or that their
           | parent was always bored or checked out whenever they came to
           | events. The solution isn't to pretend kids are okay with
           | anything, it's to be realistic about the trade-offs you
           | choose to make.
        
             | daggersandscars wrote:
             | The critical thing is to talk to the kid about what can be
             | expected and when.
             | 
             | Let them know when you'll be there and be present when you
             | are. Involve the kid in determining when you'll be there if
             | you can. For the times you can't go, talk to the kid about
             | how it went, what was good/bad, etc, taking the kid's lead
             | if they're not feeling like talking about it.
             | 
             | I played baseball as a kid, age ~8 - 12. My parents sat me
             | down when I signed up and explained that they could not be
             | there for every game but would be there when they could. If
             | there was a game that I specifically wanted them to attend,
             | to let them know ahead of time. They asked me about every
             | game they couldn't attend, were excited if I was, dropped
             | it if I didn't want to talk about it, etc.
             | 
             | There were times I was sad they weren't there (grand slam
             | home run, great plays). There were times when I was happy
             | they weren't there (struck out every at bat on bad pitches,
             | dropped an easy catch, etc). But I knew ahead of time if
             | they'd be there, which was what made it easier for kid-me
             | to understand and deal with.
             | 
             | This was how most of the families did it. The other parents
             | got to know the friends of their kids and would cheer for
             | them, too, which made it a friendly environment.
        
               | silicon2401 wrote:
               | The situation you described is exactly what I was talking
               | about. It sounds healthy, loving, and happy, while also
               | working around the realities of life and emotions. Sounds
               | like a great arrangement.
        
             | triceratops wrote:
             | I genuinely have no recollection of what my parents did at
             | my baseball games or practice. In general they were loving
             | and very involved as parents, so I'm sure they were
             | watching when I was at bat. But I was just focused on the
             | game.
        
         | ambitiousfox wrote:
         | My comment above was meant as a reply to you.
        
         | dilap wrote:
         | It reminds me of a NYT article about how many women at work
         | have baby monitors, just watching their baby, wishing they
         | could be with it, while working. Pretty heartbreaking.
         | 
         | I wouldn't say I'm against capitalism necessarily, but it does
         | seem to have resulted in a situation where a lot of us are kept
         | apart from the things and people we really want to be with.
        
       | rcpt wrote:
       | Parents spend significantly more time with their kids today.
       | Almost twice as much vs. the 60s
       | https://ourworldindata.org/parents-time-with-kids
       | 
       | I get that people love a preachy guilt trip but those moms were
       | doing just fine.
        
       | ambitiousfox wrote:
       | Not trying to impose guilt. One of the dance nights I worked on
       | my grocery order because it needed to be done. Like someone else
       | said, its more directed towards wanting to scroll mindlessly
       | instead of delihhting in your child. And it's also about me
       | fighting that. We all struggle with wanting to be on our phones.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-27 23:02 UTC)