[HN Gopher] Columbo: an origin story (2018)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Columbo: an origin story (2018)
        
       Author : MaysonL
       Score  : 105 points
       Date   : 2021-07-27 08:24 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (columbophile.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (columbophile.com)
        
       | jhbadger wrote:
       | >They based the character squarely on Porfiry Petrovich, the
       | astute but meandering lead investigator in Dostoevsky's Crime &
       | Punishment - a book both had studied at college.
       | 
       | Perhaps, but I would find it difficult to believe that the
       | creators of Columbo hadn't also seen the 1955 French film
       | _Diabolique_ (also known as _Les Diaboliques_ ). This film
       | features a detective who seems very friendly and not very
       | competent but who is cleverly setting up a rhetorical trap for
       | the murder suspect, very much like how Columbo acts.
        
       | mikebannister wrote:
       | amazing, just downloaded recently and in the middle of episode 1
       | just now...
        
       | leephillips wrote:
       | This series is one of the very rare ones in which my favorite
       | actor, Patrick McGoohan, makes a couple of guest appearances, and
       | even directed one episode.
       | 
       | https://columbophile.com/2020/08/30/episode-review-columbo-a...
        
       | lqet wrote:
       | One of the earliest (and also one of the best) Columbo episodes
       | ("Murder by the Book", 1971) was directed by Steven Spielberg. If
       | you watch it, it is _immediately_ clear (even during the initial
       | shot) that this episode is simply in another league. Not only
       | when compared to other Columbo episodes, but also when compared
       | to other TV shows during that era (see for example this short
       | documentary [0]). It is crazy to think that Spielberg was only 25
       | when he directed this.
       | 
       | If I remember correctly, the quality of that Columbo episode was
       | what really started Spielberg's career. He got the offer to
       | direct a TV movie afterwards, and he presented Duel [1] (also in
       | 1971), which is simply a masterpiece and got a theatrical release
       | after the TV success. It established Spielberg as a major film
       | director. Just watch the title sequence:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0707XtiFPs
       | 
       | [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gb62FxCH-Ks
       | 
       | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duel_(1971_film)
        
         | drcongo wrote:
         | The shot choices in that opening are spectacular. One of my
         | favourite episodes.
        
         | scandox wrote:
         | Respectfully disagree on Spielberg. Many episodes from the
         | early series show exceptional visual flair. Watch the opening
         | sequence of Publish or Perish or the post murder cover up from
         | Death Lends a Hand.
         | 
         | Spielberg was young and had enormous talent obviously but I
         | think a blind taste test wouldn't show the difference.
        
           | selimthegrim wrote:
           | You beat me to mentioning Death Lends a Hand.
           | 
           | "How do we trump split screen? Let's do it _on sunglasses_ "
           | (which always seems to get cut in syndication)
        
         | parenthesis wrote:
         | "Murder by the Book" was also an early writing credit for
         | writer/producer Steven Bochco.
        
         | Witoso wrote:
         | Apparently this episode is in the public domain, and is
         | available on the columbophile's website[0]
         | 
         | [0] https://columbophile.com/2018/03/25/full-episode-columbo-
         | mur...
        
         | mixmastamyk wrote:
         | Wow, driving from downtown LA (Broadway), up 110 to I-5 towards
         | Palmdale, using that unique connecting ramp where you turn left
         | at the end of the tunnel.
         | 
         | I've driven these recently and remember the horrible smog-
         | belching cars from my youth. Also, nice to see the freeways
         | without tagging everywhere.
        
         | NextHendrix wrote:
         | I was introduced to Columbo by a housemate a few years ago and
         | was instantly hooked. The episode you mentioned is excellent,
         | as are all the Jack Cassidy ones.
         | 
         | For me the standout episode is 'Any Old Port in a Storm' (1973)
         | with Donald Pleasance.
        
           | lqet wrote:
           | I think there are 4 things that make a Columbo episode
           | enjoyable:
           | 
           | 1) Peter Falk 2) Creative murder ideas 3) Great plot 4)
           | Supporting performances
           | 
           | In "Any Old Port in a Storm" the acting by both Falk and
           | Pleasence is outstanding. Regarding 2), I always adored "Now
           | You See Him" (the magician episode, also with Cassidy) and
           | "Swan Song" (the airplane murder with Johnny Cash).
        
             | Comevius wrote:
             | I think what makes Columbo good is how out he is of his
             | element. The perpetrators are always from a higher social
             | class and he always takes advantage of their hubris,
             | lulling them into a false sense of security, agitating them
             | until they give up clues. All that while being polite and
             | sympathetic. There is no shoehorned social commentary in
             | Columbo. It's pure entertainment, which is hard to find
             | these days.
        
               | sumtechguy wrote:
               | Kinda a lot of episodes were like that. The more
               | interesting episodes I think it was more of a he was 'a
               | sly little elf perched on his toadstool'. He was
               | unassuming. He disguised himself to be invisible and
               | would pick apart everything usually very methodically. He
               | 'took a defect and used it as a tool'. Even the way he
               | would blow people off was to be unassuming 'oh my boss he
               | is a very exacting man', 'oh just a routine question'.
               | When it was usually him looking for that information. He
               | would many times make the perp 'self own' themselves by
               | their own lies.
               | 
               | The writers were also very good on making sure motive,
               | means and opportunity were clearly picked apart in all
               | ways. Apparently the whole crew was in on it and would
               | make sure that the story stayed true. Making sure things
               | were filmed so they did not contradict later or past
               | actions.
               | 
               | The 90s series was a bit less tight and more of the
               | 'stick it to the rich'. They were enjoyable enough. But
               | something was missing.
        
       | hellbannedguy wrote:
       | Although the writing was superb, I don't think Columbo would have
       | been such a good show without Peter Falk.
       | 
       | He had talent, and natural charisma. I don't think I have ever
       | seen him in a bad performance, even before Columbo.
        
         | pimlottc wrote:
         | It's also quite lucky that they decided to go with the "too
         | young" Falk, who was then able to play the role for over thirty
         | years!
        
         | tempodox wrote:
         | Agreed. In "Murder by Death" he also plays Columbo's parody,
         | and it's hilarious.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | jaclaz wrote:
           | If you are an estimator of Peter Falk in "light" roles, you
           | surely know it, I have to confess that I still re-watch from
           | time to time The Inlaws (with Alan Arkin besides Peter Falk)
           | and still laugh out loud on the same lines, even if I almost
           | know them by heart:
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_In-Laws_(1979_film)
        
             | philiplu wrote:
             | Came here to see if anyone mentioned "The In-Laws". Just a
             | perfect, farcical gem. I still crack myself up yelling
             | "serpentine, serpentine" when running with my kids, who
             | have no idea what's funny. Probably about time I watched it
             | with them.
        
       | hawski wrote:
       | Columbo is my and my wife's favorite series. There are many
       | things that separate it from most. Nowadays there is a big focus
       | on series where every episode ends with an addictive cliffhanger.
       | I hate that. You can watch a single episode of Columbo and be
       | satisfied. There are a few things mentioned from other episodes
       | here and there, but overall nothing important. I also love how
       | the lieutenant is above all kind. Lately everything has to be
       | dark and quirkiness is used to explain how someone is directly
       | rude. I like the fact that they did not bend and show Mrs Columbo
       | (I now that there was a separate show with that title).
       | 
       | I'm sure, that it will get a reboot sometime in future. I just
       | hope that it will not receive the same treatment as Star Trek
       | with Discovery. I would appreciate i.e. Natasha Lyone to make it
       | something different enough not to look like a cheap uncanny
       | valley copy. But kindess and clear separation of episodes is a
       | must.
        
         | dazc wrote:
         | A murder detective show where you already know who did it and
         | how should never work but somehow it does, perfectly.
        
           | uniqueid wrote:
           | According to Hitchcock it just means Columbo is a Suspense
           | show, rather than a Mystery: https://youtu.be/-Xs111uH9ss
        
           | bbx wrote:
           | Yes, the viewer has way more information than Columbo, so
           | should be able to solve it even more easily. And yet it's
           | still extremely hard.
        
           | JKCalhoun wrote:
           | I think the show would be improved if it did not use that
           | device. I feel like it was almost like a detective show for
           | dummies. You didn't have to (get to) match wits with the
           | detective (or is it the writer?, ha ha) but did get to enjoy
           | some justice porn, watch the guilty squirm.
           | 
           | I love the character of Columbo and he would lose nothing if
           | they followed the more traditional detective format where all
           | the bits revealed throughout are tied together in the end.
        
           | leephillips wrote:
           | Because, after all, who cares who killed Roger Ackroyd?
        
           | andi999 wrote:
           | Yes. I think the real ingredience is that the culprit is rich
           | and has a beautiful house and Colombo is the underdog
           | bringing them down.
        
             | realce wrote:
             | It's totally the rich people going down.
        
             | altcognito wrote:
             | Not just rich but often "smart people". They might be
             | professors or scientists etc.
        
             | SCNP wrote:
             | I think my favorite aspect of the show is how there are
             | still societal remnants of the fancy, Victorian era customs
             | and Columbo uses breaking social norms to put people off-
             | balance.
        
         | Cybotron5000 wrote:
         | Oh, so they're 'rebooting' it. I wish they would hire a writer
         | with the imagination to do something completely new without all
         | that baggage. ...I agree - there's darkness in Columbo, but
         | it's much subtler and is tempered by the kindness and charm of
         | Columbo himself. I see why they do it, but the 'just one more'
         | episode netflix-thing easily gets tiresome and ends up
         | prolonging some plots/story arcs unnaturally and
         | unsatisfactorily. The little of 'Discovery' I watched I felt no
         | engagement with at all - the writing I thought was generic and
         | boring and the characters seemed two-dimensional - but maybe
         | I'm just behind the times: 'Enterprise' grew on me a few years
         | down the line (though not the opening theme!)
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | stronglikedan wrote:
         | > There are many things that separate it from most.
         | 
         | Matlock is another great detective(?) show for self-contained
         | episodes.
        
         | shantnutiwari wrote:
         | >Nowadays there is a big focus on series where every episode
         | ends with an addictive cliffhanger. I hate that.
         | 
         | Me too. And most of the cliffhangers are stupid, you know they
         | were added in just to pad out the episodes.
         | 
         | > Lately everything has to be dark and quirkiness is used to
         | explain how someone is directly rude.
         | 
         | Yeah, I've stopped reading crime fiction (and watching crime
         | drama) for exactly this reason: Every detective *has* to be
         | rude/obnoxious, hate their life, be an alcoholic with marriage
         | problems.
         | 
         | And I'm like, why can't we have a mentally stable detective who
         | solves crime because of duty, and not to excorcise their "inner
         | demons" (or other such psychological BS reason usually given).
         | 
         | For this reason, I love Columbo, Poirot and Midsomer murders:
         | The detectives are honourable people, very polite and
         | respectful, but polite doesnt mean they let people walk over
         | them.
         | 
         | It seems to me most crime writers cannot grasp the fact that
         | one can be polite and ruthless (or relentless) at the same
         | time.
        
           | dharmab wrote:
           | I recommend watching Knives Out- Daniel Craig plays the kind
           | of detective you want to see. (It helps that he is not the
           | sole point of view character.)
        
           | swhitf wrote:
           | The BBC drama The Missing and spin off Baptise have a calm
           | and friendly lead detective. Not sure where you are but it
           | you can get them in your country maybe give them a try.
        
           | dubya wrote:
           | I recommend the Maigret novels by Georges Simenon. He is
           | portrayed as a genuinely decent human being, and the stories
           | are interesting.
        
         | lokedhs wrote:
         | I agree. I have recently been watching a lot of Star Trek and
         | Mission Impossible. Two shows where you can watch one episode
         | and be done with it until the next time.
         | 
         | I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one getting really
         | annoyed with the style with which most shows are made these
         | days. I understand that there are good things about having a
         | continuous storyline, and the last season of DS9 shows that it
         | does work. But all shows don't have to be that way.
        
           | AnIdiotOnTheNet wrote:
           | The key is that your long-form stuff needs to take a back
           | seat to a plot that starts and ends in with each episode. In
           | my personal opinion, Stargate SG-1 is a master class in this.
           | 
           | Shows these days are written for streaming, they are clearly
           | meant to be binged a season at a time. You'll have 4 plots an
           | episode and not a one of them starts and ends in the same
           | one, with several episodes having resolution of anything at
           | all. It's maddening.
           | 
           | Like, there are memorable episodes of some shows, like SG-1's
           | Ergo, that you can sit down and re-watch and enjoy yourself,
           | but this made-for-streaming format just doesn't have that
           | quality. What episode did that cool thing happen in? They all
           | blur together.
        
             | db48x wrote:
             | SG-1 was good but B5 was better.
        
               | selimthegrim wrote:
               | Even with the deus ex machina aliens?
        
               | mixmastamyk wrote:
               | The plot wasn't resolved thru magic--the first ones
               | realized they were doing more harm than good and decided
               | to finally take their leave. This characterization has
               | some merit but is stretched to fit.
               | 
               | Also, the thread was discussing how a show could best
               | weave short and long term story lines together, not their
               | absolute quality.
        
               | db48x wrote:
               | Which aliens did you think of as a Deus Ex Machina?
        
             | throw0101a wrote:
             | The short-ish lived _Veronica Mars_ was quite good a having
             | both a season long story arc, but having self-contained
             | mysteries as well. Some episodes leaning more one way or
             | another, but there was usually some mix of both.
        
               | at_a_remove wrote:
               | Yes, that's one of the things that impressed me most
               | about the show before it went off the rails. You had your
               | season-long mystery, some multi-episode questions, and
               | then your single episode mysteries.
               | 
               | It also has one of the best father-daughter relationships
               | I've seen on screen.
               | 
               | I have noticed that quite a lot of how Veronica Mars
               | "worked" got shifted over into iZombie.
        
               | HideousKojima wrote:
               | The X-Files did a goodish job alternating between
               | standalone episodes and overarching plot. Roughly 2/3rds
               | of episodes were standalone monster of the week episodes,
               | while every third episode or so was about the conspiracy
               | to help aliens colonize Earth. Also occasionally stuff in
               | the standalone episodes had effects in later episodes
               | (for example Scully's dog is from a person who died in a
               | standalone episode)
        
         | AnIdiotOnTheNet wrote:
         | Oh my god, Discovery...
         | 
         | Discovery is just written by toddlers or something.
         | 
         | Like, I was willing to blame it on continuity baggage for the
         | first 2 seasons, plus the first season of every Star Trek is
         | lackluster so whatever. But in season 3 it looked like they'd
         | finally hired a competent writer for a few episodes, Osyraa was
         | suddenly a more nuanced character, the Federation was offered a
         | path to its goals that meant they'd have to compromise their
         | ideals, Burnam was becoming Han Solo [0], Tilly was being
         | slotted into the leadership role her character is actually good
         | at, etc. Then at the last second the toddlers took over again,
         | Deus-ex Burnam'd[1] the ethical decisions, shoved Tilly back
         | into a science role, put Suru on a bus, and put Han Solo in
         | charge of a starship for some reason. What the hell!?
         | 
         | [0] Which is what her character should be, clearly. She doesn't
         | follow rules, she doesn't work well with others, can't lead
         | worth a damn, and she readily compromises her ethics to achieve
         | her goals. She's a terrible Star Fleet captain but she'd be a
         | great chaotic-good rogue.
         | 
         | [1] What the fuck is with Marry-Sue God-Queen Burnam anyway?
         | She has like 95% of the screen time or something and her Picard
         | speeches inspire nothing but contempt for the writers. Like,
         | answer me this: There are regular characters on the bridge
         | other than Tilly, Burnam, and Suru. What are their names?
         | There's Detmer, who we kinda know about because she had that
         | PTSD episode on screen, and I guess that one woman is a cliff
         | diver or something, but I don't know her name. And dude in the
         | back who got horribly murdered by Mud that one time? These
         | aren't red shirts, why aren't we getting any character
         | development for them?
         | 
         | Alright, sorry, I went on a bit of a rant there.
         | 
         | P.S. I'm hesitant to blame the actors for bad performances. I
         | feel like there's a lot of bad direction and obviously terrible
         | material to work with.
         | 
         | P.P.S. I actually think the hack writers are are a pretty good
         | fit for the mirror-universe stuff. It's still garbage writing,
         | but it just sorta fits that place.
        
           | LordN00b wrote:
           | Rant or not, I have to agree entirely. They literally tried
           | to do a Die hard in Space episode...
           | 
           | If you think of it as `Star Trek: Burnham and the continuing
           | voyages of Discovery`, then it sort of makes sense. Doesn't
           | make it any good though
        
         | mixmastamyk wrote:
         | > every episode ends with an addictive cliffhanger
         | 
         | By chance I noticed if you watch from the midpoint of one
         | episode to the next, there is no cliffhanger. ;-)
        
       | LordN00b wrote:
       | In a minor dev related way, projects where clients keep piliing
       | on requirements during dev, that's a Columbo. Just one more
       | thing...
        
       | glandium wrote:
       | I hate Columbo because in the Double Exposure episode they
       | explain the cue marks that appeared during movies to indicate to
       | the projectionist they need to switch reels, and after that I
       | couldn't not notice those cue marks (Fight Club did the same
       | reveal, much later).
       | 
       | But really, I love Columbo. RIP Peter Falk. 10 years already.
        
       | yawaworht1978 wrote:
       | I agree, sadly there is nothing like Colombo produced these days,
       | the CSI series are tangentially similar but using hitech instead
       | of old school police work. Interesting movie recommendation would
       | be murder on the orient express , old or new version are equally
       | good.
        
       | throw0101a wrote:
       | I was always disappointed that Apple never got Peter Falk to
       | appear on stage at WWDC and say " _Oh, there 's one more thing
       | Mr. Jobs..._".
        
         | cardiffspaceman wrote:
         | Too true. I don't care for all revivified old shows but I've
         | been seeing a lot of this show recently (MeTV in some cities)
         | and of course, Columbo doesn't wear a stylish turtle neck, but
         | I think some would find the callback hilarious.
        
       | telesilla wrote:
       | For an extra blessing of Peter Falk should look for Wim Wender's
       | _Wings of Desire_. It 's an incredibly touching addition to an
       | already profound film.
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/u7s-H4EqP4I
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-27 23:00 UTC)