[HN Gopher] Tropical Rainforest Index
___________________________________________________________________
Tropical Rainforest Index
Author : infodocket
Score : 9 points
Date : 2021-07-23 19:44 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.udel.edu)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.udel.edu)
| throwawaysea wrote:
| The short version of this paper (https://www.cell.com/one-
| earth/fulltext/S2590-3322(21)00344-...) describes this new index
| as follows:
|
| > Here, we built a spatially explicit tropical forest
| vulnerability index (TFVI) based on observations of forest cover,
| carbon, and water fluxes to identify areas where rainforests are
| losing resilience to disturbance and are changing toward an
| irreversible state, a "tipping point."
|
| The extended version of the paper (https://www.cell.com/one-
| earth/pdfExtended/S2590-3322(21)003...) has a lot more detail and
| math, and the underlying model is described on page 999 (13 in
| the PDF) under Equation 8. The model is implemented using the rlm
| function in R (https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/MASS/versi
| ons/7.3-54...), which fits a linear regression model using
| iterated re-weighted least squares (IWLS). The input and output
| variables can be seen on page 1022 (35 in the PDF) in Table S1.
|
| As an aside, I really dislike the increasing use of "tipping
| points" in discussions around climate change. It seems so vague
| and imprecise, and the claim of irreversibility seems hard to
| establish. In the context of this paper, if you read the extended
| version, it seems tipping point here is essentially long-term
| loss of _biomass_ (not necessarily a climate-related outcome).
| Additionally, rather than irreversibility, the model they use
| predicts losses as a 1-month or 1-year lagged outcome based on
| various input stressor variables. The magnitude of the output
| index will need to be _interpreted_ to determine how significant
| the negative outcome is (that is, the model does not actually
| determine an irreversible 'tipping point'). Here's the relevant
| text:
|
| > The absolute magnitude of TFVI represents the risk of critical
| transitions that would result in abrupt decreases (negative
| values) or increases (positive values) of the response variable
| given long-term trends in the stressors. The larger the absolute
| value of TFVI, the greater the risk of a critical transition to
| either higher or lower value of the ecosystem response.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-07-23 23:01 UTC)