[HN Gopher] Programming by Poking: Why MIT Stopped Teaching SICP...
___________________________________________________________________
Programming by Poking: Why MIT Stopped Teaching SICP (2016)
Author : boramalper
Score : 22 points
Date : 2021-07-20 15:06 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (web.archive.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (web.archive.org)
| dang wrote:
| Past related threads:
|
| _Why MIT uses Python instead of Scheme for its undergraduate CS
| program (2009)_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18782101 -
| Dec 2018 (136 comments)
|
| _One Reason That MIT Should Reinstate Scheme and 6.001 (2009)_ -
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18386223 - Nov 2018 (38
| comments)
|
| _Why MIT Switched from Scheme to Python (2009)_ -
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14167453 - April 2017 (97
| comments)
|
| _Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP_ -
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13105896 - Dec 2016 (9
| comments)
|
| _Programming by poking: why MIT stopped teaching SICP_ -
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11628080 - May 2016 (232
| comments)
|
| _SICP is being taught again at MIT_ -
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3482117 - Jan 2012 (37
| comments)
|
| _SICP is still used at MIT at graduate level._ -
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3235589 - Nov 2011 (3
| comments)
|
| _Why MIT now uses python instead of scheme for its undergraduate
| CS program_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=842333 - Sept
| 2009 (38 comments)
|
| _Chiming in on the MIT Scheme to Python Switch_ -
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=622261 - May 2009 (7
| comments)
|
| _Why Did M.I.T. Switch from Scheme to Python?_ -
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=602307 - May 2009 (65
| comments)
|
| _Why MIT switched from Scheme to Python_ -
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=530605 - March 2009 (128
| comments)
|
| _MIT replacing Scheme with Python for Intro CS class_ -
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=75401 - Nov 2007 (16
| comments)
| eyelovewe wrote:
| To me, this reads as an admission that software complexity leads
| to lower determinacy and lower systemic coherence. That bottom up
| design is dead, at least with regards to the industry they are
| preparing people for. I still think that SICP teaches sound
| thinking, as do compositional agglomerative syncretic approaches,
| even if you never do write any systems in forth.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-07-20 23:03 UTC)