[HN Gopher] Economic history of World War II and the 18th Brumaire
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Economic history of World War II and the 18th Brumaire
        
       Author : who-knows
       Score  : 35 points
       Date   : 2021-07-16 17:19 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (adamtooze.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (adamtooze.substack.com)
        
       | Dumblydorr wrote:
       | Hitler relied on risk, rhetoric, and gambling to achieve his
       | modest conquests. Recall, he didn't actually conquer Austria and
       | he used rhetoric to gain Czech lands, which would've offered
       | great resistance in heavily fortified mountain forts. He gambled
       | multiple times and got lucky. If the other Germans, French,
       | Austrians, or Czechs had actually stopped him boldly, he would've
       | received much more bad press long before Poland. This could've
       | given Poland and France time to prepare for the Blitzkrieg, which
       | they sorely were not.
       | 
       | Hitler was increasingly poor as a leader over time. Megalomania,
       | hubris, over confidence, narcissism, he definitively lost the war
       | by invading USSR, a very stupid decision. Stalin's reaction
       | wasn't even rapid, Hitler's enemies dithered and paused, it took
       | Churchill and a delayed awakening by Stalin and that was enough
       | to stop "mighty" Germany. It didn't hurt that the USA provided
       | the material and the bulk of the final push, that was key.
        
         | inglor_cz wrote:
         | "which would've offered great resistance in heavily fortified
         | mountain forts"
         | 
         | Hopefully we would've offered great resistance, but the belt of
         | fortifications was far from complete and we had Hungary and
         | Poland ready to jump on our throats as well. There is no way
         | that a noodle-shaped country like Czechoslovakia of 1938 was
         | can survive attack from _all sides simultaneously_ , with one
         | of the attackers on very high military level.
         | 
         | From the Allies' point of view, the fact that Hitler gained
         | access to Czech heavy industry was probably worse than anything
         | else. Subjugated Czech factories played a huge role in arming
         | Germany for the coming war.
        
           | rjsw wrote:
           | Already manufactured Czech tanks played a big role in the
           | early years of the war, it wasn't just the capture of the
           | factories that was important.
        
         | guythedudebro wrote:
         | The idea that Germany came even close to winning the war has
         | always seemed aggressively idiotic to me. We weren't lucky to
         | win the war, Germany was lucky to even make it out of the 30's
        
           | newsclues wrote:
           | It wasn't luck.
           | 
           | After two devastating wars look at where Germany is now. An
           | economic and industrial superpower
        
           | inglor_cz wrote:
           | In May 1940, as the British were evacuating Dunkirk,
           | Churchill met the Cabinet to discuss a possible armistice
           | with Germany, mediated through Mussolini.
           | 
           | At that point, UK was the only significant power fighting the
           | Germans. Churchill prevailed against Halifax, but if the
           | decision went the other way, Germans would have uncontested
           | control over most of the continent either directly or through
           | satellite states, with exception of the USSR and small
           | holdouts like Malta.
        
         | pomian wrote:
         | Remember politics. Poland and neighbors knew of Germany's
         | invasion plans, but were not allowed to mobilize or prepare, so
         | they "wouldn't antagonize the Germans." The British were
         | playing politics hoping that talks would solve everything. So
         | in that sense, you are correct, his rhetoric prevented an
         | appropriate response.
        
       | sorokod wrote:
       | The counterfactual is explored in Philip K. Dick's "The Man in
       | the High Castle"
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-17 23:02 UTC)