[HN Gopher] The Alexander: Why did you build such a long piano?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Alexander: Why did you build such a long piano?
        
       Author : kurthr
       Score  : 733 points
       Date   : 2021-07-16 00:38 UTC (22 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.alexanderpiano.nz)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.alexanderpiano.nz)
        
       | geocrasher wrote:
       | It's amazing what can be accomplished when you don't have anyone
       | telling you it's impossible.
        
         | hexa22 wrote:
         | Also how much time can be wasted by not being alerted of the
         | common pitfalls.
        
           | bityard wrote:
           | It seems strange to think that there would be common pitfalls
           | for a project so uncommon as this.
        
           | aeorgnoieang wrote:
           | I've found, repeatedly, tho that this is the _best_ way to
           | really understand the common pitfalls without just receiving
           | them as  'holy writ'.
        
           | lowbloodsugar wrote:
           | Sure. For example, everyone knows that it is far too
           | expensive to build an electric car because battery prices are
           | far too high. Don't make that mistake! [1]
           | 
           | [1] https://youtu.be/NV3sBlRgzTI?t=55
        
           | enriquto wrote:
           | Fortunately there's enough people in the world for both
           | things to happen simultaneously in different parts, allowing
           | for a wider and deeper exploration of the problem space.
        
       | FpUser wrote:
       | The bass definitely has a character on that piano. I liked it.
        
       | fiftyacorn wrote:
       | It would be an interesting computer model to simulate an
       | infinitely long string
        
       | travisjungroth wrote:
       | I'm not into pianos, but this hit me right in the "old internet"
       | nostalgia. Anyone who wasn't there for an internet before
       | Facebook and Amazon, there was a time when the whole internet was
       | like this (and science research and porn and other stuff, but I
       | was a kid and looked at this kinda thing). Just someone who is
       | obviously an amazing person writing about something they know or
       | did on their own website. Pure HTML with some photos dropped in
       | along the way. Would have been 30 seconds MP3 downloads instead
       | of YouTube videos, though. So maybe a site like this is the best
       | of both worlds.
        
         | Kye wrote:
         | It even uses some obscure CMS I've never heard of, just like
         | old times.
        
           | exikyut wrote:
           | <meta name="generator" content="CMS Tool www.cms-tool.net" />
        
             | nashashmi wrote:
             | A product of website world
        
         | swyx wrote:
         | i like it too but its gotta come from a place of "i have enough
         | leisure time to indulge in this"... everyone else is just
         | trying to make money and cant fault them for that really
        
       | drcongo wrote:
       | This is my favourite kind of content on the web, it always makes
       | my day when something like this pops up on HN.
        
       | twelvechairs wrote:
       | There is a long guitar/lute-like instrument called 'Theorbo' from
       | the renaissance that is a good comparison. It was originally
       | built before they had wound strings (that could produce lower
       | notes).
       | 
       | A very good introduction video
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48RVcbkhNHQ
        
       | munificent wrote:
       | God, those bass notes sound divine. So clear, punchy, and in
       | tune.
        
       | dumpsterdiver wrote:
       | > I think because I was so young I absolutely knew it was totally
       | possible to do, I was fully determined and without consulting any
       | professionals I had no barrier stopping me.
       | 
       | IMO, this is the mindset of greatness to come. So many who have
       | failed before us are quick to proclaim the impossible. Time and
       | time again humans have displayed that the impossible may in fact
       | be nothing more than a lack of imagination.
        
         | ianlevesque wrote:
         | Yeah it's a really interesting human trait. There's clearly
         | hazard in falling prey to the sunk costs fallacy and spinning
         | your wheels forever, but naive determination is an integral
         | part of the human success story.
        
         | Shish2k wrote:
         | I miss having this attitude - as a teenager, I created a two
         | minute long animation with ~200 bytes of code and ~1700 bytes
         | of data (demoscene-style). Now as a professional software
         | engineer if you asked me to do that, I'd say "it's impossible -
         | the unit tests alone would break the 2KB limit!" :(
        
           | rmetzler wrote:
           | Unit Tests don't count against the byte limit. ;-)
        
         | hutzlibu wrote:
         | "Time and time again humans have displayed that the impossible
         | may in fact be nothing more than a lack of imagination. "
         | 
         | Sure, but there is still no working Perpetuum Mobile, despite
         | many freaks are working on it.
         | 
         | And I mean, who knows, maybe one of them accidently invents
         | cold fusion in that approach, but most of the time, youthful
         | optimism can be very blinding for reality. (And I mean not the
         | reality of old cynics, who failed to achieve their dreams and
         | conclude that since they could not make it work, why should the
         | young and dumb ones succed, who lack experience and skills) But
         | actual reality, with physical boundaries of time and matter.
         | 
         | But nothing was impossible with this project, it was just lots
         | of work, so congratulations.
        
       | zmix wrote:
       | Nobody mentioning, the guy was 16 when he started the build? Just
       | W.O.W.!
        
       | CarVac wrote:
       | As someone who's tuned my own piano, the inharmonicity in the
       | bass is really noticeably low.
        
         | elihu wrote:
         | I think the low strings usually get tuned about half a semitone
         | or more lower just to sound in tune with the rest of the
         | instrument.
         | 
         | It'd be interesting to know what the railsback curve looks like
         | for this long piano; I'd expect it to be a lot flatter.
         | 
         | I imagine you could also flatten out the curve on the treble
         | end by using thinner gauge wire, but I suppose there's probably
         | a trade-off in terms of volume or durability, otherwise all
         | pianos would use thin wire for the treble strings. (I think
         | most pianos use wire that's a little thinner in the treble, but
         | not by much. I might be wrong about that, though.)
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piano_acoustics#The_Railsback_...
        
         | prvc wrote:
         | Yet the timbre on this is quite different from that of an
         | ordinary piano. Which make the experiment worth doing on its
         | own (and successful)!
        
         | nyanpasu64 wrote:
         | Chrono Trigger is a SNES game with short samples. Normally that
         | would result in significant quality degradation, but one
         | interesting side effect is that its short looped low piano
         | sample (found in songs like Lavos's Theme[1]) has no
         | inharmonicity. When the attack ends and the sample loops, it
         | almost sounds like the harmonics go a bit flat.
         | 
         | [1]: https://fi.zophar.net/soundfiles/nintendo-snes-spc/chrono-
         | tr...
        
         | marcan_42 wrote:
         | This is why I love Pianoteq. It's a plug-in that virtually
         | models a piano, so if you want 10 meter long strings, you can
         | have that. Or you can go crazy with other parameters and get
         | very strange pianos.
         | 
         | As someone who enjoys playing piano but doesn't have the space
         | nor acoustic insulation for a real one, it's great being able
         | to not just get the sound of different pianos whenever I want,
         | but also virtually design my own. Modeling technology has
         | really come a long way.
         | 
         | That's not to say that if I ever own a large enough house I
         | wouldn't want an acoustic piano :-)
        
           | yboris wrote:
           | I second Pianoteq as a recommendation. It can run on Linux,
           | so I have it on a Raspberry Pi attached to my digital piano.
           | As a bonus, it also drives some addressable (programmable)
           | LEDs: https://github.com/whyboris/Digital-Piano-LED
           | 
           | To install Pianoteq on a Raspberry Pi, it's a single script
           | that sets everything up: https://github.com/youfou/pianoteq-
           | pi
        
           | HPsquared wrote:
           | I searched this thread to see if anyone mentioned Pianoteq.
           | :)
           | 
           | It's also fun to play around with alternative tuning systems,
           | try different hammers, soundboard characteristics, etc etc.
        
         | Synaesthesia wrote:
         | I once pitched up a sample of a very low note plated on piano,
         | it sounds so weird! The inharmonicity manifests as all kinds of
         | weird whistling sounds.
        
         | felipemnoa wrote:
         | For those of us that know nothing about music, is this good or
         | bad?
        
           | LanceH wrote:
           | When played a note will emit overtones -- the same note an at
           | higher octaves. So a low C will also have middle C, high C,
           | etc at different volumes depending on the instrument. This is
           | playing low notes without low volume overtones. In short, the
           | low notes are more purely low.
        
             | elihu wrote:
             | That's not quite right. The overtones are the harmonic
             | series, not just octaves (1:2, 1:4, 1:8, etc..) but an
             | octave and a fifth (1:3), two octaves and a third, (1:5),
             | etc..
             | 
             | In a piano, the bass and treble strings have a lot of
             | inharmonicity. They don't behave like ideal strings for
             | various reasons, so the harmonics aren't exact multiples of
             | the fundamental frequency. Piano tuners deal with this be
             | stretching the octave, so that the piano sounds in tune
             | even though it kind of isn't.
             | 
             | Having a super long bass string instead of a short double-
             | wound bass string probably behaves more like an ideal
             | string (with harmonics that are closer to whole-number
             | multiples of the fundamental), so it should sound like it
             | has a more definite pitch and less like a gong.
             | 
             | Interestingly, we don't really perceive the fundamental
             | frequencies of the low notes in a piano much at all in the
             | first place. If you filter them out, the notes will sound
             | about the same -- we take most of our perceptual cues from
             | the higher harmonics, and our brain just inserts the
             | implied bass fundamental. In the same way, playing a major
             | chord sort of implies a bass note a couple octaves below
             | the root of the chord -- if all the harmonics are there,
             | then we expect it to be there.
        
               | LanceH wrote:
               | Thank you.
        
               | LeonB wrote:
               | "playing a major chord sort of implies a bass note a
               | couple octaves below the root of the chord"
               | 
               | Wow! Of course! Lightbulb moment. This isn't something
               | that occurred to me independently but makes so much sense
               | I wonder how it hadn't, and it explains a lot of what
               | chords are really all about.
        
               | elihu wrote:
               | Yeah, chords are interesting. Major triads are basically
               | a 4:5:6 ratio, which is the 4th, 5th, and 6th harmonic of
               | some low bass note. (Different inversions get you 2:3:5
               | or 3:4:5 or whatever.) A dominant 7th chord gets you one
               | more step in the harmonic series: 4:5:6:7. That 7th
               | harmonic is way out of tune in 12-tone equal temperament,
               | though.
               | 
               | Minor chords are a 10:12:15 ratio, which kind of looks
               | like a bunch of arbitrary chosen numbers, but we could
               | rewrite that as 60/6 : 60/5 : 60/4 and then it sort of
               | make sense that minor would be a sort of mathematical
               | reciprocal of the major. Minor chords can be interpreted
               | either as the 10th, 12th, and 15th harmonics of some bass
               | note or as the first three prime subharmonics that are
               | integer divisions of the fundamental note. Subharmonics
               | don't really occur in nature, though.
        
           | retrac wrote:
           | Inharmonicity is when the overtones (frequency multiples) are
           | not whole number multiples of the fundamental frequency. It
           | sounds bad. Discordant, like playing two notes directly next
           | to each other on the keyboard.
           | 
           | When designing a string or percussion instrument (or any
           | resonator, in general, I suppose) one of the challenges is
           | ensuring that you aren't creating undesired harmonics. With
           | something like a piano with hundreds or thousands of strings
           | that might be induced to resonate undesirably if even
           | slightly out, or whose own movement might alter other parts
           | and affect them, it becomes a significant challenge.
        
           | duskwuff wrote:
           | It's very good.
           | 
           | Normally, the lowest few octaves on a piano all sound a
           | little weird; the individual notes are a little hard to tell
           | apart and multiple low notes played together often blend into
           | a rumbly mess. This is because the strings for those notes
           | are shorter than they should be for their frequencies --
           | they're artificially made to vibrate at a lower frequency by
           | making the strings heavier.
           | 
           | This effect seems to be significantly reduced on the
           | Alexander piano.
        
             | dehrmann wrote:
             | > rumbly mess
             | 
             | The A0 key on a piano is 27 Hz. The frequency is so low it
             | stops sounding like a single tone, and it almost sounds
             | like the string is flopping around.
        
               | TheOtherHobbes wrote:
               | Inharmonicity means there's almost no fundamental in the
               | notes in that octave.
               | 
               | The low notes on a conventional piano _are_ a rumbly
               | mess, but we 're used to them.
               | 
               | Hearing a piano design with much cleaner bass overtones
               | is a real shock.
        
             | atwebb wrote:
             | Thanks for the explanation! Is it noticeable at this time
             | stamp? https://youtu.be/nj4fhdiXy48?t=178
             | 
             | I feel like the lower notes are much more distinct and
             | separate but might just be imagining it.
        
               | kmill wrote:
               | Those bass notes are noticeably clearer there!
               | 
               | The sound of inharmonicity comes from dispersion --
               | different frequencies travel through the string at
               | different velocities. The lower the frequency, the less
               | the wave notices the stiffness of the string, so to
               | speak, and the stiffer the string the quicker a wave will
               | travel through it. If you've ever tapped on a wire fence
               | or played with a slinky, you'll be familiar with the
               | "pew" sound. A pure impulse consists of all frequencies
               | at once, but when it's traveled through the fence,
               | bounced off a post, and come back, you hear the high
               | frequencies first, which is why the "pew" descends in
               | frequency.
               | 
               | Anyway, I've found that you can notice this on the
               | attacks of bass notes on pianos. Only the very lowest
               | notes of the Alexander piano seem to really have it
               | audible, and even then it's much more slight.
        
               | mrob wrote:
               | I thought the cause of inharmonicity was that higher
               | frequencies cause steeper bending of the string at the
               | attachment points, which makes the effective length of
               | the string shorter. Sound on Sound's article on
               | synthesizing guitar sounds (which have the same problem)
               | has a good diagram explaining it (see figure 12):
               | 
               | https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/final-attempt-
               | synthe...
               | 
               | And this model explains why the inharmonicity is higher
               | on the attacks (higher vibration amplitude increases
               | bending of the string).
        
               | kmill wrote:
               | Thanks for sharing that article. My understanding is that
               | this bridge effect is actually what is happening across
               | the entire length of the string; it's just that the
               | boundary condition makes the effects of stiffness
               | clearer.
               | 
               | Stiffness causes there to basically be a radius of
               | curvature in the string when you apply a force. The
               | boundary condition of a guitar string is that the
               | displacement and first derivative of displacement of the
               | string are zero at both ends. So, this radius of
               | curvature will be visible there. But, even when plucking
               | a string, rather than having a sharp peak at the
               | plectrum, it will necessarily be similarly smoothed out.
               | (Though, through time in a frequency-dependent way.)
               | 
               | In the wave equation, stiffness involves a factor with a
               | coefficient proportional to Young's modulus. Based on the
               | stress/strain graphs I could find, Young's modulus of a
               | guitar string increases with tension, increasing
               | inharmonicity. Of course, the pitch of the string also
               | increases with tension, so there's a lot going on.
               | 
               | (I have to admit that the zero-first-derivative boundary
               | condition having no additional effect is coming from my
               | intuitions about linearity of solutions to the wave
               | equation, but maybe it still has some interesting effect.
               | I think the overall effect of stiffness would dominate
               | this one, however.)
               | 
               | Some things I was looking at: https://www.dsprelated.com/
               | freebooks/pasp/Dispersive_1D_Wave... https://www.dsprelat
               | ed.com/freebooks/pasp/Stiff_String.html
        
             | burntwater wrote:
             | I hear solely through a hearing aid and always thought the
             | low frequencies were just being butchered by my hearing
             | aid. Glad to learn it's not just me!
        
           | hug wrote:
           | The harmonic series is a really neat thing to learn about --
           | one of those "art is math" kind of moments.
           | 
           | This video does a good job of explaining it in a relatively
           | short and simple way, but goes in-depth enough that even
           | people with an understanding of music might learn something:
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx_kugSemfY
        
           | CarVac wrote:
           | It's good.
           | 
           | Due to the stiffness of real strings, the overtones do not
           | occur at even multiples of the fundamental frequency.
           | 
           | This means that when tuning a piano, you need to compromise
           | between tuning so that the fundamentals are in tune with
           | distant notes but having the overtones sound discordant with
           | nearby notes, or having sweet overtone matching with nearby
           | notes, causing notes to be very far off when harmonizing at
           | longer distances across the keyboard.
           | 
           | With my upright, I've had more success tuning more based on
           | the fundamental than on the overtones, because it has enough
           | inharmonicity that tuning to the overtones causes right-hand-
           | to-left-hand harmonies to sound noticeably off. But this
           | makes single-hand chords sound messier.
           | 
           | A piano with looooooooooooooooong bass strings can have
           | skinnier strings that are flexible and behave closer to
           | ideal, so you don't have to compromise as much when tuning.
        
             | munificent wrote:
             | For anyone curious, the name for this tuning technique is
             | "stretch":
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piano_tuning#Stretch
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stretched_tuning
             | 
             | Software synthesized pianos implement this too because it's
             | part of how we expect piano-based instruments to sound.
        
             | leephillips wrote:
             | Excellent explanation. We can get a little quantitative if
             | we remember that the fundamental frequency of a vibrating
             | string is sqrt(T/m)/(2L), where T is the tension, m is the
             | linear density, and L is the length. So if we make the
             | string twice as long, (T/m) has to be increased by a factor
             | of four; if we keep the tension the same we can use a
             | string with 1/4 the linear density, which I guess would
             | decrease the inharmonicity significantly.
             | 
             | The square root magnifies the effect of increasing the
             | length, so you get a lot from making the piano a bit
             | longer. The project is a wonderful idea.
        
       | lugged wrote:
       | Yea, but does it play the boogie woogie?
        
         | robmiller wrote:
         | Close. It plays the Maple Leaf Rag,
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-XTA_ORK38
        
           | lugged wrote:
           | When they said long...
        
       | alexdong wrote:
       | Fun story: four years ago, I hired Adrian to move a second-hand
       | piano into our house. We lived on a very steep area with a narrow
       | elbow driveway. Adrian has this incredible spatial memory and
       | fine motor control that I still find it hard to believe how he
       | did it.
       | 
       | He loaded the piano in his trailer and basically backed his BMW
       | all the way up with half meter at most on each side, slowly
       | through that elbow bend and parked the trailer's door right on
       | where we planned to unload the piano. Maybe 2cm away from where
       | he intended to land it.
        
         | soperj wrote:
         | If you tell me that you live on Baldwin st, it's gonna blow my
         | mind.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | jll29 wrote:
       | It's delightful to see that musicians have their own geeks just
       | like computer science has. Their advantage is the execution of
       | their code is universally understood by all of humanity.
        
         | ygra wrote:
         | Another one that fits that description would be Martin Molin of
         | Wintergatan, who's currently on a multi-year quest to build a
         | concert-suitable programmable marble music instrument. He's
         | been detailing the build and concept process on YouTube.
        
           | dmurray wrote:
           | I thought this was going to be an instrument made entirely
           | out of marble, and wondered what it could be. I thought maybe
           | a cymbal but settled on it being most likely a flute or
           | recorder of some sort. Which certainly seems like it could be
           | made from marble, but I don't know enough about sculpture to
           | know how plausible that is.
           | 
           | Turns out it's played with marbles instead, which is just as
           | cool.
        
           | retzkek wrote:
           | Inspired, I presume, by those awesome ray-traced animations
           | from the early oughts? I had started sketching ideas on how
           | to make that a reality (pneumatics and magnets mainly) but
           | never got beyond concept.
           | 
           | Specifically this one:
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyCIpKAIFyo
        
       | wucheong wrote:
       | I was a guitar and bass player. I would like to say, that's the
       | freaking reason that we need fan fret guitar in 8 string guitar.
       | The deep solid low bass!!
        
       | bmitc wrote:
       | I love the simplicity of "I just wanted to see what a long bass
       | string sounded like".
        
       | mastazi wrote:
       | Some other unconventional Pianos:
       | 
       | https://klavins-pianos.com/products/model-450i/
       | 
       | https://klavins-pianos.com/products/una-corda/
        
         | squeaky-clean wrote:
         | For anyone into VST's, Native Instruments has a great sampled
         | instrument of Una Corda. And their instrument "The Giant" is
         | based on the Klavins model 370i. The product page for the 370i
         | is blank, but it seems like the Model 450i is their new version
         | of the same concept.
         | 
         | I hope that one day I'll be able to play one of the real
         | models, but until then The Giant is my favorite virtual piano
         | because of how massive it sounds.
        
           | dhon_ wrote:
           | I originally thought The Giant was a modelled instrument (as
           | opposed to sampled) because it looked like something out of a
           | Studio Ghibli film
        
         | bartc wrote:
         | Also see the Earth harp: https://www.williamearthharp.com/
        
         | jefftk wrote:
         | With the Giant, why put the keyboard at the top? If you put the
         | keyboard at the bottom, it can be like a normal upright piano
         | that is just incredibly tall, and doesn't require a ladder. Is
         | this about where along the string the hammers are hitting?
        
           | mastazi wrote:
           | > Is this about where along the string the hammers are
           | hitting?
           | 
           | I suspect you are right, I studied a bit of classical guitar
           | and I know for a fact that plucking the strings near the
           | bridge or near the fretboard creates very different sounds.
           | It is probably a similar problem with pianos.
        
         | pilsetnieks wrote:
         | A larger version from the same manufacturer was built and
         | installed in Ventspils, Latvia. Supposedly it's the largest
         | concert piano in the world right now.
         | 
         | https://www.classicfm.com/music-news/pictures/worlds-biggest...
        
         | alanbernstein wrote:
         | Here's a ring piano: https://pianoarc.com/about/
        
           | quadrangle wrote:
           | not to be negative, but various shaped controllers that are
           | electronic, there's tons of those. That's not interesting in
           | the same sort of way as an acoustically-distinct sound-
           | production device
        
             | Synaesthesia wrote:
             | I think that's a very rock and roll controller. Picture
             | Elton John in the middle of that.
        
         | ipsum2 wrote:
         | Some more interesting pianos, all from the same person.
         | 
         | Tiny hammers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AB7dXFWhMNU
         | 
         | Bass strings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijUKBIxeAS4
         | 
         | Fishing line: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-KHIJk4Yx8
         | 
         | Guitar string: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RyjoXVDqUs
        
       | Pxtl wrote:
       | Surprised nobody's built such a thing before for eg. churches
       | where a piano or organ will be permanent. Such a beautiful
       | instrument and obvious in hindsight.
        
         | geerlingguy wrote:
         | There are many custom-built organs that defy logic.
         | 
         | Here in St. Louis, the organ at the Cathedral Basilica of St.
         | Louis was built over decades, and one of the ranks (sets of
         | pipes) has pipes that are so long, they were formed in a semi-
         | circle so they would fit within the building.
         | 
         | One of those pipes (a low note) was stuck on one time, and it
         | caused a bit of a vibration in the whole place, and the
         | organist had to turn off the pipe organ until someone could
         | come fix the broken valve!
         | 
         | But it's amazing seeing how there were pipes jammed literally
         | in every nook and cranny and closet in that place--and from
         | what I hear that's not even that massive an installation!
        
       | Tomminn wrote:
       | Funnily enough, I feel like Gareth Davies, the presumably semi-
       | amateur player in the video set, is the only one who really gets
       | the piano, and focuses on those unusually melodic bass notes.
        
         | Synaesthesia wrote:
         | His performance of Maple Leaf Rag rocks! Pretty good player.
        
         | fumeux_fume wrote:
         | Lol, completely agree. Scarlatti?! How silly! I have a very
         | nice tube amp sitting on my desk (#pandemic-hifi) so I thought
         | I'd take your rec and listen to Mr. Davies instead. The long
         | bass strings produce a better sustained note which creates very
         | nice harmonics!
        
           | johncalvinyoung wrote:
           | Has #pandemicHIFI been a thing? I know I've made a few
           | purchases this year that I probably wouldn't have on my old
           | routine.
        
         | ericbarrett wrote:
         | Agreed. Hyperion Knight playing Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring
         | (Bach)[0] is also a really good demonstration of the incredible
         | clarity of the bass keys. It's really astonishing to hear. In
         | fact I feel some of the concert pianists playing it are a
         | little sloppy on the low notes--probably because they're not
         | used to being judged on them! My old Wurlitzer upright could
         | never compare :)
         | 
         | [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPb2hMJ9Ojk around 3:00
        
           | throw0101a wrote:
           | Listening on headphones is weird: usually, for an instrument,
           | the sound comes from one direction. Here some notes were more
           | in the centre, while others (lower ones) were coming from the
           | left channel.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | CarVac wrote:
             | In one of the youtube videos, the uploader (piano maker?)
             | comments that the real stereo effect of the piano is hard
             | to capture in recordings.
        
           | superhuzza wrote:
           | Hyperion Knight - What a name, he sounds like a science
           | fiction character!
        
         | hanslub42 wrote:
         | Yes, and no. The less unharmonic bass strings make a noticeable
         | difference for the middle and high register too, when the
         | dampers are lifted by the sustain pedal and the bass strings
         | resonate with the higher ones. This "roominess" is also
         | noticeable on the old long-neck lutes like the chitarrone,
         | which had long bass strings for the same reason as this piano:
         | avoiding wound strings (in their case, because those hadn't
         | been invented yet)
        
       | jollybean wrote:
       | Does someone knowledgeable want to comment on the actual sound
       | please? Thanks.
        
         | Synaesthesia wrote:
         | Very clean sounding low end, otherwise sounds like a good
         | piano. The problem with piano IMO is the lowest notes are often
         | kinda muddy sounding. This doesn't have that issue.
        
       | pohl wrote:
       | This is fantastic! Most of the videos, unfortunately, are of
       | pieces that avoid the lowest register of the piano.
       | 
       | The video of the Liszt Funerailles performance towards the bottom
       | was the only one I found that demonstrates what makes this
       | instrument unique.
        
       | devnull255 wrote:
       | Wow. Build a beautiful, long piano and they will come!
        
       | techsurfer wrote:
       | I transported this piano once when I was a roadie (instrument
       | transporter) for the Auckland Philharmonic Orchestra.
       | 
       | We had a _long_ day that day!
        
       | throwaway287391 wrote:
       | I only see one mention of a year towards the end -- 4 April 2009,
       | the date of the first concert -- and the only other date I see is
       | that construction began the 24th of October (with no year). Am I
       | missing something or should I assume he built an amazing sounding
       | piano, like no other piano in the world, with no prior
       | experience, in <6 months?! Unbelievable.
        
       | TaupeRanger wrote:
       | Interesting rattly/tinny timbre on the low end. I had to re-
       | listen on better speakers to get a sense of how different this
       | sounds from a normal grand piano (and even those can sound very
       | different from each other).
        
       | aerovistae wrote:
       | Wow, I really wish he included details of how he shaped the metal
       | parts and how he made the curved wood portions. Seems like highly
       | specialized techniques or skills would be needed for much of
       | this, often requiring equipment that can only be found in well-
       | stocked university/craftsman workshops. Did he hand-make the
       | action, for instance? That seems impossible.
        
       | telesilla wrote:
       | Beautiful work, I am a little disappointed not to find a video or
       | recording demonstrating the tonality in a dedicated listening
       | setting: I'm curious to hear how it really sounds but perhaps it
       | can only be done in person.
       | 
       | The best of the youtube collection he shares seems to be
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k54XzhuACrg for judging the
       | quality of the piano - I hear what seems to be a longer than
       | usual reverb on the lower strings but possibly I'm just imagining
       | it: could be the space itself or I'm just paying particular
       | attention to it as a pianist, to compare to my own. Oh, and this:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPb2hMJ9Ojk&t=186s
        
       | throwaway81523 wrote:
       | Oh man, it's a normal width keyboard and it's the strings that
       | are long. This is way cool, but I was imagining it to be the
       | other way around, like the 500 seat piano in the fantastic and
       | too-overlooked movie The 5000 Fingers of Dr. T.
       | 
       | Pic of the movie piano: http://manapop.com/wp-
       | content/uploads/2014/09/vlcsnap-2014-0...
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | Did Dr. T get a good deal on leftover helmets from
         | Nickelodeon's Double Dare?
        
           | danbmil99 wrote:
           | In case anyone remembers, there was a company called Dr. T's
           | music software, they developed for the Atari and Amiga. I did
           | some work for them in the late 80s
        
             | thewebcount wrote:
             | I definitely remember! He later worked for BorisFX doing
             | video plug-ins, which is how I met him. Interesting guy!
        
         | LeonB wrote:
         | Wow!
         | 
         | "It was the only feature film written by Theodor Seuss Geisel
         | (Dr. Seuss), who wrote the story, screenplay and lyrics."
         | 
         | -- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_5,000_Fingers_of_Dr._T.
        
         | pugworthy wrote:
         | What a classic movie - I remember it as being one of those
         | Saturday afternoon movies that came on once.
        
         | AdamTReineke wrote:
         | I'm 99% sure this is the movie I've been trying to re-find for
         | over a decade. I had this strangest memory of watching a movie
         | while very young that involved hands and a large number but I
         | could never find it. A 1953 musical would definitely fit what
         | my mother would have watched on VHS in the early 90s.
        
         | munificent wrote:
         | I imagined this at first too and was confused because a wider
         | piano makes no sense. The 88s keys already cover almost the
         | entire range of human hearing. Adding just one more octave (a
         | few keys below and above the range) would basically cover it
         | all.
         | 
         | Of course, you could argue that there is merit to having low
         | keys whose fundamental is below human hearing because the
         | overtones would still be audible. But that seems to be of
         | pretty limited use to me.
        
       | mullikine wrote:
       | Aside from being a local celebrity, Alex services pianos around
       | Dunedin. Who better to ask to tune my piano than Alex. And he
       | blessed me with a tour of his piano shop and a concert on the
       | long piano. He is the coolest guy ever. I asked him about the
       | possibility of making a piano which two people could play -- in
       | the same key and he entertained the idea. He is so passionate.
       | Such a cool person!
        
       | asimpletune wrote:
       | It honestly sounds fantastic. It's like the most piano sound of
       | any piano I've heard.
        
       | eplanit wrote:
       | The piano is very interesting, and Molly McGee singing "Life on
       | Mars" is fantastic.
        
       | z3t4 wrote:
       | I was expecting a badass base, but it sounds like a piano
        
       | csours wrote:
       | "I didn't know how hard it would be" - man I wish I had that. I
       | feel like I know exactly how hard everything will be.
        
         | xaduha wrote:
         | Are you good at estimating how long things would take?
        
           | csours wrote:
           | I'm good at estimating what parts of a task will take a long
           | time.
        
             | monsieurbanana wrote:
             | For _any_ task? That 's simply not possible.
        
               | csours wrote:
               | > I'm good at estimating what parts of a task will take a
               | long time.
               | 
               | I think it's trivial. I didn't say I can estimate how
               | long the hard parts will take, just what the hard parts
               | will be. If I don't understand something, I estimate that
               | it will take a long time.
        
               | Intermernet wrote:
               | I estimate that the time estimate for any part of any
               | task can be calculated in approximately the time it would
               | take to complete that task.
        
         | bitexploder wrote:
         | Hard things can only be hard. The rest is a function of time :)
        
           | hkt wrote:
           | I can't find it now, but you've reminded me of the
           | description for an experimental optimiser flag on a perl
           | compiler from what must have been 15 years or more ago. It
           | promised it would always deliver a working binary that was
           | functionally identical to the original script, but that it
           | may not do so in finite amounts of time.
        
         | AlbertCory wrote:
         | I'm reading a very short & cryptic book "Three Uses of the
         | Knife" by David Mamet, the playwright and director. It's about
         | the basis of great art. You've hit on something here that
         | resonates with all of us.
         | 
         | "The Hero's Journey" involves the hero in Act I embarking on a
         | quest. In Act II unforeseen difficulties beset him, maybe he
         | doubts himself, the quest changes, and HE changes. In Act III,
         | he completes the maybe-different task, as a changed person.
         | 
         | So this guy enacted some of that journey, and I admire him so
         | much for it.
        
         | ZephyrBlu wrote:
         | It sounds like you're either very experienced, or have never
         | tried anything really ambitious before.
        
       | Donckele wrote:
       | Thanks for that and keep it going. "I think because I was so
       | young I absolutely knew it was totally possible to do, I was
       | fully determined and without consulting any professionals I had
       | no barrier stopping me."
        
         | jkepler wrote:
         | I wonder also if he had the constraints of traditional
         | obligatory schooling, or if he had the freedom of home
         | education to pursue his incredible interest and self-education
         | in piano crafting and entrepreneurial activity?
        
       | noduerme wrote:
       | Okay, this is just straight up awesome. I've played piano for 37
       | years. I've built things all my life. But I never even considered
       | the possibility of building a piano from the ground up. Let alone
       | the difficulty of engineering an instrument that defied all the
       | normal parameters. This is real world hacking at its finest. Not
       | to mention it sounds _great_.
        
         | ksec wrote:
         | Yes, which makes me wonder why hasn't this been done before?
         | How were the standard length in today's piano determined in the
         | first place? The piano making history and a whole loads of
         | questions unanswered and need time to dig deeper.
        
           | mensetmanusman wrote:
           | Lots of products are limited by the cost shipping, size of
           | roads and train car boxes, etc.
        
           | majormajor wrote:
           | I don't know that there's so much a "standard" as just
           | tradition - smaller grands are largely, as I understand it,
           | about space constraints, but while I knew a place growing up
           | with an almost-ten-foot Bosendorfer, it doesn't look like
           | much ever broke the 10' mark. Most variation seems to happen
           | in the 5-to-10-foot range.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | kzrdude wrote:
           | You can get grand pianos in many different lengths, look at
           | for example Yamaha's products
           | 
           | For example here https://www.robertspianos.com/top-makes-of-
           | piano/yamaha-pian...
        
             | exikyut wrote:
             | _[Scroll]_
             | 
             | Nothing listed there is half as long as this piano.
        
               | CydeWeys wrote:
               | Because you get drastically diminishing returns as you
               | increase past a certain size, as a huge piano is a hassle
               | in its own right. The linked super long piano won't work
               | even in concert halls -- it's too long to move around
               | backstage!
        
               | ivanbakel wrote:
               | I think the point being made was that there is no
               | "standard" piano length, and that it's controlled by the
               | engineer. Which suggests that the answer to the question
               | of "why has nobody made such a long piano before?" is
               | "nobody wanted to" - and I can see why, because this
               | particular piano is incredibly inconvenient to move, and
               | pianos are expected to do that.
        
           | aasasd wrote:
           | Perhaps the dimensions of someone's barn were a factor.
        
           | Kye wrote:
           | Designs for instruments are always a practical balance.
           | 
           | See also: lutes. A theorbo might allow for greater
           | expression, but it's not very practical.
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVabz8LneI4
        
             | squarefoot wrote:
             | Thanks for the link. I'm not into lutes, but i found this
             | among the suggested videos, and now am in love.
             | 
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9VI4tNMyJk
        
           | randyrand wrote:
           | there certainly are pianos that are incredibly long for this
           | reason.
        
         | fho wrote:
         | > Not to mention it sounds great.
         | 
         | I grabbed my best pair of headphones and monitors ... but I
         | imagine that any recording just does not do this monster of a
         | piano justice.
        
           | squarefoot wrote:
           | Yes, I'm sure the deep bass it can produce can only be heard
           | and felt in person. Also in some videos, especially the 480p
           | ones, the low bitrate artifacts are clearly audible.
        
         | Loic wrote:
         | Yes and incredibly well balanced, listen to the Funerailles von
         | Liszt recording if you want to get the bass sounds. You get
         | both really nice bass with clear high tones. _Chapeau_.
        
           | stinos wrote:
           | Came here to mention this. I'm not exactly a connoisseur when
           | it comes to classical music, but if there's one thing I like
           | it is Liszt, and I haven't heard it like this before. I mean
           | this bass reminds me of 'proper' bass in electronic music
           | (synth or guitar), unheard for a piano in my limited
           | experience.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | rattray wrote:
           | Direct link: https://youtu.be/sOILiAIwwFM
           | 
           | It is a great showcase of the instrument
        
         | petercooper wrote:
         | In his later years (and as dementia was beginning to set in) my
         | dad spontaneously decided to start building acoustic guitars in
         | all sorts of shapes and sizes, trying out various weird ideas
         | he had. He _hugely_ enjoyed it and it 's left behind some
         | interesting heirlooms and a legacy that he otherwise never
         | expected to leave. A piano is at a different scale (pun
         | intended) but if you have a modicum of practicality, you can
         | build something like that with enough time.
        
           | TheRealPomax wrote:
           | and access to either some very enthusiastic amateur smelters,
           | one enthusiastic professional smelter, or some _really_ good
           | welders, because wood you can easily find, but a pre-cast
           | plate for an unusual size piano... very not so much.
        
             | whatshisface wrote:
             | I wonder how much of the necessary structure could be
             | obtained by drilling and bolting.
        
               | Wistar wrote:
               | Better be really well-engineered as the the string
               | tensions on a conventional grand piano ranges into the
               | low 10s of tons. Yamaha pianos, for example, are around
               | 20 tons.
        
           | aliswe wrote:
           | any photos?
        
           | TheMagicHorsey wrote:
           | My dad is starting to get dementia, but all he does is watch
           | TV. I wish he would build guitars.
        
             | exikyut wrote:
             | Hmm, maybe try figuring out what things he likes and/or can
             | engage in without effort - whatever he can do well without
             | thinking.
             | 
             | And maybe track this over time. Borrowing the analogy of
             | HDD/SSD corruption, which can impact critical filesystem
             | metadata just as easily as file contents, it's impossible
             | to predict how that fundamental capacity to engage will
             | shift and change in confounding and lateral ways.
        
             | Jeff_Brown wrote:
             | I had a similar experience with my grandmother. Her
             | motivation and curiosity left her. I tried to interest her
             | in new things a number of times, thinking she'd be so much
             | happier. The data, though, led me to decide she was in fact
             | happier when I just accepted who she had become.
        
               | xyproto wrote:
               | This is my greatest fear, more than death: to stop
               | learning, to stop creating, to stagnate. I wonder if
               | nutrition or exercise has an impact on this. I would eat
               | broccoli every day if I thought it would improve my
               | chances.
        
           | soperj wrote:
           | very interested in seeing what those look like
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-16 23:01 UTC)