[HN Gopher] Archaeologists "flabbergasted" to find Cerne Giant's...
___________________________________________________________________
Archaeologists "flabbergasted" to find Cerne Giant's origins are
medieval
Author : diodorus
Score : 26 points
Date : 2021-07-15 05:35 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
| dogorman wrote:
| > _That would explain why he doesn't appear in the abbey records
| or in Tudor surveys. "_
|
| Perhaps this figure was simply considered too rude to write
| about.
| dash2 wrote:
| I was so pleased to hear that the cock was a later addition. I
| feel a tiny bit of national pride to know that my ancestors,
| seeing the Cerne Giant, thought "you know what that needs? A big
| old stiffie."
| ntrz wrote:
| I've read that the dick had originally been sized more
| proportionately to the figure, but at some point it was merged
| with a large circular belly button, increasing its size/length.
|
| I wonder whether that is the result the article is referring
| to, or whether there was an initial project to add a penis to
| the figure, followed by a distinct "this penis needs to be
| longer" revision later on.
| quercusa wrote:
| "If your geoglyph lasts more than 500 years..."
| [deleted]
| teruakohatu wrote:
| > indicating that the giant was probably first made by late
| Saxons sometime between 700 and 1100 CE. However, other samples
| indicate a later date of around 1560--still predating the first
| recorded mention of the giant in the 1694 church warden's
| account.
|
| I still think the later date is much more likely. That nobody in
| England bothered to mention the giant for nearly 1000 years seems
| very unlikely.
| theshrike79 wrote:
| People didn't write stuff down at that time. The English forgot
| that the Romans used to rule the land and built a bunch of
| stuff...
| antihero wrote:
| Who knows, perhaps we were hungover?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-07-16 23:00 UTC)