[HN Gopher] Cornel West Releases Resignation Letter from Harvard
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Cornel West Releases Resignation Letter from Harvard
        
       Author : Black101
       Score  : 63 points
       Date   : 2021-07-13 19:47 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.npr.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.npr.org)
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | Harvard still has a divinity school? That's retro.
        
         | neom wrote:
         | Do you think the Department of Philosophy is retro as well?
         | Theology has shaped humanity, wouldn't it be weird for a school
         | as prestigious as Harvard to not have a school for it?
        
           | Black101 wrote:
           | Philosophy makes a lot more sense then Theology.
        
           | Grakel wrote:
           | Yes, philosophy was rendered irrelevant by the scientific
           | method.
        
             | s1artibartfast wrote:
             | I'm hoping this is sarcasm
        
               | neom wrote:
               | I presume it must be, here is a post from them
               | philosophizing:
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27789493
        
           | hogFeast wrote:
           | Most of the ideas within Theology are ideas that went on to
           | become known as Philosophy (for proof: Christian theology
           | came after Philosophy but Aristotle was regarded as the
           | authority on basically everything for pre-Reformation
           | theologians, despite him not being a Christian or having
           | anything to with Christianity...this also occurred in Judaism
           | and Islam).
           | 
           | There are obviously topics that are fairly inseparable from
           | religion, for example hermeneutics, but religion is just
           | another frame of reference onto all the issues that are still
           | important to humans today. Whether you believe that God
           | exists or not is usually not particularly relevant, you just
           | believe the eventual cause is different.
        
             | neom wrote:
             | There are many parallels between theology and philosophy,
             | that's why I mentioned it... I still don't understand what
             | that has to do with them being passe? There's nothing retro
             | about studying divinity.
        
         | pradn wrote:
         | It's not necessarily about training seminarians; it's a school
         | for research into historical and contemporary religions, and
         | not just Christianity.
        
         | brudgers wrote:
         | Harvard was founded to train clergy. It is named for a
         | clergyman.
        
         | sha256kira wrote:
         | And unlike every other Ivy League school it doesn't have a
         | graduate fine are art dept. Even more retro.
        
       | elefanten wrote:
       | He's a celebrity public intellectual. He hasn't pioneered any
       | ideas or theories. He builds departments and plays a ton of
       | politics (both internally at academic institutions and publicly
       | in the American media ecosystem.)
       | 
       | He's a PR intellectual. He gets way too much air time for his
       | contributions to humanity. A boring figure.
        
         | AnimalMuppet wrote:
         | I don't know about that. He's someone I disagree with on many
         | points, but he still speaks in a way that I understand. I may
         | still disagree, but I find myself thinking that many of his
         | points are interesting and/or at least somewhat valid.
        
           | elefanten wrote:
           | Yeah I was over the top there. He's smart and prolific.
           | Public intellectuals are important, it just feels like he's
           | in that class that cares about spectacle over substance.
        
             | robotastronaut wrote:
             | There is a growing number of academics who might argue that
             | the spectacle can be part of the substance. For quite a
             | long time, spectacle (or even advocacy) has been regarded
             | as problematic in academia, particularly in the sciences. I
             | see a lot of what West does as making "good trouble" that
             | gets really important philosophical issues added to the
             | general discourse
        
       | foobarian wrote:
       | *Harvard Divinity School
        
       | eric_b wrote:
       | Yikes, the writing in that letter was not up to par for a
       | professor who was seeking tenure at a prestigious university. The
       | tone, word choice, layout, everything felt amateur and overly
       | emotional. I haven't read many resignation letters but I'd have
       | expected more polish and professionalism.
        
         | handrous wrote:
         | One takes a rather different tone in a pointed and deliberate
         | "fuck you; strong letter to follow" than in a resignation
         | letter that's mostly polite BS, as is typical.
        
         | keel1o wrote:
         | He's hardly a professor. He's contributed no meaningful
         | research in his field and by my own recollection he only ever
         | appears when he makes headlines for saving something extremely
         | racist, or extremely harsh.
         | 
         | He's a divisive figure and a celebrity "philosopher". A literal
         | nobody. It comes to me, and anyone else with experience an
         | academia, that such a washout would never make tenure. Even at
         | a "woke" academic institution.
        
           | endisneigh wrote:
           | kind of ironic that cornel west releases his resignation
           | letter and meanwhile we get some new account calling him a
           | nobody. at least use your main account to say such things.
           | 
           | anyway - addressing your comment itself. doesn't he now have
           | tenure at UTS? Wasn't he also tenured previously at Princeton
           | and Yale? hardly a nobody lmao
        
             | keel1o wrote:
             | He didn't hold tenure at any prestigious university he held
             | professorship. There's a lot of nobodies who get associate
             | at these institutions especially in the fields of
             | philosophy and social science.
             | 
             | UTS is an absolute nobody school. It's like graduating from
             | ASU - no one will ever take you seriously. He's just an old
             | bigot going home to roost.
        
               | endisneigh wrote:
               | idk why I'm even wasting my time responding to obviously
               | wrong things - just go look it up, he's been tenured
               | before. he was actually offered tenure in 1993 but left
               | because he disagreed with Larry Summers, then president
               | of Harvard, at the time.
        
               | failwhaleshark wrote:
               | Yep. Sigh.
               | 
               | Haters gonna...
               | 
               | Sigh.
               | 
               | He's done a lot of good as a civically-involved public
               | intellectual and debater than most academics do writing
               | research papers few people read to "move the needle"
               | towards where many things need to go. I sometimes say
               | about sales and influence: You can build a viable fusion
               | reactor, but if no one knows about it, it may as well not
               | even exist.
        
           | sha256kira wrote:
           | Personally Im into Cornel West but I do agree that the
           | phenomena of celebrity academics / philosophers needs to be
           | discussed more openly and critically.
        
       | eplanit wrote:
       | The main reasons in his conclusion are: Harvard doesn't support
       | Palestine, he's displeased by the level of sympathy he received
       | at his mother's passing, and general issues with the underlying
       | politics of the curriculum.
       | 
       | It all seems a bit self-centered. Why publicize the letter, other
       | than to signal and cue the outrage mob?
       | 
       | The letter helps make the point of how absurd these heavily-
       | endowed universities have become.
        
         | whymauri wrote:
         | >Harvard doesn't support Palestine
         | 
         | I read this differently. Figured that his point is that Harvard
         | is willing to block his career based on an academic
         | disagreement surrounding Palestine. Instead of engaging with
         | his perspective and providing, well, a collegial environment
         | for this discourse, they've undermined his academic career
         | (while still benefiting from his speeches, tutelage, and
         | instruction).
        
       | underseacables wrote:
       | I think Harvard has wrapped itself in an echo chamber and views
       | itself as, well, invincible. Nothing can hurt Harvard. Nothing
       | can tarnish its reputation. It doesn't need anyone, with the
       | money it has in the bank, and I think all of those billions has
       | fulfilled the adage that power corrupts and absolute power
       | corrupts absolutely.
        
         | x86_64Ubuntu wrote:
         | Did you read the resignation letter? It had pretty much nothing
         | to do with "corruption" or absolute power.
        
           | freshdonut wrote:
           | Did _you_ read the resignation letter? I thought it was
           | pretty obvious that corruption - maybe in a less sinister
           | form - was the underlying reason for the issues he brought
           | up.
        
             | elefanten wrote:
             | Given how wrapped the letter is in one-sided rhetoric and
             | how full it is of sweeping, dismissive accusations such as
             | "we all knew the mendacious reasons had nothing to do with
             | academic standards"... how exactly do extract an "obvious"
             | takeaway about the underlying events?
        
             | x86_64Ubuntu wrote:
             | He spoke about Palestine and not getting enough condolences
             | for his mother's death. Neither of those subjects jump out
             | as "corruption".
        
               | dmos62 wrote:
               | Apathy and politicaly-motivated administration is
               | corruption of a collegial environment and academic
               | responsibilities.
        
       | lupire wrote:
       | It is a bit strange to see a professor of divinity complaining
       | about intellectual bankruptcy.
       | 
       | (To be fair, his list of courses taught seem broader than
       | "divinity". )
        
       | gamesbrainiac wrote:
       | I think some are focusing on his mother's death; it's the straw
       | the broke the camel's back but the root cause is apathy towards
       | him.
       | 
       | They are however, ignoring the part where he was declined tenure
       | for no good reason, and despite being a professor at other
       | prestigious universities. He was also paid badly and was treated
       | poorly when it came to sabbaticals.
       | 
       | In other words he was sidelined for no good reason. This is sad.
       | 
       | There are some questions though, why did he leave Princeton? I
       | mean what difference does it make if you're at Princeton or
       | Harvard, they are both great schools.
        
         | smt88 wrote:
         | > _I mean what difference does it make if you 're at Princeton
         | or Harvard, they are both great schools._
         | 
         | Why do we tell academics they have to stay in one place forever
         | once they get tenure? Don't they want to move around as much as
         | anyone else? Maybe his reason was just that he wanted a change.
        
           | NtochkaNzvanova wrote:
           | > _Why do we tell academics they have to stay in one place
           | forever once they get tenure?_
           | 
           | We don't tell them that. Tenured academics do move between
           | universities, and rarely if ever have to regain tenure --
           | because they negotiate with the new university to immediately
           | be at the same status they had at the old university.
           | 
           | If West couldn't swing that, that's on him. West definitely
           | seems to be more interested in playing the outspoken
           | celebrity intellectual / activist than being a serious
           | academic, and Harvard probably didn't want to risk a replay
           | of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornel_West#Dispute_with_Law
           | re....
        
         | whymauri wrote:
         | Exactly. At nearly 20 years of membership and collective
         | service to the Divinity School and Harvard College, he's been a
         | fixture (from undergrad, to postdoc, to lecturer, to professor,
         | to joint appointee, to commencement speaker) for nearly as long
         | as I have been alive, and certainly for longer than current
         | undergrads have been alive.
         | 
         | If I devoted half that amount of time to an institution and
         | received this treatment in return, I would struggle to contain
         | my composure. I think the letter insinuates that his service to
         | Harvard stems from a love/appreciation for what the institution
         | stood for 20, 30, perhaps even 40-50 years ago. Who here
         | doesn't feel similarly about their undergrad? Of those who feel
         | that way, who else would feel irate if they were treated this
         | way in return?
        
           | endisneigh wrote:
           | To add to this, ironically the only reason he even went back
           | to Harvard (IIRC) is because he has strong feelings for
           | Harvard. He was actually tenured at Princeton when he went to
           | Harvard. So I can't blame him lol
        
         | chadash wrote:
         | > "he was declined tenure for no good reason"
         | 
         | Usually you _get_ tenure for a good reason. Plenty of very
         | talented people are denied it for no good reason. I 'm not
         | saying that his accusations are untrue, but denial of tenure
         | happens all of the time, so the onus is really on him to say
         | why he should have gotten it.
         | 
         | I feel like i'm missing some pieces of this story though. Why
         | did a previously tenured academic well into his career agree to
         | take a poorly paid job without tenure in the first place?
        
           | okareaman wrote:
           | Some people are less interested in money and status than they
           | are in discovering something original about the Universe. If
           | not original, a new take on it. Dr West strikes me as such a
           | person. I focused on the part of the letter that says he
           | wanted to explore philosophy but they miscategorized his
           | endeavors as Afro-Studies. I'd get frustrated and quit too.
        
       | mark_l_watson wrote:
       | I am really sorry he was not treated well. He is one of those
       | people who I am grateful to have in the world because they push
       | back against untrue "accepted narratives." There is so much
       | bullshit in the world, from corporations, governments, and almost
       | all news media. I look to West, Chomsky, Tulsa Gabbard and a few
       | others who I think really say and do what is right.
       | 
       | I have never seen Cornel West talk live - I need to fix that.
        
       | propter_hoc wrote:
       | Condolences for his loss, that's always terrible to deal with.
        
       | robotresearcher wrote:
       | 'no possible summer salary'
       | 
       | Summer salaries are usually paid for by research funding raised
       | by the professor from outside sources. Typically you make sure
       | your students are supported, then travel and operating costs for
       | your group, then if any funding is left over, you can pay
       | yourself summer salary.
       | 
       | Is the university preventing him from raising funds? If he is not
       | raising funds, then the expenses above could be unmet. It's hard
       | to get tenure without covering your costs.
        
         | derbOac wrote:
         | Where I was at, in an entirely different field, it wasn't
         | uncommon for faculty to obtain summer salary through summer
         | teaching. Usually that was reserved for graduate students, but
         | it was a normal thing for some faculty to have.
        
         | robotresearcher wrote:
         | backgrounder:
         | 
         | It's not obvious to outsiders that being a successful
         | researcher is expensive, and the university does not pay for it
         | after a short startup period. Harvard is unusual in that they
         | have much more internal student scholarship money than most,
         | which helps a lot. That subsidy, and the Harvard brand, means
         | that Harvard faculty have a good advantage over the field when
         | raising money.
         | 
         | On the other hand, a lot is expected of them. The university is
         | considering the opportunity cost, and the opportunity is very
         | valuable.
        
       | klyrs wrote:
       | June 30th, 2021
       | 
       | I hope and pray you and your family are well! This summer is a
       | scorcher! Here is my brief and candid letter of resignation: "How
       | sad it is to see our beloved Harvard Divinity School in such
       | decline and decay. The disarray of a scattered curriculum, the
       | disenchantment of talented yet deferential faculty, and the
       | disorientation of precious students loom large. When I arrived
       | four years ago - with a salary less than what I received 15 years
       | earlier and with no tenure status after being a University
       | Professor at Harvard and Princeton - I oped and prayed I could
       | still end my career with some semblance of intellectual intensity
       | and personal respect. How wrong I was! With a few glorious and
       | glaring exceptions, the shadow of Jim Crow was cast in its new
       | glittering form expressed in the language of superficial
       | diversity: all my courses were subsumed under Afro-American
       | Religious Studies, including those on Existentialism, American
       | Democracy, and the Conduct of Life, no possible summer salary
       | alongside the lowest increase possible every year. Yet I
       | delivered two convocation addresses and one commencement speech
       | in four years. I was promised a year sabbatical but could only
       | take one semester in practice. And to witness a faculty
       | enthusiastically support a candidate for tenure then timidly
       | defer to a rejection based on the Harvard administration's
       | hostility to the Palestinian cause was disgusting. We all new the
       | mendacious reasons given had nothing to do with academic
       | standards. When my committee recommended a tenure review - also
       | rejected by the Harvard administration - I knew my academic
       | achievements and student teaching meant far less than their
       | political prejudices. Even my good friends in the Afro-American
       | and African Studies Department were paralyzed, given their close
       | relations to the administration. And after teaching extra
       | courses, including five courses in one year, this silence
       | continued. When the announcement of the death of my beloved
       | Mother appeared in the regular newsletter, I received two public
       | replies (just as that of my colleague Dr. Jacqueline Olga Cooke-
       | Rivers who received none when her blessed Mother died). Any
       | ordinary announcement about a lecture, award or professional
       | advancement received about twenty replies! This kind of
       | narcissistic academic professionalism, cowardly deference to the
       | anti-Palestinian prejudices of the Harvard administration, and
       | indifference to my Mother's death constitute an intellectual and
       | spiritual bankruptcy of deep depths. In my case, a serious
       | commitment to Veritas requires resignation - with precious
       | memories but absolutely no regrets!"
       | 
       | Cornel West
        
       | pmoriarty wrote:
       | Does anyone have a direct link to the text of the letter?
        
         | whymauri wrote:
         | is an image OK?
         | 
         | https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E6JB3QqWQAMCsyC?format=jpg&name=...
        
           | enlyth wrote:
           | OCR of your image https://pastebin.com/raw/66mAzqyL
        
             | whymauri wrote:
             | Pleasantly surprised by the quality and turnaround -- thank
             | you for Pastebinning the letter!
        
       | stevecalifornia wrote:
       | His resignation letter chastises the school for not giving enough
       | attention to his mother's death-- he only got two condolences.
       | Does this strike anyone else as a really strange thing to bring
       | up a tally of condolences in a resignation letter?
        
         | yellow_lead wrote:
         | Yes. I was wondering if I was misunderstanding what he meant by
         | "public replies."
        
         | pradn wrote:
         | He means that his colleagues at the Divinity School don't seem
         | to care enough about him to send him a condolence for his
         | mother's death. It's about the apathetic work environment at
         | the school. That would be a problem for me, too, at my company
         | if I chose to disclose that via a public email. Hell, I have
         | several colleagues that wish me well when I have a cold.
        
           | darkerside wrote:
           | He specified public condolences. I don't think it's uncommon
           | for people to share those types of messages privately.
        
           | whymauri wrote:
           | Especially for a Divinity School, his point is that it marks
           | a fundamental departure from the spirituality and community
           | that made the school special at some point.
        
             | threatofrain wrote:
             | What does it mean to send condolences to a colleague when
             | you don't know much about their mother? That carries the
             | intimacy of sending someone a life event message because FB
             | told you so.
             | 
             | I really don't see that as "spiritually bankrupt".
        
               | ashtonkem wrote:
               | I mean, I got more than two condolences from my team when
               | I mentioned that my cat was sick, and I think my team is
               | smaller than the Harvard Divinity School.
               | 
               | Spiritually bankrupt? Not sure. It's not great though.
        
               | chrismcb wrote:
               | It has nothing to do with the mother. You would be
               | sending condolences to him. If it's about his loss.
               | Presumably his colleagues know something about him.
        
             | fidesomnes wrote:
             | Comedy gold right here.
        
             | OrvalWintermute wrote:
             | What struck me about his letter was not only that
             | specifically about the death of his mother, but he also
             | referenced the death of his colleague's mother, Dr. Cooke-
             | Rivers, received no public condolences.
             | 
             | Whether that is Spiritual Bankruptcy, or merely
             | Indifference, I know not, but it definitely reflects a
             | culture problem of sorts.
             | 
             | The best workplaces do not involve parking your humanity or
             | caring at the door.
        
           | duxup wrote:
           | He might think it is apathy, but it's not like we know their
           | motivations.
        
         | duxup wrote:
         | I don't know Cornel West, but I often find academia and some
         | who inhabit it ... sort of impenetrable to understand.
         | 
         | My theory:
         | 
         | Many of them are passionate, and it makes them good at their
         | job, but their personalities and their job and the
         | relationships with their peers seem almost inseparable...
         | resulting in the sort of mish mash of professional and personal
         | life that seem inseparable. For some almost everything can be
         | personal to some extent... and in some cases I would find it
         | inappropriate to mix all that up in the way some (not all) of
         | them do at times.
         | 
         | It doesn't make them wrong, but it makes it really hard to
         | understand. Such things happen outside of academia too, but it
         | seems particularly prevalent there in my experience.
         | 
         | At least that's how I explain it to myself when I bump into
         | such things.
        
         | handrous wrote:
         | I took it as an example of how fake and political their
         | communication has become, and/or how disconnected a "community"
         | they are. Course announcement that's easy to comment on, 20
         | pointless "that's great!" replies. Something serious and
         | personal, 0 or 2 (there are two cases mentioned, not just his)
         | because it's a channel for obligatory, performative engagement
         | with strangers, not sincere communication with close
         | colleagues.
         | 
         | It's probably intended to land best with people who are
         | familiar with how communication works in that
         | school/department, and the general atmosphere there, I'd
         | expect.
        
           | lupire wrote:
           | a tweet eulogy seems like an easy peformative act.
           | 
           | likely he suspects that colleagues are afraid to publicly
           | associate with him because he is too left wing /
           | unapologetically Black / hot topic for Harvard.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | handrous wrote:
             | Maybe, and maybe the other person with a similar experience
             | is also to be understood as similarly _persona non grata_ ,
             | for those with more insight into the circumstances.
             | 
             | This is definitely one of those "could be full of shit,
             | _or_ might barely even be scratching the surface and is
             | actually quite restrained " kind of letters. It's hard to
             | tell without more info.
        
         | germinalphrase wrote:
         | Perhaps, he expects colleagues in a _divinity school_ would be
         | more aware and responsive to such a large life event.
        
           | oh_sigh wrote:
           | Maybe religious people are less likely to offer condolences
           | because they think the deceased are in "a better place"?
        
         | klyrs wrote:
         | No, the death of a parent (depending on one's relationship) can
         | be incredibly devastating. It is certainly appropriate to bring
         | that to work, because it will almost always impact one's
         | performance.
         | 
         | Is it strange for folks to talk about a newborn child, or
         | marriage at work? Conversely, what about infant death or
         | divorce? Can you bring your "whole self" or just the good news?
        
           | war1025 wrote:
           | > Conversely, what about infant death
           | 
           | Now that I have kids, I think back every now and again to
           | when I was in high school and my math teacher's wife
           | miscarried fairly far along into the pregnancy. Looking back,
           | I'm sure that was absolutely devastating for him, but as a
           | class I don't think we gave it a second thought.
           | 
           | I feel bad about that. Kids just have no concept of how big a
           | loss that is. Hopefully the staff was more sympathetic about
           | it.
        
           | lmilcin wrote:
           | I think it is one thing to "bring that to work" and another
           | to _expect_ condolences.
           | 
           | Weren't there truly any better reasons to resign? If no, then
           | I think Harvard is really a good place to work.
        
             | handrous wrote:
             | I don't know if _anything_ in the letter is true or
             | accurate, of course, but that anecdote seemed to be
             | illustrating a subtle point for people with better insight
             | into his school than most of us have, and was definitely
             | not the only reason cited (or else it really is just a
             | weird thing to mention, which is possible, but, regardless,
             | it 's far from the only complaint)
        
             | benjaminjosephw wrote:
             | For an academic in a Divinity school, an uncaring but
             | professional environment is a dead canary. It means
             | something much worse than the lack of sympathy in that
             | moment.
             | 
             | But, if that doesn't make sense to you, how about being
             | systematically passed over for a promotion because of your
             | political views?
             | 
             | It's hard not to see this as being a crappy place to work
             | if you put yourself in his shoes.
        
               | [deleted]
        
           | stevecalifornia wrote:
           | You are right, I didn't write out my intention clearly.
           | People should bring life experiences like that to work--
           | probably shouldn't keep a scorecard though.
        
         | Black101 wrote:
         | I didn't take it that way, but the news was published in the
         | newsletter.
        
         | rdiddly wrote:
         | Yeah it's odd. Especially for those of us whose moms weren't
         | such wonderful blessed martyrs (eyeroll). Doesn't really
         | bolster any particular point either, unless maybe it's about
         | careerism in the department, but otherwise seems petty: "My
         | mom's death didn't get enough likes." Would've been good to
         | expand on the theme maybe. Although that would've incurred
         | costs to the current brevity.
        
         | LatteLazy wrote:
         | It's pretty standard for West, I remember him complaining the
         | Summers (president of harvard) didn't send him a get well soon
         | card quickly enough when he got cancer.
        
         | block_dagger wrote:
         | I thought the exact same
        
         | failwhaleshark wrote:
         | No. It's a signal of the lack of the Golden Rule /
         | interpersonal, real reciprocity. I worked at a STEM department
         | in Pac12/Ivy that was very family-like. I think that's what he
         | felt was missing and turned him off because he's a touchy-feely
         | (not John Key-style), warm guy who's a free-love hippie like
         | George Clinton.
        
         | throw7 wrote:
         | He's playing dispirited that only 2 colleagues made public
         | replies while he'd get many replies for a "narcissistic
         | academic achievement".
         | 
         | One wonders if he had gotten tenure and received much beloved
         | public replies he would resign thereafter.
        
       | iammisc wrote:
       | I'm not a fan of West's politics (look up my comment history,
       | because it's pretty clear what my politics are), but the comments
       | here making light of West's objections seem completely off the
       | mark.
       | 
       | Reading the letter I see a few extremely salient complaints:
       | 
       | 1. His first complaint is that he was a token diversity hire.
       | Instead of his courses being placed in the general coursework
       | section, his courses were put under 'African American' religious
       | studies. As many minorities know, this is a way of discounting
       | minority viewpoints. No one would dare dream put a history class
       | taught by a white professor under the 'European American studies'
       | portion. If he's teaching a course supposedly on American
       | democracy, then surely it should go under history or social
       | sciences, not 'black people social sciences'.
       | 
       | 2. Failure to compensate an appropriate amount given West's
       | celebrity status. Again, I don't particularly like West's
       | politics, but he is clearly quite the celebrity. It seems he was
       | not compensated appropriately, despite Harvard being happy to use
       | his celebrity status to further their own reputation. Pretty
       | standard employee complaint.
       | 
       | 3. His tenure application was denied despite Harvard asking him
       | to leave an existing tenured professorship. He believes his
       | application was denied not due to his teaching but because
       | Harvard disagreed with one of his political views. Again, as much
       | as I disagree with West's politics, it seems incredibly
       | disingenuous to profit off of a new employee's celebrit, tempt
       | him to join you from a stable job with promises of future
       | stability, and then to deny him tenureship because he has
       | differing opinions on some random issue.
       | 
       | 4. Despite supposedly wanting a close faculty, no one in the
       | faculty would stand up for him when his tenure was denied. The
       | fact of his mother's death not soliciting any response was not
       | brought up in isolation as other comments claim (current top
       | comment does). It was brought up in reference to the fact that no
       | one on faculty would dare speak up to the administration on his
       | behalf and it seemed like, after tenure was denied for his
       | beliefs on Palestine, he was ostracized from his department. Many
       | academics know that being ostracized in your department is not
       | good.
       | 
       | 5. Furthermore, it seemed that Harvard has a problem in not
       | focusing on the whole person. Instead, it's developed into a
       | technocratic institution (which I know from personal knowledge,
       | West decries).
       | 
       | So yeah, all the people saying this is only about his mother or
       | because of palestine are either being incredibly dense or
       | purposely deceitful.
       | 
       | Again, I disagree with basically everything West stands for, but
       | I agree with him that he shouldn't essentially be exploited and
       | then canceled. That goes against every shred of common decency.
        
         | commandlinefan wrote:
         | > No one would dare dream put a history class taught by a white
         | professor under the 'European American studies'
         | 
         | ... that's because no one would dare dream to have a 'European
         | American studies' program in the first place.
        
           | iammisc wrote:
           | That's because it's as pointless as african american studies.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-13 23:02 UTC)