[HN Gopher] Comic Books and Juvenile Delinquency (1955)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Comic Books and Juvenile Delinquency (1955)
        
       Author : uniqueid
       Score  : 50 points
       Date   : 2021-07-12 06:47 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.thecomicbooks.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.thecomicbooks.com)
        
       | BurningFrog wrote:
       | Didn't read the report, but it's always the same cycle:
       | 
       | New tech creates a new medium for expression. Young people get
       | obsessed about it, as they do. Older people get offended and
       | think it's threatening the foundations of society, as we do.
       | 
       | 2-3 decades later, what was new and dangerous is the now _the_
       | established sophisticated art, and the former youth is aghast at
       | what current youth is doing.
        
         | JackFr wrote:
         | Maybe you should read the report.
         | 
         | > 2-3 decades later, what was new and dangerous is the now the
         | established sophisticated art,
         | 
         | The report is almost exclusively devoted to violent
         | representations in horror and crime comics, which, rather than
         | becoming high art, have largely disappeared.
        
           | michaelbrave wrote:
           | I know there was heavy censorship of comics for a long time I
           | remember when I was a kid in the 90's a lot of the comics put
           | in anti censorship ads for awareness of it, I wonder if that
           | censorship contributed to this genre mostly disappearing.
        
         | ahartmetz wrote:
         | It depends. Superhero comics are not on a path to becoming high
         | culture, and I agree with that. Electronic music clubs are on a
         | path to becoming high culture (recent law change in Germany),
         | and I also agree with that.
        
           | shadowgovt wrote:
           | I suppose it depends on how you define "high culture," but
           | when Disney is making Marvel Cinematic Universe movies
           | grossing past $2.7 billion, I think it's fair to say
           | superhero comics have become something.
        
             | stronglikedan wrote:
             | I'd wager a very small percentage of the moviegoers have
             | ever even seen a comic featuring their favorite movie
             | superheroes, much less picked one up and read it.
        
               | sandworm101 wrote:
               | And I would wager that only a very small percentage of
               | Broadway audiences have ever picked up a play in paper
               | form either.
        
           | domador wrote:
           | What was the recent law change in Germany?
        
             | ahartmetz wrote:
             | In city planning, clubs will be classified in the same
             | group as theaters and operas. They were previously in the
             | same group as brothels and gambling joints.
             | 
             | https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/deutschland/gesellschaft/clu
             | b...
        
           | BurningFrog wrote:
           | Actual comic books peaked in the 90s maybe.
           | 
           | They never fully broke into mainstream culture, but in their
           | niche they were big and certainly accepted.
           | 
           | Now those characters and stories live on in "comic book
           | movies". Less employed people than me can debate to what
           | extent that is the same thing :)
        
       | throwaway9561 wrote:
       | Maybe comic books didn't lead to delinquency but they sure led to
       | something far worse. A non-stop stream of terrible Marvel movies
       | and TV shows that seem to be mandatory viewing for everyone if
       | you wanna be able to have a conversation with people nowadays
        
         | teekert wrote:
         | You have the wrong friends ;)
        
         | gambiting wrote:
         | >>A non-stop stream of terrible Marvel movies and TV shows
         | 
         | I'm always surprised when people have such a visceral reaction
         | to _anything_. There 's what, 20? 30? Proper big marvel movies
         | now - are they all terrible? I literally can't believe that -
         | yes, they are not high cinema, but there is enough variety
         | there that surely you can't describe all of them as terrible.
         | Unless I don't know, you just hate marvel and all their
         | characters?
        
           | javier10e6 wrote:
           | Granted, not all the Marvel movies are terrible. Yet They
           | have gone from a freshly squeezed orange drink to a canned
           | energy drink.
        
             | jimbokun wrote:
             | WandaVision was brilliant and innovative and unique.
             | 
             | So I don't think they are at the point yet of just cranking
             | out derivative shows and movies based on the same template.
        
             | bitwize wrote:
             | Disney has ESG obligations to meet. Classic hero stories
             | will reflect badly on their commitment to diversity.
        
         | JackFr wrote:
         | I look at the Marvel movies and TV shows and think about a
         | Westerns in the 50's. They were hugely popular, there were a
         | ton of them and some actually were quite good. in the fifties
         | the three networks produced 90 different Western series. But
         | now theres not a single one, and you could count the number of
         | of Hollywood westerns on one hand, and people wonder about the
         | awful taste which must have supported this environment.
        
         | stolenmerch wrote:
         | Naw, the "mandatory viewing" is pretty much all prestige
         | television and blockbuster movies. Marvel is just the brand
         | _you_ are particularly irritated with. It makes sense because
         | most other forms of entertainment have become too fragmented to
         | have a meaningfully shared experience with anyone. Music,
         | games, sports, arts are so niche and idiosyncratic now that a
         | water cooler conversation is hard. New blockbuster TV and
         | movies are still mainstream and accessible enough to break the
         | ice with someone.
        
         | the_doctah wrote:
         | They aren't all terrible. Black Widow is. Loki isn't.
        
           | handrous wrote:
           | Haven't seen Black Widow yet (I'm getting "wait 'till it's
           | free" vibes), but opinions of Loki are... not universally
           | good. I, for one, was skeptical about the other two shows and
           | ended up loving both except for the last episodes (which was
           | still OK for Wandavision, but outright bad in F&WS), while
           | Loki was the one I was most interested in, but I've spent
           | almost the whole time furrow-browed thinking " _how_ is this
           | _so_ bad? _How_? Why did they make that choice? Why is this
           | scene _still_ going on? "
           | 
           | What's best and what's worst in Marvel tends to draw opinions
           | that are all over the place, excepting that rarely does
           | anyone rank the two Guardians movies near the bottom. Like
           | Star Wars, I guess. You can get rankings that are wildly
           | different, except for a few things (almost no-one is going to
           | rank Empire very low, and almost no-one is going to rank AOTC
           | higher than the middle, for instance).
        
         | apocalypstyx wrote:
         | That's because events such as these (and subsequently the
         | comics code authority) made it legally and financially
         | nonviable to do anything but spandex comics for kids. Before
         | that, the contents of comics was as varied as the films and
         | pulp fiction of the time. Imagine if during the time of the
         | Hays Code people were burning celluloid in the streets (look up
         | public comic book burnings) and as a reaction studios made
         | nothing but Laurel and Hardy and Ma and Pa Kettle films and it
         | wasn't until the 80s that any kind of adult film-making re-
         | emerged in the mainstream in any substantial way.
        
           | damontal wrote:
           | The comic Planetary (DC) is a pretty good send up of this
           | phenomenon. It indirectly pays homage to the old varied
           | styles of comics while showing how the popularity of super
           | hero comics, namely The Fantastic Four, destroyed those other
           | genres.
        
         | pmoriarty wrote:
         | It's escapism. When people's lives turn to shit they want to
         | escape in to fantasy and wish-fulfillment.
        
         | uniqueid wrote:
         | Maybe comic books didn't lead to delinquency
         | 
         | I find it more interesting to entertain the possibility that
         | they _did_. It 's probably wrong (even if there were/is a
         | correlation, the cause would likely be deeper -- maybe the
         | World Wars?) but it's fun to be contrarian and seriously
         | entertain the theory.
        
           | apocalypstyx wrote:
           | If any medium can be accused of destroying the "West", it
           | would be the novel[1].
           | 
           | Terror of media has been an almost constant train of thought
           | since at least the era of Plato. But most particularly it
           | seems that Protestant Christianity is haunted by an
           | existential terror of the imaginary.[2] At the very core of
           | Christian teaching is the unease around Jesus' use of
           | parables (constructs of fiction designed to reveal truth, a
           | contradiction which has resulted in the use of much ink
           | dedicated to the explication of how the former is not really
           | involved at all). It could be argued to hearken back
           | (conceptually) even to the "Tree of Knowledge", where
           | original sin is no longer sex but knowledge itself (which
           | would include knowledge of sex).
           | 
           | [1] The Novel-Reading Panic in 18th Century in England: An
           | Outline of an Early Moral Media Panic ---
           | https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Novel-Reading-
           | Pani...
           | 
           | [2] ON DANGEROUS READING: A Warning Against The Reading of
           | Novels, Fiction, and Other Poisonous Literature (1849) --- ht
           | tp://www.truecovenanter.com/against_the_world/dabney_on_da...
        
             | et1337 wrote:
             | Tolkien and CS Lewis would like a word with you... Edit:
             | Tolkien was Catholic and CS Lewis was Anglican, but their
             | works seem popular enough with Protestants.
        
               | apocalypstyx wrote:
               | I doubt hauntings are distributed uniformly or that their
               | manifestations are identical, which for me recalls the
               | quote from _A River Runs Through It_ : "They were
               | Methodists, a denomination my father referred to as
               | Baptists who could read." And of course I have been in
               | many Baptist churches that avow from their pulpits that
               | Catholics are cultists and non-Christian.
               | 
               | Catholicism has always been far more comfortable with the
               | story and the image than its offshoots. So we can get
               | persons like Chesterton who could posit Christianity as
               | distinct in that it is the only religion in which God
               | himself becomes at atheist. And Tolkien could place
               | fiction and fact into oroborosian configurations: "Of
               | course I do not mean that the Gospels tell what is only a
               | fairy-story; but I do mean very strongly that they do
               | tell a fairy-story: the greatest. Man the story-teller
               | would have to be redeemed in a manner consonant with his
               | nature: by a moving story. But since the author of it is
               | the supreme Artist and the Author of Reality, this one
               | was also made to Be, to be true."
               | 
               | Comparatively, between him and Lewis, it might be notable
               | that in their major works only Lewis (the non-Catholic)
               | needed to explicitly bring Christianity to the fore.
               | 
               | Popularity I don't know about. As someone who grew up in
               | a household where Tolkien and Lewis were okay but
               | Dungeons and Dragons was Satanic, I think for many it's
               | more about what they assume the contents to be, rather
               | than their actual properties. It's a spectrum. As one
               | reviewer of a Christian horror series modeled after
               | _Goosebumps_ put it:  "I am not sure how I feel about
               | Christian horror books".
               | 
               | Such things tends to occupy that interstitial world of
               | alternative Christian culture that recreates rock music
               | and movies and book series, as if to have no active
               | acknowledgement of God (or perhaps such Christian culture
               | in general) for even the briefest moment is
               | indistinguishable from disbelief. It is the same mindset
               | that compels the production of textbooks that are
               | required to invoke a Bible verse to go along with every
               | math problem and to warn children that doing yoga will
               | allow you to be possessed by demons (my 5th grade health
               | book).
               | 
               | But, as I say, I doubt everything is haunted the same
               | way. There are plenty of Protestants who have no problem
               | playing D&D on a Saturday night. But, too, people aren't
               | often consistent. There are many who would defend violent
               | video games, but would then turn around and deploy
               | exactly those arguments against other types of media, as
               | if they too could somehow 'infect'.
        
             | pmoriarty wrote:
             | There's no shortage of moral panics about all sorts of
             | things, from rock and roll to dancing to drugs to games to
             | political movements to demographic changes and social
             | mobility, etc, etc, etc.
             | 
             | Anything that is seen to potentially threaten the status
             | quo is liable to upset the people who benefit from it (who
             | also tend to hold the most power in society). Combine such
             | concerns with overactive imaginations and a media which
             | thrives on sensationalism and you get the perfect storm of
             | a moral panic.
        
               | apocalypstyx wrote:
               | I don't doubt the commonplace nature of moral panic. I
               | do, however, wonder to what degree it is culturally
               | hidebound. It might, perhaps, be a general human
               | characteristic, but the cultural leeway any desire or
               | compulsion is granted is a determiner in to what it
               | effects are (and the way in which it manifests).
               | 
               | For instance, Japan experienced a similar type of moral
               | panic (through a combination of government and media)
               | around anime and manga at roughly the same time (or a
               | little after) the crusades against comic books (and
               | broader efforts against such works as _Lady Chatterley 's
               | Lover_) were ongoing in the U.S. and the U.K. However, in
               | regards to Japan, the results broke in the opposite
               | direction. Unlike in the U.S., a translation of _Lady
               | Chatterley 's Lover_ was found to be obscene, but manga
               | escaped, seemingly, relatively unscathed, and so it
               | continued to develop as a medium in general and thus,
               | now, in various incarnations, caters to a multiplicity of
               | audiences, men and women, children to elderly, students
               | to business professionals to housewives.
        
       | candiodari wrote:
       | It's funny how people never learn. There are 2000+ year old texts
       | complaining about how youth's "inability" to obey their parents,
       | and wearing Toga's "halfway" (whatever that means), will destroy
       | the future of everyone.
        
         | the-dude wrote:
         | Could you please list your sources? Because the Plato one is
         | apocryphal ( and actually from last century ) :
         | 
         | https://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/05/01/misbehave/
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | Ah, the 300 BC equivalent of rebuckling your knickerbockers
         | BELOW the knee. Scandalous!
        
           | m_myers wrote:
           | Is he starting to memorize jokes from Centurion Vilhelmus's
           | Whiz Bang?
        
             | neonnoodle wrote:
             | Are certain words creeping into his conversation?
             | Words...like... edema
        
         | ardit33 wrote:
         | Yes... and pants were banned in Rome for a while, because it
         | was mostly Germanic people wearing them at the time, and it was
         | a mark of the fall of the civilization.
         | 
         | It is like banning sneakers because there is a certain group
         | that is wearing them.... and then retroactively find the excuse
         | to why sneakers are not classy, etc... yet some of them cost a
         | lot, and proper tennis shows look great.
        
       | technothrasher wrote:
       | "Standards for such products, whether in the form of a code
       | of[sic] by the policies of individual producers, should not be
       | aimed to eliminate only that which can be proved beyond doubt to
       | demoralize youth. Rather the aim should be to eliminate all
       | materials that potentially exert detrimental effects."
       | 
       | Sounds like a job for the records department at the Ministry of
       | Truth.
        
       | aj7 wrote:
       | Remarkable creativity. As a kid, I found Wertham's book in a used
       | bookstore. A plate in the book showed a grizzly baseball game.
       | The catcher used a dismembered, decapitated torso as a chest
       | protector.
        
       | awinter-py wrote:
       | 'misuse of mailing lists' section feels surprisingly modern
        
       | blakesterz wrote:
       | Really interesting stuff from other places on what's a pretty
       | darn interesting topic...
       | 
       | There's a nicer site from The U.S. Capitol Visitor Center:
       | 
       | https://www.visitthecapitol.gov/exhibitions/congress-investi...
       | 
       | A wikipedia page:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_Subcommit...
       | 
       | And a longer read from The New Yorker with some interesting
       | details:
       | 
       | https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/03/31/the-horror
       | 
       | And entire series from Comic Book Legal Defense Fund an comics
       | censorship:
       | 
       | http://cbldf.org/resources/history-of-comics-censorship/hist...
        
         | uniqueid wrote:
         | There's also an interesting essay about the Canadian 'Fulton
         | Bill' here (via the last site you linked): 'Crime Comics Still
         | Illegal in Canada' http://cbldf.org/2016/05/crime-comics-still-
         | illegal-in-canad...
        
       | anm89 wrote:
       | Serious people doing serious stuff.
       | 
       | There's a lot of them these days as well.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-13 23:01 UTC)