[HN Gopher] The Death of the Festival
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Death of the Festival
        
       Author : rudenoise
       Score  : 108 points
       Date   : 2021-07-11 05:47 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (charleseisenstein.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (charleseisenstein.org)
        
       | spandrew wrote:
       | When all one has is a hammer (Girardian festival analogy) all of
       | the world's problems begin looking like nails... (socially
       | engineer-able solutions)
       | 
       | I can't really tell, but I think this article is arguing that the
       | carbon crisis would be solved so long as the smelly privileged
       | are allowed to have orgies in fields.
        
       | golergka wrote:
       | I spent 4 marvellous days at a semi-private psychedelic trance
       | festival in deep Russian woods this June, and I couldn't disagree
       | more. I felt as if I witnessed an event of similar cultural
       | significance as british late 80s raves were back in their day,
       | but the one that nobody outside of the community really knows
       | anything about.
       | 
       | The festival culture is alive and well, it's just got a little
       | bit private, as it tries to conceal itself from authorities and
       | masses. Burning Man, as well as many other festivals that
       | attracted crowds lost a lot of intimacy and implied freedom; I
       | just don't believe that you could feel the same way in a
       | commercial festival that has more than a thousand of attendees.
        
         | sunshineforever wrote:
         | Can I ask, would a transgender person who speaks some Russian
         | be able to reasonably safely go to Russia? I've practically
         | almost been lynched in the USA so I am wary. I carry a gun and
         | would feel pretty naked without it.
         | 
         | Pro: I used to live on the street so I don't think I would be
         | too phased by anything like average Americans.
         | 
         | So, you think it's a good idea?
        
           | golergka wrote:
           | I wrote a big comment and deleted it, because it all depends
           | on your notion of reasonable safety. If you look transgender,
           | you will certainly get glances and some occasional verbal
           | aggression, but as long as you follow the basic common sense
           | safety rules, I doubt that you'll have to worry about
           | something worse. Russia is a huge place, and living in a
           | center of Moscow does feel like one of the most modern, shiny
           | European cities. There's plenty of middle class (by US and
           | Europe standards; they're at least upper-middle class by
           | Russian standards) people living by progressive western
           | values. But there's plenty of places that aren't that
           | welcoming.
        
         | kipchak wrote:
         | These smaller festivals seem great for those who can attend,
         | but it seems like for those who can't the largest option is
         | commercialized subcultures, something like Star Wars
         | Celebration to pick an example.
        
           | MisterBastahrd wrote:
           | Except those types of festivals are marketing events, not
           | true festivals.
        
           | golergka wrote:
           | > those who can attend
           | 
           | Why wouldn't someone be able to attend? Just to clarify, I
           | saw startup founders with net worth of tens of million of
           | dollars and "true hippies" living on $300 a month and I
           | couldn't tell them apart.
        
       | jkhdigital wrote:
       | Reads a lot like Jordan Peterson. Essays on psychological
       | symbolism are hard to judge; I've read some Jung and Campbell but
       | my comprehension still feels weak.
        
       | machinehermiter wrote:
       | I am a Girardian newb but Girard even mentions sporting events in
       | the article.
       | 
       | IMO it isn't just sporting events though but violent sporting
       | events that let us exercise the scapegoat mechanism. At least in
       | the US. If your team wins, it doesn't matter your background if
       | you are both fans of the same team. I really can't think of
       | anything that quite brings us together like team sports in the
       | 21st century.
       | 
       | Obviously, if you are not a sports fan this is much harder to
       | see.
       | 
       | Burning man is too obvious, literal and it just isn't that many
       | people vs the whole of society.
       | 
       | I can remember as a little kid the mimetic desire to become my
       | favorite sports stars complete with wearing a jersey with their
       | name on my back as if I was them.
       | 
       | On a side note, it is an absolutely ridiculous situation that
       | Audible has one audio book by Girard. I would love to pass the
       | time driving in the car with a wide selection of Girard to chew
       | on.
        
       | megameter wrote:
       | It's a little bit too pat in its conclusions.
       | 
       | When watching livestreams of riots, it's really evident that the
       | chaos they produce is rather like little bursts of action, and
       | not so much a sustained pandemonium. These bursts are a thing
       | that can actually take place anytime and don't gain special value
       | because of the riot, they are just more common, more easily
       | prompted. Everyone gets behind on their narrative of events in
       | the process; though the observers'll say something is happening
       | according to their beliefs, it's not literally the thing that is
       | happening.
       | 
       | And that isn't so far removed from just an ordinary "wild party"
       | that hurts people or gets stuff smashed. It's riotous
       | specifically because of the context and political impact. There
       | aren't "sides" in a party, unless there's a gang fight or
       | something of that nature. But a riot always expresses some
       | politics.
        
       | ElViajero wrote:
       | > We know the rules of society are arbitrary, set up so that the
       | show can be played out to its conclusion.
       | 
       | This seems wrong to me. Most society rules have a reason to
       | exist. Maybe, in the past century a few of that rules have become
       | obsolete. But humanity is excellent at creating rules that makes
       | things good enough to keep going.
       | 
       | There is nothing that makes a society change its rules like a
       | change on the environment.
       | 
       | > We should not be surprised that Western societies are showing
       | signs of mass psychosis.
       | 
       | The "everything is going to hell" theory. And, as often happens,
       | without any proof or care to explain.
       | 
       | > More generally, locked in, locked down, and locked out, the
       | population's confinement within the highly controlled environment
       | of the internet is driving them crazy.
       | 
       | *Them. I guess that the author is immune to this effect.
       | 
       | I love festivals, and they make for a great opportunity to meet
       | people and create community. Also, festivals are an opportunity
       | for a community to present respect to folklore heroes and their
       | moral values, and to laugh at villain and their lack thereof.
       | Festivals are not to for "blow off steam".
        
         | michaelt wrote:
         | _> Most society rules have a reason to exist._
         | 
         | Well, it depends how broad your definition of 'rules' is.
         | 
         | I've known people who consider it a 'rule' that when wearing a
         | suit you should not do up the jacket's bottom button.
         | 
         | I can imagine a person who used this expansive definition might
         | see a great many rules as arbitrary; and enjoy a festival where
         | rules could be broken.
        
         | spurgu wrote:
         | > > We know the rules of society are arbitrary, set up so that
         | the show can be played out to its conclusion.
         | 
         | > This seems wrong to me. Most society rules have a reason to
         | exist.
         | 
         | They do have a reason to exist but that doesn't mean the rules
         | are not arbitrary.
         | 
         | Stop signs for example. They actually indicate that extra
         | caution should be taken at the crossing. Actually stopping is
         | rarely a necessity unless you want to obey the law to the
         | letter. It's an arbitrary rule designed to decrease local
         | accidents.
         | 
         | Flirting at the workplace is another. It's more complex, but
         | it's still an arbitrary rule, one that we might do without,
         | it's all about what specifically we're trying to achieve (less
         | romantic/sexual complications - positive _and_ negative - at
         | the workplace) with this arbitrary rule.
         | 
         | There are less arbitrary rules of course, like not hurting
         | other people, but most rules governing day-to-day life are
         | highly arbitrary, to the point where you live an incredibly
         | boring life unless you're a "criminal" - I don't stop at all
         | stop signs for example, which by definition makes me a
         | criminal. I also use drugs recreationally.
         | 
         | > Festivals are not to for "blow off steam".
         | 
         | Depends on the type of festival. I'd say all of them offer a
         | fresh experience out of the regular day-to-day life (which
         | could be defined as "blowing off steam"). Some might be more
         | "transcendent" than others.
        
           | derekp7 wrote:
           | There is a really good reason for stopping fully at a stop
           | sign. If your speed and that of the cross traffic vehicle is
           | matched appropriately, the vehicle will occupy the same
           | position (remain stationary) in your field of view. That can
           | cause you to miss seeing the car. By stopping then looking,
           | the car will appear in motion against a still background
           | making it much more likely to stand out.
        
             | spurgu wrote:
             | Sure, that's a good point, but it also applies to crossings
             | without stop signs. :)
        
               | InitialLastName wrote:
               | At least where I am (NE US), there are very few
               | intersections that are uncontrolled in all directions.
        
             | senkora wrote:
             | Bicycles can also be completely blocked by the car pillars
             | due to this effect.
        
         | MrBuddyCasino wrote:
         | > We know the rules of society are arbitrary
         | 
         | Author clearly has an underpowered pattern recognition module.
        
         | andrey_utkin wrote:
         | > Most society rules have a reason to exist.
         | 
         | Quite some rules are affected by such reasons as "power begets
         | power" - incumbent rulers/influencers tweaking the rulebook to
         | reward incumbent powers and compliant populace and punish
         | contenders.
         | 
         | > Maybe, in the past century a few of that rules have become
         | obsolete. But humanity is excellent at creating rules that
         | makes things good enough to keep going.
         | 
         | > There is nothing that makes a society change its rules like a
         | change on the environment.
         | 
         | From evolutionary perspective, I'd say people make up all sorts
         | of changes, to a large degree at random, according to their own
         | appetite. Then environment does its things, especially but not
         | necessarily with factors not well understood by the societies,
         | and wipes out the societies which can't survive in the new
         | environment.
         | 
         | For example, the USSR has played out the game of "more power to
         | the center, more limitations for the public, more punishments
         | for the dissenters" until it couldn't operate anymore. And
         | increasingly lots of people have seen it coming, some of them
         | decades in advance.
         | 
         | Of course you can say "well but most people have survived and
         | now the society has re-made itself", sure, but the society as
         | in the set of definitive, durable, observable social constructs
         | has ceased to exist.
        
           | enkid wrote:
           | The period directly before the fall of the Soviet Union was
           | one of liberalization and opening up. If any thing, the
           | history of the Soviet Union was on of decreasing repression
           | (in fits and with some set backs) after Stalin's death. You
           | also have to be really careful of historical predictions.
           | Lots of people make lots of predictions. Most of them are
           | wrong, and most of them aren't remembered.
        
             | tolbish wrote:
             | Liberals cause communism, liberals cause the end of
             | communism--it's just hard to keep these vague political
             | bogeymen straight sometimes.
        
               | enkid wrote:
               | Liberalization in this context has nothing to do with the
               | current usage in American politics.
        
               | tolbish wrote:
               | Liberalization was blamed both before the Soviet Union
               | was established, and again when it was dissolved. You
               | should be thinking of the former usage of both "liberals"
               | and "liberalization".
        
         | romesmoke wrote:
         | > The "everything is going to hell" theory. And, as often
         | happens, without any proof or care to explain.
         | 
         | How about an algorithmically-driven, heavily addicted, Brave-
         | New-World-resembling globalized society?
         | 
         | Why has the concept of 'proof' been lifted so many thousand
         | kilometers off its place as a useful tool in scientific
         | conduct, and placed over common sense?
        
       | bmarquez wrote:
       | The article mentions festivals as a "suspension of normal rules,
       | mores, structures, and social distinction" and riots having a
       | festive dimension. I don't know Girard's work enough to comment,
       | but wonder if is a connection between Girard and Temporary
       | Autonomous Zones[1] (which Burning Man is a large scale example
       | of)
       | 
       | As an aside, the article claims that online Burning Man failed
       | because of it was too consumption based. It's not a good example
       | since there were numerous issues including participants lacking
       | VR headsets, userbase split up into different platforms (there
       | was no singular "official" software), capacity constraints, etc.
       | I tried it on burn night (Altspace VR) and the man was floating
       | in mid-air as it was burning, so glitches too.
       | 
       | [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporary_Autonomous_Zone
        
       | pugworthy wrote:
       | As a fairly seasoned burner, I really had to shake my head at
       | this article.
       | 
       | I found it really odd that the only mention of Burning Man is how
       | the online version attempts last year didn't work so well. No
       | mention of how Burning Man fits into this "death spiral" idea -
       | or how Burning Man fails to fall into that spiral.
       | 
       | In particular, it makes this one comment stood out...
       | 
       | > A true festival is not a tame affair. It is a suspension of
       | normal rules, mores, structures, and social distinctions. Girard
       | explains:
       | 
       | OK yes, that sounds like Burning Man. But then it follows up with
       | this part of Girard's explanation...
       | 
       | > As one might expect, this destruction of differences is often
       | accompanied by violence and strife. Subordinates hurl insults at
       | their superiors; various social factions exchange gibes and
       | abuse. Disputes rage in the midst of disorder.
       | 
       | Violence and strife? Raging disputes? Hurled insults? (OK well
       | there are those megaphone people.) Seriously, the author has
       | never been to Burning Man. Or if they did go, it was a hugely
       | different experience than what I and a lot of other people ever
       | had.
       | 
       | Maybe Burning Man just isn't a festival. Or maybe burners just
       | festival differently. Or maybe the author is talking about
       | something else.
        
         | seph-reed wrote:
         | There's a lot missing in the article.
         | 
         | In particular, self-expression (IMO) has advanced a little bit.
         | Hurling insults doesn't really mean much anymore, you can do it
         | on any forum. But creating _your_ art... that means something.
         | Something that can 't be said with words.
         | 
         | It's really amazing how different peoples experiences can be
         | though. Even going to the big burn, many never reach that
         | "escape velocity."
        
           | pugworthy wrote:
           | > Even going to the big burn, many never reach that "escape
           | velocity."
           | 
           | Very true.
           | 
           | And you bring up an interesting point in terms of creating
           | your own art. There are festivals where people arrive and
           | proclaim, "Entertain me!" Whereas there are others (like
           | Burning Man) where people often come to express themselves
           | and share their creations. Even those not bringing a lot
           | often go just to experience the joy of the creations of
           | others.
        
       | gverrilla wrote:
       | >The natural order is unraveling. Plagues, floods, droughts,
       | political unrest, riots, and economic crises strike one upon the
       | next
       | 
       | Interesting concept of "natural order". What "natural" means in
       | this context? What about "order"? Would lets say genocide be
       | considered a part of natural order aswell?
       | 
       | >Societies have faced such circumstances repeatedly throughout
       | history, just as we face them today.
       | 
       | Fake news. Doesn't understand History.
        
         | f6v wrote:
         | I love this meme [1]. We're living in the best society to date.
         | On average, of course.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://www.reddit.com/r/memes/comments/aylts5/not_a_cellpho...
        
       | ethn wrote:
       | Or consider Wittgenstein. Maybe people attend festivals just
       | because it's fun.
        
       | secretsatan wrote:
       | Stopped reading at `Systemic use of natural and alternative
       | healing modalities could vastly reduce covid mortality`
        
         | Trufa wrote:
         | Why? You might disagree but the article is interesting?
         | 
         | Can you also assert that there's nothing "natural" you can do
         | that would systematically _help_ with COVID prevention?
         | Quitting smoking, running, healthy inmune system with dieting
         | and so on?
        
           | Tenoke wrote:
           | That's not particularly alternative, it's interventions
           | completely accepted by the medical system.
        
           | tokai wrote:
           | Quitting smoking is not what natural means here. Natural &
           | Alternative is a catch all term for holistic medicine.
        
           | secretsatan wrote:
           | That's not what he means and you know it.
        
             | Trufa wrote:
             | I'm honestly not sure what he means. I may disagree with
             | most, but I'm just surprised about people stopping reading
             | when they hear something they disagree with.
             | 
             | It's not even the central point of the article.
        
               | spurgu wrote:
               | Yeah this is a major problem in the political landscape
               | overall. Like for example refusing to read anything by
               | conservatives just because you happen to disagree with
               | them on abortion issues. You're going to be a) missing
               | out on a lot of insights and b) even worse, create a
               | divide where you can't even understand the other side
               | anymore just because you outright refuse to hear them
               | out.
               | 
               | I tripped on that sentence myself but continued reading
               | since it seemed like a minor point to the actual story
               | and I wasn't disappointed.
        
               | eplanit wrote:
               | It's stopping reading at a sentence dripping with pseudo
               | intellectualism. When writers try too hard to sound
               | intelligent and erudite it's off-putting, and a
               | "bullshit" indicator.
        
               | worldsayshi wrote:
               | I agree that it puts me off as well but it's also feels a
               | bit like a no true Scotsman fallacy. If we're always on
               | the lookout for "bad words" then we will eventually set
               | up impossible standards for how we speak.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | worldsayshi wrote:
         | Feels like you're throwing out the baby with the bathwater a
         | bit there.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Ok, but please don't post unsubstantive comments to Hacker
         | News.
        
         | dr_dshiv wrote:
         | Physical exercise, breathwork, healthy diets and diverse immune
         | exposure all seem rather "holistic" and yet seem rather likely
         | to reduce covid mortality -- perhaps much more so than, say,
         | Remdesvir
        
           | dandellion wrote:
           | > Physical exercise, breathwork, healthy diets and diverse
           | immune exposure
           | 
           | I've gone to "mainstream healing" doctors and they always
           | recommend exercise, have a good diet, etc. When people say
           | "alternative healing" that's not usually what they mean.
        
           | rozab wrote:
           | When people refer to natural or alternative medicine, they're
           | not usually talking about common sense lifestyle changes
           | universally endorsed by the medical establishment. That's
           | just regular medicine.
        
             | dr_dshiv wrote:
             | You'd think so, but no. My father had amazing cancer care
             | but the idea of prescribing him yoga or actually any kind
             | of light physical fitness program was considered
             | "integrative" medicine and basically outside of the
             | mainstream. This is changing. But "regular medicine" is, at
             | present, very much _not_ a holistic healing practice.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | blobbers wrote:
       | "None of the problems facing humanity today are technically
       | difficult to solve. Holistic farming methods could heal soil and
       | water, sequester carbon, increase biodiversity, and actually
       | increase yields to swiftly solve various ecological and
       | humanitarian crises. Simply declaring a moratorium on fishing in
       | half the world's oceans would heal them too"
       | 
       | What kind of sanctimonious BS is this. I stopped reading because
       | his thinking did not appear to be worth my time. And I came here
       | to the comments to check if I was correct or not...
        
         | beckman466 wrote:
         | > sanctimonious BS
         | 
         | Ah yes, using big words and no actual critique. Can you please
         | put more effort into this and explain why this post is
         | "sanctimonious BS" to you?
        
       | 3np wrote:
       | > As for Burning Man and the transformational music & art
       | festivals, these have exercised some of the festival's authentic
       | function - until recently, when their exile to online platforms
       | stripped them of any transcendental possibility. Much as the
       | organizers are doing their best to keep the idea of the festival
       | alive, online festivals risk becoming just another show for
       | consumption. One clicks into them, sits back, and watches. In-
       | person festivals are different. They start with a journey, then
       | one must undergo an ordeal (waiting in line for hours). Finally
       | you get to the entrance temple (the registration booth), where a
       | small divination ritual (checking the list) is performed to
       | determine your fitness to attend (by having made the appropriate
       | sacrifice - a payment - beforehand). Thereupon, the priest or
       | priestess in the booth confers upon the celebrant a special
       | talisman to wear around the wrist at all times. After all this,
       | the subconscious mind understands one has entered a separate
       | realm, where indeed, to a degree at least, normal distinctions,
       | relations, and rules do not apply. Online events of any kind rest
       | safely in the home. Whatever the content, the body recognizes it
       | as a show.
       | 
       | I don't buy it. Surely there are still burns and de-facto lawless
       | (as long as safety of others is not violated, and by that I'm not
       | talking about social distancing or masks) festivals happening
       | worldwide still? It's just that most government/corporate-backed
       | ordeals, and huge (1k+ participants) events are called off.
       | 
       | Here in JP (an otherwise famously very restrictive and normative
       | society), meat-space outdoors raves/festivals and rainbow-like
       | gatherings have been thriving during the pandemic, even moreso
       | now during the summer, likely due to the nerfing of indoor club
       | events.
       | 
       | May be the case for other scenes as well; this is just the one
       | I'm personally familiar with presently.
       | 
       | From my limited perspective the festival scene is more active
       | than ever: There are multiple 1-to-3-day raves/music festivals
       | happening every week within 2h drive from where I'm at in the
       | sleepy conforming boonies, states of emergency or not. There is
       | certainly code, but I argue at least the events my friend groups
       | have been frequenting are easily breaking social norms enough
       | that they're still valid under their definition. They may be
       | smaller, but they're more in numbers and frequency.
       | 
       | From what I hear, the fetish subscenes also alive, active, and
       | well.
       | 
       | If it still happens here, I'd be surprised if it wasn't the case
       | most everywhere. I suspect the author hasn't been seriously
       | surveying their locale.
       | 
       | (I certainly don't go rave every week; I know people who do,
       | though. I gave up trying to preach to people that they should act
       | COVID-safer. Party people gonna party people)
        
         | mxfh wrote:
         | Ironically COVID might save festival culture from total
         | megacorp commercialization for another generation while giving
         | back outdoor rave their clandestine feel, While being
         | comparably safe compared to indoor booze-fests.
         | 
         | Regarding online, the emerging 'just chatting' Twitch rave
         | scene is something to behold in it's anarchism.
        
           | thinkingemote wrote:
           | Could you give me some pointers to find them on twitch in
           | that category? Do they use tags or common words in the
           | titles? "Rave"?
        
             | mxfh wrote:
             | A german article on that phenomenon is here:
             | https://www.dj-lab.de/reportage-die-fabelhafte-welt-der-
             | twit...
             | 
             | Yes a bit german heavy, but quite remarkle in contrast with
             | the polished stuff like `cercle`.
        
         | jkhdigital wrote:
         | I think the point of that passage is that "online" festivals no
         | longer provide the function of the archetypal festival and are
         | reduced to mere entertainment. Clearly, _many_ festivals
         | suffered this fate during the pandemic, and individuals
         | accustomed to attending them had to go without or find
         | alternatives.
         | 
         | Also, I'd argue that niche or underground "festival" activity
         | doesn't really live up the archetypal ideal anyway--traditional
         | festivals cut across the societal spectrum.
        
       | motohagiography wrote:
       | Appears the writing is on the wall, as it were. Some years after
       | Girard, Nassim Taleb riffed on a similar theme he called
       | "suppressed volatility," where he started with risk being akin to
       | a kind of energy that could not be created or destroyed, and the
       | inevitable consequence of suppressing volatility was a kind of
       | mean reversion or explosion on the other direction. I'd never
       | consider Taleb as simpler or less wordy than anyone, but in this
       | case, he seems more succinct than Girard on a similar topic.
       | 
       | Carnivals and festivals today are still role reversals, where
       | some Burners described it to me as for a week in the desert,
       | artists and working people become administrators and facilitators
       | where in regular life they may have little formal authority in
       | their own roles, but here they are the volunteer leaders and make
       | the whole thing go, and then white collar people who spend their
       | lives projecting an edgeless affect can walk around naked,
       | anonymous, and high. No doubt it's more than that, but as
       | something that puts the carnal in carnival, it was a useful
       | description.
       | 
       | Personally, I think Girardian warnings of scapegoating rituals
       | are late arriving words for a greater dynamic that appears to
       | have been set in motion, as though if we've heard of his ideas
       | and work, it's because we already needed to know them. The
       | author's admonition that storm clouds are gathering is a
       | pervasive sentiment in conversations I've had lately, but to
       | extend the metaphor, everyone thinks they need to prepare for a
       | storm, without considering that what they should be worried about
       | is a flood and its aftermath.
       | 
       | I wish festivals could help relieve some of the tectonic social
       | pressures of the last few years, but as he points out, whether
       | they are sanctioned events with artists, or just riots and worse,
       | they're going to happen one way or another.
        
         | schemathings wrote:
         | When I returned from my first burn I described it to friends as
         | a carnival where everyone brings their own ride, and bonus
         | points if its something ridiculous you imagined when you were a
         | kid at your first carnival (a fire-breathing octopus for
         | example)
        
       | jostylr wrote:
       | It reminds me of the discussion of forest fires and whether to
       | let the smaller fires burn to avoid the big, devastating fires.
       | And then there is the question of intentionally starting fires to
       | do the role of the smaller ones.
       | 
       | Given how that debate is not even agreed upon, it is hard to
       | believe that one could come to much of an understanding of the
       | Festival and its need with humans.
        
       | readflaggedcomm wrote:
       | >Every human being knows, if only unconsciously, that we are not
       | the roles and personae we occupy in the cultural drama of life.
       | 
       | Reminds me of Catcher in the Rye, only older and more cynical.
       | 
       | The author should reconsider "connection to a reality that is
       | non-conventional": the physical activity he lists is only non-
       | conventional to a select few, especially in the past. His
       | evidence feels like an argument for festivals as a ward against
       | idleness, not as a relief valve of simulated violence, which is
       | poorly-justified.
       | 
       | Perhaps Girard put too much faith in what "genuine artists" sense
       | out of something like a harvest festival, which is the leisure of
       | hard-working laborers. The author might consider that daily labor
       | could be more violent than playful festivals, and what Girard
       | sensed may have been relief from that, not from a crisis averted.
        
       | bsenftner wrote:
       | He's on to something. The prose drops little passages easy to
       | criticize, but the overall essay has good reasoning. I strongly
       | agree the events one attends creating an alternative reality are
       | more therapeutic and necessary than many are willing to admit.
        
         | mojuba wrote:
         | I also liked the idea that true festivals (and riots) can serve
         | as a regular reminder what it means to not have order in the
         | society. It's a big immersive "what if" show.
        
         | smackeyacky wrote:
         | Where did you find any nugget of wisdom hiding in this
         | dangerous bunkum? Holistc healing and organic farming are what
         | we abandoned so we wouldn't starve to death or mistake sepsis
         | for being bedevilled. There isn't any reason in any of it, the
         | whole essay is abandonment of reason.
        
           | jazzyjackson wrote:
           | Holistic healing and organic farming haven't been abandoned
           | at all, industrial farming and pharmaceuticals have merely
           | dwarfed them thanks to its economic efficiency.
           | 
           | But building soil and mixing a little wu with your morning
           | stretches never hurt anyone (you do stretch in the morning,
           | don't you?)
        
       | jeegsy wrote:
       | You could almost rework this to be a promotion for "The Purge"
       | movies
        
       | sandworm101 wrote:
       | The author has obviously never been to Comicon. The festivals are
       | still there, they just aren't manditory anymore. We no longer
       | inist that everyone enjoy the same setpiece festivals at the
       | government-approved times and locations. Compared to the past, we
       | are now all free to participate in or even create our own
       | festivals.
        
       | mbg721 wrote:
       | This is mixing up the cause and the effect. What's happening
       | isn't society fracturing for lack of occasions to break the
       | rules, it's that society can't invent occasions to break the
       | rules if it can't agree what the rules are. Which side of the
       | culture war is going to be given up when "violent unanimity" is
       | achieved at the end of the festival?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-12 23:01 UTC)