[HN Gopher] Cyberpunk derivatives
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Cyberpunk derivatives
        
       Author : hidden-spyder
       Score  : 70 points
       Date   : 2021-07-11 12:24 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org)
        
       | fhars wrote:
       | How many of these come with their own genre of heavy metal music?
        
         | Semaphor wrote:
         | Steampunk actually exists as subgenre of metal, rock, and folk
         | ;)
        
         | bnbond wrote:
         | We can hope all of them!
         | 
         | For real though, solarpunk at least has a nicely growing scene
         | on Bandcamp. There's a compilation album of various artists
         | simply called "Solarpunk".
        
       | Hamuko wrote:
       | Missing "brainpunk", which according to SCARLET NEXUS producers
       | is a thing.
        
       | agbell wrote:
       | > Cyber noir is subgenre that combines elements of noir and
       | cyberpunk.
       | 
       | Isn't cyber punk supposed to be film noir set in a high tech
       | future? So we just increasing the amount of film noir to get
       | Cyber Noir?
        
         | spfzero wrote:
         | That one really stood out to me as well. All of the early
         | Cyberpunk I remember reading seemed noir as hell. But maybe
         | Cyberpunk has become such a big tent that "original" Cyberpunk
         | needs a new name.
        
         | stevula wrote:
         | Snow Crash is cyberpunk but it would be a stretch to call it
         | noir.
        
         | microtherion wrote:
         | Yes, I think cyberpunk was always film noir inspired. E.g. I
         | seem to recall that William Gibson was influenced by Dashiel
         | Hammett.
        
       | hprotagonist wrote:
       | i favor the works ostensibly written as parodies that wind up
       | accidentally defining the genre.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | rm_-rf_slash wrote:
         | Heh, then it's no accident your username references Snow Crash.
        
       | riffraff wrote:
       | I wonder if the hyper taxonomization of genres is something
       | specific to our era.
       | 
       | When I was a kid we barely distinguished between horror and
       | thriller but nowadays books are written on the subtle differences
       | between slipstream and new weird, and the subgenres of fantasy
       | and sci-fi are legions.
       | 
       | Maybe it's Wikipedia's fault.
        
         | agarsev wrote:
         | I think it is fine to pursue this ever increasingly detailed
         | classification of things (not only in art or pop culture, this
         | applies to other knowledge too, including science). The problem
         | might come if one takes one of these descriptive, post-hoc
         | classifications, ignores the fact that they are often diffuse
         | and imperfect, and then tries to use it as a predictive model
         | to explain and deal with everything, and discard any data that
         | doesn't fit. But people like meta, so it might not even be a
         | problem :)
        
         | the_rectifier wrote:
         | More nuance is the opposite of a problem.
        
           | user-the-name wrote:
           | Hyper-specialised labelling is the opposite of nuance.
        
         | tomjen3 wrote:
         | My school library had maybe 3 foot shelves dedicated to
         | scifi/fantasy.
         | 
         | Today I can buy the most obscure books I want on Amazon.
         | 
         | Maybe that is why we have more taxonomies now.
        
         | tedunangst wrote:
         | The anti romantic movement consisting of Hawthorne and Melville
         | comes to mind.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | JimiofEden wrote:
         | It might also just be a matter of growing up and suddenly
         | realizing that everything seems so much more defined than
         | previously thought.
         | 
         | Anecdotally, but I also noticed that from around 2000 to 2010,
         | suddenly everything needed to be categorized very specifically.
         | 
         | But what stood out is that people would get very weirdly upset
         | if you put something in the wrong box, and all but start a
         | fight about it (over forums, of course.) This was especially
         | prevalent in the electronic music scene, but happens to this
         | day during video game genre discussions.
        
           | Kye wrote:
           | The "Is Zelda an RPG?" hell threads come to mind.
        
       | prionassembly wrote:
       | Came in expecting these to be like an exotic kind of option.
        
       | MichaelMoser123 wrote:
       | Never dared to ask: is Vonneguth a cyberpunk author?
        
         | Jtsummers wrote:
         | Vonnegut. No h. Which book? I've read most of his novels and
         | most of what's considered cyberpunk (well, nothing recent
         | though). I can't think of any of his books that would fit the
         | cyberpunk genre. Closest _might_ be _Player Piano_ which hits a
         | few of the themes, but isn't really cyberpunk and is more
         | dystopian.
        
           | MichaelMoser123 wrote:
           | maybe books by Vonnegut don't qualify, but Kilgore Trouts
           | stuff does.
        
           | __s wrote:
           | Harrison Bergeron involves the opposite of cyber
           | augmentations
           | 
           | He definitely writes with enough cynicism towards technology
           | to fit the genre
        
           | MichaelMoser123 wrote:
           | Slapstick?
        
             | Jtsummers wrote:
             | That's actually among the few I haven't gotten to yet so I
             | couldn't comment on it.
        
       | Nbox9 wrote:
       | So many of these genres are applied to works long after they have
       | been completed. For example, The Flintstones are labeled as
       | stonepunk, even though it originally aired in the early 60s.
        
         | teddyh wrote:
         | The Flintstones was in effect an animated remake of popular
         | live-action TV series _The Honeymooners_ , with the stone-age
         | setting as just an added quirky facade to get easy jokes out
         | of. It was, needless to say, never meant as an actual reference
         | to any actual stone-age.
         | 
         | Compare this to, say, _Dinosaurs_ , which (while in many ways
         | similar to _The Flintstones_ ) had actual references to
         | contemporary events and phenomena.
        
         | platz wrote:
         | There are probably only a handful of people in the world using
         | the term stonepunk, while steampunk is quite popular. Most of
         | the obscure references here do not have broad adoption. In
         | order for a genre to have influence it has to have cultural
         | resonance
        
         | kijin wrote:
         | That happens with every genre. Genres are labels. You can
         | attach them to works long after the fact, whether the original
         | creator(s) intended or not.
         | 
         | Jules Verne wrote steampunk a century before the term was even
         | coined. Cervantes wrote a novel before novels were a thing (at
         | least in the West), and thereby defined what a novel should
         | look like. _The Epic of Gilgamesh_ predates the Greek tradition
         | of epic poetry by at least a millennium, but nobody denies that
         | it 's an epic poem.
        
           | danidiaz wrote:
           | Don Quixote is windmillpunk! Less facetiously, it's a work
           | informed by the technological developments of its time.
           | http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/obra-visor/cervantes-
           | bulleti...
           | 
           | According to this article
           | https://www.depauw.edu/sfs/backissues/2/plank2art.htm
           | "windmills were first erected in La Mancha thirty years or
           | less before Don Quixote was written" and this gives new
           | nuances to Quixote's delusion.
           | 
           | That's not the only encounter with "advanced" technology;
           | there's also the episode with the water-powered "fulling-
           | hammers" https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/d/don-
           | quixote/summary...
           | 
           | Don Quixote also rails against modern military technology
           | like firearms.
        
       | jameshart wrote:
       | Cyberpunk derivatives? I guess _cyberpunk futures_ are a well
       | defined market (some would argue we are living in one right now),
       | but are there also _cyberpunk options_ and _cyberpunk swaps_?
        
         | thebooktocome wrote:
         | You jest, but one of the main features of cyberpunk is a sense
         | of hauntology, the economy of _futures that never were_ :
         | 
         | "Is hauntology, then, some attempt to revive the supernatural,
         | or is it just a figure of speech? The way out of this unhelpful
         | opposition is to think of _hauntology as the agency of the
         | virtual_ , with the spectre understood not as anything
         | supernatural, but as that which acts without (physically)
         | existing."
         | 
         | -- Mark Fisher, Ghosts of My Life, emph. added.
        
       | q-big wrote:
       | See also "Punk Punk" on TV Tropes:
       | 
       | > https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PunkPunk
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-11 23:02 UTC)