[HN Gopher] Life Advice: Become a Billionaire
___________________________________________________________________
Life Advice: Become a Billionaire
Author : danboarder
Score : 20 points
Date : 2021-07-10 20:24 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (applieddivinitystudies.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (applieddivinitystudies.com)
| nonameiguess wrote:
| > In practice, we can easily generate a reasonable lower bound
| for the probability. Just take the number of billionaires and
| divide by a count of the total human population. You end up with
| a small number, but one considerably larger than 0.
|
| I just got 0.000000354. I guess it's a matter of opinion what
| counts as "considerably larger than 0," but that's a pretty small
| chance.
|
| That's really _not_ the lower bound, either. That 's the average
| probability for all people, but some people's chances are much
| higher than that. For Jeff Bezos' kids, the chance is nearly 1.
| That means the chance for other people needs to be lower to come
| out with the number of billionaires we actually have.
|
| I don't really want to put aside that advice like this
| necessarily can't scale because the number of people taking the
| advice changes how effective the strategy can be. In the limit,
| if every single person on the planet tried to found their own AI
| tech startup, 0 of them would succeed and humanity would quickly
| go extinct as we no longer had food because all the farmers quit
| to found AI startups.
|
| We may or may not need _some_ people trying to become
| billionaires, but we definitely do not want _all_ people trying
| to become billionaires.
| caffeine wrote:
| Excellent article, thank you. It's OK and even rational to be
| ambitious.
| maverick-iceman wrote:
| Life advice addendum.
|
| Become a Billionaire in a manner which is so quiet that only the
| IRS knows that you are one, even better not even them :)
| MaxBarraclough wrote:
| Why should I assume I would be a better philanthropist
| billionaire than the next guy? To make a 'greater good' case for
| becoming a billionaire, this seems like a question we need to
| explore.
|
| > the odds of becoming a billionaire are low, but it doesn't
| matter if you only consider the conditional probabilities. [...]
| The bet sounds insane to begin with, but at each step you're
| taking on a very reasonable level of risk.
|
| I'm still not convinced that it makes self-interested sense to do
| the risky thing and spin the billionaire roulette wheel i.e.
| leave a steady well-paying job and try my luck with a start-up.
| (Ignoring that some people just prefer being in a start-up, and
| some prefer not being in a start-up.)
|
| The most likely outcome is a significantly reduced personal
| wealth. There's a vanishingly small probability of vastly
| increased personal wealth, but as the article acknowledges, this
| suffers from diminishing returns. It's a question of what
| statisticians call 'expected value', and it seems unlikely to me
| that spinning the wheel improves the expected value of the sum of
| my happiness and life-satisfaction numbers. Even if I increase
| the expected value of my wealth, the non-linearity will
| presumably easily outweigh this.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-07-10 23:02 UTC)