[HN Gopher] Private Security Force That Works with Citizen Wants...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Private Security Force That Works with Citizen Wants the Power to
       Arrest People
        
       Author : neom
       Score  : 26 points
       Date   : 2021-07-10 17:53 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.vice.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.vice.com)
        
       | zepto wrote:
       | Seems like the natural corollary to defund the police. People who
       | can afford to do so will hire private services.
        
         | mc32 wrote:
         | This already happens in parts of the world where the police are
         | ineffective in combating rampant crime.
        
         | DeliriumTrigger wrote:
         | Look at that as retarded right wing and racist as the last of
         | your comments.
        
           | rayiner wrote:
           | I know you're just trolling, but for the benefit of the
           | reader: https://www.businessinsider.com/eric-adams-defund-
           | the-police...
           | 
           | > In an interview with New York Magazine published Tuesday,
           | Adams said the "defund the police" movement is led not by
           | people of color in the Big Apple, but rather by young white
           | professionals.
           | 
           | Adams is absolutely correct. He ran on a common-sense
           | approach to policing, and won every non-white constituency in
           | NYC. Maya Wiley supported defunding and her base was affluent
           | white professionals: https://nypost.com/2021/07/04/nyc-mayor-
           | race-shows-its-well-...
           | 
           | > But despite her leftish credentials, Wiley won only 22
           | percent of first-choice votes. She carried no assembly
           | districts in Manhattan or The Bronx and none with large black
           | percentages.
           | 
           | Calling criticism of defunding the police "racist" is an
           | classic example of how left-wing white people (and non-whites
           | platformed mainly by white people, whether in the media or
           | academic) invoke the moral authority of purporting to speak
           | people of color to push their own agendas.
        
             | DeliriumTrigger wrote:
             | Nice to dig even deeper.
        
               | rayiner wrote:
               | Sorry, what's racist--or at least unseemly in the same
               | way as stolen valor--is white progressives trading on the
               | political capital of POC to further their own ends.
               | 
               | I was never opposed to "identity politics" until I
               | realized that, because white liberals control most media
               | outlets as well as institutions, it's trivial to invoke
               | people's identities for political ends without actually
               | having their support. CNN will have some professor of XYZ
               | studies on TV, but who selected that professor to be on
               | TV? Or granted her tenure?
        
         | p49k wrote:
         | That's disingenuous, given that the movement is about allowing
         | police to _only_ focus on security rather than trying to solve
         | every societal ill.
         | 
         | https://mobile.twitter.com/nskorpen/status/12841449250392637...
        
           | zepto wrote:
           | It isn't even remotely disingenuous to say that 'defund the
           | police' is literally about abolition.
           | 
           | It is widely reported on:
           | 
           | https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/12/opinion/sunday/floyd-
           | abol...
           | 
           | https://www.vice.com/en/article/ep4xy7/what-does-defund-
           | and-...
           | 
           | https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/democrats-mean-it-when-
           | the...
        
             | brundolf wrote:
             | I think the movement is not homogenous. "Defunding" can be
             | partial.
        
               | zepto wrote:
               | Indeed - which is why claiming that the movement is only
               | saying only one thing is misleading.
        
           | Rebelgecko wrote:
           | Who gets to gatekeep what the movement is actually about?
           | I've seen quite a few at protests with signs saying "abolish
           | the police". Seems like those people don't want police to
           | focus on security.
           | 
           | AFAIK there hasn't been any polls to see preferences for the
           | desired level of defunding w/in the movement. I wouldn't be
           | surprised if 100% defunding was a plurality (but not a
           | majority)
        
             | harimau777 wrote:
             | The way that I would approach it is to try to take the
             | strongest version of a given argument; particularly if that
             | is the argument that the leaders/spokesmen in a movement
             | are making.
        
           | mc32 wrote:
           | Unfortunately that's not what the vocal proponents of defund
           | the police mean. When asked they say yes it literally means
           | defund and reduce the police force.
           | 
           | It's like saying, here, we'll keep the price of a box of
           | cereal the same (but reduce the mass on the sly).
        
         | MeinBlutIstBlau wrote:
         | It sounds like South Africa. As garbage as US police can be
         | sometimes, it's miles better than hoping you're within your
         | private security force zone being afraid to leave it.
        
       | fogihujy wrote:
       | Jennifer Government was satire and not a manual.
        
       | MikeUt wrote:
       | > "Private security has zero authority on a public space," he
       | later laments.
       | 
       | An excellent argument against the privatization of public space,
       | such as those privately-owned parks publicized during the Wall
       | Street protests.
        
       | throwaway0a5e wrote:
       | So what's the big deal here? This is no different than any
       | chartered university police department, transit infrastructure
       | police, port police or govern department specific security force.
       | All those forces exist for no reason other than to prioritize
       | calls that would get laughed off or a "we'll get to it when we
       | get to it" response from a local or state police department.
       | 
       | The rent-a-cops employed by the company named in TFA have little
       | difference from government rent-a-cops performing the same duties
       | beyond who's letterhead they get their pay stubs on.
       | 
       | Frankly I think allowing security forces to have police powers is
       | crap loaded with perverse incentives and ripe for abuse. But also
       | I see no reason why being buddy-buddy with the .gov should get
       | the above mentioned types of security agencies law enforcement
       | power while a private security force securing a private facility
       | cannot do the same. Rent-a-cop is rent-a-cop. Either they all get
       | to arrest a hobo for peeing in a corner or none of them do.
        
       | nradov wrote:
       | It's sad that the situation has come to this. Los Angeles and
       | some other large cities have basically given up on enforcing
       | minor crimes and so those who can afford it hire private
       | security. Unfortunately this will make the situation worse for
       | everyone in the long run by removing the pressure on the
       | government to find real solutions
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-10 23:02 UTC)