[HN Gopher] The Ramanujan Machine
___________________________________________________________________
The Ramanujan Machine
Author : max_
Score : 37 points
Date : 2021-07-10 17:32 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.ramanujanmachine.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.ramanujanmachine.com)
| yarg wrote:
| What subset of the reals can be constructed with this machine?
| lovebes wrote:
| Why can't this be a source to mine instead of hashes for
| cryptocurrency? Seems like it's more beneficial to science if a
| coin was built around it.
| mediocregopher wrote:
| A key component of the hash algorithm used by blockchain is
| that difficulty can be adjusted, such that the algorithm
| ensures that the difficulty to mine the next block
| increases/decreases based on how long it took previous blocks
| to mine. In this way the network can attempt to maintain a
| predictable rate of blocks being mined as mining power
| fluctuates.
|
| So for this to be a good computation for a blockchain to use it
| would have to have a way to modify difficulty in a predictable
| way.
| MathYouF wrote:
| This is only a problem if you care about predictable rate of
| blocks being mined right?
|
| What reasons besides predictable inflation are there for
| desiring that property?
| [deleted]
| Taek wrote:
| The security properties of Proof of Work cryptocurrency are
| derived from the wastefulness. We want to be confident that
| everyone has the same cost when producing a block.
|
| If the problems being solved are useful, they are potentially
| more useful to some parties than others, meaning some parties
| may have a lower cost to attack the blockchain, because it was
| computation they needed to spend money on anyway, might as well
| attack a blockchain while you are at it.
|
| I can try to explain further if that's confusing.
| MathYouF wrote:
| Doesn't this ignore the real world realities of economies of
| scale though with the physical materials being used? I'd
| enjoy a bit deeper explanation for this if you don't mind. :)
| sega_sai wrote:
| I don't think professional mathematicians think highly of this
| https://www.galoisrepresentations.com/2019/07/07/en-passant-...
| Y_Y wrote:
| Looks cool, so cool that I'm certain Fabrice Bellard or John
| Conway probably did it already.
| sahil50 wrote:
| Wyler's derivation of the fine structure constant might be the
| accurate one, and what the Machine will churn out sooner or
| later. Resembles the Stefan Boltzmann constant in form and
| function.
| gus_massa wrote:
| Previous discussion:
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20352252 (158 points | July
| 4, 2019 | 28 comments)
|
| But note that it just generate special cases of a well known
| formula. More details in " _The Ramanujan Machine is all hype_ "
| https://www.galoisrepresentations.com/2019/07/17/the-ramanuj...
| (HN discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26144665 (40
| points | 4 months ago | 16 comments))
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-07-10 23:01 UTC)