[HN Gopher] The curious death of Oppenheimer's mistress (2015)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The curious death of Oppenheimer's mistress (2015)
        
       Author : Hooke
       Score  : 79 points
       Date   : 2021-07-07 04:45 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (blog.nuclearsecrecy.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (blog.nuclearsecrecy.com)
        
       | trimbo wrote:
       | > More recently, and more sensationally, there is an entire
       | chapter on Tatlock's death in Kai Bird and Martin Sherwin's
       | biography of Oppenheimer
       | 
       | I read American Prometheus last summer, and did not walk away
       | with any inkling that the discussion of Tatlock's death was
       | sensational at all. I just re-skimmed that chapter and while it
       | documents the questions others brought up later, the authors do
       | not seem to imply they thought it was more than a suicide. They
       | conclude by saying Oppenheimer never thought it more than
       | suicide.
        
         | mywittyname wrote:
         | From those snippets of interviews, it sounds like he really
         | loved her. I can't imagine how I'd feel if a person I love died
         | because of me. When the choices are to believe that they A)
         | committed suicide, or B) were murdered for being affiliated
         | with you by a powerful person who clearly has you in their
         | sights, you probably try your damnedest to make yourself
         | believe A.
        
       | hindsightbias wrote:
       | Also interesting: https://knowledgenuts.com/atom-bomb-creator-
       | tried-to-poison-...
        
         | bjornsing wrote:
         | Wow, if eating that apple would have been lethal... that's
         | insane... But I somehow doubt that it would have.
        
       | MichaelMoser123 wrote:
       | interesting, it sounds that they had quite a bit of security
       | around the Manhatan project, now how did they manage to ignore
       | such a big number of real spies?
        
         | mywittyname wrote:
         | Probably due to a good bit of misdirection aided by real spies.
         | The obsession with "communists" always struck me as counter
         | productive. What real Soviet spy would openly operate in
         | communist/pro-Soviet circles? A spy who wanted to stay hidden
         | would be a WASPy white supremacist who'd punch anyone that
         | disrespected the flag.
         | 
         | Intelligence operatives probably feed these communist groups
         | with enough mundane operations to overwhelm the counter-
         | intelligence and ensure they weren't looking under the correct
         | rocks. All while the little old lady who says The Pledge to the
         | flag every day before coming into the office is walking out
         | with photocopies of top secret materials.
        
           | mynameishere wrote:
           | Uh, no. The actual spies were pretty much the usual suspects.
        
           | pvg wrote:
           | _What real Soviet spy would openly operate in communist /pro-
           | Soviet circles?_
           | 
           | Quite a few did since that was where ideologically-motivated
           | recruits were more readily available. The obsession was
           | misplaced and counterproductive not because the spies weren't
           | there but because the overwhelming majority of people with
           | left-leaning politics weren't any sort of spies or even
           | 'disloyal' in any material sense.
        
             | mywittyname wrote:
             | Sure, but I'm arguing that they were mainly there to tie up
             | counter-intelligence resources.
             | 
             | We rarely captured the spies who actually stole damaging
             | information. Of the few notable ones that were caught, most
             | weren't running around rallies in Che t-shirts. They were
             | milquetoast, stodgy coots who lived in suburbia.
             | 
             | The CIA et al did eventually catch on to the personality
             | traits and personal situations that make for a
             | compromiseable target. But they clearly spent decades
             | chasing their tail before figuring it out.
        
               | fishtockos wrote:
               | Ahh. Surely this explains Klaus Fuchs, the most important
               | spy in the Manhattan Project and a long-time communist?
        
               | pvg wrote:
               | I think you're anachronistically conflating Che-t-shirt
               | leftism with the political inclinations of plenty of
               | educated, professional people of the period. Many atomic
               | spies had political or ideological motives as did several
               | of the Cambridge Five and their initial contacts with
               | Soviet intelligence came about because Soviet
               | intelligence specifically set out to recruit in such
               | circles.
        
           | creamynebula wrote:
           | To be thinking about such things makes me smile remember how
           | much as a child I wanted to be a spy or a police
           | investigator!
        
         | jessaustin wrote:
         | This is probably related to the fact that Pervaia molniia was a
         | carbon copy of Fat Man. Without another nuclear power, there
         | would have been no reason to build so many weapons.
        
       | kbenson wrote:
       | _What becomes more suspicious is when you look a bit more at the
       | person who might have been most interested in Tatlock being
       | "removed from the picture": Lt. Col. Boris Pash, chief of the
       | Counterintelligence Branch of the Western Defense Command (Army
       | G-2 counterintelligence). A Russian immigrant to the United
       | States who had fought on the losing side of the Russian Civil
       | War, Pash was regarded by fellow Russian emigre George
       | Kistiakowsky as "a really wild Russian, an extreme right wing,
       | sort of Ku Klux Klan enthusiast."_
       | 
       | It's interesting to me, that in the context of a story about the
       | possible assassination of a U.S. citizen by its government for
       | purported anti-government sympathies, that one of the main
       | suspects would be an immigrant that achieved high status in the
       | armed services (or came over as somewhat high status and retained
       | some sort of rank in the military of a different nation?).
       | 
       | That said, I'm not sure if that highlights how much more
       | important in the past it was what you thought and how less
       | important it was where you came from or if it's just really wild
       | story that says less about the nation at that time and more about
       | some really crazy characters that happened to be in proximity.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | vzaliva wrote:
       | IANAL, but wouldn't it be possible to request all documents
       | pretaining to this case under FOIA, to put this question to rest?
        
         | deregulateMed wrote:
         | Requesting doesn't mean you will get anything.
         | 
         | Had a lawyer on 2 occasions request various pieces of
         | information regarding traffic, denied.
         | 
         | And it was traffic, not state secrets...
        
           | dredmorbius wrote:
           | Not asking guarantees you won't.
           | 
           | There are ways of increasing odds, including researching
           | multiple questions or agencies, among others.
        
           | jjk166 wrote:
           | And of course the record needs to exist to begin with.
           | Unsanctioned assassinations of US citizens probably aren't
           | well documented.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-08 23:01 UTC)