[HN Gopher] No, open source Audacity audio editor is not "spyware"
___________________________________________________________________
No, open source Audacity audio editor is not "spyware"
Author : AdmiralAsshat
Score : 27 points
Date : 2021-07-06 18:32 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
| berenza wrote:
| see also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27739596
| [Audacity: Clarification of Privacy Policy]
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27741910 [Audacity fork
| without any sentry telemetry or crash reporting]
| randombits0 wrote:
| Why is the default "we're going to collect data from you."? Opt-
| in or no-go. Don't assume I'm ok with it.
| jolmg wrote:
| > This leaves the last row--"data necessary for law enforcement,
| litigation and authorities' requests (if any)." While that's
| certainly a broad category and not particularly well-defined,
| it's also a fact of life in 2021.
|
| On web services, which don't have access to your whole machine.
| Also perhaps in closed-source software, which many FOSS users use
| nothing of.
|
| FOSS doing the same is pretty far from fact of life in 2021.
| colejohnson66 wrote:
| It's standard legal boilerplate to say "if we do get a request
| in the form of a warrant, we will follow the law and comply."
| Despite the common reading, it does _not_ mean "we collect data
| we can hand over to law enforcement."
| jolmg wrote:
| > it does not mean "we collect data we can hand over to law
| enforcement."
|
| That's exactly what it says. The part of the privacy policy
| in discussion is about _what_ they collect, not what they do
| with data they collect for other reasons.
|
| That's very different from the standard boilerplate,
| specially for a locally running program.
| SahAssar wrote:
| A local application does not need that boilerplate, right? If
| the app does not have a server-side component why put it in
| there?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-07-06 23:02 UTC)