[HN Gopher] In praise of the novelization, pop fiction's least r...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       In praise of the novelization, pop fiction's least reputable genre
        
       Author : howrude
       Score  : 36 points
       Date   : 2021-07-05 19:11 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (quillette.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (quillette.com)
        
       | vmilner wrote:
       | The Dr Who novelisations were loved in part because they were the
       | only way pre-video for the show's decades of output to be
       | experienced. (And still are for some lost episodes.) I'd hardly
       | ever seen an episode (as a late 70's 10 year old) but had read
       | all the books I could find in the local library.
       | 
       | (I suspect they also inspired many kids to read for similar
       | reasons.)
        
         | handrous wrote:
         | Novelizations and (less commonly) comic-adaptations of films
         | filled this role generally, before home video releases were
         | common & affordable. The Star Wars novelization, for example,
         | didn't sell well because it was a great book, but because most
         | kids couldn't re-watch the movie every single day like they
         | could when the VHS releases came out, so they'd instead read a
         | $1.25 mass-market paperback until it fell apart. They were
         | chiefly memory-refreshers for the actual film. There was even a
         | brief span of time in which audio versions (often of the film
         | itself, not necessarily of the novelization, so, not exactly an
         | "audio book") helped filled this role for some films, because
         | audio cassettes & stereos/walkmans were more widely available &
         | affordable than video decks.
         | 
         | Maybe I'm imagining it, but I wanna say there were things like
         | re-cap books for seasons of shows like The X-Files, even,
         | because home-video copies of entire shows were prohibitively
         | expensive for all but the craziest fans. That's also part of
         | what coffee-table type books about shows & movies were for--
         | lore & encyclopedic content mixed with stills and what were
         | effectively plot and episode summaries.
        
         | dharmab wrote:
         | My parents were not movie people- never went to the theater,
         | rarely rented movies. So my introduction to Star Wars was the
         | Expanded Universe novels at the local library.
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | Around 1999, Microsoft had a pulp fiction division. The "Crimson
       | Skies" game had a complicated backstory, which included
       | references to fictional magazines such as "Spicy Air Tales".
       | Microsoft had two volumes of that written and published, plus
       | some other short novels.[1]
       | 
       | [1] https://www.amazon.com/Crimson-Skies-Spicy-Tales-
       | Fortunes/dp...
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | Crimson Skies was based on a tabletop game that came with a
         | decent amount of world building material in the box. Tabletop
         | wargame designers in general seem to love releasing source
         | material that isn't directly tied to the game.
        
         | simonh wrote:
         | Crimson Skies was wonderful. Ok it took about 5 minutes to load
         | each mission, but it was actually worth it. I miss that game so
         | much.
        
           | Animats wrote:
           | Now that's a title worth a remake. Especially since Microsoft
           | already has the Flight Simulator engine and huge areas of
           | detailed terrain.
        
       | tialaramex wrote:
       | I felt sure this would mention Orson Scott Card's novelization of
       | "The Abyss" which I thought gave much more depth for Lindsey (the
       | engineer who designed the "Deep Core" drilling platform, played
       | by Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio).
       | 
       | I'm not a fan of Card's other work (Ender's Game is a perfectly
       | fine SF story, but didn't need a sequel let alone multiple
       | sequels) but I thought this background really helps The Abyss
       | much more than even the Director's Cut.
       | 
       | Or, if not that then B-to-the-F which is Ryan North's series
       | about the novelization of Back to the Future, eventually
       | published as an e-book - meta!.
       | 
       | But neither of them rates a mention, I guess that even if it
       | lacks praise there was too much going on in this sub-genre to
       | mention it all even in passing.
        
         | themadturk wrote:
         | As the movie was filmed in Card's home state, he was on the
         | production site while writing the novelization. I understand he
         | and the production team cross-pollinated off each other,
         | contributing to both the film and the novelization.
        
       | hairofadog wrote:
       | There is this wonderful page-by-page review of the novelization
       | of Back to the Future:
       | 
       | https://btothef.tumblr.com/page/19
        
       | at_a_remove wrote:
       | I am a _fiend_ for novelizations. You can get a lot of insight as
       | to what the shooting script might have been, for example, and
       | sometimes some of your favorite writers are slumming it under a
       | pseudonym. It can be an interesting game to guess the author if
       | their prose has enough of a fingerprint and you care to do a
       | little homework after.
       | 
       | Some of them are so good they bring additional life to the
       | original, and buttress flaws -- Greg Cox wrote a trilogy about
       | Trek's Khan that left me delighted with its ingenuity.
       | 
       | Speaking of, I wonder if the villains at Disney still owe Alan
       | Dean Foster a lot of money.
        
       | dharmab wrote:
       | See also the mini-story on film novelizations from 99% Invisible:
       | https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/mini-stories-volume-9...
       | 
       | A funny part of these is that the author often doesn't get to see
       | the movie they're adapting!
       | 
       | > The novelization of "Alien," for example, does not have a
       | description of the alien, because 20th Century Fox wouldn't let
       | the writer look at the puppet while it was being designed. And in
       | "The Empire Strikes Back," the famously green character Yoda is
       | described as having blue skin.
       | 
       | > Author Hank Searls went off the rails during his adaptation of
       | "Jaws: The Revenge," adding a plot about the shark being
       | controlled by a "voodoo curse."
        
         | gxqoz wrote:
         | Licensed videogames before around 2000 commonly had this
         | problem. They'd get an early script and have to build a game
         | based on it. Sometimes, like with Ghostbusters 2, the script
         | would change significantly over the course of the shooting /
         | edit and there'd be game scenes that are no longer important /
         | removed from the final cut.
        
         | Finnucane wrote:
         | Usually (having worked on the editorial/production side of some
         | novelizations) the author is working from a script, because the
         | book has to be written, typeset, and printed before the film is
         | released.
         | 
         | The folks on the Hollywood side do not understand publishing
         | schedules.
        
         | squeaky-clean wrote:
         | Another funny anecdote in that category I didn't see in the
         | article is Isaac Asimov's novelization for Fantastic Voyage.
         | Because of filming delays the book was published 6 months
         | before the film release, leading many people to believe the
         | film was an adaptation of the book.
         | 
         | That novelization differs significantly from the movie, but
         | mostly because Asimov thought the screenplay was filled with
         | bad sci-fi plot-holes and was given permission to change
         | whatever he liked.
        
       | nonameiguess wrote:
       | Space Odyssey trilogy did this right. Develop films and novels in
       | tandem, with neither more canonical than the other. And both are
       | all-time sci-fi classics, and Arthur Clarke's novels are
       | definitely reputable and respected.
       | 
       | In any case, I think harlequin romance is probably considered
       | less reputable than this.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-06 23:01 UTC)