[HN Gopher] In praise of the novelization, pop fiction's least r...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       In praise of the novelization, pop fiction's least reputable genre
        
       Author : howrude
       Score  : 17 points
       Date   : 2021-07-05 19:11 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (quillette.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (quillette.com)
        
       | vmilner wrote:
       | The Dr Who novelisations were loved in part because they were the
       | only way pre-video for the show's decades of output to be
       | experienced. (And still are for some lost episodes.) I'd hardly
       | ever seen an episode (as a late 70's 10 year old) but had read
       | all the books I could find in the local library.
       | 
       | (I suspect they also inspired many kids to read for similar
       | reasons.)
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | Around 1999, Microsoft had a pulp fiction division. The "Crimson
       | Skies" game had a complicated backstory, which included
       | references to fictional magazines such as "Spicy Air Tales".
       | Microsoft had two volumes of that written and published, plus
       | some other short novels.[1]
       | 
       | [1] https://www.amazon.com/Crimson-Skies-Spicy-Tales-
       | Fortunes/dp...
        
         | simonh wrote:
         | Crimson Skies was wonderful. Ok it took about 5 minutes to load
         | each mission, but it was actually worth it. I miss that game so
         | much.
        
           | Animats wrote:
           | Now that's a title worth a remake. Especially since Microsoft
           | already has the Flight Simulator engine and huge areas of
           | detailed terrain.
        
       | tialaramex wrote:
       | I felt sure this would mention Orson Scott Card's novelization of
       | "The Abyss" which I thought gave much more depth for Lindsey (the
       | engineer who designed the "Deep Core" drilling platform, played
       | by Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio).
       | 
       | I'm not a fan of Card's other work (Ender's Game is a perfectly
       | fine SF story, but didn't need a sequel let alone multiple
       | sequels) but I thought this background really helps The Abyss
       | much more than even the Director's Cut.
       | 
       | Or, if not that then B-to-the-F which is Ryan North's series
       | about the novelization of Back to the Future, eventually
       | published as an e-book - meta!.
       | 
       | But neither of them rates a mention, I guess that even if it
       | lacks praise there was too much going on in this sub-genre to
       | mention it all even in passing.
        
       | hairofadog wrote:
       | There is this wonderful page-by-page review of the novelization
       | of Back to the Future:
       | 
       | https://btothef.tumblr.com/page/19
        
       | dharmab wrote:
       | See also the mini-story on film novelizations from 99% Invisible:
       | https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/mini-stories-volume-9...
       | 
       | A funny part of these is that the author often doesn't get to see
       | the movie they're adapting!
       | 
       | > The novelization of "Alien," for example, does not have a
       | description of the alien, because 20th Century Fox wouldn't let
       | the writer look at the puppet while it was being designed. And in
       | "The Empire Strikes Back," the famously green character Yoda is
       | described as having blue skin.
       | 
       | > Author Hank Searls went off the rails during his adaptation of
       | "Jaws: The Revenge," adding a plot about the shark being
       | controlled by a "voodoo curse."
        
         | squeaky-clean wrote:
         | Another funny anecdote in that category I didn't see in the
         | article is Isaac Asimov's novelization for Fantastic Voyage.
         | Because of filming delays the book was published 6 months
         | before the film release, leading many people to believe the
         | film was an adaptation of the book.
         | 
         | That novelization differs significantly from the movie, but
         | mostly because Asimov thought the screenplay was filled with
         | bad sci-fi plot-holes and was given permission to change
         | whatever he liked.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-05 23:02 UTC)