[HN Gopher] 'Dragon Man' may be an elusive Denisovan
___________________________________________________________________
'Dragon Man' may be an elusive Denisovan
Author : etiam
Score : 37 points
Date : 2021-07-02 20:00 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (science.sciencemag.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (science.sciencemag.org)
| dang wrote:
| Recent and related:
|
| _'Dragon Man' skull may be new species, shaking up human family
| tree_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27638218 - June 2021
| (118 comments)
| teruakohatu wrote:
| > For now, the paper authors say they do not want to risk
| destroying the tooth or other bone to get DNA or protein.
|
| Yes it might mean their claims of being a new species could be
| invalidated, but it would be far more exciting if a Denisovan had
| been finally found.
|
| Another paper published recently looks at Denisovan DNA in
| populations of South East Asian Island populations.
|
| http://www.sci-news.com/othersciences/anthropology/southeast...
| anm89 wrote:
| Or he was a Trogdoooooooooorrrrrr
| ggm wrote:
| Came for the burninator was not disappointed
| mc32 wrote:
| One bit of confusion for me was the dragon part of the name.
|
| Peking man was discovered near 'dragon bone hill' (Longgushan)
| back in 1921 in Zhoukoudian, but this Dragon man was discovered
| in 1933 in Heilongjiang, and hence the name "Dragon man" (the
| 'long' (Long ) part of the place name meaning dragon). Lots of
| place names contain dragon this or that in China. These two
| specimens are not contemporary but separated by at least a 100
| thousand years.
| sxyuan wrote:
| For those without access to the full text, here's a related news
| article on Science with a bit more context:
| https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/06/stunning-dragon-man-...
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-07-02 23:00 UTC)