[HN Gopher] The Work of Art in the Age of Second-Order Observation
___________________________________________________________________
The Work of Art in the Age of Second-Order Observation
Author : cton
Score : 33 points
Date : 2021-07-01 10:51 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.mediastudies.asia)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.mediastudies.asia)
| inetsee wrote:
| Can I get an NFT of an invisible sculpture? Or, more importantly,
| can I sell one?
| throwamon wrote:
| The only thing I "learned" from this Salvatore Garau in this text
| is that this sort of art is but one expensive form of
| institutionalization of commercial bullshit.
| platz wrote:
| Have you tried reading artist statements before.
| harvey9 wrote:
| Sometimes interesting. But I recall an ugly mess on the wall
| of Tate Modern with a card below which included "...then we
| shot it with a real gun..." . Britain has very strict gun
| laws so most people have never used one. Use of the word
| 'real' left me with the impression the artist had gotten over
| excited at something which is commonplace in other countries,
| and confused that with creative endeavor.
| [deleted]
| NtochkaNzvanova wrote:
| You might enjoy the film "The Square":
| https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4995790/. Hilarious send-up of
| this BS. Try to avoid reading any spoilers, it'll be much
| better that way.
| bellyfullofbac wrote:
| Just like the emperor had no clothes, whoever bought this has no
| art.
| tagami wrote:
| Your post validates the artist's intent.
| beckingz wrote:
| They purchased no art, and that in and of itself is art.
| teekert wrote:
| I hope they paid with a large bag of invisible money.
| AlbertCory wrote:
| Tom Wolfe (RIP) wrote "The Painted Word" in 2008 which pretty
| well summarized all this.
|
| Those can make art, make art. Those who can't, write artist's
| statements. And those who can't do that, write impenetrable
| essays about it.
| tarr11 wrote:
| This article explained a lot to me about why people purchase
| these types of things.
|
| https://newrepublic.com/article/147192/modern-art-serves-ric...
| anm89 wrote:
| That article is really fascinating
| lisper wrote:
| The line between art and trolling is becoming increasingly
| difficult for me to discern. If indeed there ever even was such a
| line.
| barathr wrote:
| > 'Beware of first- hand ideas!' exclaimed one of the most
| advanced of them. 'First-hand ideas do not really exist. They are
| but the physical impressions produced by love and fear, and on
| this gross foundation who could erect a philosophy? Let your
| ideas be second-hand, and if possible tenth-hand, for then they
| will be far removed from that disturbing element - direct
| observation.
|
| (The Machine Stops, 1909, E.M. Forster)
|
| https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops
| anm89 wrote:
| Just reead through "The Machine Stops". That is unbelievably
| ahead of its time. Great read
| draw_down wrote:
| This is such masturbatory silliness.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-07-02 23:01 UTC)