[HN Gopher] FCC Reaffirms $3M Fine for Marketing Unauthorized Dr...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       FCC Reaffirms $3M Fine for Marketing Unauthorized Drone
       Transmitters
        
       Author : 7402
       Score  : 41 points
       Date   : 2021-07-01 20:46 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.arrl.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.arrl.org)
        
       | lytfyre wrote:
       | Ahh, hobbyking. I used to order RC and electronics stuff from
       | them, back before off the shelf drones became common enough that
       | regulations ramped way up.
       | 
       | Their checkout pipeline used to have a drop-down box for what
       | percent of the orders value to declare on the customs documents.
       | IIRC, the default value was 30%...
       | 
       | It was also always interesting seeing what machinations they were
       | using when orders of LiPo batteries would get shipped. I had a
       | very large battery order for a workshop I ran that was shipped
       | from HK to the west coast via Fiji post - and by the postal
       | tracking, took the long way around, and showed up with a
       | surprising lack of stickers related to the contents.
       | 
       | They still have the best battery searcher in the business if you
       | need to find pouch cells with specific dimensions.
       | 
       | Not surprised that regulators have been catching up with them.
        
       | Ecco wrote:
       | I got screwed over by HobbyKing who never let me cancel an order
       | even though they were over a month late and still hadn't shipped
       | it.
       | 
       | I'm glad they got fined, they're definitely shady.
        
       | Syonyk wrote:
       | This appears to be "video streaming" style transmitters, not an
       | ADS-B out sort of location transmitter or anything.
       | 
       | And it seems that HobbyKing just... hoped nothing would happen.
       | 
       | > _As spelled out in ARRL's 2017 complaint, the ARRL Laboratory
       | had documented that the operating frequencies of these drone TV
       | transmitters near the 1.3 GHz amateur band were dip-switch
       | selectable for frequencies internationally assigned for use by
       | Aeronautical Navigation, GPS, GLONASS L1, ATC Mode "S," as well
       | as to both the interrogation and reply frequencies used for Air
       | Traffic Control Air-Route Surveillance "transponder" radar
       | systems. "Transmissions from these drone TV transmitters would
       | have caused harmful interference to these essential Navigation
       | and ATC Radar systems, presenting a real and dangerous threat to
       | the safety of flight," Carlson said._
       | 
       | That's impressively ballsy. I'm glad the FCC smacked them down
       | pretty hard. It's not like _global frequency allocations_ aren 't
       | well known.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | trafalgarcircle wrote:
         | Linux allows individuals to override tx frequencies and power
         | on many devices, but at least that's done in software. I could
         | understand if the dips were for setting bits on a frequency
         | divider and could allow selecting any frequency, but having
         | them directly correlate to reserved frequencies is beyond the
         | pale.
        
           | throwaway0a5e wrote:
           | >but having them directly correlate to reserved frequencies
           | is beyond the pale.
           | 
           | I don't think you get it.
           | 
           | The whole point of this cheapo hardware is that it can be
           | used for whatever just by setting switches and therefore
           | achieves massive economies of scale. They sell the same
           | hardware to the drone makers and the radio makers and so on.
           | 
           | IIRC these switches were not user accessible. The
           | manufacturer set them in the right position.
        
         | jimmaswell wrote:
         | All that for a dip switch that isn't normally accessible?
        
       | underseacables wrote:
       | This is unfortunate but I'm more displeased with the ARRL. They
       | spend millions on lobbyists and politicians, pay the President A
       | quarter of a million a year, and they're really not doing that
       | much for it. The website is seriously lacking an up-to-date
       | information about state and federal issues, and I'm very dismayed
       | at what seems to be a lot of money spent but very little to show
       | for it. Ive been an Extra since 2002 and I didn't renew my
       | membership last year. To me, a humble Ham in tornado country,
       | ARRL just seems like a lot of people hanging on feeding at the
       | trough.
        
         | jquinby wrote:
         | Also an Extra. I actually delayed renewal this year, but then
         | re-upped when I remembered that I'd been using the
         | callsign@arrl.org email forwarded for a bunch of stuff and
         | shelling out for one more year was easier than hunting down all
         | the places I'd used it. I'll probably address that soon and let
         | it go for good after this year.
        
         | jvanderbot wrote:
         | Lobbyists is exactly what I pay them for.
         | 
         | But other than that, a quarter million sounds huge, but that's
         | not huge for a big, heavily-government-involved national non-
         | profit.
         | 
         | For my own benefit, they orchestrate the classes and testing
         | that I used to get my license, publish excellent reference
         | materials, etc. I'm no longer in tornado country, but in
         | earthquake country and a bigger city, the many different HAM
         | activities are nice to know about.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-07-01 23:00 UTC)