[HN Gopher] Incremental Note-Taking
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Incremental Note-Taking
        
       Author : thesephist
       Score  : 31 points
       Date   : 2021-06-28 20:25 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (thesephist.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (thesephist.com)
        
       | Rochus wrote:
       | Interesting text. But by the end of the day I think it is quite
       | subjective how people optimally capture their thoughts and ideas.
       | I spent many years doing research to find an optimal tool.
       | Netmanage Ecco worked very well for me, but had some limitations
       | - interestingly some which also the referenced article considers
       | important. Other people were fan of completely different tools
       | which I couldn't get much out of (and vice versa). Finally I
       | implemented my own tool (not for the first time) ten years ago
       | which I'm successfully using since then
       | (https://github.com/rochus-keller/crossline/). It looks certainly
       | old fashioned to younger people, but I'm very efficient with it
       | because I can talk to people and record/organize the discussion
       | at the same time without moving my hands away from the keyboard
       | (what helps me to focus on the topic and counterparts and not to
       | be distracted by handling the tool). If I assess my approach with
       | the "Principles of incremental notes" it looks like a good match.
       | Point 1 is met by efficient shortcuts and capturing information
       | in context due to outlining approach. Point 4 is met in that each
       | outline is automatically added to a history list; of course I can
       | organize outlines in that some outlines are used as directories,
       | and there is also a full text search; I agree that I very often
       | rediscover notes from the history context. Point 2 is met in that
       | I can consolidate notes from old ones without copying, i.e. I
       | just take the items from different outlines I want and put them
       | together in a new outline without losing the link to the original
       | context; much more to say. And yes, I carry a small laptop with
       | me wherever I go; it has a good keyboard on which I can type
       | faster than people usually talk. Doesn't work with a smartphone.
        
       | greyman wrote:
       | >The tragedy of Apple Notes is that it's an idea black hole.
       | 
       | I don't quite understand what's the problem here. You capture
       | ideas digitally, and later, you can revisit them just the same as
       | you revisit paper notebooks.
        
         | tylerwince wrote:
         | Agreed. I didn't understand this part. I exclusively use Apple
         | Notes for typed and handwritten notes. I also find the search
         | functionality to be excellent at finding stuff I need, so I'm
         | not sure why the author bashes Apple Notes search either.
        
       | tunesmith wrote:
       | The incremental note-taking approach is interesting - it's
       | definitely a solid primitive for tracking the history of data.
       | But it also puts an even greater burden on the surrounding
       | features for sorting, organizing, summarizing, because now you
       | can't just delete something that is better represented elsewhere.
        
       | riffic wrote:
       | Is any of this influenced by _How to Take Smart Notes_ by Sonke
       | Ahrens, or any of the recently trendy PKMS bloggers /youtubers?
       | 
       | It seems there's been a mini-renaissance surrounding some of
       | these topics.
        
       | discardable_dan wrote:
       | No discussion of Workflowy (https://workflowy.com/)? It is, in my
       | opinion, by far the best note-taking app I have used. You can
       | search, reorganize, and freely move content as you take it, and
       | also after. You can nest a whole campaign of D&D notes next to
       | your favorite recipes, and it feels natural due to their focus
       | level model. More importantly, it's absolutely dead simple, and
       | it "gets out of the way."
       | 
       | The author dances around the two main properties that all good
       | note-taking methods have:
       | 
       | 1. It's easy to add new notes 2. It's easy to look through old
       | notes to find what you want
       | 
       | Pencil and paper, or bound journals, do the former very easily.
       | The latter is much harder, unless you start some indexing system
       | (such as a bullet journal solution). This suggests searching and
       | tagging are ideal, which digital is good for. But, and I cannot
       | stress this enough, (1) is more important than (2). It is not
       | impossible to find information in hand-written notes, just
       | harder. But the exact moment it becomes hard to take new notes,
       | the solution fails because you won't use it. And I believe
       | Workflowy does all of this, with quick nesting, easy extension,
       | and even quick reorganization. And you can quickly drop into
       | "just let me write some notes," then go back and organize later
       | (even splitting your notes up into subcomponents, if you want).
        
         | thesephist wrote:
         | OP here. There are a lot that I left out -- Workflowy of
         | course, but also Notational Velocity and its cousins (nvAlt,
         | nvUltra) are another favorite of mine. I guess I mostly
         | mentioned the ones that were top of mind / in the zeitgeist in
         | my work. But you can extrapolate this philosophy to other apps
         | like Workflowy for sure.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-29 23:01 UTC)