[HN Gopher] Circling-or cycling-the track at F1's famous Circuit...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Circling-or cycling-the track at F1's famous Circuit of the
       Americas
        
       Author : Tomte
       Score  : 74 points
       Date   : 2021-06-27 06:26 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (arstechnica.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (arstechnica.com)
        
       | Qw3r7 wrote:
       | Now go bike Source into Eau Rouge and let us know the difference!
        
         | danburbridge wrote:
         | I don't think they ride Eau Rouge, but Spa is sometimes used
         | for some elite level Cyclocross:
         | https://www.velonews.com/news/cyclocross/gallery-spa-francor...
         | The grass bank climb is incredibly steep.
        
       | bretthoerner wrote:
       | I've done this once. It was OK, but at the end of the day it's
       | like shutting down a highway and letting you bike on it. It's
       | just a huge (from the POV of a cyclist) empty concrete road. I'd
       | much rather bike around the actual city or do a trail through
       | trees with some sights to see.
       | 
       | Basically, it's all of the bad and boring aspects of driving
       | excepts you're on a bike. But to me one of the best parts of
       | biking is that you're not in a cage on a boring highway. It also
       | has big "drive my truck to the gym to do a run" vibes since it's
       | in the middle of nowhere.
       | 
       | That said, turn 1 is a (fun) beast and being around a bunch of
       | people excited to cycle is the best part.
        
         | stefan_ wrote:
         | For the Nurburgring, they have events and amateur races they
         | put on:
         | 
         | https://radamring.de/en/disciplines/24h-bike-race/
        
         | epage wrote:
         | I've not been yet but the draws for me are (1) the novelty and
         | (2) an uninterrupted ride. There aren't many places you I've
         | found to ride that isn't stop and go while also being safe. If
         | only 360 wasn't suicide to ride.
        
           | heyzeusalmighty wrote:
           | May I suggest the Veloway across the street from the Lady
           | Bird Johnson Wildflower Center?
        
           | bretthoerner wrote:
           | I hear you loud and clear, but South Walnut Creek is way
           | better than this for uninterrupted riding, IMO.
           | 
           | https://www.austintexas.gov/department/southern-walnut-
           | creek...
        
           | gameswithgo wrote:
           | second the veloway, and mountain biking in austin is amazing
           | and way less stressful
        
       | ximm wrote:
       | Note on typography: I know this is very common in the US, but I
       | just cannot get used to em-dashes without spaces around them. I
       | tried for ~30secs to figure out what "circling-or" and "cyciling-
       | the" might be, until I realized that those dashes are meant to
       | separate, not join. IMHO "circling - or cycling - the tack" is
       | much easier to read.
        
       | mrkwse wrote:
       | Just to correct this point for anyone who doesn't follow the
       | sport like the author:
       | 
       | > This F1 fansite claims that cars can get to around 110 km/h
       | (~70 mph) climbing this thing, which we very much did not
       | achieve.
       | 
       | The fansite link is stating that cars will brake to approach the
       | sharp left-hander of turn 1 at 110km/h (~70mph) (site claims
       | 85km/h on the apex), they'll do well in excess of that on the run
       | up (300km/h+ on a flying lap or still comfortably beyond 200km/h
       | from a standing start).
       | 
       | With that out of the way it looks a great way of using a
       | racetrack when cars aren't going around it, and I'll have to see
       | if there's anything similar in the UK as a lot of racetracks will
       | often have very pleasant surrounds and similarly undulating
       | elevations for a bit of a challenge. (Brands Hatch strikes me as
       | having a lot of potential for a particularly pleasant ride)
        
         | InitialLastName wrote:
         | I have a habit of looking at the calendars of the tracks F1
         | goes to, just out of curiosity. Many of them have bicycle
         | events in addition to car events, for exactly the reasons you
         | would think (and mentioned): well-maintained roads with no
         | cars, an interesting, undulating course, nice surroundings, and
         | infrastructure for crowds.
         | 
         | As an example, the 2020 UCI Road World championship was
         | centered around the Imola track, and looking at their schedule
         | they frequently have other cycling events.
        
           | giobox wrote:
           | The UCI Tour of California has been to Laguna Seca too, it
           | was one of my least favorite bike race watching experiences.
           | 
           | Professional road cycling generally has no barriers between
           | spectators and the riders except in key areas or start/finish
           | lines. A race track designed for cars of course has enormous
           | run off areas and view blocking steel safety structures, tire
           | walls for 150mph+ accidents - you don't need these for a bike
           | race. The result is spectators generally sat far, far further
           | away and the atmosphere is IMO much worse for it. I've had
           | far more fun sat at the side of mountain stages with friends
           | and a few beers.
           | 
           | That said, of course it has the advantage you get to see the
           | riders multiple times instead of just once as is case on most
           | point to point stages, but easy access to live streams on
           | phones/tablets makes the race so easy to follow at the
           | roadside anyway.
        
             | jandrese wrote:
             | On the other hand maybe some separation between the
             | cyclists and spectators isn't a terrible idea? Or at the
             | very least require the spectators to have a least a minimal
             | level of situational awareness.
             | 
             | https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/27/sport/tour-de-france-crash-
             | in...
        
               | noarchy wrote:
               | I'm not sure why you'd be getting downvoted. This year's
               | Tour has been off to a very rocky start and fan
               | interference sure hasn't helped.
        
               | Luc wrote:
               | > I'm not sure why you'd be getting downvoted.
               | 
               | Because it's one of those comments that took 3s to write
               | but would take a lot of effort to properly respond to,
               | because it's 'not even wrong'.
        
           | nradov wrote:
           | The Clash triathlon series uses NASCAR tracks for their
           | races. The scenery is a bit monotonous for athletes, but the
           | bike courses are very safe and it gives spectators a better
           | view of the action.
           | 
           | https://www.triathlete.com/events/challenge-u-s-splits-
           | with-...
        
             | ProAm wrote:
             | Aren't NASCAR tracks just ovals?
        
               | gwoplock wrote:
               | Most are but they sometimes go to others. About a month
               | or 2 ago, NASCAR went to COTA. Some of the pictures in
               | the article are from that race.
        
               | pionar wrote:
               | A lot of NASCAR tracks also have road courses. Indy,
               | Daytona, Atlanta, a lot of the others.
        
         | danburbridge wrote:
         | I know that Castle Coombe has regular bicycle races - both
         | criteriums and time trials. Pretty sure many of the circuits
         | do, as its a good way to use the track and get some cash in, as
         | they are often regulated in the number of motor races due to
         | noise issues.
        
         | chedabob wrote:
         | Oulton Park has opened up to cyclists in the past, but doesn't
         | look like there's anything except a duathlon scheduled for this
         | year.
        
         | sidewndr46 wrote:
         | I don't ride a road bicycle for safety reasons, but I do live
         | in Austin. One of the unexpected benefits of COTA is many
         | bicyclists I've met have praised the bicycling events there.
         | Some large bicycle races even use it as a starting point.
        
         | c0nsumer wrote:
         | There's a local racetrack here in Waterford, Michigan, US
         | (north of Detroit) which hosts road bike races. It really is a
         | great use, because it's a closed/non-open-to-public route which
         | is generally well paved and free of the usual road debris
         | (gravel, grass, car parts, glass).
         | 
         | Details: https://www.flyingrhinocc.com/flying-rhino-race-series
         | 
         | Bicycle road races are otherwise pretty complicated to put on,
         | because they require a section of road that can be closed (eg:
         | private industrial park / campus), sometimes work done to the
         | road to clean it beforehand, etc. Using a race track has a lot
         | of this done for you.
        
       | nradov wrote:
       | Circuit Gilles Villeneuve in Montreal is the track for the
       | Canadian Grand Prix F1 race. It's usually open to cyclists, and
       | when I was there a few years ago I rented one of those horrible
       | Bixi bikes and made a few laps.
        
         | logshipper wrote:
         | Circuit Gilles Villeneuve is a fantastic place not just for
         | cycling, but also running and roller-blading. I have been there
         | for a couple of runs - the lanes are clearly demarcated, and
         | the track is a real treat to run on.
        
         | cmyr wrote:
         | Yea the track in Montreal is open to cyclists for most of the
         | season; along with the mountain itself it is one of the two
         | main places in the city where cyclists tend to train.
        
       | navbaker wrote:
       | I had a blast doing this at Laguna Seca when I lived in Monterey.
       | Highly recommended if you live near a track that opens up for
       | bicycles!
        
         | flyingfences wrote:
         | I can only imagine how going down The Corkscrew must feel on a
         | bicycle. What a blast!
        
           | mikestew wrote:
           | I raced that course years ago, having done a track day on a
           | motorcycle in the past, and even on a bicycle The Corkscrew
           | is surprisingly tight. Not anything like doing it on/in a
           | motorized vehicle, but more effort than I thought it would
           | be. Mainly because that hill can pile on some serious speed.
           | Sadly, I don't think I have the Garmin file from that race
           | and can't look up exactly how fast I'd go down that hill.
        
       | crispyambulance wrote:
       | I am sure it's fun, but there ARE actual velodromes in the US and
       | they're much more interesting for spectators and cyclists than
       | something that's set up for a car.
       | 
       | A typical setup for a velodrome is 1/3 of a Kilometer oval with
       | 30 degree banked turns (you don't even notice that angle at
       | velodrome speed, 20+ mph, because you're pretty much
       | perpendicular to the surface and riding on the circumference).
       | This gives spectators a view of the whole track and it's setup
       | for many different UCI-sanctioned events-- match-sprint, madison,
       | time-trials, kerin/moto-pacing, etc.
       | 
       | I wish there were more velodromes, it's a great sport and
       | especially exciting to watch because all the action happens in a
       | matter of minutes.
        
         | doikor wrote:
         | Velodrome and road cycling are completely different
         | disciplines. This is like saying that why bother building
         | purpose built track and field venue so you can do the 100m run
         | there when just some random piece of tarmac would do (it works
         | for marathons so obviously it is fine as a running surface)
        
         | theli0nheart wrote:
         | > _I am sure it 's fun, but there ARE actual velodromes in the
         | US and they're much more interesting for spectators and
         | cyclists than something that's set up for a car._
         | 
         | Austin also has an "velodrome-like" track called the Veloway.
         | It's outside, so it can get hot, and it's not an oval track,
         | but it's very fun.
         | 
         | > _The Veloway at Circle C Ranch Metropolitan Park was
         | constructed in the early 90's and was the first facility of its
         | kind in the United States. The Veloway is a 23' wide, 3.1 miles
         | (5K) long bicycle tract that traverses the natural terrain.
         | People travel from all over the metropolitan region to cycle
         | here on a daily basis. The project was partially funded by a
         | Texas Parks and Wildlife Grant._
         | 
         | http://austintexas.gov/department/veloway
        
         | publicola1990 wrote:
         | Are there Keirin races in the US?
        
           | kevin_thibedeau wrote:
           | It's in the Olympics, so yes, minus the gambling.
        
           | mikestew wrote:
           | There are at the Redmond, WA Jerry Baker Velodrome. Schedule
           | for an upcoming event, Keirin listed down a ways:
           | 
           | (PDF link) https://velodrome.org/wp-
           | content/uploads/2021/01/2021-Freds-...
        
       | globular-toast wrote:
       | 133 feet doesn't mean an awful lot without knowing the gradient.
       | I looked it up and it's 11%. That is surprisingly high! Not
       | surprised people struggle on it. For trained cyclists it's not
       | massive but will definitely be tough if you're not ready for it.
        
         | ben7799 wrote:
         | It depends on where you live and how much you bicycle.
         | 
         | 133ft @ 11% is a speed bump to most competitive or avid amateur
         | cyclists. Where I live 1000ft of climbing per hour would be
         | "hilly" but not mountainous. In mountainous regions you can
         | very easily go on rides requiring climbing > 10,000ft over the
         | course of a 3-5 hour ride.
         | 
         | It is actually common to have bicycle races at car race tracks,
         | I've done it. But on one of these F1 courses you'd race many
         | many laps of the track and the officials would pull anyone out
         | of the race if they fall behind to avoid anyone getting lapped
         | and causing safety issues.
         | 
         | If you ride that 133ft hill on the race track 10-30x in the
         | course of a race then it starts to be annoying as there is
         | going to be someone who attacks up the hill every lap, and if
         | you fall off the back on the hill you'd stand a good chance of
         | not catching up and being pulled from the race. A typical road
         | race would have the lower categories doing around 8 laps of a
         | track like COTA to get to a 25 mile race and the upper classes
         | would be doing 30ish to get to a race closer to 100 miles.
        
           | theli0nheart wrote:
           | > _133ft @ 11% is a speed bump to most competitive or avid
           | amateur cyclists._
           | 
           | I've been a competitive-ish triathlete for five years, and I
           | have to disagree.
           | 
           | From "The Climbing Cyclist, Gradients and cycling, an
           | introduction" [1]:                 * 0%:      A flat road
           | * 1-3%:    Slightly uphill but not particularly
           | challenging. A bit like riding into the wind.       * 4-6%:
           | A manageable gradient that can cause fatigue
           | over long periods.       * 7-9%:    Starting to become
           | uncomfortable for seasoned                  riders, and very
           | challenging for new climbers.       * 10%-15%: A painful
           | gradient, especially if maintained                  for any
           | length of time       * 16%+:    Very challenging for riders
           | of all abilities.                  Maintaining this sort of
           | incline for any                  length of time is very
           | painful.
           | 
           | [1]: http://theclimbingcyclist.com/gradients-and-cycling-an-
           | intro... (archive: https://archive.is/Nx8HX)
        
             | ska wrote:
             | Agreed. GP mentions 1000ft/hour being "hilly" but thats
             | something like 1000ft in 1000000ft at serious cyclist rate,
             | so averaging 1%-ish. Obviously it's unlikely to be uniform,
             | but doesn't really support the argument. If you are on a
             | 10% grade for any length of tim you know it even if you are
             | a pro.
        
               | ben7799 wrote:
               | The point was the hill is only 133 feet high, at 11% it's
               | about 1000ft long, less than 1/4 mile. The duration of
               | the climb is very important as well as the grade and in
               | the case of this racetrack hill there's just no duration.
               | 
               | It's over in less than a minute for a fit cyclist. You
               | would hit the bottom of the hill at > 20mph and your
               | momentum is going to help you get partway up the hill
               | before they hit the point they even have to climb at a
               | steady speed. It's not even long enough for "climber"
               | type cyclists to be able to start dropping heavier
               | sprinter type cyclists because it's a quick little effort
               | and you're over the top. Even if you're in a race and had
               | to do 10 laps (a short beginner level distance) you would
               | still only climb 1330 feet across a 30 mile race, which
               | would generally be considered a fairly flat race.
               | 
               | The Tour De France has a classification system for
               | climbs.. this one would be so short it would not
               | necessarily even get a classification since it's not even
               | 0.5km.
               | 
               | A really scary climb would be > 10% for 10km or more. I
               | had mentioned the Mt. Washington Hill climb in NH. That
               | is 7mi/11km at a 13% average grade with essentially no
               | letup the entire climb and some sections exceeding 20%.
               | An excellent time is anything under an hour and twenty
               | minutes and if you can break 1 hour you're putting in a
               | world class performance. A winning time up that mountain
               | would considerably longer than a 10 lap race of COTA,
               | average speed at COTA for an elite group would be around
               | 30mph for 10 laps of COTA in all likelihood.
               | 
               | The hill at this race track is not even going to register
               | to most serious cyclists.
        
               | ska wrote:
               | Agree duration is an important factor, an nobody would
               | suggest this was a "real" climb in the tour-de-france
               | sense.
               | 
               | I think we are differing mostly on semantics. I would say
               | for a serious cyclist, it will register but would not be
               | any kind of challenge. Not sure why you are bringing
               | elite cyclists (cf again, TDF) into it, there is an
               | absolutely massive gap between the average serious
               | cyclist and the elites.
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | nradov wrote:
             | Gearing matters. If you're riding a dedicated tri bike with
             | typical race gears then an 11% gradient is tough. On a road
             | bike with a compact crankset it's fine.
        
         | jsjsbdkj wrote:
         | 11% is brutal! One of my favorite local climbs is about 450ft
         | and maxes out at 7.5%, there's always people walking their
         | bikes up the shoulder.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-28 23:01 UTC)