[HN Gopher] Private Gmail and Docs alternatives: Proton, Skiff, ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Private Gmail and Docs alternatives: Proton, Skiff, and more
        
       Author : janjones
       Score  : 118 points
       Date   : 2021-06-25 13:18 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.fastcompany.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.fastcompany.com)
        
       | ampdepolymerase wrote:
       | > _CDRT used to be "outrageously slow" for something like a
       | document editor, Milich says, but that's not the case anymore._
       | 
       | What is their trick for this?
        
       | imagine99 wrote:
       | I've said this before but I've been waiting for almost five years
       | now to switch to Protonmail personally - and with several
       | clients, SMEs and startups.
       | 
       | Why haven't I done it?
       | 
       | Well, for one, to this day their pricing and feature structure is
       | utterly unattractive, orders of magnitude more expensive than
       | competitors (especially Gsuite/Google Workspace and Microsoft
       | 365) and thoroughly confusing.
       | 
       | Some examples:
       | 
       | - Want to put your whole family on the "visionary plan"
       | (~$350/year)? Tough luck, it's limited to 6 users, so your wife's
       | parents are out.
       | 
       | - No multi-user support in tiers below "Professional", i.e. a
       | family of 7 (incl. e.g. grandma) pays at least $560 per year.
       | 
       | - Work as a consultant, juggling several projects or startups?
       | Tough luck, 2 custom domains and 5 measly aliases included only,
       | even on the professional plan (~$90/user)! Also a mere 5 GB of
       | storage. Google offered twice that 10 years ago and currently 3x
       | - for free. Google's paid accounts include up to 2 TB (!) at that
       | price point. As for the custom domains, on my private Gsuite I
       | currently run about 10 without problem plus and at least fifty
       | aliases (I make new ones for many services I sign up for, my #1
       | spam-avoidance trick). Even if I wanted, I couldn't switch
       | without losing a ton of functionality, security and convenience.
       | Getting most of this in Protonmail would probably cost me an eye-
       | watering additional ~$360 - per user!
       | 
       | What on earth is their value proposition? Switzerland +
       | encryption, okay, all well and good. Happy to pay _some_ extra
       | money for that. But not more than _10 times_ the amount a user
       | costs on Google Workspace.
       | 
       | They also have no discounts, let alone free accounts for EDU or
       | NGOs which makes it hard _very_ hard to convince any of these
       | orgs to switch there seeing as they get a lot more value from
       | Google Workspace or Microsoft 365, completely for free - and
       | these companies know that people will be more likely to privately
       | sign up for Gmail, Office etc. if they use it at work or at
       | school all day.
       | 
       | Bottom-line, I've longed for a service like Protonmail for almost
       | half a decade now but at least the people and companies I work
       | with don't want to pay close to what they're asking and are not
       | willing to be nickel-and-dimed for something trivial like
       | aliases, a catch-all address or a reasonable amount of storage (2
       | TB would cost ~$21,500 per year on Protonmail, according to their
       | published price list!!).
       | 
       | From statements of their management I suspect that they're trying
       | to manage (and limit) growth and thus have positioned their
       | product in a way that makes it a premium/high-end offer,
       | certainly without the goal of getting "everyone" to switch to
       | them. The price and feature/addon policy makes it extremely
       | difficult to convince anybody to switch for whom privacy and
       | encryption is "nice to have" but not worth $$$.
       | 
       | I am a bit frustrated by this and have been for a long time.
       | 
       | Here's to hoping that a competitor appears and offers a more
       | attractive bundle. Or that they finally get together a growth
       | plan or funding that allows them to reduce costs and scale to
       | more customers quickly.
        
         | bredren wrote:
         | Is the pricing really too high or just lacking in subsidy due
         | to monetization of your data?
        
       | sgrove wrote:
       | Depending on your use case - specifically for notes - Serenity
       | notes [0] might fill the niche:                 * End to end
       | encrypted       * Fully collaborative via CRDTs       * Mobile
       | clients
       | 
       | They have some ideas to incorporate zero-knowledge proofs to even
       | remove some of the metadata that leaks from watch encrypted data
       | move around. There was a talk earlier today at worker.sh on how
       | it works and their ambitions [1].
       | 
       | Next Wednesday they'll have a very technical deep dive into all
       | the inner workings https://www.meetup.com/Security-Meetup-by-SBA-
       | Research/event...
       | 
       | And I believe the source is available if you care to audit it
       | yourself!
       | 
       | [0]: https://www.serenity.re/en/notes
       | 
       | [1]: https://youtu.be/3p1uQ4Fzilk?t=6344
        
       | yewenjie wrote:
       | Is there some webextension and/or email provider that supports
       | quickly creating calendar events to CalDAV servers?
        
       | gnicholas wrote:
       | Does anyone know if Skiff uses canvas-based rendering? I heard
       | that Google Docs is moving toward a canvas-based rendering
       | system, which will prevent some Chrome extensions (including my
       | own accessibility extension) from working on Docs.
       | 
       | It would be great to know if Skiff could be an alternative for
       | folks who rely on extensions to make document creation/editing
       | more enjoyable and accessible.
        
         | bhl wrote:
         | Skiff uses https://github.com/chanzuckerberg/czi-prosemirror
         | last time I checked, which just uses the DOM.
        
         | danaris wrote:
         | Not only that, it breaks browser-native search functionality--
         | and apparently replaces it with nothing, at least on Safari,
         | where they've removed the standard search option entirely.
         | 
         |  _Strangely enough_ , the in-Google-Doc search function works
         | just fine on Chrome.
         | 
         | I recognize that it sounds somewhat paranoid, but I strongly
         | suspect this is a deliberate attempt to push people to use
         | Chrome over other browsers.
        
       | tut-urut-utut wrote:
       | Wow, page talking about privacy that get 44% of the page blocked
       | by AdBlock Origin. There are so many trackers that I had to
       | scroll the list to see everything that is blocked.
       | 
       | I'm not even sure I want to check the actual content anymore.
        
         | andai wrote:
         | Ah, but this is how everybody does things now! An article is
         | text, maybe some images, and of course 20MB of JavaScript
         | spyware.
        
       | mark_l_watson wrote:
       | I don't really use ProtonMail calendar, but I like the email and
       | VPN functionality. I run the ProtonBridge on my laptop just in
       | case I need to search my email. I can't search my ProtonMail on
       | my phone ( except subject lines), and that is OK. I use Apple's
       | calendar.
       | 
       | Apple has hinted at privacy enhanced email with personal domain
       | names. I am not sure what will happen there. I will stay a paying
       | ProtonMail customer but I really hope iCloud+ gets more secure
       | services.
       | 
       | I keep medical records and tax notes in encrypted Apple Pages
       | documents. I think the encryption is good enough for me.
        
       | eterps wrote:
       | It's weird that Skiff still represent documents in pages. I guess
       | most tech workers make a hardcopy of a document once or twice a
       | year (or even less?).
        
         | aamarks97 wrote:
         | I haven't printed a document in 3 or 4 years. Don't think I'll
         | ever own a printer
        
       | 12ian34 wrote:
       | >To truly take on the likes of Google, they need to build
       | ecosystems instead of just one unique service.
       | 
       | I'd like to see this leverage decentralisation and/or open
       | standards rather than see each of these companies building
       | interoperable walled gardens. I think this dream is unlikely
       | because sadly it's less obvious as an option for monetisation
       | which, at the end of the day, is why each of these companies
       | exist.
        
       | twodayslate wrote:
       | What alternative has a customizable priority inbox like Gmail?
       | Priority inbox is essential to my workflow and is the main reason
       | I won't switch away from Gmail. I have my unread messages on top,
       | drafts, then everything else.
        
       | actuator wrote:
       | E2E is mentioned in the article as a target for few of the
       | alternatives mentioned but how do you trust these companies to
       | build the E2E tech safely unless it is open and if not E2E, I
       | would trust them way less than big companies like Google to keep
       | my data safe as data security is hard. Almost every other day
       | some service gets breached.
       | 
       | If ads on Gmail are a concern, it is mentioned briefly in the
       | article, you can get Google Workspace for yourself as a single
       | user. It is way cheaper than the alternatives as well and after
       | trying out Hey last year, I personally prefer Gmail.
       | 
       | Here is an excerpt from Google's workspace page
       | (https://workspace.google.com/security):
       | 
       | > No ads, ever. Google does not collect, scan, or use your data
       | in Google Workspace services for advertising purposes and we do
       | not display ads in Google Workspace. We use your data to provide
       | Google Workspace services, and for system support, such as spam
       | filtering, virus detection, spell-checking, capacity planning,
       | traffic routing, and the ability to search for emails and files
       | within an individual account.
        
         | mark_l_watson wrote:
         | I used to do this, but stopped. The deal breaker for me was
         | that I use my personal gmail account to buy Google Play books,
         | TV shows, and movies. I have YouTube subscriptions. Etc... I
         | found switching between Google accounts irritated me.
        
           | MiddleEndian wrote:
           | Google has always been really weird with accounts. Back when
           | they were still pushing Google+, I could not register with my
           | Google Apps account because it didn't end in @gmail.com lol.
           | I have a permanently grandfathered free plan, but if I were
           | paying for it and I cared about Google+, I would have been
           | pissed.
        
       | meitham wrote:
       | Being a customer of Fastmail I had briefly assumed incorrectly
       | that fastcompany and fastmail are related and this post was a
       | promotion of fastmail!
        
       | prophesi wrote:
       | Just wanted to give a quick shoutout to Mailfence[0]. Their
       | support team helped me set up DMARC/SPF/DKIM. Their keystore
       | makes it easy for non-techies to use PGP, and the tech-savvy are
       | free to use their own keys and their own mail client.
       | 
       | [0] https://mailfence.com/
        
       | CA0DA wrote:
       | Protonmail still does not have message threading built into the
       | mobile app. That seems like a minimum requirement in 2021,
       | doesn't it? I don't know how that is still not in there.
        
       | AzzieElbab wrote:
       | what is wrong with using encrypted s3 and desktop apps?
        
       | tupac_speedrap wrote:
       | The UX on that website more akin to torture than an actual user
       | experience. Not only an auto playing video but one that actually
       | chases you down the page and I can't block the element because
       | I'm on a work laptop.
        
         | leephillips wrote:
         | I use a bookmarklet that deletes all fixed elements. I seem to
         | be using it on half of the pages I visit these days, because of
         | "front end engineers". I don't remember where I got this, but
         | it works well:
         | 
         | javascript:let i, elements = document.querySelectorAll('body
         | *'); for (i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) {
         | if(getComputedStyle(elements[i]).position === 'fixed' ||
         | getComputedStyle(elements[i]).position === 'sticky'){
         | elements[i].parentNode.removeChild(elements[i]); } }
        
       | alberth wrote:
       | It's interesting Proton is featured instead of Fastmail ...
       | especially given that Vivaldi (who is featured) has a close
       | partnership with Fastmail.
       | 
       | Off topic: I wish Fastmail provided SSO (IdP) services. I want to
       | move my small business over to it but lack of SSO is a blocker. I
       | guess I'll just continue to use it for personal.
        
         | brongondwana wrote:
         | On that off topic... I'm interested to know more about your use
         | case. I've been looking at what it would take to integrate SSO
         | into Fastmail. You can email me brong at fastmailteam com or
         | just comment here if you're happy to respond in public. Thanks!
        
           | alberth wrote:
           | Hi Bron
           | 
           | Really appreciate you noticing my comment and responding. I
           | really love your company for its values (and it doesn't hurt
           | that you have the best webmail interface I've ever used ...
           | and I've used them all).
           | 
           | Essentially, I have a small company of 11 employees. All
           | remote. We have no on-premise infrastructure, cloud for
           | everything. The vast majority of my team use: Github,
           | Zendesk, Zoom, and Slack daily.
           | 
           | Whenever I hire a new employee, without SSO (and identity
           | management), I have setup a multiple account credentials just
           | for that single employee (and off boarding employees to
           | deactivate access is a whole bigger issue).
           | 
           | It's not uncommon that an employee of mine might have 8-10
           | different username and passwords for all the various systems
           | they use daily. Because of differing username or password
           | retention policies, the usernames might be different and/or
           | the passwords become out of synch because one provider is on
           | a 90 day password change when another is on a 60 day password
           | change. It's a mess and I'm sure people have sticky notes
           | with their username/password written down just to keep up
           | with all of their various username/passwords.
           | 
           | By having SSO/IdP provided by our email provider, I can
           | eliminate all of these problems. Note: I'm not saying for you
           | to accept SSO from a 3rd party - I'm suggesting that Fastmail
           | be the Identity Provider (IdP) for my employees so that they
           | can use their Fastmail (my domain) account with
           | Github/Slack/Zendesk/etc.
           | 
           | Here's some SSO documentation from common 3rd party services
           | we use.
           | 
           | Again, thanks so much for considering this. I would LOVE it
           | if you became an IdP/SSO provider. Happy to answer any more
           | questions.
           | 
           | EDIT: I should mention that I've looked into Okta in the past
           | but for sites that don't support SSO, what Okta does is
           | essentially a formfill/Lastpass like feature. Which kind of
           | makes me uncomfortable. But if Fastmail allow SSO, Okta
           | becomes more appealing (though not required)
           | 
           | EDIT2: this might be more heavy weight that you're looking
           | for but I know at one time the gold standard for open source
           | SSO offerings is OpenAM (it's the forked SSO offering that
           | was from Sun back in the day and Sun at the time was the IAM
           | leader). https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/
           | 
           | [1] https://docs.github.com/en/github/authenticating-to-
           | github/a...
           | 
           | [2] https://slack.com/help/articles/203772216-SAML-single-
           | sign-o...
           | 
           | [3] https://support.zendesk.com/hc/en-
           | us/articles/203663826-Sing...
        
         | brongondwana wrote:
         | ... and on the on-topic, I really do need to get back to
         | writing up that blog post idea about the distinction between
         | secrecy and privacy. Protonmail definitely does more secrecy
         | (with the end-to-end, hidden from themselves encryption, etc) -
         | but I suspect that with our (Fastmail's) image proxying and
         | standards-based integration with regular tooling that the
         | overall balance of usable and effective privacy is more mixed.
        
         | jabroni_salad wrote:
         | The privacy community does not really like fastmail. I stick
         | with FM because I personally value the service and find it
         | reliable, but they aren't zero-knowledge and australia has
         | recently had some unfortunate legislation in regards to digital
         | privacy.
        
           | fossuser wrote:
           | I think Fastmail is more honest - if you're using email and
           | communicating with 90% of the rest of the world that uses
           | gmail then the 'privacy' provided by proton mail is
           | irrelevant.
           | 
           | They're also based in [edit: I thought Protonmail was Russian
           | based, but they're not]. I think that's probably worse from a
           | country level.
           | 
           | Encrypted email is a bad way to do private communication -
           | services that pretend otherwise set off alarms for me.
           | 
           | The main advantage of Fastmail vs. Google is that it's a
           | separate service focused on providing you a good experience
           | with custom domain support. The business model is not ad
           | driven so incentives are more aligned and it lets you leave
           | Google services.
           | 
           | The privacy people's faith in proton is misplaced (imo).
        
             | cherrycherry98 wrote:
             | Who's based in Russia? Fastmail seems to be Aussie/American
             | and Protonmail is Swiss.
        
               | fossuser wrote:
               | Ah you're right - not sure why I thought that Protonmail
               | was Russian, but they're not.
        
             | mackrevinack wrote:
             | i would have gone with fastmail if there was a free tier.
             | ive been paying for protonmail for years now even though i
             | don't need any of the premium features, but if there ever
             | comes a year where i cant pay for whatever reason, its nice
             | knowing that my email still work as normal
        
             | cge wrote:
             | The major point of Protonmail, I think, is the no-access
             | encrypted storage, not E2E-encrypted transit, which it does
             | have, but only in limited and, as you point out,
             | problematic circumstances.
             | 
             | If your concern is with state-level actors with the ability
             | to do mass spying on emails in transit and collection from
             | many different providers, then no, Protonmail won't be that
             | useful. If your concern is with someone getting access to
             | your email archive, possibly years after the emails have
             | been sent, then Protonmail does offer something: even if
             | its own data storage is compromised, your emails should be
             | secure. I suspect the latter is actually a much more common
             | problem than the former, as we've seen with data ransoming
             | lately.
             | 
             | Unfortunately, Protonmail's implementation is rather
             | clunky. I actually would consider using a self-hosted
             | system that did something similar: get clear-text emails,
             | but immediately encrypt them with a key that the server
             | doesn't have the private key for, and still allow searching
             | and notifications in some way.
        
               | fossuser wrote:
               | Thanks - I think this is a good counter argument.
               | 
               | My personal approach is to treat email as public
               | communication and to delete archives aggressively.
               | 
               | I recognize that this isn't something most people do.
        
             | tionis wrote:
             | Well if you want custom domain support and reliable mail, I
             | can suggest purelymail, very cheap, only mail, reliable non
             | bloat service. I switched from protonmail because I like
             | using native mail clients and not paying as much.
        
             | allarm wrote:
             | > They're also based in Russia?
             | 
             | No, they're based in Australia. They've been blocked in
             | Russia recently though.
        
               | gunapologist99 wrote:
               | Protonmail is Swiss, not AU. Fastmail is Australian.
        
       | cutthegrass2 wrote:
       | Are these alternatives even worth adopting if you're using an
       | Android phone?
        
         | soco wrote:
         | Why not? The only thing Google mandates on Android is that you
         | download them from Google Play (and even that can be worked
         | around). Nothing stands in your way to use what you want for
         | email or document editing or storage.
        
           | Natsu wrote:
           | I assume they mean that you don't gain much privacy from
           | Google if you still have one of their phones. See also: the
           | location tracking stuff lately.
        
           | spinax wrote:
           | Real life +1, Google is used for the basic Android setup
           | needs and that's it, all other needs are non-Google services
           | (well, technically NewPipe is Youtube because who doesn't
           | like a good cat video). One key app most people will want is
           | DAVx5: https://www.davx5.com/ (also available on f-droid)
        
         | Bayart wrote:
         | I use Protonmail, including on Android, and it's doing fine.
         | Albeit I don't do anything fancy, save for some filtering.
        
       | minton wrote:
       | My company recently tried to find an alternative to Google
       | Workspace.
       | 
       | We looked at Hey and really liked it. However, they lacked a
       | calendar and we felt training some of our less technical users
       | would be too much effort.
       | 
       | We tried ProtonMail (Business account) but ran into these issues:
       | - no shared Calendar - no way to enforce MFA - no way to enforce
       | a password policy - no way to forward emails (except manually) so
       | we can use Zapier - no way to help employees with password resets
       | 
       | In the end we just stayed with Google as we couldn't find a
       | competitor with matching services.
        
         | pjerem wrote:
         | It looks like Fastmail checks all your needs (not sure about
         | password policy) and it's a fantastic product. It deserves the
         | << fast >> in its name and the webmail as well as the calendar
         | are really great (and fast, too).
         | 
         | It's one of those rare products you can feel that they have
         | been crafted with a lot of love.
        
         | josefresco wrote:
         | Did you evaluate Zoho or Office365?
        
           | minton wrote:
           | We looked briefly at Zoho but the founder didn't trust the
           | brand for whatever reason. Office365 seemed like too much a
           | burden on IT to setup and configure everything properly.
           | 
           | Also, we're trying to move away from these "suite" type
           | offerings that come with a ton of tools. We just want email
           | and calendar.
        
             | bredren wrote:
             | Fwiw, zoho's brand logo has needed an update since the crm
             | launched. The child blocks don't scream professionalism.
        
         | yonixw wrote:
         | I had a similar experience searching for MS Office\Google Docs
         | self-hosted alternative. While evaluation ONLYOFFICE, I found
         | that they don't have RTL support (for over 4 years:
         | https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DocumentServer/issues/19)
        
         | forbiddenvoid wrote:
         | Curious: Did you evaluate MS Office? I feel like Microsoft gets
         | left out of a lot of these conversations because of a cult-like
         | 'M$ is bad' culture in SV, but a lot of people I've talked to
         | haven't even used or tried their products in years if ever.
        
           | minton wrote:
           | We looked at Microsoft's offering, but IT felt the
           | administration burden was too high even compared to Google
           | Workspace.
        
           | kwanbix wrote:
           | I use both. Google Workspace at work and my personal account
           | which I got free at the time, and Office 365 Family.
           | 
           | Gapps is very good. It does probably 100% of what 90% of the
           | people need. Same for Office.
           | 
           | My only grip with Office is that in Android, the integration
           | seems to be less polished than that of Google.
           | 
           | The advantage for Office is the family plan that for about
           | 50~100 euros per year gives you 6 accounts. Something similar
           | for Google Workspace will be 300~360.
           | 
           | And if you must have office desktop, that is the cheapest
           | way.
        
         | yosito wrote:
         | Did you look into Nextcloud? If you don't have the expertise to
         | maintain it in-house, you might have to pay for a managed
         | instance, but it's been a pretty solid replacement for Google
         | services for me.
        
       | temp8964 wrote:
       | May I ask, what's wrong with using the email service provided by
       | your domain / web hosting company? Many times they are free.
        
       | sys_64738 wrote:
       | I stick with iCloud myself.
        
       | wishinghand wrote:
       | This site has served me well for finding alternatives to
       | companies that sell your data: https://switching.software
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-25 23:02 UTC)