[HN Gopher] List of Printers Which Do or Do Not Display Tracking...
___________________________________________________________________
List of Printers Which Do or Do Not Display Tracking Dots
Author : anonu
Score : 34 points
Date : 2021-06-24 20:33 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.eff.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.eff.org)
| floxy wrote:
| Anyone know the status of steganographic tracking / watermarking
| for scanners? Like when you scan to PDF. There might be something
| plain-text/easy that ends up in the PDF file to identify the
| make/model/serial number of the scanner that might be
| straightforward to strip. But are there more subtle yellow-dot
| like things that might be harder to strip?
| rendx wrote:
| Does not look very useful, unfortunately:
|
| "REMINDER: IT APPEARS LIKELY THAT ALL RECENT COMMERCIAL COLOR
| LASER PRINTERS PRINT SOME KIND OF FORENSIC TRACKING CODES, NOT
| NECESSARILY USING YELLOW DOTS. THIS IS TRUE WHETHER OR NOT THOSE
| CODES ARE VISIBLE TO THE EYE AND WHETHER OR NOT THE PRINTER
| MODELS ARE LISTED HERE. THIS ALSO INCLUDES THE PRINTERS THAT ARE
| LISTED HERE AS NOT PRODUCING YELLOW DOTS.
|
| This list is no longer being updated."
|
| I wonder if it would be possible to reverse engineer the
| firmware, and remove the dot printing, similar to camera hacks
| that remove feature restrictions.
| oxfeed65261 wrote:
| > "REMINDER: IT APPEARS LIKELY THAT ALL RECENT COMMERCIAL COLOR
| LASER PRINTERS PRINT SOME KIND OF FORENSIC TRACKING CODES, NOT
| NECESSARILY USING YELLOW DOTS. THIS IS TRUE WHETHER OR NOT THOSE
| CODES ARE VISIBLE TO THE EYE AND WHETHER OR NOT THE PRINTER
| MODELS ARE LISTED HERE. THIS ALSO INCLUDES THE PRINTERS THAT ARE
| LISTED HERE AS NOT PRODUCING YELLOW DOTS."
|
| So the title is misleading; this list indicates whether dots have
| been observed, not whether they are present.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-06-24 23:01 UTC)