[HN Gopher] Bee-friendly urban wildflower meadows prove a hit wi...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Bee-friendly urban wildflower meadows prove a hit with German city
       dwellers
        
       Author : rapnie
       Score  : 124 points
       Date   : 2021-06-20 17:55 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com)
        
       | DerSaidin wrote:
       | I first read the title as "beer-friendly urban wildflower
       | meadows", and thought that would indeed make a lovely beer
       | garden.
       | 
       | Maybe these meadows could serve bees and beers? :)
        
       | hangonhn wrote:
       | Can any Googlers confirm or deny if this is also what Google is
       | doing near their campus? I was out walking my dogs near the
       | Google campus and was just stunned by the landscaping that looks
       | like a bunch of unmanicured wild flowers in bloom. It was
       | simultaneously beautiful but very natural looking. There were
       | definitely a lot of bees and "life" around them. As a resident of
       | Mountain View, I really appreciated it but wasn't sure if it was
       | deliberate and if it was, if this is a new trend.
        
       | neonate wrote:
       | https://archive.is/IqKd9
        
       | Tomte wrote:
       | Our municipality even gave out such a seed mix for free.
       | 
       | If you're buying somewhere (supermarket etc.): caveat emptor.
       | 
       | Many of the flower mixes are neither native nor appropriate for
       | common native insects, but designed for beauty.
       | 
       | It may be a good idea to search for reputable vendors.
       | 
       | There are "famous" standardized mixes in Germany, but I cannot
       | remember the names.
        
       | fredley wrote:
       | In the city I live in we are lucky to have a lot of parks, but
       | also they leave the grass uncut in large portions of them. It
       | grows long, with flowers and other plants providing greater
       | biodiversity and a habitat for many more insects and small
       | creatures.
       | 
       | Some short grass is good, but the overabundance of lawns--
       | particularly as the default coverage for parks and gardens--is a
       | big problem.
        
         | sohkamyung wrote:
         | In Singapore, during last year's Circuit Breaker to break a
         | surge in COVID-19 infections, the grass verges were left uncut
         | (grass cutters were not allowed to work). It led to a surge in
         | butterflies in my local area.
         | 
         | Sadly, it ended after the Circuit Breaker ended, but I did
         | notice some local parks now having long grass that would have
         | been cut in previous years.
         | 
         | Here's a commentary about that period in the local papers.
         | 
         | https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/commentary/covid-19-cir...
        
       | techsupporter wrote:
       | This is something that cities the world over should be doing,
       | both from a bee and a people perspective. Density is a lot more
       | nice if greenery is nearby. Doesn't really matter if it's a park
       | or an allotment or a library with a wide area. Just plenty of
       | "something" with a large "big something" every so often.
       | 
       | In most cities I have experience with, high quality outdoor space
       | is largely reserved for the parts of town populated by people
       | living in detached, one-family dwellings. The more dense parts of
       | town are clustered next to noisy streets or with pollution. Not
       | much greenspace. The cities that have gotten it more right than
       | wrong are usually in western Europe and parts of Asia.
       | 
       | > Christian Schmid-Egger, who coordinates Berlin's wildflower
       | meadows on behalf of the German Wildlife Foundation, said any
       | conservation effort would ultimate require broader changes in
       | agricultural practices: "If we are going to save the bees, we
       | won't be doing it in cities."
       | 
       | He's not wrong, but he's also not fully right either. One of the
       | biggest damages we've done to our biome is to pave so much of it,
       | largely to make space for automobiles. Animals and insects need
       | places to thrive all over and setting aside more space among our
       | population for both people _and_ insects makes for a better
       | environment.
        
         | rapnie wrote:
         | I do some "guerilla seeding" now and then where I live,
         | scattering seeds in abandoned city spots that are waiting for
         | new housing to be build (which can take years). It is so
         | beautiful what flowers emerge, and when I see how both
         | residents and tourists enjoy them, taking pictures and such, I
         | felt it should be common practice to sow such spaces with
         | flowers. Suggested it to our municipality, but after a "Maybe,
         | we'll consider it" nothing happened. It is such low effort, low
         | cost though.. it has a good ROI in terms of well-being for bees
         | and humans alike :)
        
           | Sharlin wrote:
           | In my city, a grassroots organization that started as a bunch
           | of "guerrilla gardeners" now has their urban meadow projects
           | sanctioned by the city, more meadows are being created, and
           | they do paid consulting for the city as well on the topic of
           | biodiversity and various restoration projects. Very nice.
        
           | Rochus wrote:
           | That's a good approach; I looked around what to sow or plant;
           | here is a site with useful information:
           | http://hummelgarten.ch/dokumente/ (mostly German, but there
           | are also a few English documents).
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | TaylorAlexander wrote:
           | I've been doing something similar. Collecting native seeds
           | from plants that grow well here after they bloom, and
           | distributing them to barren spots that need more growth and
           | color. I just started but hopefully next year there will be
           | more Echium and Lupine around here.
        
             | distances wrote:
             | Small warning for Europeans: here Lupine is a introduced
             | species that displaces endemic plants. It probably should
             | be removed if it's growing in your lands.
        
               | Rochus wrote:
               | Don't remove it; better a few foreign lupines than no
               | more bumble or solitary bees.
        
               | developer93 wrote:
               | *replace it with native species
        
               | Rochus wrote:
               | Well, what is native? The Lupinus polyphyllus is the most
               | common lupine species in Central Europe and has been
               | present here for more than a hundred years. It is also
               | one of the better bumblebee plants. When farmers mow the
               | meadows (cutting down most of the native bumblebee
               | plants) the bumblebees can't find anything there and are
               | grateful for any garden.
        
               | developer93 wrote:
               | I believe it's also poisonous
        
               | _Microft wrote:
               | I know that nature conservation authorities had to do
               | that here in Germany when these plants spread from
               | people's gardens into natural reserves. Please use local
               | species instead of invasive ones.
        
         | Mediterraneo10 wrote:
         | In highly litigious cultures like the USA, wouldn't a city be
         | wary of attracting lawsuits from people with bee-sting
         | allergies for putting them at supposed risk?
        
           | dan-robertson wrote:
           | The US may be litigious but judges and lawyers aren't stupid.
           | The key issue is that it would generally be pretty hard to
           | find someone sufficiently culpable.
           | 
           | Many cities plant lots of male dioecious trees (ie some
           | individuals of the species only have staminate ("male")
           | flowers and others individuals only have pistillate
           | ("female") flowers, the city plants only the trees that
           | produce staminate flowers) which produce twice as much pollen
           | as they would if trees were selected more randomly. This is
           | because they drop less litter. But it is bad for people with
           | allergies. I don't think any such people have had success
           | suing their cities for this practice.
        
             | nullc wrote:
             | > which produce twice as much pollen as they would if trees
             | were selected more randomly.
             | 
             | My understanding is that it's even worse than twice,
             | because the female flowers of some species actually filter
             | the pollen out of the air.
        
         | dan-robertson wrote:
         | It sounds like the "high quality outdoor space" you are
         | referring to is something to be found in typical North American
         | suburbia, but I would argue that this is typically a bleak
         | crabgrass hell and not much higher quality or more alive than
         | the road/parking-lot hell that surrounds it. But maybe you are
         | instead imagining streets lined with elm trees (well elm was
         | traditional but most died of Dutch elm disease--other species
         | are used now).
         | 
         | Occasionally one may find an undeveloped lot which has more
         | native species growing there, but perhaps we just disagree on
         | what a high-quality outdoor space is, and you have something
         | much more human-focused than natural in mind. I would argue
         | that these _do_ exist in the dense parts of big American cities
         | (think Central Park in New York, which has a lot of space but
         | also serves a dense population and so can afford more
         | gardeners, flower beds, and varied features in general; New
         | York also manages to sustain two botanical gardens which have
         | reasonable examples of natural habitat too.) Though I would
         | imagine the typical US city with a hollowed-out downtown
         | mightn't have good parks or shared spaces.
        
           | ben_w wrote:
           | As a non-American, American cities haven't impressed me _at
           | all_.
           | 
           | However, you may find it interesting to explore the rest of
           | the world via Google Street View: I grew up in the South
           | Downs of the UK, did my degree in Aberystwyth, spent several
           | years in Cambridge and roughly one each in Plymouth and
           | Sheffield, and now live in Berlin. These all have a lot of
           | greenery within and on their doorsteps, the worst among them
           | (Sheffield and Plymouth) being roughly similar to my memories
           | of Manhattan.
           | 
           | Street View images of Spain, Greece, and Cyprus remind me a
           | lot of rural California (when actually visiting, Spain and
           | Greece felt accurate, Cyprus felt like the UK). Most of
           | England, Wales, and North-West France reminds me of New
           | England. The only places I've been to that were as bleak as
           | Nevada/Salt Lake were literally beaches, and even there the
           | bleakness didn't stretch to the horizon.
           | 
           | Rhine Valley has some colossal eyesores, but even then you
           | get to fantastic countryside in a fairly short cycle ride.
           | Everywhere in Switzerland, even the cities, is basically a
           | paradise on par with Yosemite, with the occasional mistake
           | present (Zurich motorway); and, with the caveat that I was 9
           | and this was multiple decades ago now, I have lots of green
           | memories from when I visited Singapore, Bangkok, Adelaide,
           | Sydney, Canberra, and Cairns.
           | 
           | (Nairobi had a lot of green in a lot of places, but I really
           | did not feel like I grokked any of the cities' underlying
           | patterns in the week I was there, so I can't say if greenery
           | implied rich places or poor places).
        
           | techsupporter wrote:
           | My view of a high-quality outdoor space is one where humans
           | can be without the need to pay, with the ability to sit, and
           | some space for play or leisure. We should also plan for pets
           | being present because no matter how many signs you put asking
           | people to not bring their dogs, cats, turtles, or ferrets,
           | people will bring them. So let's not assume otherwise. A
           | water fountain would be great, a public restroom (like a
           | Portland Loo) even moreso in larger areas.
           | 
           | This same space should also have as much of its volume as
           | possible given over to natural surfaces. Grasses and hardy
           | flowers, in particular. We don't need a rose garden. Most
           | plant species native to an area look quite nice if not mowed
           | down or stunted with pesticides.
           | 
           | We should encourage property owners to give over some of the
           | massive amounts of space currently used for automobile
           | operation and storage to these public spaces. Eliminate
           | parking minimums so that grocery and other big box stores in
           | urban areas are able to rip up the artificial paving and
           | return that space to natural use, for example. Make more
           | planter box seating in movement rights-of-way. Unused parcels
           | owned by governments should not be fenced off but have some
           | furniture plopped down and an "everyone welcome" sign placed
           | here.
           | 
           | I also want people and their cities to think about more than
           | just downtown. Comparatively few people live in "actual"
           | downtowns. We need to deal with that, too, so that downtowns
           | are not just clusters of tall office buildings that empty out
           | at the end of a workday. Nothing says that Downtown cannot be
           | a vibrant neighborhood of its own, arguably even easier than
           | trying to kickstart other neighborhoods. But just saying
           | "putting green space in downtown is difficult" misses the
           | many, many other areas of most cities and towns.
           | 
           | (I'm sure someone will come along and say "but you can't
           | possibly do this because _the homeless_ " so yes, this does
           | mean we are addressing environmental concerns at the same
           | time we are addressing human concerns.)
        
       | germinalphrase wrote:
       | Minneapolis gave small grants to homeowners for this purpose. The
       | program was well publicized before it began and all slots filled
       | immediately.
       | 
       | I know an entomology researcher that is studying the impact on
       | native pollinators and (unofficially) they are feeling very
       | bullish about the whole thing.
        
       | Tomte wrote:
       | Many towns now let neighbours care about "Baumscheiben"
       | (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumscheibe) along their streets.
       | In my town there are many that have been "adopted", and they are
       | sometimes spectacularly beautiful.
       | 
       | There are a few rules: the tree and its roots must not be
       | damaged, you must not plant things that grow too tall, because it
       | would create dangers in traffic.
       | 
       | City dwellers get to garden a little bit, the town saves on
       | upkeep.
       | 
       | And today I'm in Muenster and I saw a nice addition to that: the
       | town placed several large water containers along the sidewalk, so
       | the people don't have to carry water from their homes.
        
       | BuyMyBitcoins wrote:
       | I live in Texas and I saw a monarch butterfly for the first time
       | a few weeks ago. I hope more people let wildflowers grow - as the
       | people who are currently doing so seem to be helping the biome
       | recover.
        
       | vhodges wrote:
       | For readers in the Lower Mainland (of BC):
       | 
       | https://www.westcoastseeds.com/products/bee-turf and/or
       | https://www.westcoastseeds.com/products/alternative-lawn-mix
        
       | dan-robertson wrote:
       | The biggest cause of these declining populations seems, to me, to
       | be intensive agriculture which leads to both loss of habitat and
       | various toxic chemicals (pesticides but also fertilisers and huge
       | quantities of slurry). Another cause may be pollution but it
       | seems to me that we've had pollution for longer. In the U.K. this
       | intensive agriculture was started in the war as an effort to
       | produce more food locally. It meant less land was left fallow and
       | land which had been too poor quality to be viable was farmed
       | (with low yields and lots of artificial inputs.) It also means
       | that any agricultural runoff is worse for the environment it runs
       | into (even fertilisers may cause algal blooms in rivers which can
       | then remove the oxygen from the water.) Because farms have to
       | stay competitive, there isn't much choice but to continue these
       | intensive practices. To some extent, switching to certified
       | organic practices allows farms to stop such practices.
       | 
       | It's not so obvious what the solution is. There are a lot of
       | people to feed and reducing the productivity of the land in a
       | rich country puts pressure on land in other countries. One
       | suggested solution is people changing to more land-efficient
       | diets with less meat, but I don't really see this happening much.
        
         | pfdietz wrote:
         | How do fertilizers kill insects?
        
           | dan-robertson wrote:
           | Well insecticides and habitat loss kill insects. Intensive
           | farming involves insecticides and habitat loss. And
           | fertilisers in runoff may damage ecosystems causing further
           | loss of habitat.
        
       | Rochus wrote:
       | This is very important and worrisome. People usually know only
       | the honeybees. But, for example, bumblebees are at least as
       | important in pollination (even more diligent than honeybees
       | because they fly even in bad and cold weather).
       | 
       | But this year is extreme; here in Switzerland I hardly see
       | bumblebees anymore, no idea why. I am far from being the only one
       | who has noticed this. Here, for example, a detailed blog (in
       | German), where an incredible planting in contrast to previous
       | years is hardly visited by bumblebees:
       | http://www.hummelgarten.ch.
        
         | snovv_crash wrote:
         | Maybe it was due to the very cold winter?
        
           | Rochus wrote:
           | Well, I remember much harsher winters twenty years ago which
           | apparently was no issue for the bees. And until some weeks
           | ago I actually saw many bumblebee queens on the flowers, but
           | then by end of May the number suddenly decreased sharply.
           | Must be another reason.
        
             | qayxc wrote:
             | I found many dead bumblebees this year and many of them
             | were infected with mites.
             | 
             | It seems as if varroa mites have carried viruses from
             | infected honey bees to wild bees and are killing a lot
             | them.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-20 23:00 UTC)