[HN Gopher] Taxes Are for the Little People
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Taxes Are for the Little People
        
       Author : rbanffy
       Score  : 75 points
       Date   : 2021-06-19 18:30 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (pluralistic.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (pluralistic.net)
        
       | djenendik wrote:
       | I no longer live in the US, but once held permanent residence
       | status. I plan on running a little experiment: submit randomly
       | generated tax returns to the irs. I'll keep you posted.
        
       | useful wrote:
       | Why is carried interest still a thing? Why are fixed fees taken
       | by investment managers not taxed as income?
       | 
       | I think the current administration could fix these things easily
       | but we are talking about all kinds of other things while ignoring
       | low hanging fruit.
        
       | okareaman wrote:
       | Wtf is this?: _By reading this website, you agree, on behalf of
       | your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers
       | arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses,
       | terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap,
       | confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use
       | policies ( "BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your
       | employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in
       | perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and
       | privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to
       | release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer._
       | 
       | If it's supposed to be funny, I really don't have time for it so
       | I left without reading
        
         | wizzwizz4 wrote:
         | It's supposed to be satire. Not all satire is funny. (It also,
         | potentially, shields the author from lawsuits.)
        
           | edoceo wrote:
           | Might even be good satire (which I think means: 50/50 funny,
           | 80% offensive) and it got someone to leave - so...Well
           | played?
        
       | llimos wrote:
       | Is there anything anyone can do about all this? Or is this how
       | Western civilization finally ends?
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | Exploiting tax loopholes is like hacking the financial system.
         | And this kind of hacking should be punishable just like black-
         | hat computer hacking is.
         | 
         | Using a system (or the law) in ways it was not intended to be
         | used can be considered hacking.
        
           | whatshisface wrote:
           | That just replaces all of the accountants with lawyers.
        
         | atlgator wrote:
         | There is a huge difference between taxing capital gains (net
         | profit from investment each year) and taxing capital (direct
         | tax on your entire net worth). The former is an effective tool
         | to tax the wealthy by adding new capital gains tax brackets.
         | The latter is how Western civilization ends because you will no
         | longer own anything free and clear after income taxes. The
         | Government will have the ability to take your capital when and
         | how they wish.
        
           | ak217 wrote:
           | That sounds histrionic because real property is already taxed
           | in many states, and short of taxing wealth, the government
           | can do many things to devalue your assets.
           | 
           | Putting aside the issue of the current trajectory of
           | increasing inequality and its destabilizing effects on
           | national security, the obsession Americans have with owning
           | things "free and clear" is a reflection of a kind of
           | privilege. The US is blessed with an expansionary economy,
           | stable financial system, strong rule of law, military power,
           | and respect for individual rights. These all form the basis
           | of this belief that private property rights are absolute.
           | They are never absolute, always subject to the goodwill of
           | the social contract and the laws of physics. What good is
           | owning things free and clear when there is a marauding
           | militia outside your Capitol, or your land lost all value
           | because of the environmental damage externalities of the
           | economy?
        
           | aqme28 wrote:
           | That is quite a big leap to go from "taxing capital" to
           | "Western civilization ends because you will no longer own
           | anything free and clear after income taxes."
           | 
           | Can you justify that at all?
        
           | xg15 wrote:
           | If the move to subscriptions and smart devices keeps going
           | like it does, you'll no longer own anything anyway.
        
           | xg15 wrote:
           | > _net profit from investment each year_
           | 
           | Ah, so no growth, no taxes. I see what your did there.
        
           | ajmadesc wrote:
           | I mean, what it only kicks in after say $25 million?
           | 
           | Then everyone would be able to own 25,000,000 worth of stuff
           | free and clear.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | edoceo wrote:
             | And you could adjust yearly, don't want those multi-
             | millionaires to feel too much burden. Who will creat the
             | jobs!? Won't somebody think of the jobs?!?
        
           | laserdancepony wrote:
           | It's okay because I have nothing to take.
        
           | Retric wrote:
           | We already tax cars and land, it's hardly the end of
           | civilization.
        
           | pcbro141 wrote:
           | Do you pay property tax?
        
         | disposekinetics wrote:
         | I feel like you're conflating civilization and government.
        
         | tootie wrote:
         | Vote.
         | 
         | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-12/manchin-o...
        
         | ilaksh wrote:
         | I'm pretty sure there are only two possible ways these things
         | will change significantly. WWIII or AI/yogurt takeover.
        
         | breatheoften wrote:
         | I could imagine a wealth tax movement getting strong enough and
         | that or the threat of it might eventually be able to change
         | things ... :fingers crossed:
         | 
         | Or maybe if the trend of folks no longer working continues for
         | long enough with enough force ...
         | 
         | The labor class has gotten screwed so severely for so long
         | opting out of the labor economy is probably the most rationale
         | option available for the majority of earth's human population
         | ...
        
         | brnt wrote:
         | It's how Anglosaxon civilization may end, but there are Western
         | alternatives with better democratic oversight, such as the
         | Rhineland model. They are creaking under the strain of
         | Anglosaxon propaganda though.
        
         | api wrote:
         | The culture war ensures that neither side will vote on the
         | basis of economic issues, so no.
        
       | jl2718 wrote:
       | "Monetarily sovereign countries don't tax to fund their
       | operations. Rather, they tax to fight inflation"
       | 
       | Another way of putting this: we are paying the interest on their
       | loans. That is, the only thing that would be different without
       | taxes is higher interest rates.
       | 
       | https://www.sifma.org/resources/research/us-treasury-securit...
        
         | orwin wrote:
         | > Another way of putting this: we are paying the interest on
         | their loans.
         | 
         | No. Most of the money (more than 90%) is issued by private
         | banks, and most of that is for private companies. the taxpayers
         | are paying interest on those loans.
        
       | loosetypes wrote:
       | In Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City by Matthew
       | Desmond, the author shows not only that there is money to be made
       | renting housing to the American lower class, but also that it is
       | in fact more profitable than renting to their more economically
       | well off counterparts.
       | 
       | This is not because they have more money to part with but because
       | they can be squeezed harder.
       | 
       | The wider concept seemed counterintuitive to me at first but I
       | see various implementations abound in the wild the harder I look.
       | This article shows one example.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | rcurry wrote:
         | He cut that corner pasture into acre lots,
         | 
         | He sells 'em owner-financed strictly to them that's got no kind
         | of credit,
         | 
         | 'cause he knows they're slackers and they'll miss that payment,
         | 
         | then he takes it back.
         | 
         | - From Choctaw Bingo, by James McMurty.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-19 23:01 UTC)