[HN Gopher] Manuka - a antipodean aesthetic on 19th century Germ...
___________________________________________________________________
Manuka - a antipodean aesthetic on 19th century German root-stock
Author : firloop
Score : 42 points
Date : 2021-06-13 19:31 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (klim.co.nz)
(TXT) w3m dump (klim.co.nz)
| timClicks wrote:
| Does anyone know how wood was able to be carved with sufficient
| precision to enable it to be used as a medium for type? At such
| small scales, surely it splintered and fractured all the time?
| jack_jennings wrote:
| As the previous poster mentioned, wood would only be used for
| particularly large poster type, but (if I recall correctly)
| even at large scale the printing press does wear out the wood
| blocks more quickly than metal type; the good designs that you
| see in wood would anticipate that distortion without
| compromising legibility.
|
| Wood type was also often very trendy, insofar that new designs
| that were bigger and bolder were developed and produced quickly
| -- the aesthetic lifespan may not have been longer than the
| physical one.
| timClicks wrote:
| Understood, thanks. Interesting point about wooden type being
| easier to produce - that makes a lot of sense. Thank you for
| taking the time to answer the question.
| Igelau wrote:
| My understanding is that it's actually the opposite of what
| you're thinking. Small scale wasn't an issue because wood type
| was used for large letters. This is because large scale was an
| issue for metal type, which could cool unevenly and warp at
| larger sizes.
| timClicks wrote:
| Ah right, this makes perfect sense. Thank you for taking the
| time to answer the question.
| teruakohatu wrote:
| As a kiwi reading this, at the start I thought it was about a new
| hybrid manuka tree developed off German root stock ...nope it was
| just tree metaphors about a new font.
| crb wrote:
| https://klim.co.nz/about/:
|
| > Our foundational ethos is "a thing well made".
|
| I see what you did there.
| ZephyrBlu wrote:
| Me too. I'm very disappointed :/.
| tpaulin wrote:
| Me three.
| mirekrusin wrote:
| 3 out of 7.9 billion is not bad!
| mdoms wrote:
| There's an image[1] of text with bush in the background that
| appears to have no manuka whatsoever in it. You don't have to
| travel far in NZ to find thousands and thousands of manuka trees.
| I'm not convinced the author even knows what manuka is.
|
| [1] https://klim.imgix.net/original_images/Manuka-Campaign-
| Slab-...
| 1970-01-01 wrote:
| The site is about fonts and text, not trees and roots.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-06-14 23:02 UTC)