[HN Gopher] Internet of Shit
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Internet of Shit
        
       Author : dTal
       Score  : 104 points
       Date   : 2021-06-13 20:15 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (twitter.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com)
        
       | orf wrote:
       | Firmware updates for your shoes. Mother of god.
        
       | throwawaaarrgh wrote:
       | IoT is the 21st century version of bloodletting
        
       | voqv wrote:
       | That account always brings me to chuckle. But the biggest joke
       | actually comes from myself, being a person who owns 10 smart
       | bulbs at home. This smart home thing has just stalled: * At least
       | several times a week my hue bridge is not found and I lie for 10
       | seconds in bed repeatedly tapping the "off button" like a dummy.
       | * Sync to music is still increadibly limited and just doesn't
       | work well. Arguably it was better 7 years ago when streaming was
       | less popular and apps could analyse the track waveform, instead
       | of relying on microphones. * Sync to games and movies is also
       | still fairly poor. If you're viewing a scene during broad
       | daylight and in front of you a red van appears, the whole room
       | goes red instead of maintaining the white daylight. * Dynamic
       | light scenes are very cool but are also just a pain to use. It
       | shouldn't take me 30 seconds to set the room to a certain mood. I
       | sometimes feel like the developers of the dynamic scenes apps
       | don't use their own products.
       | 
       | All just my experience.
        
       | 3princip wrote:
       | These stories used to be funny when it was about crap that just
       | didn't work. They are becoming terrifying to be frank. Counting
       | people in rooms for on-demand tickets, in-car purchasing of
       | additional features, mandatory bio-metric monitoring of delivery
       | driver behavior...
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | midasuni wrote:
       | See, there is an S in IoT. Still doesn't stand for security
       | though.
        
       | rektide wrote:
       | Such a great great account. IoT devices feel completely out of
       | control. They've long been a stealthied tip of the spear in the
       | War Against General General Purpose Computing: complex
       | computerized systems & devices, spread out all over our
       | environment, but possessing secret programming, sending all their
       | gathered data to big data centers. All of it done invisibly,
       | unobservably. Consumers see & hear nothing except a highly
       | synthetic output, mediated through a narrow window of the
       | provided application. I continue to think push back should start,
       | that it's in everyone's interest- consumers, & a market which is
       | seeing adoption but also struggling to maintain the image of
       | legitemacy while suffering endless hits- to change things around,
       | & try to do better, try to be more open & up front & honest.
       | 
       | I mentioned Webinos[1] the other day, which was a really good
       | attempt to create personal data systems for their network of
       | devices. This particular mention was in the context of the car,
       | but Webinos was a pro-user general IoT system for all manners of
       | devices. I think it had a long way to go to be viable, but it's
       | still the most interesting data-point I have seen, and one that I
       | should probably try to write up better in long-form sometime.
       | 
       | Right now, the Connectivity Standards Alliance & their new Matter
       | standard, built around the Threads standards, atop IPv6 and
       | 802.15.4 low power wireless, seems very promising. It seems like
       | there is finally some well known industrial knowledge we are able
       | to deploy to make reasonably good devices, although like, Matter
       | is only a month old. Not a lot of activity on HN around this
       | work, but I really enjoyed the Gigastacey write up on this[2].
       | 
       | There are two core failures though. First, neither Thread nor the
       | CSA's Matter are open standards. There are open source
       | implementations, and supposedly Thread isn't that hard to get the
       | standards to, but these are not open, advertised pieces of
       | knowledge. These are still anti-general-purpose-computing
       | devices, still not radiant, visible systems to users. Not
       | everyone needs to engage at that level, but right now these
       | systems all being opaque, industrial machinations that we have no
       | window into: that's extremely hostile. Computing ought espouse
       | better principles of foundational knowledge, ought try to be a
       | clear, knowable thing. The other problem, and I'm less sure about
       | this (because in part the specs aren't readily available/it's not
       | publicly knowable!), but I'm not sure if Thread devices are
       | actually inherently end-user interactable. There might well be a
       | bunch of good IoT standards, but all interaction might still be
       | channeled through overlay networks back to big data centers.
       | There might be good standards for hardware, but no actual pro-
       | user power derivable from that: this might be another example of
       | the "internet" being used as a way to expand the control of
       | closed, isolated, corporate servers into the home, with no real
       | capability for those within the home to use their own systems &
       | devices directly.
       | 
       | I'd like to see IoT become something other than this vanguard
       | force in The War Against General Purpose Computing. It's
       | disspiriting that there seems to be so little basis, so few
       | positive signs out there. But I also think sea change could
       | happen quickly. Pieces seem to be in place, or close, but we're
       | still, right now, inviting alien data-centers into our home, and
       | they frankly have a lot of f-ups & problems beyond that that make
       | this a sad sad tale. Here's to hoping we can all eventually find
       | a more equitable relationship to work with our devices from.
       | 
       | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27463898
       | 
       | [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27121525
       | https://9to5mac.com/2021/05/11/smart-home-alliance-from-appl...
        
       | throwawayay02 wrote:
       | I avoid smart crap as much as possible, but now my parents were
       | hit: they've had the same TV and cable box thing for many years,
       | and this month it started showing ads on everything: the menus,
       | paused movies, past recordings. Unskippable ads as well.
       | 
       | It's just so tiring, I dread the day I will need to buy a new car
       | and they will all have touchscreen internet connected gimmicks
       | and ads.
        
         | pmoriarty wrote:
         | I wish we'd just ban all unsolicited ads already.
         | 
         | The world would be so much better.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-13 23:01 UTC)