[HN Gopher] Surprising Shared Word Etymologies
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Surprising Shared Word Etymologies
        
       Author : DanielDe
       Score  : 250 points
       Date   : 2021-06-11 16:15 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.danielde.dev)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.danielde.dev)
        
       | dhosek wrote:
       | On the flip side, miniature and minimum are etymologically
       | _unrelated_.
        
       | schoen wrote:
       | There was a great puzzle in the MIT Mystery Hunt this year about
       | calques between Latin and Greek, where words would be literally
       | equivalent if you translated them morpheme-by-morpheme. While
       | this is sometimes a source of etymology (because someone
       | consciously translated a foreign word this way), in this case it
       | was just a source of humor because the particular calques in the
       | puzzle are _not_ equivalents.
       | 
       | The example I most remember is "suppository" (from Latin) and
       | "hypothesis" (from Greek), both literally meaning 'put under'.
       | (The actual etymological calque would be "supposition".)
       | 
       | As https://devjoe.appspot.com/huntindex/ isn't updated with 2021
       | puzzles yet, I don't know how to find the specific puzzle I'm
       | thinking of to show the other examples. :-)
        
         | Grustaf wrote:
         | Well, isn't Latin a whole cloth calque of Greek anyway...
         | 
         | But that aside, if you're interested in calques, checkout Old
         | Church Slavonic, they calqued massive amounts of Greek words,
         | rather than going the lazy route of English and just borrowing
         | them. They hade the same issue, no way to express these complex
         | religious ideas, but solved it in different way. A lot of these
         | words are still used in modern slavic languages.
         | 
         | preobrazhenie = transfiguration (pre-obrazhenie, pere =
         | through, obraz = image)
         | 
         | Bogoroditsa = Theotokos (bogoroditsa, bog = god, rodit' = give
         | birth)
         | 
         | I especially love that S:t John Chrysostomos is called Ioann
         | Zlatoust (Golden mouth) and Constantinople is Tsargrad or
         | Konstantinograd.
        
           | schoen wrote:
           | Those are great!
           | 
           | > but solved it in different way
           | 
           | Different from what? You were mentioning that Latin calques
           | of Greek are common, which is my impression too (ana-stasis -
           | re-surrectio, upo-stasis -> sub-stantia, and non-religious
           | sum-patheia - com-passio).
        
             | Grustaf wrote:
             | I mean that in English they just took the Greek or Latin
             | word and anglicized it a bit, but in OCS they mostly
             | calqued more complex words.
             | 
             | Some common words were borrowed though, like gospel which
             | is evangelii - evangeli.
             | 
             | Chinese and more traditional Japanese is also good at
             | calquing or inventing new words, instead of borrowing, like
             | computer in Chinese being called electrobrain, or orthodox
             | in Japanese is sei-kyou, meaning correct church or
             | something like that.
             | 
             | Of course Japanese is basically made up of Chinese calques
             | and ancient loanwords, which is also a fascinating story.
        
               | msrenee wrote:
               | Just to nitpick a bit, it's evangelie - evangelieh. Well,
               | in Russian it is. I just realized you were talking about
               | old church Slavonic. I just saw modern Cyrillic and went
               | straight to Russian. As far as I can figure out without
               | any clue about OCS, it still seems like you're missing
               | the last syllable there.
        
               | msrenee wrote:
               | Yeh-van-gel'-ee-ay to be more precise. I really suck at
               | transliterating. With a hard G "guh" sound, rather than
               | the kind of soft G/J sound it has in English. I need to
               | learn IPA.
        
               | Grustaf wrote:
               | Yes this is the Russian form, but all those words are
               | usually very similar in Russian and the latest Russian
               | forms of Church Slavic, there are many varieties for
               | different times and places and the one used in the
               | Russian church today feels closer to modern Russian than
               | to something like Codex Suprasliensis.
               | 
               | As to the transcription, sure it wasn't precise (and yeah
               | it ends with an e in singular) Nowadays it of course
               | starts with YE but it's not really clear if that was
               | always the case, looking at etymology resources like
               | Fasmer: http://expositions.nlr.ru/ex_manus/Ostromir_Gospe
               | l/index.php
        
               | msrenee wrote:
               | Neat. I learned something today. Thanks!
        
           | mikelward wrote:
           | Mozart's full name was Johannes Chrysostomus Wolfgangus
           | Theophilus Mozart (Johann Goldmund Wolfgang Gottlieb Mozart).
           | 
           | Theophilus (Gottlieb) is Amadeus in Latin.
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozart%27s_name
        
       | JackFr wrote:
       | "Christ" and "grime" both come from the proto Indo-European root
       | for rub or smear. Christ as in anointing with oil, grimy from
       | tubing in dirt.
        
         | bloak wrote:
         | That's a good one. I like it.
         | 
         | However, although Wiktionary gives the etymology of "grime" as
         | "from Proto-Germanic _grimo ("mask") ", it also says: "Possibly
         | influenced by Danish grim ("soot, grime"), Old Dutch grijmsel,
         | Middle Dutch grime, Middle Low German greme ("dirt")." The
         | former goes back to "Proto-Indo-European _gkrey- ("to paint,
         | streak, smear"), from _gker- ("to rub, stroke") ", which is
         | also the origin of "Christ", but the latter goes back to
         | "Proto-Indo-European _gkrem- ("to resound; thunder")".
         | According to Wiktionary. But that doesn't really make much
         | sense, does it? I think there must be a mistake in there
         | somewhere.
         | 
         | Amusingly, "Grim" is also one of the names of the Norse god
         | Odin, presumably because he wore a mask. (Is that perhaps
         | mentioned in the film "The mask"?) So Christ and Odin have the
         | same name, sort of.
        
       | jfengel wrote:
       | My favorite shared etymology is "guest" and "hostile", along with
       | "host" both in the sense of "person who hosts a guest" and "an
       | army". They both go back to a Latin word meaning "stranger".
       | 
       | Cross-language ones are also fun. I like that the German word for
       | poison is "Gift", which etymologically means "something given".
       | Makes for some good puns.
       | 
       | This is a very clever approach to determining these
       | automatically. There is a field of Computational Humor and I
       | suspect you could combine this with a GPT-3-type mechanism to
       | make some good jokes.
        
         | Jiocus wrote:
         | > Cross-language ones are also fun. I like that the German word
         | for poison is "Gift", which etymologically means "something
         | given". Makes for some good puns.
         | 
         | "Gift" means poison in Swedish as well, and adding to that, it
         | also means "married". When I was a kid (before I really
         | understood that words are shared) I remember feeling worried
         | about some friends of the family that were about to get
         | married. From the sound of it, I thought something bad was
         | about to happen.
         | 
         | I had simply learned, in quite sensible order, the meaning of
         | _poison_ before _married_.
        
         | msrenee wrote:
         | I'm pretty sure "guest" comes from Old Norse, not Latin. And
         | hostile came from Latin through French. They've got the same
         | PIE root though, which is what's interesting. Same root, just
         | from before the germanic and romance languages split off PIE.
        
       | DanielBMarkham wrote:
       | Related: I've been listening to the History of English podcast.
       | If this kind of content is your thing, it's highly recommended.
        
       | Sharlin wrote:
       | A fun example of the opposite - a pair of very similar words that
       | have totally different etymologies - are "carouse" and
       | "carousel". The former comes via French from German "gar aus", an
       | exclamation with the same meaning as "drink up" in English
       | (literally, "quite out"). The latter, on the other hand, also
       | comes via French but from Italian, and originally means a type of
       | military drill or display executed by horsemen.
        
       | KoftaBob wrote:
       | Super cool! This reminds me of a fascinating fact I learned the
       | other day, about the history of the Coptic language in Egypt (the
       | final stage of the Egyptian language before Arabic was
       | introduced):
       | 
       | The Phoenician alphabet was heavily based on Ancient Egyptian
       | hieroglyph script. The Greek alphabet was in turn originally
       | based on the Phoenician alphabet. Finally, the Coptic alphabet
       | was based on Greek, bringing it full circle back to Egypt!
        
       | iib wrote:
       | I really like that definition of "surprising".
       | 
       | While I am amused by auto-antonyms, and words that mean opposite
       | things while having the same root, I never found them to be
       | surprising, because being the complete opposite of something is
       | actually related to that something, akin to the bitwise "not"
       | operation.
       | 
       | I am glad this definition took that into account.
        
       | Tagbert wrote:
       | To find out more cognates and some of the history of how those
       | words evolved, I recommend the History of English podcast. You'll
       | get language history and etymology as well as lots of social and
       | historical drivers for those changes.
       | 
       | From this, I learned that "white" and "black" are cognate with an
       | IE root that meant both burning and burned.
       | 
       | https://historyofenglishpodcast.com/
        
       | hprotagonist wrote:
       | My favorite is "shit" and "science", both of which have a root
       | sense of "to cleave or separate".
       | 
       | https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=shit
       | 
       |  _The notion is of "separation" from the body (compare Latin
       | excrementum, from excernere "to separate," Old English scearn
       | "dung, muck," from scieran "to cut, shear;" see sharn). It is
       | thus a cousin to science and conscience._
        
         | jfk13 wrote:
         | Interesting... though for what it's worth, the Oxford English
         | Dictionary doesn't confirm that origin for "science". Once you
         | get back to _scire_ 'to know', it says "of unknown origin":
         | 
         | > Etymology: < Anglo-Norman _cience_ , _sience_ , Anglo-Norman
         | and Middle French science (French _science_ ) knowledge,
         | understanding, secular knowledge, knowledge derived from
         | experience, study, or reflection, acquired skill or ability,
         | knowledge as granted by God (12th cent. in Old French), the
         | collective body of knowledge in a particular field or sphere
         | (13th cent.) < classical Latin _scientia_ knowledge, knowledge
         | as opposed to belief, understanding, expert knowledge,
         | particular branch of knowledge, learning, erudition  <
         | _scient-_ , _sciens_ , present participle of _scire_ to know,
         | of unknown origin + _-ia_ -ia suffix1.
         | 
         | Not claiming the OED is right and etymonline is wrong, of
         | course (it could equally well be the other way around); just
         | noting that this may not be a universally accepted etymology.
        
           | tkgally wrote:
           | I think the American Heritage Dictionary (1969) was the first
           | general dictionary to show reconstructed Indo-European
           | etymologies for English words [1, 2]. That's where I learned
           | about the supposed common origin of "science" and "shit,"
           | more than forty years ago.
           | 
           | The first and second editions of the OED did not show many
           | (any?) Indo-European roots, at least as far as I can recall,
           | and they may not have been incorporated fully yet into the
           | current online edition either. It's also possible that the
           | OED editors are cautious about accepting Indo-European
           | etymologies, which are reconstructed rather than based on
           | written evidence.
           | 
           | [1] https://www.ahdictionary.com/
           | 
           | [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_American_Heritage_Dicti
           | ona...
        
           | Grustaf wrote:
           | The word science definitely comes from scio - to know, but it
           | seems correct that shit and science ultimately come from the
           | same proto indo-european root, *skei.
           | 
           | https://www.etymonline.com/word/science
           | https://www.etymonline.com/word/shit
        
       | xefer wrote:
       | "cannabis" and "hemp"
       | 
       | https://blogs.illinois.edu/view/25/107526
        
       | SamBam wrote:
       | > These words all descend from the Greek "karkinos", meaning
       | "crab", which became "cancer" in Latin.
       | 
       | > "Cancer" later took on an alternative meaning, "enclosure",
       | because of the way a crab's pincers form a circle.
       | 
       | I am not an expert, but I think this may be backwards. I think
       | the original meaning was circle, from which both the "enclose"
       | meaning and the "crab" meaning (because the pincers form a circle
       | or an enclosure) derive.
       | 
       | wiktionary [1] has the most in-depth etymology I can find, and
       | has for "cancer" (meaning crab) the etymology is: _karkros
       | ("enclosure") (because the pincers of a crab form a circle), from
       | Proto-Indo-European_ kr-kr- ("circular"), reduplication of Proto-
       | Indo-European *(s)ker- ("to turn, bend") in the sense of
       | "enclosure", and as such a doublet of carcer. Cognate with
       | curvus.
       | 
       | Anyway, that aside, I felt stupid not having realized the
       | etymology of "cancel," since in Italian (one of my languages)
       | "cancello" means "gate."
       | 
       | 1. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cancer#Latin
        
         | programmer_dude wrote:
         | Wow, kark is crab in sanskrit.
        
           | danans wrote:
           | That should be the least surprising. Sanskrit (especially the
           | Vedic stage) preserves a tremendous number of old Indo
           | European forms and is often used as a sort of validity check
           | for PIE etymologies.
        
         | canjobear wrote:
         | Relatedly, "cycle", "wheel", "circle", and "chakra" are all
         | from the same Indo-European root via different languages.
        
           | jeofken wrote:
           | How does "wheel" relate? In Sweden/DK/NO we call it "hjul"
           | which is pronounced like the American nicotine vape brand
           | juul, quite similar to English
        
             | flobosg wrote:
             | All those words derive from the same Proto-Indo-European
             | root, _*kwel-_ : https://www.etymonline.com/word/*kwel-
        
               | canjobear wrote:
               | Apparently also "pole", via a change kw > p in Greek!
        
             | thaumasiotes wrote:
             | > In Sweden/DK/NO we call it "hjul" which is pronounced
             | like the American nicotine vape brand juul, quite similar
             | to English
             | 
             | I can't quite tell, but if you're saying that the American
             | brand Juul is pronounced in English as if it were the word
             | "you'll", that is not correct. Americans don't think of the
             | letter J that way.
             | 
             | (If you're saying Nordic hjul and English wheel are
             | similar, they are cognates.)
        
             | canjobear wrote:
             | Grimm's Law was a sound change that turned k into h when
             | Proto-Germanic split off from Proto-Indo-European. The
             | original form was something like *kwel which turned into
             | *hwel in Proto-Germanic, then eventually wheel in English
             | and hjul in Scandinavian languages.
             | 
             | The other words (chakra, circle, cycle) are from some kind
             | of reduplicated form like *kwekwlos, via different routes.
        
               | dotancohen wrote:
               | This is easily seen today in e.g. Norwegian Kval and
               | English Whale, which still sound similar enough to appear
               | related even to the layman.
        
         | DanielDe wrote:
         | Ah yes, I think you're right, I got that backwards! I'll update
         | the post, thank you!
        
         | armandososa wrote:
         | In Spanish we also use "cancel" as gate or fence.
        
       | AndrewOMartin wrote:
       | Do stationary (not moving) and stationery (paper, envelopes and
       | stuff) count?
       | 
       | Roving peddlers were the norm in the Middle Ages; sellers with a
       | fixed location often were bookshops licensed by universities;
       | hence the word acquired a more specific sense than its
       | etymological one.
       | 
       | https://www.etymonline.com/word/stationer
        
       | stakkur wrote:
       | https://www.etymonline.com/
        
       | kortex wrote:
       | I can't confirm it, but I've studied language and etymology a
       | ton, and I think there is a hidden etymology between "man"
       | (referring to humanity as a whole) and the mama/mom/mammary
       | cluster. Hear me out.
       | 
       | "Ma" is virtually always the first sound a baby makes, and is
       | also reminiscent of breastfeeding, with the lips pursing
       | together. It's widely hypothesized that because of this, the word
       | for "mother" in nearly every language on the planet is some
       | variant of "ma(m)".
       | 
       | "Da" and "pa" are the next-easiest sounds to make. Hence,
       | "dada/papa" for father (originally pH2ter in PIE, where h2 is the
       | "a-colored laryngeal).
       | 
       | Anyway, we have the word "man", related to the Latin "homo",
       | which is suspiciously close to "mama". Nowadays, "man" (and the
       | Italian "uomo") has mostly masculine connotation. But it strikes
       | me as really weird how close it is to such a feminine phoneme. My
       | headcannon is that "mam" is the root of words referring to both
       | "mother" (the first human a baby experiences) and "humanity" as a
       | whole.
       | 
       | It's hard to tease apart the influence of "guma"/dhghem, the PIE
       | for earth. Also related to "Adam" (as in "Adam and Eve") who was
       | famously made from Earth...yes Genesis is essentially based
       | around a giant pun in Hebrew.
       | 
       | Mama/dada/adamah/humana - they all swirl around the same phonetic
       | space, and I don't think this is a coincidence.
       | 
       | https://www.etymonline.com/word/*dhghem-?ref=etymonline_cros...
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamah
        
       | narag wrote:
       | My favourite in Spanish (but I think English speakers can relate)
       | is "botica" (pharmacy) and "bodega" (cellar), both from Greek
       | apotheke (basement, literally "under-box")
        
         | StavrosK wrote:
         | German speakers can also relate, with "apotheke".
         | Interestingly, apotheke in modern Greek means "storage room",
         | pharmacy is "pharmakeio". Ypotheke does mean mortgage in modern
         | Greek too.
        
         | schoen wrote:
         | Or "boutique" (in English via French). The perceived level of
         | fanciness in shopping at a boutique as opposed to a bodega is
         | rather different!
        
           | narag wrote:
           | Or imagine asking the pharmacist for wine :) In Spanish
           | "bodega" is specifically where wine is made or kept. I'm
           | aware that in English it's used for convenience stores. Just
           | a different joke.
        
         | reactspa wrote:
         | In Hindi, the word "booti" means medicinal plant (seems similar
         | to "botica" here).
        
         | asveikau wrote:
         | Spanish has tons of double imports from Latin. Words that
         | follow the normal phonetic evolution going from Latin to
         | Spanish, then parallel words re-imported from latin later.
         | 
         | Some I can think of offhand are the ones with the consonant + l
         | -> ll change:
         | 
         | Plano + llano
         | 
         | Clave + llave
         | 
         | Pleno + lleno
         | 
         | I think there are some others where Latin vowels like /o/ or
         | /e/ change to diphthongs like /we/ or /je/ and they get re-
         | imported with /o/ or /e/ again. I can't think of examples of
         | this right now but I am sure they exist. [Edit: foco + fuego is
         | one such example]
         | 
         | Probably others with word initial /f/ put to silent h, then re-
         | imported with an f again.
         | 
         | Wiktionary has a long list of these here:
         | 
         | https://en.m.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Spani...
        
         | d_tr wrote:
         | > apotheke (basement, literally "under-box")
         | 
         | Actually, "apo" has the meaning of "away" here, so "away-box"
         | would be more accurate. Maybe you are confusing it with "ypo",
         | which actually means "under" in Greek?
         | 
         | I always enjoy reading about this stuff, btw!
        
           | narag wrote:
           | Oops! that's right... "under-box" would be "hipoteca" =
           | mortgage.
           | 
           | Anything with the "teca" (or "theque" in other languages) has
           | some relation, like modern discoteca or biblioteca = library.
        
       | jlos wrote:
       | My favourite is idiot and idiomatic, both coming from the word
       | idios - literally meaning one's own. While idiot usually implies
       | someone lacking intelligence, an idiotes (idiotes) is a person
       | who lacks perspective, namely, one that is not their own.
       | 
       | In other words, an idiot is someone so caught up in their own
       | perspective they are incapable of engaging in fruitful public
       | conversation. Don't know what Plato would think of Twitter then .
       | . .
        
         | stevula wrote:
         | This might be more of a modern reinterpretation based on
         | etymology. The sense development in Greek was apparently more
         | like "private (non-political) person" > "layperson" >
         | "ignorant" > "stupid".
        
       | meristohm wrote:
       | I listened to The Blindboy Podcast episode "Manchan Magan"[0]
       | (The name of the interviewee, author of an etymology book[1])
       | yesterday and some of the stories were about shared words.
       | 
       | [0] https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-blindboy-
       | podcast/i...
       | 
       | [1] Library link: https://www.worldcat.org/title/thirty-two-
       | words-for-field-lo...
        
       | ineptech wrote:
       | My favorite example of similar words with seemingly-unrelated
       | meanings is "capitulate" (surrender) and "recapitulate" (repeat
       | or summarize).
       | 
       | Turns out that they both derive from "caput" (head) in its sense
       | of chapter or heading, due to the formal process of surrendering
       | in war, which involved drafting a document explicating the terms
       | of surrender which was divided into chapters.
        
       | dustractor wrote:
       | My favorite insight lately comes from looking at the letter ell.
       | Hebrew lamedh. Familiar to programmers, a 'lambda' function is a
       | nameless function.
       | 
       | Looking at a translation of the lords prayer, wondering where the
       | word 'hallowed' came in, since it wouldn't have been part of the
       | original language, I delved into why hallow was the substitute
       | for sacred, and what the origins of 'sacred' were.
       | 
       | Sacere, a set-aside area, so so something set aside is 'sacred'.
       | To hallow something is to hold it in high regard, to respect it,
       | to put it in another category other than the normal one.
       | 
       | The hebrews had seven holy names and EL was one of them. Imagine
       | if you time traveled back to that time and asked random people in
       | the fertile crescent, who or what do you worship? They
       | technically couldn't answer that because their beliefs told them
       | not to say that word, but they COULD say the ____
       | 
       | the ____
       | 
       | el (blank)
       | 
       | the the
       | 
       | EL EL? I worship the ____ (cant say it, leave a blank)
       | 
       | A blank? Like a hollow? A word with a separate category? A set-
       | aside-area? Sacere. Sacred. So, our father hallowed be thy name
       | is like saying you have a separate category for that name. What
       | is the normal category for all the normal words? You can say them
       | and you can write them. What is special about the 'sacred' words?
       | You don't say them.
        
         | jlos wrote:
         | The distinction between "hallow" and "sacred" is a distinction
         | that arises only due to the traditional of English
         | translations. Sacere is the Latin. Lord's prayer is written in
         | Koine Greek and uses agiazo (hagiadzo), the verbal form of
         | agios (hagios). Hagios is the by far the most common word for
         | "holy".
         | 
         | While modern translations are extremely good, publishers are
         | apparently hesitant to modify verses prone to memorization or
         | used in liturgies (such as the Lord's prayer),
        
           | StavrosK wrote:
           | *hagiazo, btw, a d slipped in there by accident.
        
         | rsj_hn wrote:
         | > Imagine if you time traveled back to that time and asked
         | random people in the fertile crescent, who or what do you
         | worship? They technically couldn't answer that because their
         | beliefs told them not to say that word
         | 
         | The tradition of not pronouncing the name YHWH is specific to
         | rabbinic judaism and was not a feature of either temple judaism
         | as practiced in the era of King David nor religions in the
         | fertile crescent.
         | 
         | Rather the opposite, as names of Gods were loudly and proudly
         | proclaimed. We know this because of poems (which were sung
         | outloud) composed that contain names of gods in such a way as
         | proper pronounciaton is required for the songs to have the
         | right rhythm and meter. (This is also how modern scholars
         | believe the correct pronounciation is "Yahweh", e.g. that the
         | vav was a "w" sound and the yod was a "y" sound.) In fact the
         | very idea of a name that could be written but not spoken
         | presupposes a tradition of reading and writing texts --
         | something practiced by Masoretes and Pharisees -- rather than a
         | service consisting of songs and spoken ceremonies as performed
         | in actual temples.
         | 
         | It is a question as to which extra-levitical sects initially
         | began this tradition of omitting the name in spoken
         | pronunciation sometime during the second temple period, as it
         | was most likely related to them not being priests and thus not
         | considering themselves worthy to say the name, but when the
         | priestly service ended and the temple was destroyed,
         | guardianship of law passed to rabbinical groups focused on
         | working with texts, and then no one was considered worthy to
         | say the name and thus it became a general prohibition even
         | though the royal singers singing the psalms loudly sang
         | "Yahweh" in almost every song in daily service.
         | 
         | But this practice of omitting the name was not shared by other
         | semitic groups in the region, nor is it present in Arabic
         | cultures. So let's not backpropagate that relatively modern
         | scholarly tradition to religious practices in the fertile
         | crescent during the dawn of civilization.
        
         | TchoBeer wrote:
         | Hallowed is a very apt translation, the hebrew word qdvsh
         | (which I think is the one that means hallowed?) can also be
         | translated as "sperated"; "separated/holy" is pretty much the
         | dictionary definition of hallowed
        
         | danans wrote:
         | > Looking at a translation of the lords prayer, wondering where
         | the word 'hallowed' came in,
         | 
         | Hallowed is word of Germanic origin. It has shared etymology
         | with holy and is part of the name of the Anglo-Saxon pagan
         | festival Halloween.
        
       | shever73 wrote:
       | My personal favourite is "science" and "shit". Both derive from a
       | root meaning to separate. Science separating one thing from
       | another and...well, you get the idea!
       | https://www.etymonline.com/word/shit#etymonline_v_45328
        
       | decuran wrote:
       | I love this! I had no idea about the Etymological Wordnet and it
       | probably would have saved me a ton of time developing my app for
       | finding "interesting" cognates: https://etymologyexplorer.com
       | 
       | I've always loved the same thing--finding hidden connections
       | between everyday words. I recently did this with "vain". It comes
       | from Latin vanus, meaning "empty". More obvious with the "in
       | vain" meaning, but the modern day comes from the idea of an
       | exaggerated self image, with no substance behind it. It has a ton
       | of "empty" cognates: vanish, evanescence, vanity (table), vaunt,
       | vacuous, vacuum, vacation, void, devastate, wanton, wane
        
         | thaumasiotes wrote:
         | > It comes from Latin vanus, meaning "empty". More obvious with
         | the "in vain" meaning
         | 
         | Fun fact: the Latin word for "in vain" is _frustra_.
        
         | carlob wrote:
         | I'm pretty sure that you can't have devastate in they list
         | without mentioning waste.
        
       | carlob wrote:
       | There is a fun triplet in Italian:
       | 
       | anello (ring, think annular)
       | 
       | anno (year, think annual)
       | 
       | ano (anus)
       | 
       | all come from the Latin word for ring: the year because of the
       | repetition of seasons and the anus, well, because of its shape.
        
         | gfaure wrote:
         | Unfortunately, this isn't correct according to my sources --
         | Italian anno < Latin annus < PIE _h2t-no-s from a root_ h2t-
         | "to go", while ano < Latin anus < PIE *h1eh2no- "ring".
        
           | carlob wrote:
           | That's the English Wiktionary and it doesn't cite any
           | sources. The paper etymological dictionary I've checked gives
           | both theories and a number of references for each.
        
             | junar wrote:
             | Not who you replied to, but it's consistent with basically
             | other source I can find. I'm inclined to believe that the
             | root for year is indeed different, based on the suggested
             | cognates in other languages.
             | 
             | https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/annual
             | https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anus
             | 
             | https://www.etymonline.com/word/annual
             | https://www.etymonline.com/word/anus
        
       | causality0 wrote:
       | I know I'm being pedantic here but if you're going to insist on
       | writing Greek words with Greek letters you need to stop writing
       | Latin words with the modern "u".
        
         | StavrosK wrote:
         | Latin used the V for both V and U today, right? How did those
         | two get separated? Why did we get "virus" and not "virvs" or
         | "uirus"? I guess they were pronounced differently back then
         | too?
        
           | laichzeit0 wrote:
           | Consonant v is pronounced as w in modern English. Vowel v is
           | pronounced as "oo" as in book. So "virus" in Latin would be
           | pronounced "wiroos".
           | 
           | It's really a pet peeve of mine when I hear people pronounce
           | Latin words starting with v and using the modern English v.
           | It's pronounced as w.
        
             | StavrosK wrote:
             | Ah, so they did indeed use the same letter for two distinct
             | sounds. Makes sense, thanks!
        
               | thaumasiotes wrote:
               | They used the same letter for two sounds in the sense
               | that it had a consonantal use and a vowel use. But they
               | did not, themselves, perceive the two sounds as being
               | different sounds. They are, to the Romans, one sound in
               | two different contexts.
               | 
               | Quoting _Vox Latina_ :
               | 
               | > There is also a much-quoted anecdote of Cicero's, which
               | tells how, when Marcus Crassus was setting out on an ill-
               | fated expedition against the Parthians, a seller of
               | Caunean figs was crying out ' _Cauneas!_ '; and Cicero
               | comments [...] that it would have been well for Crassus
               | if he had heeded the 'omen', viz. ' _Caue ne eas_ '; this
               | hardly makes sense unless, as we presume, the
               | [consonantal] _u_ of _caue_ was similar to the [vocalic]
               | _u_ of _Cauneas_. A parallel case is provided by Varro 's
               | etymology of _auris_ from _auere_
               | 
               | (The book is accurate in representing the Latin spelling
               | as being identical for the consonant and the vowel; in
               | fact they used V and U is a much later invention. Perhaps
               | the book felt English speakers would have more trouble
               | accepting V as a vowel than U as a consonant.)
        
             | thaumasiotes wrote:
             | > It's really a pet peeve of mine when I hear people
             | pronounce Latin words starting with v and using the modern
             | English v. It's pronounced as w.
             | 
             | It's a little more complicated. The Romans didn't
             | distinguish the sounds. But that doesn't mean they always
             | produced a sound that you would recognize as W. Sometimes
             | they did, sometimes not. You can observe the same effect
             | easily in modern languages with the same non-distinction --
             | for example, in modern Mandarin, Wen  formally begins with
             | a W sound, but in practice often begins with what I hear as
             | a V.
             | 
             | (For extra interest, contrast Old English, in which -- like
             | modern Mandarin -- /f/ and /w/ were phonemes while /v/ was
             | not, but -- unlike Mandarin -- [v] was a variety of /f/,
             | not of /w/.)
        
       | russellbeattie wrote:
       | Along these lines, the words "male" and "female" came to English
       | from Latin along totally different paths, even though they seem
       | like they'd have been created together.
        
         | StavrosK wrote:
         | Whaaat? That's crazy, thanks for that!
        
       | gfaure wrote:
       | "suture" and "sutra" are cognates in Latin and Sanskrit
       | respectively. A sutra suutr is literally a thread or fibre. This
       | also explains why it was calqued into Chinese as Jing  (among
       | other meanings, "weave").
       | 
       | Similarly, "joust" and "juxtapose" are cognates via French and
       | neo-Latinate French respectively (ultimately from iuxta, a Latin
       | preposition meaning "near", "next to").
       | 
       | However, my most favourite pair of surprising cognates that I
       | discovered recently is "durian" (the fruit) and "iwi" (a word
       | loaned from Maori into New Zealand English meaning "tribe"). This
       | one goes way back into Proto-Austronesian...
        
         | karaterobot wrote:
         | Beyond the etymologies, I learned what a calque is from your
         | comment, so thanks for that.
        
       | JW_00000 wrote:
       | Just finding Latin verbs and adding different prefixes is also a
       | fun way to find etymologically related words. Some examples:
       | (English is not my native language, so I don't know how obvious
       | they are to native English speakers / people who didn't learn
       | some Latin in school.)                 iacere = to throw       *
       | inject: to throw in (could be a vaccine injection, or e.g. data
       | injected in a program)       * eject: to throw out       *
       | reject: to throw back       * abject: to thow away => cast aside
       | => despicable ("abject coward") => miserable ("abject poverty")
       | * conjecture: something thrown together       * interject: to
       | throw inbetween       * subject: throw under => something placed
       | underneath something else ("a British subject", the subject of a
       | sentence, "subject to terms and conditions", the subject of a
       | paper)       * object: thrown against/facing => to expose =>
       | something tangible/material         * objective: a material
       | object => not influenced by emotions but based on observed facts
       | vs subjective: subject to emotions/personal opinions         *
       | objective: thrown against/facing => goal       * trajectory: to
       | throw accross       * project: to throw forth       * adjective:
       | to throw towards => something added/additional => an adjective
       | * jet: a "throw" => a jet e.g. of water => a spout that jets
       | => jet engine => a jet (plane with jet engines)         => jet
       | set (lifestyle of people that can travel for pleasure)
       | legere = to choose, to collect/gather, to read       * elect,
       | elective (optional), elite ("chosen out"), 1337 (= leet, from
       | elite), elegant       * select       * collect       * lecture,
       | college, lector, lectern, lesson       * neglect       *
       | intellect, intelligent (originally "discerning", literally
       | "choose between")       * diligent (to choose apart)       *
       | legion (a collection of soldiers in the Roman army, now also
       | meaning "numerous")       * legend: "that which must be read"
       | 
       | Who would've thought the words 1337, elegant, lesson, and legend
       | are related? Or superjet and adjective?
        
         | Sharlin wrote:
         | Also the mathematical term "surjection", a mapping that is
         | "over" its codomain, so covers all of it.
        
       | noncoml wrote:
       | kimono and winter
        
         | spoondan wrote:
         | Kimono is Zhao Wu  which transliterates to "wear-thing." It's
         | the word for clothes, not just the traditional robes, and it's
         | not etymologically related to a word for Winter in any
         | language.
         | 
         | Japanese has many -mono words based on verbs: tabemono Shi beWu
         | is food (eat-thing), nomimono Yin miWu  is a beverage (drink-
         | thing), tatemono Jian Wu  is a building (build-thing), kudamono
         | Guo Wu  is fruit (reward-thing; the Japanese word for "to
         | fruit" being related to the verb for achieving, similar to
         | English "come to fruition").
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | mkl wrote:
         | This is not true [1], it's a line from the movie _My Big Fat
         | Greek Wedding_ which doesn 't even mention the etymology of
         | "winter": "Ah, of course! Kimono is come from the Greek word
         | cheimonas which is mean winter. So what do you wear in the
         | wintertime to stay warm? A robe."
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=QQovEeLHVl0C&pg=PA115&lp...
        
       | Jun8 wrote:
       | If you like this sort of thing there's a whole book on them that
       | I found really enjoyable: _Dubious Doublets_ by Stewart
       | Edelstein.
       | 
       | Some pairs I found interesting from that book:                 *
       | Aardvark - Porcelain       * Brassiere - Pretzel (bonus: bracelet
       | and embrace)       * Bid - Buddha       * Hieroglyphics - Clever
       | * Zodiac - Whiskey
        
       | leipert wrote:
       | English is my second language and Latin my third. While the
       | latter is not as useful as learning Spanish or French in day to
       | day communication, it really helped my English capabilities as a
       | lot of words in English are Latin based.
       | 
       | My favorite etymological thing is the German ,,Bank" which can
       | mean bench or bank. Funnily enough the financial institution is a
       | loan via the Italian ,,banca" but that itself goes back to the
       | same old Germanic root as the bench you sit on.
        
         | DanielDe wrote:
         | Ha, I love this! A bit more history from the Wikipedia article
         | on banks:
         | 
         | > Benches were used as makeshift desks or exchange counters
         | during the Renaissance by Florentine bankers
        
           | jahnu wrote:
           | Bankrupt, or Bankrott from German means rotten bench. You can
           | work out the rest :)
        
             | tomjakubowski wrote:
             | -rupt comes from Latin rompere meaning to break. (see also
             | "rupture")
        
               | Sharlin wrote:
               | And "erupt", "disrupt", and "abrupt", which come from
               | roots literally meaning "out-break", "apart-break", and
               | "away-break", respectively :)
        
             | leipert wrote:
             | Seems like a false assumption.
             | 
             | According to wiktionary it comes from ,,banca rotta" where
             | rotta goes back to Latin ,,rumpere" which means ,,to
             | break". Whereas the English rotten or the German go back to
             | old Norse ,,rutna" (to rot). The two don't share the same
             | root.
        
         | tragomaskhalos wrote:
         | Also Modern Greek bank = Trapeza = ancient Gk for table, so I
         | guess this derivation via furniture that you sat on / traded
         | money over is common
        
         | PennRobotics wrote:
         | The difference between German's Gift (poison) and the English
         | gift (a present) amuses me. Evidently, they both derive from
         | something being given e.g. a lethal dosage, in the German case.
         | 
         | Related: Be mindful when your Denglish tempts you to say,
         | "Danke fur das Gift!"
        
           | taejo wrote:
           | The "present" meaning survives in German in _Mitgift_ (dowry,
           | a gift given _with_ the bride)
        
           | rhodin wrote:
           | Ah, and the Swedish "gift" (married) and "gift" (poison).
        
       | Grustaf wrote:
       | Etymology is to linguistics what pyrotechnics are to chemistry, a
       | gateway drug.
        
       | dnautics wrote:
       | I had always thought it a strange coincidence that in Japanese,
       | sunday is 'sun day' and monday is 'moon day'.
       | 
       | At least in japanese, the other days of the week are also
       | associated with celestial bodies, tuesday 'fire day', wednesday
       | 'water day', thursday 'wood day', friday 'gold day', and saturday
       | 'dirt day'.
       | 
       | mars: fire planet
       | 
       | mercury: water planet
       | 
       | jupiter: wood planet
       | 
       | venus: gold planet
       | 
       | saturn: dirt planet
       | 
       | If you're familiar with any romance language, the days of the
       | week associate correctly with the names of the planets (martis,
       | mercurii, jovis); and in english the rough translations into
       | anglo-saxon/norse gods applies (tyr/tiw, thor, freija)
       | 
       | Apparently it's unlikely to be an accident, but it's a very
       | ancient connection, via the chinese, who have in more recent
       | times ditched the system.
        
         | uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh wrote:
         | I have always assummed these are dna-baked-ins, the language is
         | different but the underlying ideas are instinctual like dam
         | building in beavers.
        
         | rsj_hn wrote:
         | > Apparently it's unlikely to be an accident, but it's a very
         | ancient connection, via the chinese, who have in more recent
         | times ditched the system.
         | 
         | China is a relative latecomer here and typically lags these
         | types of ancient civilizational innovations, with the oldest
         | being Mesopotamia and Egypt. In China, the seven day week was
         | adopted in the late 4th Century A.D. in the Jin dynasty roughly
         | 3000 years after it was adopted in Mesopotamia.
         | 
         | There are two theories as to the origin of the seven day week,
         | one that it started in ancient Babylon and another that it
         | started in ancient Egypt.
         | 
         | The concept of a "week" is directly tied to the concept of a
         | sabbath (a special holy day to mark the end of the week). This,
         | in turn is related to Babylonian numerical systems -- they had
         | a base 6 system corresponding to 6 days of work followed by the
         | religious day, and hence the origin of our seven day week.
         | Interestingly, unlike in judaism where the seventh day is
         | considered one in which work was forbidden as God rested on
         | that week, in Babylonian tradition, the seventh day was
         | considered unlucky for work and thus work was to be avoided. It
         | is a fine line separating these different notions of a Sabbath
         | and thus of the week.
         | 
         | Another speculated origin for the week was via lunar
         | observations -- e.g. a quarter phase of the moon corresponding
         | to a half-moon either waxing or waning with a lunar month being
         | roughly 29.5 days, so 1/4 of that would be 7.4 days. But there
         | are different ways to divide this -- e.g. a sequence of 7 day
         | units followed by a sequence of special days tacked at the end
         | or some other combination. You actually see these types of
         | divisions in some ancient Babylonian calendars. But with a base
         | 6 system, there are some nice divisions, e.g. 6 days of work
         | followed by the holy day = 1 week
         | 
         | 4 weeks followed by a holy day at the end = 1 month
         | 
         | the residual .5 day, can accumulate so that after 12 months,
         | 12*.5 = 6. 6 special days to be added at the end of 12 months.
         | 
         | In the ancient past, you had different regions practicing their
         | own calendar system and one of the first innovations of the
         | first (known) empire in Mesopotamia was the standardization of
         | weeks and months as different cities were brought into the
         | Sumerian empire. Sargon I of Akkad is said to have standardized
         | the week by ensuring that the different cities he conquered
         | were synced up and observed the same set of extra holy days in
         | what is the first (known) empire
         | 
         | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1179/0308018827898012...
         | 
         | However there is some linguistic evidence that the Sumerians
         | merely borrowed the concept of a week from the Akkadian
         | civilization, so the earlier Akkadian civilization is believed
         | to have held the concept of a week first.
         | 
         | Once you have the notion of a week, it is not hard to name it
         | after the sun, moon, and 5 celestial planets, as these were the
         | primary astronomical phenomena. You can see these names in
         | ancient languages here:
         | https://www.hermetic.ch/cal_stud/hlwc/why_seven.htm
        
         | jolmg wrote:
         | > the days of the week associate correctly with the days of the
         | week
         | 
         | Maybe for the second one you meant "names of the planets"?
        
           | dnautics wrote:
           | thanks, edited.
        
         | thaumasiotes wrote:
         | > via the chinese, who have in more recent times ditched the
         | system.
         | 
         | What? They use the same seven-day week today.
         | 
         | They name the days "one", "two", "three", etc, which was
         | actually an innovation by Christian missionaries in China, not
         | the Chinese themselves. The seventh day is named "day" rather
         | than being numbered, so that the full name is Li Bai Tian  "the
         | day of worship", anchoring the week firmly to the Christian
         | week.
         | 
         | (The same effort to rename the days of the week along more
         | Christian lines was also made in Europe, but it didn't take
         | there.)
         | 
         | > the rough translations into anglo-saxon/norse gods applies
         | (tyr/tiw, thor, freija)
         | 
         | I was kind of amused to see "anglo-saxon/norse" followed by
         | "tyr/tiw"; Tyr is the Norse form and Tiw is the English form.
         | 
         | (The goddess honored by Friday was Frig in English, and Thor is
         | of course Thunor -- his name is nothing but the ordinary word
         | "thunder".)
        
           | weinzierl wrote:
           | This sounds very similar to the naming scheme used in
           | Portuguese, which interestingly differs from Spanish. In
           | Portuguese the five workdays are numbered starting from two,
           | because the first day is Sunday which isn't numbered but has
           | - like Saturday - its own name.
        
           | dnautics wrote:
           | Sorry, by system I mean "naming system", not base-7 system.
        
         | jlg23 wrote:
         | > At least in japanese, the other days of the week are also
         | associated with celestial bodies
         | 
         | The naming scheme also holds for French, except for Saturday
         | (samedi [0]) and Sunday(dimanche [1]), which originates from
         | "Day of Shabbat" and "Day of the Lord". But according to
         | wikipedia [0], samedi replaced the "Day of Saturn".
         | 
         | [0] https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samedi
         | 
         | [1] https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimanche
        
           | stevula wrote:
           | "Saturday" is from "Saturn".
        
           | armandososa wrote:
           | And dimanche sounds like "domingo" in spanish.
        
             | fbellag wrote:
             | Domingo comes from Dominicus, or "belonging to the Lord" as
             | in French, or the Italian "Domenica". All share the same
             | etymology
             | 
             | "Sabado" is Spanish for Shabat as is Sabato in Italian
             | 
             | (I'm sure other romance languages are similar, even
             | Portuguese, that has Sabado and Domingo, but the rest of
             | the days are numbered from 2nd to 6th, oddly enough)
             | 
             | All of them coming directly from Latin
        
         | xiaq wrote:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_the_days_of_the_week#...
         | 
         | > The Chinese had apparently adopted the seven-day week from
         | the Hellenistic system by the 4th century, although by which
         | route is not entirely clear. It was again transmitted to China
         | in the 8th century by Manichaeans, via the country of Kang (a
         | Central Asian polity near Samarkand).[20] The 4th-century date,
         | according to the Cihai encyclopedia,[year needed] is due to a
         | reference to Fan Ning (Fan Zhu ), an astrologer of the Jin
         | Dynasty. The renewed adoption from Manichaeans in the 8th
         | century (Tang Dynasty) is documented with the writings of the
         | Chinese Buddhist monk Yijing and the Ceylonese Buddhist monk Bu
         | Kong.
         | 
         | > The Chinese transliteration of the planetary system was soon
         | brought to Japan by the Japanese monk Kobo Daishi; surviving
         | diaries of the Japanese statesman Fujiwara no Michinaga show
         | the seven-day system in use in Heian Period Japan as early as
         | 1007. In Japan, the seven-day system was kept in use (for
         | astrological purposes) until its promotion to a full-fledged
         | (Western-style) calendrical basis during the Meiji era. In
         | China, with the founding of the Republic of China in 1911,
         | Monday through Saturday in China are now named after the
         | luminaries implicitly with the numbers.
        
           | thaumasiotes wrote:
           | Interestingly, the more ancient Chinese system of ten-day
           | weeks still survives in modern usage to refer to the early /
           | middle / late parts of a month, Shang Xun  / Zhong Xun  / Xia
           | Xun .
        
         | skhr0680 wrote:
         | It's explicit in Japanese that the days of the week are named
         | after planets. Huo Yao Ri  means "Mars day" not "Fire day".
        
           | thaumasiotes wrote:
           | Sort of. Etymologically, you're correct that Huo Yao Ri
           | originates as the term Huo Yao -Ri , the day (Ri ) of the
           | fire light (Huo Yao ).
           | 
           | But I don't think even most Japanese people are aware of this
           | today; the only common use of Yao  is its use in the name of
           | every weekday, so people think of Huo Yao Ri  as being
           | segmented Huo -Yao Ri , the weekday ("Yao Ri ",
           | etymologically spurious) of fire (Huo ).
           | 
           | I don't know the modern Japanese word for Mars, but in
           | Chinese it's Huo Xing , not Huo Yao .
        
             | skhr0680 wrote:
             | > the day (Ri ) of the fire light (Huo Yao ).
             | 
             | The fire light being Mars.
             | 
             | > I don't know the modern Japanese word for Mars, but in
             | Chinese it's Huo Xing , not Huo Yao .
             | 
             | Huo Xing  is the same. I don't know about Chinese, but in
             | Japanese Yao  can be a general word for the sun, the moon,
             | and stars (Qi Yao ).
        
       | tboyd47 wrote:
       | One of the more interesting ones I've come across lately:
       | 
       | France - frank (being unencumbered in speech) - franchise (the
       | right to vote)
        
         | schoen wrote:
         | Wow! Wiktionary suggests that the Franks (from whom these
         | derive) themselves were named after a word for "spear".
         | 
         | An amazing one that I've found striking for a while and that
         | also involves an ethnic group is
         | 
         | ciao - slave - Slav
         | 
         | > Borrowed from Italian ciao ("hello, goodbye"), from Venetian
         | ciao ("hello, goodbye, your (humble) servant"), from Venetian
         | s-ciao / s-ciavo ("servant, slave"), from Medieval Latin
         | sclavus ("Slav, slave"), related also to Italian schiavo,
         | English Slav, slave and Old Venetian S-ciavon ("Slav"), from
         | Latin Sclavonia ("Slavonia").
         | 
         | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ciao#Etymology
         | 
         | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/slave#English "because Slavs
         | were often forced into slavery in the Middle Ages"
         | 
         | The etymology of the Slavs' autonym itself is much more
         | disputed, but possibly derives from the Slavic word for "word",
         | so meaning "people who can talk", among several totally
         | different suggestions.
         | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/s...
        
           | ajuc wrote:
           | > The etymology of the Slavs' autonym itself is much more
           | disputed, but possibly derives from the Slavic word for
           | "word", so meaning "people who can talk", among several
           | totally different suggestions.
           | 
           | Well in pretty much every Slavic language analog of "slowo"
           | is "word" and "slowianin" is Slav. And in most of these
           | languages the word for Germans (the most common non-Slavic
           | foreigners) is analog of "Niemiec" which is the same word
           | root as "mute person" (niemy).
           | 
           | I don't see how it can be disputed.
        
             | schoen wrote:
             | The Wiktionary quick summary of why it's disputed is one
             | researcher's assertion that " _slovene can 't be formed
             | from _slovo because _-enin',_ -anin' only occurs in
             | derivations from place names". (Maybe slowianin <
             | _slovenin' is an exception, but you can see where someone
             | might be skeptical if it 's supposedly the _only*
             | exception!)
             | 
             | Sometimes etymologies that feel super-logical turn out to
             | be more complicated historically. In many of these cases,
             | the later perception that two words were related influenced
             | their subsequent meaning or spelling, even if they were
             | originally _not_ related.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paronymic_attraction
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_etymology#Productive_for
             | c...
             | 
             | As a non-speaker of Slavic languages, I'm pretty convinced
             | about the "word" connection, especially with the example
             | you mentioned about the Germans being called "non-talkers",
             | since it's not very unusual for ethnic groups' autonyms to
             | mean something like "speakers". But there are lots of
             | etymologies that feel natural and straightforward and are
             | later shown to have a folk etymological component.
        
               | ajuc wrote:
               | Indeed I can't find in Polish any other singular -anin
               | not derived from place, But slowianin in plural is
               | slowianie, and there's lots of -anie words not derived
               | from places.
               | 
               | For example abstract nouns formed from verbs, like:
               | 
               | pisanie (writing) from pisac (to write)
               | 
               | palenie (smoking) from palic (to burn)
               | 
               | sniadanie (breakfast) from archaic sniadac (to eat)
               | 
               | jedzenie (food) from modern jesc (to eat)
               | 
               | bieganie (running) from biec (to run)
               | 
               | etc. There's easily hundreds of these.
               | 
               | Then it would be
               | 
               | slowianie (abstract noun for people who can talk) from
               | archaic slowic (to express in words)
               | 
               | The only weird thing would be that slowianie is plural
               | and all of the other -anie nouns made from verbs are
               | singular.
        
               | schoen wrote:
               | That seems pretty strong, but Wiktionary analyzes these
               | two kinds of -anie as different suffixes
               | 
               | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-anie#Polish
               | 
               | without stating whether they're etymologically related.
               | It would also be good to know whether both exist in other
               | Slavic languages.
               | 
               | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-anin#Polish
               | 
               | has another example in Serbo-Croatian, which in turn has
               | a different suffix corresponding to Polish -anie:
               | 
               | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-anje#Serbo-Croatian
               | 
               | I don't know any of these languages, so I don't have any
               | intuitions about this.
        
           | tralarpa wrote:
           | > Wiktionary suggests that the Franks (from whom these
           | derive) themselves were named after a word for "spear"
           | 
           | That is only one possible origin. The other one is "frec"
           | (greedy, bold, brave).
        
           | twic wrote:
           | There's an interesting complex around the Proto-Indo-European
           | root 'walhaz':
           | 
           | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-
           | Germanic...
           | 
           | From which we get Wales, Cornwall, Gaul, Walloon, and
           | Wallachia. Originally the name of a particular tribe, but
           | came to refer to angry foreign neighbours more generally.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | galaxyLogic wrote:
       | Finnish word "Norsu" means elephant but there are no nor have
       | there been since at least after last ice-age Elephants in those
       | northern latitudes. So whence the word "Norsu", which does not
       | seem to be a word in any other language?
       | 
       | Well it is explained below. Turns out that Finns had another word
       | "Marsu" for walrus, which also have tusks. So therefore they
       | started using a similar word for a (somewhat) similar animal.
       | 
       | https://www.wordsense.eu/norsu/
        
         | otabdeveloper4 wrote:
         | No, it's not as simple as that. Finnish and the Slavic
         | languages are the only ones in Europe that have a native word
         | for "elephant". (Everyone else uses variants of the Greek
         | "elephas" or Arabic "fil".)
         | 
         | The question is, _why those two languages and only those two_?
         | 
         | What's worse, the Slavic word dates to proto-Slavic times, it's
         | one of the basic animal words like "deer", "rabbit", "cow",
         | etc.!
        
           | milansm wrote:
           | Just wanted to mention that! In Serbian (and most other south
           | Slavic languages) we use a word slon (slon) for elephant. I
           | was always wondering why is that, how can we have native word
           | for the animal we could hardly had chance to see. However,
           | there's some evidence that (south) Slavic people lived
           | somewhere near India. And India is mentioned a lot in some of
           | the tradional folk poems. There's even a town in Serbia
           | called Indija. Really interesting stuff, but not sure how
           | credible that theory is.
        
           | StavrosK wrote:
           | > Finnish and the Slavic languages are the only ones in
           | Europe that have a native word for "elephant". (Everyone else
           | uses variants of the Greek "elephas" or Arabic "fil".)
           | 
           | So the only languages in Europe except the other language in
           | Europe? :)
        
             | namenotrequired wrote:
             | He means "indigenous" words that evolved along with the
             | rest of the language rather than being adopted from another
             | language.
        
               | StavrosK wrote:
               | Right, but Greek fits that description. Three languages
               | in Europe have a native word for elephant.
        
               | thaumasiotes wrote:
               | Depends; etymonline says this:
               | 
               | > from Greek elephas (genitive elephantos) "elephant;
               | ivory," probably from a non-Indo-European language,
               | likely via Phoenician (compare Hamitic elu "elephant,"
               | source of the word for it in many Semitic languages, or
               | possibly from Sanskrit ibhah "elephant").
               | 
               | So the Greek word is not necessarily native to Greek.
        
       | eysquared wrote:
       | Fans of this type of thing may enjoy listening to The Allusionist
       | podcast: https://www.theallusionist.org/.
        
         | madcaptenor wrote:
         | Also the Endless Knot podcast:
         | http://www.alliterative.net/podcast
        
       | mikelward wrote:
       | https://youtu.be/ZAsNO9eXLgM
       | 
       | Explains how "ciao" comes from "servus" via "schiavo", meaning
       | slave or servant.
       | 
       | It's also related to words in other languages meaning fame, word,
       | and language.
        
       | harimau777 wrote:
       | A set that I found interesting:
       | 
       | - Defense (protecting something)
       | 
       | - Fencing (protecting yourself with a sword)
       | 
       | - Fence (a wall that protects your property)
       | 
       | - Fence (someone who buys stolen goods which allows the thief to
       | protect themselves from getting caught)
        
       | junar wrote:
       | I'd nominate "casual" and "cadaver".
       | 
       | The Latin _cado_ root had multiple meanings, like  "fall", "die"
       | and "decay". So while "cadaver" is obvious, "casual" took a
       | circuitous route of "fall" -> "accident" -> "by chance", and
       | eventually "informal".
        
       | namenotrequired wrote:
       | In the same list as "estate" and "contrast" and "status" we have
       | country names like "Afghanistan"... it is the place where the
       | Afghans are (stand).
       | 
       | Also the Spanish/Portuguese "estar" (to be).
        
       | aatharuv wrote:
       | Yoga (Sanskrit) and yoke (English).
       | 
       | Yoga literally means union and is derived from a prefix yuj
       | meaning to attach, join, harness, yoke.
        
       | codeflo wrote:
       | Can someone explain to a non-native speaker what's surprising
       | about this?
       | 
       | > The leap from a word meaning "imaginary" to a word meaning
       | "fantastic" struck me as odd initially, but apparently it comes
       | from the sense of the word "imaginary" as "unreal".
       | 
       | What other sense is there that Wiktionary doesn't know about?
       | 
       | https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/imaginary
        
         | DanielDe wrote:
         | Author of the post here, I'll try to elaborate.
         | 
         | My primary association with the word "fantastic" is simply
         | "great" or "very good", as in "you did a fantastic job!". It's
         | this meaning of the word that I found oddly disconnected from
         | the word "imaginary". How do you get from something meaning
         | "not real" to something meaning "very good"?
         | 
         | But the word "unreal" helped me make the leap, since that's a
         | word I would use to describe something I thought was "very
         | cool" or "well done".
        
           | spoondan wrote:
           | Similarly, awesome is great, but awful is terrible. And
           | terrible and terrifying are bad, but terrific is awesome.
        
           | missblit wrote:
           | Fantastic can still be used to describe something fantasy-
           | esque in modern usage. Albeit it's probably getting more
           | rare.
           | 
           | Like "fantastic voyage", "fantastic beliefs", "fantastic
           | visions".
        
             | StavrosK wrote:
             | "Fantastical" is probably more used for that nowadays (and
             | that very rarely), but it didn't occur to me that there
             | could be any other explanation, as in Greek we use
             | "fantastic" for both meanings commonly, ie "fantastic job"
             | and "fantastic world" (imaginary world).
        
             | tesseract wrote:
             | And "fancy" still retains some links to "fantastic" and
             | "fantasy", as in "fancy dress" or "flight of fancy".
        
           | cecilpl2 wrote:
           | That seems very roundabout. "unreal" seems like relatively
           | recent slang to me, just like the "very great" meaning of
           | "fantastic".
           | 
           | "Fantastic" also means "based on fantasy", so the leap to
           | "imaginary" is short.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | derbOac wrote:
         | I'm a native speaker and this wasn't really surprising to me.
         | "Fantastic" is still used in the sense of "imaginary"
         | sometimes.
         | 
         | The link between "fantastic" and "phenotype" was surprising to
         | me, even though it makes sense reading it.
        
       | captaincrowbar wrote:
       | My favourite example of apparently unrelated words with an
       | unexpected common root: "government" and "cybernetics" both come
       | from the Greek "kubernetes" (helmsman).
        
         | asveikau wrote:
         | When Latin borrowed the root of "govern" from Greek, it was a
         | nautical term, to steer.
         | 
         | We have a tendency to think of "cy" as an S followed by an "ai"
         | diphthong. But if we consider the "c" as a hard /k/ and the "y"
         | as a vowel similar to /u/, there isn't a huge difference
         | between "cyber" and "guber", the latter form showing up in
         | Latin and ultimately in English words like "gubernatorial".
        
         | kortex wrote:
         | You start to notice a lot of roots by applying a "toki pona"
         | style phonetic rule: collapse all voiced and unvoiced
         | consonants. Reverse Grimm's law. Th -> t. And then apply Arabic
         | vowels: a, i, u. This is pretty much reversing the most common
         | sound shifts over time.
         | 
         | f=v=b=p, g=k, d=t, y=o=u, e=i.
         | 
         | Cybernetics -> kupirnitics
         | 
         | Government -> kupirnit
         | 
         | It's probably also related to "operatus" (Latin for "work",
         | things like cooperate and opera come from it) but I can't find
         | sources. (co)operatus -> (k)upiratus
         | 
         | Another example is the famous "father" etymology:
         | 
         | Father/vader/pater -> patir (PIE *pH2ter)
        
           | asveikau wrote:
           | That doesn't seem plausible to me when you consider that
           | opera is the plural of opus. Afaik in early latin, /s/ often
           | went to /r/ when it fell between vowels. That is why it has
           | /s/ in the nominative but /r/ when you start to inflect it
           | with suffices.
           | 
           | This happens a lot for third declension nouns where
           | nominative ends in -s (opus is one such example)
           | 
           | Other examples of this pattern:
           | 
           | Corpus -> corporem (not *corpusem)
           | 
           | Venus -> Venerem (not *Venusem)
           | 
           | Flos -> florem (not *flosem)
           | 
           | Colos -> colorem (not *colosem)
           | 
           | Or more simply, we can look at opus and see it comes from a
           | different PIE root from cyber. (When i look it up, the former
           | has a root meaning "work", and the latter has a root meaning
           | "turn")
        
             | thaumasiotes wrote:
             | I was under the impression that the underlying /r/ became
             | [s] in the nominative case where it was followed by an /s/,
             | rather than -- as you seem to suggest -- an underlying /s/
             | becoming [r] when intervocalic.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Ikura in sushi restaurants always makes me think of ikra (ikra),
       | which is caviar in Russian. It can't be a coincidence but I don't
       | know how it got there.
       | 
       | https://www.google.com/search?q=ikura&tbm=isch
       | 
       | https://www.google.com/search?q=ikra&tbm=isch
        
         | dnh44 wrote:
         | It's also ikra in Romanian.
        
         | junar wrote:
         | Japanese borrowed it from Russian.
         | 
         | https://kotobank.jp/word/%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AF%E3%83%A9-30248
        
           | dang wrote:
           | Hmm - the Google-translated version of that page says that
           | Russian POWs in the Russo-Japanese war used salmon roe (i.e.
           | ikura) as a substitute for caviar. Interesting--thanks!
        
             | pvg wrote:
             | It maybe makes a bit more sense when you consider 'ikra'
             | doesn't just mean caviar but also fish roe in general and
             | is also applied even more broadly in entirely fishless
             | things like 'ikra balkazhannaia'
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-12 23:02 UTC)