[HN Gopher] What the Aztecs can teach us about happiness and the...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       What the Aztecs can teach us about happiness and the good life
       (2016)
        
       Author : drdee
       Score  : 26 points
       Date   : 2021-06-04 01:42 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (aeon.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (aeon.co)
        
       | randallsquared wrote:
       | Happiness is your internal estimate of how successful your
       | actions are. Goodhart's law applies, of course, but our culture
       | (I'm usian) seems to have a fixation on gaming the metric in this
       | case.
        
       | kmnc wrote:
       | So the secret to happiness is exercise, meditate, be social and
       | develop a spiritual relationship with nature? So basically no
       | more insightful then any pop self help book.
       | 
       | Maybe the more interesting question is why no one putting down
       | there hand when being told facts about how they will be happier
       | without kids is instantly glossed over. Maybe this instant
       | acceptance of equating traditional life milestones as leading a
       | fulfilling life is the real issue. Giving that up is the real key
       | to happiness.
        
         | slicktux wrote:
         | No kids here and I am happy camper...
        
         | _Microft wrote:
         | Do you think people are eventually happier without children? In
         | short term, maybe. I guess nobody enjoys changing or feeding a
         | baby at 3a.m. that much. In the long run, I would be surprised
         | if that's still true. Not having relatives when growing old
         | seems like a recipe for misery.
        
           | stemlord wrote:
           | Both of your perspectives are equally toxic... have kids if
           | you want them, don't if you don't. I'm sure one can find
           | happiness or misery either way
        
             | ttt0 wrote:
             | And telling someone to exercise is fatphobic, expecting
             | people to be social is discriminating against people with
             | aspergers, telling someone to meditate is anti-ADHD people.
             | Do literally whatever you want, I'm sure you can _somehow_
             | be happy no matter what you do. Toxicity, toxicity
             | everywhere.
        
             | prepend wrote:
             | Neither perspective is toxic. I'm sure it's knowable
             | whether kids add or decrease happiness. And there's
             | probably some outlier set that feels differently than the
             | population.
             | 
             | Thinking this doesn't mean anything about toxicity.
             | 
             | Generally speaking I haven't heard anyone use that word
             | properly in years. It's a pretty stupid word, unless
             | dealing with chemicals and lethal doses.
        
           | thrav wrote:
           | They've done studies, and parents are dramatically happier
           | than non-parents after the teenage years (when the kids
           | leave).
           | 
           | It's a long term investment that pays dividends when you have
           | nothing else you want to do with your life, but chill with
           | your family.
        
       | slumdev wrote:
       | A culture built on human sacrifice has nothing to offer.
       | 
       | The Spanish did nothing wrong.
        
       | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
       | I was looking for the part about sacrificing humans to assure
       | favor of Quetzalcoatl.
        
         | bashmelek wrote:
         | Quetzalcoatl preferred nonhuman sacrifice. Other gods of the
         | Aztec pantheon, such as Tezcatlipoca, Tlaloc, and
         | Huitzilpohctli, however, did have a lot of human sacrifices
         | offered
        
           | ergot_vacation wrote:
           | This is the level of detail I appreciate. It was a
           | fascinating culture, just not a very warm and friendly one.
        
       | ardit33 wrote:
       | The Actecs were the nazis of meso-america, and treated every
       | other tribe and culture around them like slaves/cattle. I would
       | not take any advice from their genocidal culture.
        
         | oh_sigh wrote:
         | This is true. People imagine the Spanish conquistadors
         | destroying the Aztec empire, but really it was something like
         | 700 Spaniards + 100,000 pissed off Aztec-neighbors who
         | destroyed it. The Spaniards, as far as I know, tried to
         | actually stop the raping and pillaging of Tenochtitlan but
         | didn't have much luck in that regard.
        
           | ku-man wrote:
           | Indeed. And this is true for the Incas as well.
           | 
           | Wanna hear a funny historical observation I read somewhere?:
           | native women were crazy about the Spaniard conquistadores
           | (talking about the very definition of alpha male here).
        
         | ergot_vacation wrote:
         | People call anything and everything "Nazi" in this day and age,
         | but in this case it might be somewhat of a relevant comparison.
         | We're not talking about the Na'vi here: the Aztec were some
         | brutally cruel people.
        
           | crooked-v wrote:
           | For example, it was a common practice for the Aztecs to
           | engage in ritualistic wars against their smaller neighbors
           | specifically to abduct captives for use in human sacrifice.
        
         | jmnicolas wrote:
         | So if Hitler liked apples you wouldn't eat any?
         | 
         | IMHO people / cultures / civilizations aren't all bad or all
         | good, there's always something to learn about them.
        
           | bryanrasmussen wrote:
           | If they are not all bad or good are they all the same ( that
           | is to say composed of equal number and value of good and bad
           | parts) that seems unlikely to be the case and would need some
           | theory other than just answering yes so I suppose we will say
           | no.
           | 
           | If people / cultures / civilizations vary in the level of
           | goodness and badness in them then it follows that there
           | should be a distribution of societies that are significantly
           | more good than bad, societies that are average, and societies
           | that are significantly more bad than good.
           | 
           | If a society is significantly more bad than good it can be
           | true that you could still find something good in them but it
           | becomes questionable if it is worth an individual to study
           | the society to extract this good part from all the bad.
           | 
           | Thus I would conclude that it might not be really worthwhile
           | to learn anything from the Aztecs.
        
             | golemotron wrote:
             | > If they are not all bad or good are they all the same (
             | that is to say composed of equal number and value of good
             | and bad parts) that seems unlikely to be the case and would
             | need some theory other than just answering yes so I suppose
             | we will say no.
             | 
             | Good and bad are time and culture specific. In 50 years,
             | many things that we do everyday now will be "bad" and many
             | things that we see as "bad" will be "good."
        
               | irrational wrote:
               | This is why the phrase "on the right side of history" is
               | so stupid. It is literally impossible to know what is and
               | is not on the right side of history until it actually is
               | history.
        
               | golemotron wrote:
               | And even then... history takes a long time.
        
         | krapp wrote:
         | Chances are you come from a culture that did more or less the
         | same.
        
           | irrational wrote:
           | I assume you mean some culture your ancestors belonged to in
           | the past few hundred thousand years was more or less the
           | same.
        
             | krapp wrote:
             | I meant far closer to the present than "past few hundred
             | thousand years" but yes, that's why I used the past tense
             | "did" rather than the present tense "does."
             | 
             | Slavery? Genocide? Plunder? Rape? Religious violence?
             | Slaughter of peoples they considered inferior? The
             | "civilized" Christian cultures of the time did everything
             | the Aztecs did, minus the human sacrifice.
        
               | crooked-v wrote:
               | There's something many people find uniquely, particularly
               | offensive about using the machinery of war to perform
               | human sacrifice as its own end (and not as the means to
               | some variety of conquest or resource extraction), and
               | there aren't many cultures that have actually
               | historically engaged in that sort of thing.
        
               | krapp wrote:
               | They weren't performing human sacrifice as its own end,
               | they were performing human sacrifice to honor their
               | God... which is essentially what the Crusades were, an
               | act of ritual human sacrifice to honor the Christian God.
               | 
               | One is just more alien to Western culture than the other,
               | so it seems more viscerally evil, and their means differ
               | but their nature is the same.
        
       | ergot_vacation wrote:
       | How much does constructing giant skull walls and pillars from the
       | remains of your human
       | sacrifices(https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/06/feeding-gods-
       | hundred...) contribute to happiness and the good life? Asking for
       | a friend.
        
         | CapitalistCartr wrote:
         | "To crush your enemies, to see them fall at your feet -- to
         | take their horses and goods and hear the lamentation of their
         | women. That is best."
        
         | Grieving wrote:
         | Depends on what you think is best in life
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo9buo9Mtos
         | 
         | edit: looks like I was beaten
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-05 23:00 UTC)