[HN Gopher] The Human Body in Space: Distinguishing Fact from Fi...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Human Body in Space: Distinguishing Fact from Fiction (2013)
        
       Author : jacksonkmarley
       Score  : 60 points
       Date   : 2021-06-02 12:10 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (sitn.hms.harvard.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (sitn.hms.harvard.edu)
        
       | tgb wrote:
       | > Because thermal radiation (the heat of the stove that you can
       | feel from a distance, or from the Sun's rays) becomes the
       | predominant process for heat transfer, one might feel slightly
       | warm if directly exposed to the Sun's radiation, or slightly cool
       | if shaded from sunlight, where the person's own body will radiate
       | away heat.
       | 
       | Since the body also produces heat, would you even feel cool when
       | shaded? If body heat generation outpaces radiation then I think
       | you'd feel warm. Wikipedia puts the energy radiated out as about
       | 2000kcals per day, or right around a human would produce from
       | metabolism. So I guess it basically balances out.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-body_radiation#Human-bod...
        
       | geranim0 wrote:
       | In the movie Men Behind the Sun they show the japanse putting
       | people in vacuum chambers and literally shit their guts
        
       | sammalloy wrote:
       | This article is from 2013, but since 2019, there's been active
       | research in things like latent herpes reactivation, which could
       | have implications for long duration spaceflight.
       | 
       | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.0001...
        
       | zeeshanqureshi wrote:
       | Plus there could also be the psychological effects of possibly
       | being isolated and confined in a small floating tin can.
        
         | Akinato wrote:
         | IIRC Nasa put out a bunch of RFPs last year for studying,
         | identifying, and alleviating that exact problem.
        
         | seaorg wrote:
         | Imagine if they tried to cram a bunch of people in a literal
         | metal tube with no windows and send them to the bottom of the
         | ocean for months as a time. How could anyone be stupid enough
         | to think that would work?
        
       | mattowen_uk wrote:
       | Reading this, I learned that the 'Exposed To Space' stuff that
       | happens in The Expanse (TV show - I've not read the books) is
       | pretty much spot on.
        
       | causality0 wrote:
       | _since two of the three methods of heat transfer (conduction and
       | convection)_
       | 
       | This always drives me nuts. Convection _is_ conduction, just in a
       | fluid. Conduction and radiation are two entirely different
       | physical processes.
        
         | guntars wrote:
         | I think the distinguishing difference between conduction in a
         | fluid and convection is that the fluid "leaves" and takes away
         | the heat.
        
         | lmilcin wrote:
         | Well, not exactly.
         | 
         | Conduction means you touch something and that something slowly
         | gets hotter and conducts heat away from your body. You can
         | calculate how fast the energy is transferred based on
         | properties of the material and geometry of objects and their
         | interface.
         | 
         | Convection means you touch something and that something is
         | constantly being replaced. You can't use the formula for
         | conduction here.
         | 
         | In case of convection, the basic mechanism of energy being
         | moved has nothing to do with conduction, rather with movement
         | (replacement) of the material that takes away the heat.
         | 
         | How is moving heat by moving the material and moving heat by
         | letting it to dissipate through stationary material not two
         | different processes?
        
         | only_as_i_fall wrote:
         | Actually conduction is radiation at the atomic level. If you
         | bring either point up in a conversation which is understood to
         | be about macroscopic physics though you're really just being an
         | ass.
        
           | causality0 wrote:
           | Thermal conduction is carried out with phonons and free
           | electrons. It has a finite range. It is fundamentally
           | distinct from thermal radiation which is propagated by
           | photons with an infinite range.
        
           | swiley wrote:
           | I thought conduction propagated as phonons rather than
           | photons.
           | 
           | But I guess the particle interaction comes from photon
           | exchange, on the other hand the frequencies are different
           | enough I think you can safely call it a different thing (like
           | how UV and AM radio are different.)
        
         | zizee wrote:
         | Doesn't convection also require movement of the fluid? Under
         | gravity convection works by changes in density when the fluid
         | is heated (e.g. hot air rises). This movement of the fluid
         | provides an extra component beyond regular conduction. The
         | movement of the fluid transfers heat away.
         | 
         | In low g environments, convection due to density changes
         | doesn't happen (hot air does not rise) which means heat pools
         | around bodies at rest.
         | 
         | Edit: after reading the article a bit, i see that you were
         | quoting a section that ends with "...(conduction and
         | convection) cannot occur without matter." Which does make the
         | distinction the author was making a little more less useful.
         | However lack of convection is an issue inside the space station
         | where fans must be installed to keep air from pooling around
         | heat sources like lights and human bodies.
        
       | seaorg wrote:
       | Make the transit ship spin. Surround the habitable parts with
       | water and other materials. It's so simple but nobody seems to be
       | aware that these are solved problems.
        
         | jccalhoun wrote:
         | Lots of people have thought of similar things. I know I have
         | read scifi which uses water for shielding but I can't think of
         | a specific name.
         | 
         | However, water isn't light. According to this post on stack
         | exchange it would take something like 330,000kg of water to
         | shield a crew. Getting that into orbit is a big task.
        
         | Supermancho wrote:
         | > It's so simple but nobody seems to be aware that these are
         | solved problems.
         | 
         | It isnt reasonable to assume napkin solutions are "so simple"
         | in practice or have not been considered. There are plenty of
         | people smarter than either of us that look at these problems.
        
           | seaorg wrote:
           | The problem isn't the smart people who look at these
           | problems. It's the collective behavior of the masses to have
           | amnesia about basic physics.
        
       | localhost wrote:
       | I just finished listening to the Audible narration of the
       | excellent Project Hail Mary [1] book by Andy Weir. It explores
       | quite a few of these issues, including the cosmic radiation one.
       | Highly recommended!
       | 
       | [1] https://www.andyweirauthor.com/books/project-hail-mary
        
       | Zimahl wrote:
       | The Expanse handles this stuff much better than other shows, as
       | has been noted many times. As entertaining as it is, For All
       | Mankind gets things very wrong in a lot of cases and falls prey
       | to a lot of the 'space tropes' that plague sci-fi. And I
       | certainly don't expect hard sci-fi realism everywhere, but in
       | something like For All Mankind, which is supposed to exist in an
       | alternate timeline but be firmly planted in the real world, it's
       | jarring. When it's in something like the movie Event Horizon I
       | really don't care about realism.
        
         | at_a_remove wrote:
         | What you really want is something like the Sturm Invocation
         | from Charles Sheffield.
        
         | nojokes wrote:
         | In one episode Naomi inhales in just before exposure to the
         | vacuum - it would have been fatal according to the article.
        
           | herewulf wrote:
           | If you're referring to the scene where she deliberately exits
           | an airlock, then she actually exhaled whereas the other
           | person with her did not and died.
           | 
           | (Purposely being vague to avoiding spoiling anyone on this
           | great series)
        
             | nojokes wrote:
             | Yes, that one.
             | 
             | I rewatched this moment on Prime and I remembered it
             | correctly. While she exhales after last words slowly, she
             | inhales sharply before pressing the button.
             | 
             | I remember it probably because I watch everything with
             | subtitles on and that was written. I now watched it without
             | to avoid being biased and it still holds.
             | 
             | In addition she was exposed to the vacuum about 40 seconds
             | before using the shot.
        
           | meristem wrote:
           | In the book she exhales: "She pushed her jaw forward in a
           | yawn, opening her throat and her Eustachian tubes. Cyn yelped
           | as she hit OPEN OUTER DOOR. Air tugged at her once, hard, as
           | it evacuated. Adrenaline flooded her blood as she was
           | assaulted invisibly on every square centimeter of flesh. The
           | breath in her lungs rushed out of her, trying to pull her
           | lungs along with it.[...] With her lungs empty, there was no
           | reserve. She wasn't holding her breath, surviving off the gas
           | held inside her. Someone could hold their breath for a couple
           | minutes. In the vacuum, she could make it maybe fifteen
           | seconds unaided.
           | 
           | Corey, James S.A.. Nemesis Games (The Expanse) (p. 425).
           | Orbit. Kindle Edition.
        
             | nojokes wrote:
             | Nice to know that the author got it right in the book.
        
       | herewulf wrote:
       | This should be tagged 2013.
       | 
       | I came here just now thinking it was a new article. I actually
       | found it by way of Google a couple months ago after watching a
       | certain episode of The Expanse.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-06-03 23:01 UTC)