[HN Gopher] Chinese paddlefish, one of the world's largest fish,...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Chinese paddlefish, one of the world's largest fish, declared
       extinct
        
       Author : gadf
       Score  : 182 points
       Date   : 2021-05-31 11:10 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nationalgeographic.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nationalgeographic.com)
        
       | jacksonkmarley wrote:
       | > Yangtze dam separates Paddlefish, largest, from spawn, now
       | extinct
       | 
       | What does this mean?
        
         | 0xbadcafebee wrote:
         | Largest fish (Paddle) extincted by dam separating spawn.
         | 
         | ......nope still doesn't make sense.
        
         | Arubis wrote:
         | We've found an instance where a semicolon would be clarifying:
         | 
         | > Yangtze dam separated Paddlefish, largest (fish), from spawn;
         | now extinct.
        
           | cptskippy wrote:
           | That still confusing and seems like something only a machine
           | would produce.
        
             | DubiousPusher wrote:
             | Or a 19th century novelist.
        
               | cptskippy wrote:
               | I could see Joyce doing it, and also I could see myself
               | stabbing Joyce with a plastic fork.
        
               | doggodaddo78 wrote:
               | Correction: a plastic spork.
        
             | chapium wrote:
             | Fwiw, I understood it immediately.
        
               | tommica wrote:
               | Please come this way, there is a captcha that we need you
               | to solve...
        
           | kingofpandora wrote:
           | That's an incorrect use of a semicolon ... and it doesn't fix
           | the problem in the sentence.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | Y_Y wrote:
         | The spawn of the paddlefish look a lot like commas.
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | Fish embryos look often like that
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | After reading the article it parses out as "dam separates the
         | largest paddlefish from its spawn, fish is now extinct".
        
           | Chris2048 wrote:
           | But it's not "largest paddlefish", it's "paddlefish - the
           | largest fish"
        
           | jacksonkmarley wrote:
           | It seems like a poor HN title for a very interesting article
           | (which has a perfectly serviceable actual title btw).
           | 
           | The saddest thing is that there are apparently technical
           | solutions to this that could have potentially saved the
           | species. The article mentions fish ladders and bypasses for
           | dams. I'm not sure if the ladders are suitable for a huge
           | fish like this, or whether it has the necessary jumping
           | ability, but some sort of fish bypass seems like a good idea.
           | Hopefully this can be implemented in the future for other
           | similarly endangered species.
        
             | msrenee wrote:
             | They could even have been saved by a captive breeding
             | program. Their American cousins are the subject of a lot of
             | breeding programs. There's a number of state and federal
             | hatcheries that capture breeding adults, strip the roe and
             | milt, and return the adults to the wild. The fertilized
             | eggs hatch into tiny paddle fish and they're raised in
             | ponds until they're big enough to be released in the wild.
             | The same is done with the pallid sturgeon, whose breeding
             | habitat in the US is more or less destroyed due to the
             | channelization of rivers for use by boats.
             | 
             | It wasn't inevitable, but now it's impossible to bring them
             | back.
        
               | jacksonkmarley wrote:
               | They did mention in the article some captive breeding
               | attempts, but not sure if that was a case of 'too little,
               | too late'.
        
       | kordlessagain wrote:
       | Popups for email. No images of said fish.
        
         | rolph wrote:
         | i lifted this link to an image:
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Paddlefish_Polyodon_spath...
         | 
         | from here :
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paddlefish
        
         | WarOnPrivacy wrote:
         | Reader View in Firefox gives image and no regwall modal.
        
           | ed25519FUUU wrote:
           | Same with safari mobile.
        
             | WarOnPrivacy wrote:
             | Downvoting frequently makes no sense.
        
       | rolph wrote:
       | editorializing the title is addressed in the guidelines
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Yes, that was bad. Submitted title was "Yangtze dam separates
         | Paddlefish, largest, from spawn, now extinct". That spawned a
         | whole school of complaints and offtopicness in its own right.
         | We've changed it now.
         | 
         | Submitters: please don't do that. If you want to say what you
         | think is important about an article, that's fine, but do it by
         | adding a comment to the thread. Then your view will be on a
         | level playing field with everyone else's:
         | https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
        
       | 4f77616973 wrote:
       | Why can't they split the river in multiple parts with a small
       | tributary for wildlife that meets up with the rest of the river
       | downstream?
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_bifurcation
        
         | zwirbl wrote:
         | They could have, it just didn't happen that way. And more than
         | likely it's to late for that species anyways. It could still
         | save others though
        
         | _Microft wrote:
         | Do you maybe mean something like a fish ladder?
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_ladder
        
           | Zababa wrote:
           | Or the cool "Salmon cannon"
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z3ZyGlqUkA
        
             | OJFord wrote:
             | Am I seeing that right, they have a guy stand there, pick
             | fish up, and load them in to a pressurised cannon?
             | 
             | I wad expecting something a bit more sophisticated/under
             | the fish's control, even given the name!
        
               | robocat wrote:
               | They also have an automated system:
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGzdOpCisnQ
        
           | ambicapter wrote:
           | Can all fish jump? Feels like it may be something that salmon
           | are pretty good at, but a gigantic fish may not.
        
             | _Microft wrote:
             | Jumping is not always necessary. You can get an idea of
             | possible designs for fish ladders from the photographs in
             | the section "Types" in the article.
        
         | ed25519FUUU wrote:
         | When the dam was built, they didn't know they were cutting off
         | the fish from it's only spawn point in the world (it was
         | discovered later).
         | 
         | Still, there's an argument to be made for building a bypass or
         | fish ladder in every single new and existing dam regardless of
         | what the current expected impact is.
        
           | salawat wrote:
           | I have issues with comprehending how that wasn't factored in
           | from the start.
           | 
           | Then I remind myself most of humanity history is
           | characterized by a marked tendency toward anthropocentrism,
           | and I cease being surprised.
           | 
           | What surprises me now even more was that there were designs
           | for fish ladders even as far back as the 19th century.
        
             | xbar wrote:
             | Studying fish habits when building dams is an ancient
             | practice.
             | 
             | My guess: a political, hasty, rush to success to curry
             | favor and clout drove bad decisions regarding a massive
             | government project. Is that not the way of public
             | bureaucracy, universally?
        
       | blondie9x wrote:
       | The unbridled enthusiasm of man again pushes us deeper into this
       | 6th mass extinction event, the Holocene extinction
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction.
       | 
       | I still remember the Baiji https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baiji or
       | the finless porpoise https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narrow-
       | ridged_finless_porpoise . Can we realistically ever taper down
       | and live more simple minimalistic lives that strike a better
       | balance with our ecosystem?
       | 
       | Moreover does anyone know why the Wikipedia pages do not show the
       | Baiji or Paddlefish animals extinct? Under the EW or EX status?
        
         | selimthegrim wrote:
         | This ain't a mass extinction yet
        
       | DubiousPusher wrote:
       | > survived unimaginable changes and upheavals, such as the mass
       | extinction that killed the dinosaurs and marine reptiles like
       | plesiosaurs that it swam alongside.
       | 
       | It's generally my understanding that extant species have all
       | continued evolving and while a creature may have strong
       | morphological resemblance to its ancestor it is not the same
       | species. Therefore, to say this creature "survived" the
       | Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event would be to say all extant
       | species survived it. Am I misunderstanding this?
        
         | rolph wrote:
         | there is a framing and context that comes from massive
         | consumption of biological science.
         | 
         | when you hear statements like this, the thing that survives is
         | the overall anatomical structure and adaptations
         | indistinguishable from fossil remains except by the fact that
         | fossilization has occured
         | 
         | youare asking a legitimate question, and trying to clear up
         | your own self recognized misunderstanding, sorry to see your
         | comment going gray like that
        
           | rob74 wrote:
           | See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_fossil
        
             | rolph wrote:
             | >>The minimal superficial changes to living fossils are
             | mistakenly declared the absence of evolution, but they are
             | examples of stabilizing selection, which is an evolutionary
             | process--and perhaps the dominant process of morphological
             | evolution.[4]<<
             | 
             | if you want to talk about genetic modifications that is
             | sequitorial however the framing of the statement involves
             | anatomical structure, thus the confusions that have arisen
             | over time.
        
       | gradschoolfail wrote:
       | Seeing that this animal depends on electroreception to survive it
       | was probably a monumental mistake to RF tag the last of its
       | kind..
       | 
       | >In 2003, Wei and colleagues attached a tracking tag to a Chinese
       | paddlefish that was accidentally captured near Yibin, in south-
       | central China. They released it to see where it might go, but
       | within hours lost all signals from the tag. That was the last of
       | the species ever seen alive.
        
       | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
       | > Furthermore, activities like fishing and dam construction
       | deserve more scrutiny
       | 
       | The Gezhouba Dam generates 2.7 GW of carbon free power. In the
       | light of the critical nature of climate change, we need to build
       | more dams like it if we can. Even if a few species on the go go
       | extinct, compared to the massive devastation that will happen
       | from climate change, that is still preferable.
       | 
       | Climate change is an emergency, and we would be better off with
       | more massive hydro-electric dams even at the cost of extinctions
       | of species that might be native to the river on which it is
       | built.
        
         | reaperducer wrote:
         | _Even if a few species on the go go extinct_
         | 
         | You first.
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | Warning: plays audio when you scroll down.
        
       | dukeofdoom wrote:
       | On some bright news. Thanks to declining American manufacturing
       | (thanks China) The Detroit River has bounced back.
       | 
       | Giant 'river monster' fish found in Detroit River may be over 100
       | years old
       | 
       | https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/07/us/sturgeon-fish-intl-scli/in...
        
         | 1cvmask wrote:
         | From an economic perspective the biggest losers of the dollar
         | standard is manufacturing and the biggest winners is wall
         | street. Wall Street had secular growth and manufacturing had
         | secular decline from the adoption of the petrodollar and the
         | dollar becoming the reserve currency of the world. Similar
         | changes happened in Europe when the pound became a reserve
         | currency (growth of Germany etc in manufacturing) and then the
         | issues that surrounded relative decline in the City as a
         | financial center till the Big Bang in the 1980s.
         | 
         | Reserve currencies create huge beneficiaries and losers
         | (especially in "tradables" like manufacturing).
         | 
         | Different arguments on this subject:
         | 
         | https://www.wsj.com/articles/to-bring-back-u-s-manufacturing...
         | 
         | https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-dollar-and-the-future-of-u-...
        
         | alea_iacta_est wrote:
         | > Thanks to declining American manufacturing (thanks China)
         | 
         | Spoken like someone who doesn't work in manufacturing...
        
           | OJFord wrote:
           | (I'm not American so don't really have a horse to grind or
           | axe in this race, but) why would an American working in
           | manufacturing want American manufacturing to decline? Or do I
           | misunderstand?
        
         | gradschoolfail wrote:
         | Interestingly, the paddlefish is a relative of the sturgeon.
         | Both are farmed for caviar..
        
         | quercusa wrote:
         | If you are ever in Portland (OR), it's worth a trip to the
         | Bonneville Dam and Fish Hatchery to see Herman the Sturgeon:
         | 
         | https://www.dfw.state.or.us/resources/visitors/bonneville_ha...
        
       | HMH wrote:
       | Interestingly there is a term for the last known member of a
       | species: Endling [1]. Scrolling through that Wikipedia article
       | always gives me an eerie feeling. It looks like the Chinese
       | paddlefish is not listed yet though.
       | 
       | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endling
        
         | MawKKe wrote:
         | Last time similar topic came up (either here or reddit),
         | someone posted this recording of a "Kaua`i `o`o" bird [1] in
         | which a male, apparently the last of its species, is trying to
         | connect with a female. Reeally eerie.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDRY0CmcYNU
        
           | shakezula wrote:
           | This shit always just makes me so incredibly, deeply sad.
           | It's the loneliest thing I can imagine.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | dalbasal wrote:
       | I feel like someone somewhere should be wearing a black armband.
       | Goodbye, giant paddlefish.
        
         | kordlessagain wrote:
         | More like goodbye earth.
        
           | hunter-gatherer wrote:
           | We are going to need a lot of black arm bands
        
             | dalbasal wrote:
             | we have a lot of arms. I didn't say everyone.
        
       | forrestthewoods wrote:
       | I got downvoted in another thread for extolling the ecological
       | consequences of dams.
       | 
       | Dams should not be considered "clean" energy. They're
       | environmental disasters. Both upstream and downstream.
        
       | bioinformatics wrote:
       | After reading HN voraciously for the past years, I though Chinese
       | ecological protections and records were flawless, and the dam was
       | a sign of prosperity, jobs, opportunities and freedom to the
       | Chinese people.
       | 
       | What went wrong?
        
       | morsch wrote:
       | Its cousin, the American paddlefish, is still around, though it's
       | vulnerable.
       | 
       | Among other similar reasons (overfishing, pollution), dams are
       | related to its decline: "Series of dams on rivers such as those
       | constructed on the Missouri River have impounded large
       | populations of American paddlefish, and blocked their upstream
       | migration to spawning shoals.[29]"
       | 
       | But it's not too late...
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_paddlefish#Population...
        
       | stakkur wrote:
       | This title is something up with which, I cannot, put
        
       | gadf wrote:
       | Sad
        
       | jjt-yn_t wrote:
       | I was so glad the Paddlefish had gone extinct after reading the
       | title as "yangtze dam separates" and spent a few seconds fearing
       | another fukushima...
        
       | ed25519FUUU wrote:
       | > _This dam, which was constructed without a fish ladder or
       | bypass, cut off the paddlefish from their only spawning grounds
       | upstream, which had only been discovered in the late 1970s._
       | 
       | How effective are fish ladders? If they're effective, shouldn't
       | we focus on building a fish ladder on all existing dams?
        
         | jmclnx wrote:
         | Well these fish were very large. I cannot imagine what a fish
         | ladder would look like. There is one for salmon where I live
         | and it is not that big. They have been trying to bring salmon
         | back for over 30 years. Not much luck so far.
        
         | reportingsjr wrote:
         | Fish ladders are minimally effective. They are typically
         | installed to add a rubber stamp to dams and say "look, we
         | tried! It's not our fault the ecosystem is getting destroyed".
         | Same thing with fish breeding and release programs.
        
           | rhodozelia wrote:
           | Citation?
        
             | paulcole wrote:
             | https://e360.yale.edu/features/blocked_migration_fish_ladde
             | r...
        
               | rhodozelia wrote:
               | Thank you. The article notes that other pressures such as
               | overfishing also contribute to the decline of fish
               | populations, and that fish ladders on the Columbia river
               | are successful.
               | 
               | No doubt there are some ineffective fish ladders out
               | there, and no doubt dams have a negative impact on fish
               | populations. Could better designed fish ladders and
               | compensation channels mitigate the effect of the dam? I
               | think so.
               | 
               | Fish stocks across all species are collapsing due to
               | overfishing.
        
       | williesleg wrote:
       | Fucking Chinks. Fix your country before selling your shit to the
       | rest of the world. Assholes.
        
       | neonate wrote:
       | https://archive.is/6ppXT
        
       | okareaman wrote:
       | What was wrong with the better original title "The Chinese
       | paddlefish, one of world's largest fish, has gone extinct"
        
         | Enginerrrd wrote:
         | Perhaps because that title completely omits any form of
         | attribution, which as the article suggests, is largely because
         | of the Gezhouba Dam which completely cut paddlefish off from
         | their only spawning grounds.
         | 
         | Why would you want to omit that part?
         | 
         | That said, this title is a poor attempt at communication.
        
           | rsynnott wrote:
           | > Perhaps because that title completely omits any form of
           | attribution
           | 
           | Though even there, it's... not great, as most people will
           | probably read Yangtze dam as the Three Gorges Dam.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | okareaman wrote:
           | I thought the guide was to use the original title
        
           | ClumsyPilot wrote:
           | Well now you have a title that's, to me, incomprehensible
        
             | GordonS wrote:
             | It's not just you - the new title makes no sense at all to
             | me either. It reads as a jumbled collection of random words
             | :/
        
               | travisgriggs wrote:
               | "The paddlefish has been dammed to extinction"
        
               | philshem wrote:
               | You're hired
        
           | Chris2048 wrote:
           | There's nothing wrong with:                 The Chinese
           | paddlefish, one of world's largest fish, has gone extinct
           | *because of Yangtze dam*
           | 
           | The problem is this part:                 Paddlefish,
           | largest, from spawn, now extinct
        
             | secondcoming wrote:
             | Grammar, largest, from original, now incomprehensible
        
             | Kaibeezy wrote:
             | HN's hyperbole filter definitely takes out "world's" on the
             | first pass, but you can put it back.
             | 
             | Example: I touched off a bit of a "seems bait-y" _pas de
             | deux_ /do-si-do with the bot/mods re a BBC headline a while
             | back. It's towards the bottom (where it surely belongs) of
             | this thread - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26552375
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | mattmaroon wrote:
         | 98% of the time someone changes the title of the article to
         | which they are linking they make it worse.
        
           | doggodaddo78 wrote:
           | Cooks, many, title
        
         | csa wrote:
         | My guess is that the title that the submitter originally
         | suggested (with dam info that is not in the original title) was
         | over the 80-character limit for HN titles, so they shortened it
         | to the current existing (and confusing) title.
         | 
         | For reference when it inevitably gets changed, it's currently
         | "Yangtze dam separates Paddlefish, largest, from spawn, now
         | extinct".
         | 
         | Original title is:
         | 
         | The Chinese paddlefish, one of world's largest fish, has gone
         | extinct
         | 
         | Subtitle is:
         | 
         | Native to China's Yangtze River, these fish grew 23 feet in
         | length, but haven't been spotted since 2003.
        
         | tptacek wrote:
         | Nothing; that's what the title should be. The guidelines ask
         | you to use the original title, and not try to summarize the
         | article yourself in the submission title.
        
           | dredmorbius wrote:
           | HN has _guidelines_ , not _rules_ , and there are times when
           | they can be bent.
           | 
           | For titles, finding (or manufacturing) one that's clearer
           | based on actual article text is a common alternative. I've
           | suggested "Chinese paddlefish has gone extinct due to
           | overfishing and dams" to the moderators. (Much of that phrase
           | occurs within the article.)
        
             | tptacek wrote:
             | I don't think we disagree. The important point is that it's
             | not the job (or the privilege) of the submitter to
             | determine for everyone else what the most important angle
             | on the story is. Titles are community property. That's
             | exactly what went wrong here.
        
               | dredmorbius wrote:
               | Agreed to that point.
        
           | riffic wrote:
           | Has anyone ever considered that maybe the HN guidelines are
           | wrong here?
        
             | pvg wrote:
             | In great detail, over the better part of a decade, yes. You
             | can find some of the rationale here and a few more searches
             | will dig up more discussions about it than even an olympic-
             | level messageboard-hardened person could possibly bear
             | 
             | https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&q
             | u...
        
             | notatoad wrote:
             | the HN guidelines often lead to some stupid titles, but i
             | think this is one of those times that show why the
             | guidelines are good. The original headline accurately
             | represents the content of the article. the edited version
             | is an incomprehensible mess.
        
       | boringg wrote:
       | Serious question here - not starting a flamewar. Are there any
       | real organizations in China with power that protect the ecosystem
       | and animals there? From an outsider it seems like they just build
       | whatever they want without any concern for the environment they
       | live in which ultimately will do significant damage to their own
       | human population after the environment collapses and can't
       | support them.
        
         | markus_zhang wrote:
         | So you are speaking about MEE:
         | 
         | http://www.mee.gov.cn/
         | 
         | Not sure why but they also have an English page:
         | 
         | http://english.mee.gov.cn/
         | 
         | It is one of the ministries under the State Council.
         | Technically all Ministries are on the same Level so they enjoy
         | equal power. In reality some ministries have more weights (e.g.
         | NDRC apparently have more power than some of the smaller ones)
         | and MEE has recently gained much more power since the elevation
         | of President Xi. The following paragraph shows its power.
         | 
         | Quote in Chinese: Zu Jian Sheng Tai Huan Jing Bu . Jiang Huan
         | Jing Bao Hu Bu De Zhi Ze ,Guo Jia Fa Zhan He Gai Ge Wei Yuan
         | Hui De Ying Dui Qi Hou Bian Hua He Jian Pai Zhi Ze ,Guo Tu Zi
         | Yuan Bu De Jian Du Fang Zhi Di Xia Shui Wu Ran Zhi Ze ,Shui Li
         | Bu De Bian Zhi Shui Gong Neng Qu Hua , Pai Wu Kou She Zhi Guan
         | Li , Liu Yu Shui Huan Jing Bao Hu Zhi Ze ,Nong Ye Bu De Jian Du
         | Zhi Dao Nong Ye Mian Yuan Wu Ran Zhi Li Zhi Ze ,Guo Jia Hai
         | Yang Ju De Hai Yang Huan Jing Bao Hu Zhi Ze ,Guo Wu Yuan Nan
         | Shui Bei Diao Gong Cheng Jian She Wei Yuan Hui Ban Gong Shi De
         | Nan Shui Bei Diao Gong Cheng Xiang Mu Qu Huan Jing Bao Hu Zhi
         | Ze Zheng He ,Zu Jian Sheng Tai Huan Jing Bu ,Zuo Wei Guo Wu
         | Yuan Zu Cheng Bu Men . Sheng Tai Huan Jing Bu Dui Wai Bao Liu
         | Guo Jia He An Quan Ju Pai Zi . Bu Zai Bao Liu Huan Jing Bao Hu
         | Bu .
         | 
         | Explanation: MEE took a lot of power from other ministries and
         | departments:
         | 
         | 0 - It originated from the Ministry of Environmental Protection
         | 
         | 1 - The responsibility to tackle with climate change and
         | reducing emmision (from NDRC)
         | 
         | 2 - The responsibility to monitor underground water
         | contaimnation (from Ministry of Land and Resources)
         | 
         | 3 - A bunch of responsibilities regarding water pollution (from
         | Ministry of Water Resources)
         | 
         | 4 - The responsibility to guide argricultural pollution (from
         | Ministry of Agriculture)
         | 
         | 5 - The responsibility to protect ocean environment (from the
         | State Oceanic Administration)
         | 
         | 6 - The responsibility regarding environmental protection in
         | South-to-North Water Diversion (from relevant officials)
        
         | rsynnott wrote:
         | Note that this dam was built in 1970, when no-one was worrying
         | too much about the long-term consequences of dams.
        
           | boringg wrote:
           | Noted. That doesn't change or answer the question though. I
           | am curious if there is a real movement for protection in
           | China with any real power.
        
         | dragonelite wrote:
         | The whole article is talking about China attempts to preserve
         | endangered fish species.
         | 
         | It mostly talking about how in the 80 and 90s they didn't do
         | those preservation research when building dams.
         | 
         | The article also talks that its not only happening in China
         | these old paddlefish species are endangered all over the globe.
        
           | boringg wrote:
           | To be fair you haven't answered my question but stated that
           | there are nascent efforts to preserve endangered fish after
           | the damage is done. I don't doubt there are efforts however I
           | refer to any arm of the government with real power or any
           | institution that isn't related to the government with real
           | power.
           | 
           | Agree species are dying everywhere after all we are in an
           | Holocene extinction event. That said it seems to happening at
           | a faster pace in places like India and China with unfettered
           | development.
        
             | msrenee wrote:
             | It happened in the US already in the same way it's
             | happening in India and China now. The Carolina Parakeet,
             | the Passenger Pigeon, dozens or hundreds of native plants.
             | Shoot, the entire ecosystem known as the Tallgrass Prarie
             | is limited to a few pockets where it used to cover a large
             | section of the Midwest.
        
             | wyattpeak wrote:
             | The distinction you're applying seem to be arbitrary. What
             | makes Chinese efforts nascent but American efforts (where
             | species also continue to go extinct) developed?
             | 
             | Most efforts to preserve animals come after the damage is
             | done. That's why we maintain an endangered species list.
             | 
             | I'm not going to argue that China is as committed to, or as
             | successful at, the goal as say the US is, but "not as good"
             | is very different from claiming they fundamentally lack
             | something the West possesses.
        
               | indymike wrote:
               | > What makes Chinese efforts nascent but American efforts
               | (where species also continue to go extinct) developed?
               | 
               | Perhaps this isn't about nations, but about 1) how sad it
               | is for such a unique species to be extinct, 2) a
               | cautionary tale.
               | 
               | Also, where I live (Indiana, USA) we have a native
               | paddlefish species that was nearly fished to extinction
               | by a ring of criminals that were killing them for their
               | caviar. I wonder if something like that was happening
               | with the Yangtze version? (Article doesn't mention)
        
               | katbyte wrote:
               | > Also, where I live (Indiana, USA) we have a native
               | paddlefish species that was nearly fished to extinction
               | 
               | how are they doing now? recovering?
        
               | cptskippy wrote:
               | It's less about pointing out a failure in China and more
               | about understanding.
               | 
               | As someone in the US, I know about the EPA and the DOI. I
               | don't however know of such comparable government level
               | agencies in China or any other country.
               | 
               | Whenever anyone asks a question about certain countries,
               | the responses are hypercritical, adversarial or defensive
               | regardless of the questioner's intent.
        
               | boringg wrote:
               | So I haven't actually said anything comparing US to
               | China. I see you want to answer your own question
               | unrelated to mine - which is alright.
               | 
               | I simply asked, and continue to ask without anyone being
               | able to answer it: Are there any organizations in China
               | that have any real power to do anything to protect the
               | ecosystems critical to animal life or is it unfettered
               | development >> ecosystem.
        
               | wyattpeak wrote:
               | Given that I wasn't responding to your question, but to a
               | follow up comment you made, I don't see why you would
               | have expected me to be answering your original question.
               | 
               | Nevertheless, the organisation tasked with protecting the
               | environment in China is called the Ministry of Ecology
               | and Environment. To quote Wikipedia:
               | 
               | > The Center for American Progress has described China's
               | environmental policy as similar to that of the United
               | States before 1970. That is, the central government
               | issues fairly strict regulations, but the actual
               | monitoring and enforcement are largely undertaken by
               | local governments that have a greater interest in
               | economic growth.
        
           | Melting_Harps wrote:
           | > The article also talks that its not only happening in China
           | these old paddlefish species are endangered all over the
           | globe.
           | 
           | What remarkable a looking fish, it looks more like a shark
           | with a very elongated nose. Well, pat-on the-back progress
           | aside of their 'efforts', I feel that this is in-line with
           | not just the CCP's outview on the World, but Humanity in
           | general.
           | 
           | Biodiversity be damned (no pun intended) if it stands in the
           | way of short term gain(s). Personally speaking, I think
           | Wildlife and Marine biologists need to collaborate on
           | maintaining these species all over the World in captivity, a
           | real purpose for a zoo if there ever was one, to avoid this
           | problem. I can't stand to see a wolf or a giraffe in a zoo,
           | it makes me sad and I haven't been to one since I was forced
           | to go when I was kid.
           | 
           | As an adult I could justify going every 6 months if I knew
           | these served primarily as a way to conserve endangered
           | animals. Pandas being a chief example of it already being
           | done.
           | 
           | I have a lot of qualms with zoos in general and places like
           | Sea World, I went to university with a well known marine
           | biology program and the amount of collusion between Sea World
           | and the biology department was rather blatant at times.
           | 
           | The lessons we learned from the past 20 years in Tuna farming
           | should serve as a model of what happens when you deplete the
           | Oceans so bad you have to resort to man-made hatcheries for a
           | highly consumed staple--I fear that this species of fish may
           | not have the same recognition and thus a market price for
           | it's survival and thus is deemed insignificant.
           | 
           | Despite being a staunch Free Market advoacte, I'm well aware
           | of the inadequacies of market based solutions alone to
           | prevent, let alone, solve environmental setbacks like these
           | and I fear we have run of time or options that ensured
           | Governments could solve these either. It will require a
           | massive uptick in the need of individuals to do this.
           | 
           | If social media can topple a career with cancel culture over
           | minor indiscretions, and make corporations apologize for BS
           | things deemed not palatable to 'woke' mob then surely a
           | strong drive to make them accountable for conservation should
           | be possible, too.
           | 
           | This being China, I think it's low on the list of atrocities
           | the CCP has committed, even against it's species and this
           | very little will be done to do more than distract from the
           | real issue.
        
             | rmah wrote:
             | To call the Yangtze dam a "short term gain" is ... short
             | sighted. Now, I can't speak to the effectiveness of the
             | dam, but its goals and objectives were literally epic in
             | scope. But to understand the goals, you have to understand
             | the history, and that history stretches so far back that it
             | merges with legend...
             | 
             | Legend has it that one of the early great kings of china
             | was Da Yu  (Yu the Great). But what made him great? Was he
             | a great conqueror like Alexander? Was he a descendant of
             | the gods? No. Yu was "great" because he built the first
             | major floods control projects for the Yangtze river. Pause
             | and think about this for bit. How horrible must the floods
             | have been for a king to have literally entered legendary
             | status for managing them?
             | 
             | The Yangtze river has been the lifeblood of northern China
             | for thousands of years. But it has also literally killed
             | 100's of millions of people. Historically, the river floods
             | quite often, and once in a while floods on a massive, epic,
             | scale. The sort of flood that covers _thousands_ of square
             | miles under many meters of water. The sort of flood that
             | wipes out settlements across vast swaths of land and kill
             | millions of people. Then millions die of disease and
             | starvation. The mouth of the Yangtze has moved _hundreds_
             | of miles during recorded history. And this doesn 't happen
             | little by little... it happens catastrophically with huge
             | floods that have kill 10s of millions. Think of the
             | Mississippi mouth moving from where it is today to
             | someplace in south texas or georgia. The Yangtze river is
             | that kind of epic (but not in the good way).
             | 
             | The Three Gorges Dam was built with the intention of
             | finally, once and for all, controlling the Yangtze. Now, in
             | a few centuries, maybe history will show that it was a bad
             | idea. Or maybe history will show it was one of the most
             | important works of civil construction in human history.
             | Hard to say right now.
             | 
             | But what is clear is that it wasn't built with "short term
             | gain" in mind. That dam is the definition of long-term
             | civil engineering (for good or ill).
        
               | selimthegrim wrote:
               | The Mississippi mouth would have already moved to Morgan
               | City if not for the Old River Control Structure.
        
             | refenestrator wrote:
             | Just last summer there was major flooding up and down the
             | Yangtze. It used to be that lots of people died from these
             | events, now that they have the river under control it's
             | fine.
             | 
             | Calling it simply 'development' obscures the very real
             | human benefits.
        
               | msrenee wrote:
               | There's definitely more than one side to this issue. Do
               | be aware that it isn't just this one species affected by
               | this dam though. There are likely dozens or more other
               | species that suffered the same fate. Some of them may not
               | even have been known to science before they disappeared
               | forever. Dams are extremely hard on fish populations. The
               | real shame here though is that there are solutions
               | available to mitigate the interruptions caused by damming
               | rivers. It appears none were taken though.
               | 
               | We have the same issue here in the US. I'm less familiar
               | with dams, so I'll talk about the channelization of
               | rivers to keep them navigable year-round for
               | transportation of goods. The Missouri River used to
               | meander to a much, much greater extent than it does now.
               | It used to move back and forth over the course of
               | hundreds of years between the loess deposits in the
               | Midwest. This created a number of slow-moving backwaters
               | where many species of fish would lay their eggs. The most
               | common example of this is the pallid sturgeon.
               | 
               | With the straightening and taming of the river, they lost
               | most, if not all of their breeding habitat. Capture of
               | individuals that are under 15 years old that are not
               | traceable back to a captive breeding project is
               | essentially unheard of. Even adults which are not tagged
               | and previously used for breeding are few and far between.
               | 
               | If you don't care about fish, how about birds? The Platte
               | river was historically described as a mile wide and an
               | inch deep. It was marshy, slow-moving, and full of sand
               | bars where birds like the Piping Plover made their nests.
               | In order to reduce the flood risk and claim some of that
               | fertile land for agriculture, the stream was directed
               | into a much narrower and straighter path. With more water
               | flowing down a narrower channel, sandbars became much
               | less common and were at much higher risk of being washed
               | over, taking eggs and chicks with them. The interior
               | population of the plover was drastically reduced. At the
               | same time, the population on the eastern seaboard were
               | being displaced from their dunes along the Atlantic
               | Ocean. People like the beach, like living there and like
               | playing in the sand. That habitat was taken over by homes
               | and businesses and what was left semi-natural was used
               | for recreation and the birds could no longer safely nest
               | there.
               | 
               | Human use and animal use have to be balanced. Relatively
               | few species can thrive directly alongside humans, but
               | humanity isn't going anywhere any time soon either. It's
               | not the fault of the 9-year-old who wants to run through
               | the dunes that these animals are disappearing, but we
               | still need to keep a certain amount of nature in its
               | natural state so that we don't lose even more of our
               | native species.
               | 
               | Dams are necessary in some cases to keep homes from
               | flooding. However there's got to be a better solution
               | that damming a river completely and building in what used
               | to be valuable habitat.
        
             | msrenee wrote:
             | This is more or less what modern zoos do. They fund the
             | conservation efforts using income generated from sales at
             | the park. At the one here, the majority of animals aren't
             | on display. They're maintained in the back areas for
             | breeding, study, and conservation. There's breeding
             | populations of native plants and beetles from the region as
             | well as threatened species from around the world.
        
           | msrenee wrote:
           | "these old paddle fish species"
           | 
           | Unless you're including sturgeon in that group, there is now
           | only one surviving species of paddlefish. That one, thanks to
           | heavy conservation efforts, is listed as vulnerable, but not
           | endangered. It's actually legal to sport fish in many states
           | but takes are heavily regulated. The closely related sturgeon
           | species are also struggling.
        
         | mattmaroon wrote:
         | You know China is not a democracy right? There's only one
         | organization in China with any real power and they're the ones
         | building the dams.
         | 
         | The environment collapsing so that it can't support people is a
         | pretty drastic leap from running certain fish into extinction.
        
           | boringg wrote:
           | I am very aware of who runs China. Which is why I asked the
           | question - are there any organizations within China that have
           | any real power.
           | 
           | My suspicion is that the CCP has no real effort or interest
           | and the lack of people able to answer with a: Yes the CCP is
           | seriously trying to protect the environment/ecosystem/species
           | through the following things likely speaks to the lack of
           | interest/initiative.
        
             | mattmaroon wrote:
             | There are no organizations in China that oppose the
             | government openly. At least not for long. The Chinese
             | government has roving vans that execute dissidents and
             | harvest their organs right outside their house.
             | 
             | The CCP cares about the environment insofar as it benefits
             | China. They probably do not care about a fish going extinct
             | the way we do.
        
               | boringg wrote:
               | That sounds highly suspect: "The Chinese government has
               | roving vans that execute dissidents and harvest their
               | organs right outside their house."
        
               | sudosysgen wrote:
               | It's technically true. When someone is sentenced to death
               | in a remote area without the resources for an execution,
               | a mobile execution van may be dispatched.
               | 
               | And some of those have been dissidents.
               | 
               | Organ harvesting for executed victims has happened in the
               | past. Officially, the practice has ended but there is no
               | way to verify.
               | 
               | China executes a lot of people.
        
               | w7 wrote:
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_van
               | 
               | PRC does not deny they exist, nor denies that organs are
               | harvested after. There are pictures of them online, and
               | notable cases where it was the officially recorded method
               | of execution.
        
               | boringg wrote:
               | Well that was a wikipedia link that felt ill to read.
               | Assuming accuracy my apologies for the doubt.
        
           | petre wrote:
           | They Chinese fishing fleet is also overfishing in
           | international waters, so don't expect the CCP to care much
           | about driving fish into extinction.
           | 
           | The Soviet fishing fleet also massacred a huge amount of
           | whales just to meet dumb quotas imposed in a centrally
           | planned economy. There was not much real demand for whale
           | meat or oil in the Soviet Union.
        
       | pvaldes wrote:
       | Padlefish and Baiji dolphin river. Both went extinct at the same
       | time by the same dam. 2003 and 2007. Our time.
       | 
       | The "Las Vegas Frog" have a stroke of luck, but it is always the
       | same history
       | 
       | And the californian vaquita is probably extinct yet.
        
         | xbar wrote:
         | I had never heard of the California vaquita. Google revealed:
         | 
         | "The tiny vaquita porpoise is the world's most endangered
         | marine mammal. Its numbers are decreasing with fewer than 19
         | remaining. Vaquitas die from entanglement in illegal gillnets
         | which are intended to catch totoaba, in a lucrative illegal
         | fishery that serves an illegal trade of swim bladders to
         | China."
         | 
         | https://www.mmc.gov/priority-topics/species-of-concern/vaqui...
        
       | xiaolingxiao wrote:
       | I recall visiting the Yangtze river by boat tour around 1997.
       | This was before the dam was built and the place was beautiful.
       | Imagine the grand canyon but it was covered with lush vegetation.
       | We visited a center where there were models of the three gorges
       | dam would soon to be built. On the tour they said we would be the
       | last tourists to see the Yangtze as it stands, after the dam,
       | many landmarks/settlements would be flooded, and even back then
       | people critiqued how many species of fish would die because they
       | can no longer swim up river to spawn.
        
         | morsch wrote:
         | FWIW, the dam in question, the Gezhouba Dam, was completed by
         | 1988.
        
         | yellow_lead wrote:
         | Peter Hessler writes about his experience in Sichuan during the
         | time the three gorges dam was being built [1]. Many people have
         | had to sacrifice a lot for these dams. However, IIRC many
         | receive some form of compensation from the government (adequate
         | or not).
         | 
         | [1]https://www.amazon.com/River-Town-Years-Yangtze-
         | P-S/dp/00608...
        
           | samstave wrote:
           | What compensation do the paddlefish get ;-)
        
       | faitswulff wrote:
       | Hopefully they have a DNA sample somewhere. What a shame.
        
         | worldsayshi wrote:
         | I was just thinking, are there any initiatives in long term DNA
         | storage of extinct or endangered species?
         | 
         | Then there might at least be a chance to bring them back one
         | day?
        
         | plank_time wrote:
         | One DNA sample isn't enough. You need dozens or more to
         | repopulate a species. If you just had one or two, you would
         | have to rely on inbreeding to repopulate which would create too
         | many bad genetic problems from bad genes.
        
           | _Microft wrote:
           | Even hundreds or thousand of samples of a species would most
           | likely still be an enormous genetic bottleneck. [0]
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_bottleneck
        
             | dredmorbius wrote:
             | There are numerous vertebrate species with only a few
             | thousand (or fewer) extant members. Many have been greatly
             | reduced over the 20th century, some have been on a long
             | decline before that. Some have been small / relict /
             | outlier populations for much or all of human history.
             | 
             | Whether this means the bottleneck hypothesis is overstated,
             | or that we're looking at a tremendous number of
             | bottlenecks, isn't clear.
        
               | bpodgursky wrote:
               | The reproductive strategy of a species also matters.
               | Species that produce hundreds or thousands of young (and
               | then winnow down to the survivors) are better at quickly
               | "breeding out" genetic flaws (if 50% of the young die,
               | it's not a big deal), and have an easier time recovering
               | from population bottlenecks.
               | 
               | Vs large mammals where raising one genetically-hobbled
               | offspring (who then dies, or fails to reproduce) is a
               | huge loss to the potential of the species.
        
               | dredmorbius wrote:
               | r/K selection theory, for the interested:
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory
        
         | pvaldes wrote:
         | We can't clone a second Yang Tse River.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-05-31 23:00 UTC)