[HN Gopher] Scientists rediscover lost coffee species suited to ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Scientists rediscover lost coffee species suited to a warmer
       climate
        
       Author : throw0101a
       Score  : 248 points
       Date   : 2021-05-21 11:01 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.cbc.ca)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.cbc.ca)
        
       | throw0101a wrote:
       | Coffea stenophylla:
       | 
       | > Coffea affinis _and_ C. stenophylla _may possess useful traits
       | for coffee crop plant development, including taste
       | differentiation, disease resistance, and climate resilience.
       | These attributes would be best accessed via breeding programs,
       | although the species may have niche-market potential via minimal
       | domestication._
       | 
       | * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.00616...
        
       | selfsimilar wrote:
       | Slightly OT but is there a resource to find local coffee
       | alternatives - plants that produce caffeine or other mild
       | stimulants - to try to reduce one's shipping/carbon footprint? I
       | found it difficult to even know what local alternatives there
       | are. For reference I'm in the US midwest, but I'm curious about
       | how one finds local alternatives that are not one-to-one more
       | generally.
        
         | doodlebugging wrote:
         | Yaupon holly, which grows all over the southeastern US from
         | Texas to Florida is the only naturally-caffeinated plant in the
         | US.
         | 
         | https://lostpinesyaupontea.com/pages/yaupon-tea-caffeine-con...
         | 
         | I have several yaupons in my yard's landscape and have dried
         | the leaves as described and made tea. It has a good flavor and
         | is pleasant to drink. I drink so much coffee though that I
         | could not tell whether I was getting any caffeine. I just felt
         | normal.
         | 
         | The bushes grow to small trees that can, over time, completely
         | cover a landscape since the send up sprouts from their shallow
         | roots. This is a sustainable, easy to grow, source of caffeine
         | for areas where it will grow.
         | 
         | The berries are excellent food for birds in winter. Our trees
         | were attacked and stripped by flocks of birds in the last days
         | before the big freeze this February. I thought the trees had
         | frozen out but they are now as bushy and vibrant as ever.
         | 
         | As far as real coffees from their native environments are
         | concerned I would gladly volunteer my place as a test site for
         | growing a drought tolerant, freeze-tolerant variety as long as
         | I get to taste test it.
         | 
         | I drink my coffee New Orleans style with chicory. It is the
         | most delicious morning, noon, evening, and night drink that I
         | have ever had. Smooth, non-acidic, rich, vibrant, fragrant,
         | just plain great liquid energy.
        
           | nieve wrote:
           | > The bushes grow to small trees that can, over time,
           | completely cover a landscape since the send up sprouts from
           | their shallow roots.
           | 
           | That makes me worry about it acting as an invasive.
        
             | masklinn wrote:
             | Yaupon is native to the southern US. If it were going to
             | cover the land it would already have done so.
             | 
             | Also technically this description encompasses strawberries.
             | If that were sufficient to be invasive, there's be way more
             | strawberry bushes out there.
        
           | ianai wrote:
           | Your link: " We think the magic is actually in the balance of
           | caffeine and theobromine. In addition to caffeine, yaupon
           | also contains theobromine, which most people know from
           | chocolate. Theobromine is similar to caffeine, but has a
           | milder effect. And its uplifting effect is one of the reasons
           | chocolate is known as an aphrodisiac. Theobromine has health
           | benefits as well!"
           | 
           | They buried the lede! Theobromine is awesome! Mix in some
           | theanine and enjoy being in flow (or pretty close).
        
             | Jarwain wrote:
             | Every so often I like to brew up some cacao instead of
             | coffee; it's like a chocolate tea and feels quite nice
        
           | wernercd wrote:
           | > naturally caffeinated
           | 
           | Isn't there ways to cross pollinate stuff? I've been out of
           | school for awhile and I never got into biology... but why
           | couldn't we get caffeine in, say, apples? or wheat?
           | caffeinated bagels would rock...
        
             | xef wrote:
             | https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/edible/vegetables/vgen/cro
             | s...
             | 
             | > First, cross pollination can only occur between
             | varieties, not species. So, for example, a cucumber cannot
             | cross pollinate with a squash. They are not the same
             | species. This would be like a dog and a cat being able to
             | create offspring together. It is simply not possible. But,
             | cross pollination can happen between a zucchini and a
             | pumpkin. This would be like a yorkie dog and a rottweiler
             | dog producing offspring. Odd, but possible, because they
             | are of the same species.
        
               | kuerbel wrote:
               | For the very low chance someone wants to give this a try,
               | be wary of any zucchini you grow yourself, if it tastes
               | even mildly bitter it might kill you. The chance that
               | this happens is greatly increased if cross pollination
               | occurs. Most people don't seem to know this.
        
               | justinclift wrote:
               | > ... if it tastes even mildly bitter it might kill you.
               | 
               | Hadn't heard of this before either. Looking around
               | online, and yep, it's a real thing (was kind of wondering
               | ;>):
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marrow_(vegetable)#Toxicolo
               | gy
        
           | pabs3 wrote:
           | Do the berries also have caffeine in them?
        
             | doodlebugging wrote:
             | I believe that the berries may have some small amount of
             | caffeine but in quantity they can make you sick.
             | 
             | This link is a really good link to explain harvesting and
             | enjoying yaupon tea.
             | 
             | https://www.foragingtexas.com/2008/08/yaupon-holly.html
        
         | nabilhat wrote:
         | That depends a lot on your availability to participate in
         | preparation. Other commenters have mentioned yaupon. I'd bet
         | you have camellias growing locally as well. Commercial tea
         | comes from camellia sinensis, but can also be made from other
         | camellias. If harvesting and preparing isn't your thing, there
         | is some tea that is grown and sold in the US. Not much to
         | choose from, but it's available.
         | 
         | If it's not obvious, I've been giving this some thought for a
         | while. I've homeroasted coffee and discovered that I enjoyed
         | the process more than the quality of the outcome. Coffee won't
         | grow well where I live, but camellia does great, and that would
         | give me the opportunity to take on the entire process from root
         | to cup and truly seize the means of my own caffeination.
        
         | WaxProlix wrote:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caffeine#Natural_occurrence
         | 
         | Not sure what they're referring to by unrelated plants in
         | 'temperate climates', which I suspect parts of the midwest
         | might be generously described as.
         | 
         | I bet you could grow some of the linked items in a garden or
         | smallish greenhouse, though.
        
         | cout wrote:
         | Wikipedia lists multiple places in the US that grow tea. The
         | most notable is a large tea plantation on Wadmalaw island near
         | Charleston, SC.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_production_in_the_United...
        
         | SECProto wrote:
         | In terms of carbon footprint, coffee (as a low gram-per-serving
         | product) is probably low.
         | 
         | For example, I consume ~200g/week of coffee (10kg/yr), all of
         | which would be shipped in 25kg bags from the producing locale
         | to my local roastery. The shipping carbon impact would likely
         | be easily offset by a single consumer item purchased from
         | overseas
        
           | maddyboo wrote:
           | Water usage may be a larger concern than shipping. From
           | Wikipedia:
           | 
           | > Coffee production use a large volume of water. On average
           | it takes about 140 liters (37 U.S. gal) of water to grow the
           | coffee beans needed to produce one cup of coffee, producing 1
           | kg (2.2 lb) of roasted coffee in Africa, South America or
           | Asia requires 26,400 liters (7,000 U.S. gal) of water. Coffee
           | is often grown in countries where there is a water shortage,
           | such as Ethiopia.
           | 
           | So, assuming those numbers are accurate, your 10kg year of
           | coffee required 264,000 liters of water, or just over 10% the
           | volume of an Olympic swimming pool (2,500,000 liters).
           | 
           | That's a lot of water.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee#Ecological_effects
        
             | 4gotunameagain wrote:
             | > Coffee is often grown in countries where there is a water
             | shortage, such as Ethiopia.
             | 
             | I would imagine that the water shortage is a problem in the
             | low altitude arid deserts near the coast, while coffee is
             | grown in the high altitude inland mountainous regions.
             | 
             | Coffee needs a high altitude tropical climate with a lot of
             | rainfall, that's why it is grown in tropical
             | monsoon/rainforest climates (Brazil, Indonesia, Africa)
             | where rain is abundant
        
             | SECProto wrote:
             | Yes, water usage is likely a concern (though not the one
             | the original comment had raised/I responded to). That
             | section of the Wikipedia article is very poorly cited,
             | linking to a single EBI source [1] which doesn't cite a
             | primary source. I'd be unsurprised if coffee (particular
             | wet-processed coffee) used a fair bit of water, but other
             | agricultural products also use more water than people
             | expect - a 500g loaf of bread would need 250 to 2000L of
             | water, according to this one random source [2]. Daily
             | household water usage in North America is in the ~400 litre
             | [3] range (~150000L/yr per person).
             | 
             | [1] https://www.eib.org/en/essays/on-water
             | 
             | [2]
             | https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/jan/10/how-
             | mu...
             | 
             | [3] https://www.hamiltonproject.org/charts/domestic_water_u
             | se_pe...
        
         | hundreddaysoff wrote:
         | How about chicory? It's naturalized to the US. Easy to grow
         | perennial with pretty flowers that would look great in the
         | garden.
        
           | WaxProlix wrote:
           | Afaik there is no caffeine in chicory, if that's a meaningful
           | discriminator.
        
       | bioinformatics wrote:
       | So, was it warmer before?
        
         | mackal wrote:
         | I don't think it was in the article, but apparently it has a
         | lower yield and smaller berries. So basically economics caused
         | it to stop being commercially cultivated.
        
         | cmrdporcupine wrote:
         | Maybe try reading the article.
        
       | axaxs wrote:
       | I wonder why they made no mention of Liberica, which is currently
       | grown in very hot climates? I'd be interested in how they
       | compare.
        
         | cratermoon wrote:
         | Good question. A quick search suggests that right now it's not
         | widely grown, less than 1% of all coffee grown, and the flavor
         | profile - sweeter and fruitier - is not popular with the coffee
         | world. It's also said to be less productive than arabica and
         | robusta.
        
           | axaxs wrote:
           | Perhaps if you drink it lightly roasted? I had some made in
           | Batangas and it was dark roasted, and tasted like your
           | typical dark roast of anything else...to me.
        
       | re wrote:
       | Lake Street Dive released a song last year that touched on the
       | impact of climate change on coffee, among other things. One of my
       | favorite songs of the year, though it doesn't make me feel great.
       | 
       | > To the next generation, / Merry Christmas / You're working
       | harder than ever now / And the coffee sucks / You know, Colombia
       | and Kenya got too damn hot / And now you're making do with what
       | you got
       | 
       | https://smarturl.it/makingdo
        
         | Udik wrote:
         | And the news are yet another proof that many of the climate
         | change doom scenarios start from the assumption of a perfectly
         | static world incapable of change or adaptation. This coffee
         | species seems to taste even better than the one we use now (and
         | yet the production with the current plant, far from decreasing
         | because of climate change, has in fact grown 60% in the last 20
         | years).
        
       | hourislate wrote:
       | This is one of the main reasons I won't be able to go to Mars.
       | Unless they can bring coffee on regular resupply missions, I'm
       | stuck on this planet forever.
        
       | dicroce wrote:
       | at least we'll have coffee when climate change roasts us.
        
       | dukeofdoom wrote:
       | Best coffee I had was local coffee in Hawaii, which is like 27
       | degree celsius everyday, and low of 16. So a very small
       | temperature swings.
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | As a hardcore coffee addict, this makes me happy.
       | 
       | I wonder if some major corporation (I think we know the one that
       | comes to mind) will find a way to corner the species, and act as
       | a licensing gatekeeper...
        
         | CoastalCoder wrote:
         | Oracle?
        
       | mullikine wrote:
       | The main takeaway from this is that the future of our species is
       | secure once again
        
       | soniman wrote:
       | Articles like this are probably planted by an industry group. The
       | article mentions that the species was never lost because samples
       | are held in labs, so there really isn't any news content here.
       | What is probably going on is that coffee prices have been in a
       | long term slump, producers are barely making money on arabica
       | beans, and they want to introduce a cheaper variety that isn't
       | low-margin robusta in order to survive as the low prices persist.
        
         | alexpetralia wrote:
         | A slump until the last year it seems:
         | https://m.investing.com/commodities/us-coffee-c-historical-d...
        
           | soniman wrote:
           | https://www.macrotrends.net/2535/coffee-prices-historical-
           | ch...
        
         | MattRix wrote:
         | Nonsense, the news story here is based on a new scientific
         | paper, which in turn is based on new data. This new data shows
         | that stenophylla can grow in much higher temperatures (6.8
         | degrees C) than arabica, which is huge news considering the
         | now-certainty of global warming.
        
         | detritus wrote:
         | Which labs? Or do you mean botanical specimens held in places
         | such as the British Museum, with which they can compare with to
         | check the species - but not propagate from - as they're long-
         | since dead?
         | 
         | Seems to me the excitement in this news, which has been doing
         | the rounds for at least a couple of weeks now, is that the oft-
         | threatened single species Arabica has a similarly-tasting
         | 'backup' in case of a global coffee rust pandemic.
        
           | soniman wrote:
           | "Stenophylla had not been seen in the wild in Sierra Leone
           | since 1954 and anywhere since the 1980s in Ivory Coast, Davis
           | said. A few examples were held in coffee research
           | collections."
           | 
           | I think that means that there are a few labs with plants or
           | seeds, but the discovery here is of a _wild_ variety of the
           | plant. Could be wrong.
        
         | cmrdporcupine wrote:
         | Nah it's buzz generated out of some research from some
         | botanists. The species itself was mostly lost in the wild and
         | no longer cultivated as a crop because it wasn't economical at
         | the time -- samples in labs is something else entirely.
         | 
         | The spin that the media is putting on it is a bit weird, but as
         | a person who breeds grapes and is a botanical geek, I'm used to
         | seeing strange press distortions of these kinds of things.
         | 
         | My understanding is that this species is not a cheaper producer
         | at all. While it grows in hotter climates it producers lower
         | volume and is harder to pick. Its value will be in breeding.
         | Probably hybridizing with arabica.
        
           | HaggardFinical wrote:
           | Your last paragraph is on point. James Hoffmann made a video
           | about this (link at the top of this thread) featuring the
           | researchers and basically this is exactly what they said as
           | well.
        
           | madaxe_again wrote:
           | It is cultivated - just by small growers, not by massive
           | industrial combines. Which I guess counts as "not cultivated"
           | these days.
        
         | maxerickson wrote:
         | There's a constant shortage of the light roast I prefer. It's a
         | national brand, not anything terribly fancy, and it could just
         | be that a couple new people started buying it from my local
         | store.
        
       | andrewxdiamond wrote:
       | A hacker news favorite, James Hoffmann, got the opportunity to
       | taste this lost coffee about a month ago.
       | 
       | As typical with a James video, it's high quality and worth a
       | watch.
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/iGL7LtgC_0I
        
         | phnofive wrote:
         | TL;DW: it's got a clean, sweet, mildly acidic flavor.
        
           | pedroma wrote:
           | Maybe this is the joke, but it seems he says that every
           | video.
        
             | masklinn wrote:
             | Because it's basically what you're looking for in a good
             | coffee? Unless you got into wine tasting stuff with <<
             | notes of chocolate and raspberry >>.
        
               | rorykoehler wrote:
               | Who decides what's good? People have different
               | preferences. My mother doesn't like the "good coffee" as
               | per your description for example (I love it however).
        
             | qbasic_forever wrote:
             | Not in the videos where he tastes 50 year old coffee beans
             | someone found in their attic. :)
        
               | mths wrote:
               | Aged coffee is a thing. I tried something in the 10-15yo
               | range once, and for a dark roast it wasn't bad.
        
               | prox wrote:
               | Aged fermented tea is as well. A Chinese tea house had
               | tea's reaching into the hundreds of dollars (for one
               | brew!)
        
               | rorykoehler wrote:
               | Best tea I've ever had was 20 year old Pu'er tea.
        
               | koolhaas wrote:
               | Do you have a recommended legit online source for med -
               | high quality Pu'er?
        
               | cyberpunk wrote:
               | meileaf.com -- you can find it cheaper elsewhere but the
               | stuff on there is curated and I've never had a lemon from
               | them.
        
               | koolhaas wrote:
               | Thanks!
        
               | cyberpunk wrote:
               | They also have a pretty good YouTube channel with lots of
               | tips and tricks on gongfu brewing etc, definitely
               | marketing related and sure drove a lot of sales, but it's
               | worth checking out their masterclass playlist :)
        
               | Stratoscope wrote:
               | Was this coffee that was roasted and _then_ aged for that
               | long? That doesn 't sound good.
               | 
               | I have gotten some nice aged coffees, an aged Sumatra and
               | a monsooned Malabar (they age it in a warehouse open to
               | the monsoon wind and moisture).
               | 
               | But these were aged while green and I roasted them fresh.
               | 
               | I wonder if what you got was something more like that,
               | aged green and then roasted after aging?
        
               | belval wrote:
               | A dark roast that is aged would taste bland. Usually
               | darker roast = faster degradation.
        
               | klyrs wrote:
               | A good dark roast is often oily, so they tend to go
               | rancid in a span of months unless hermetically sealed
        
               | lostlogin wrote:
               | Dark roasts hide a lot. I say this as someone who is
               | terrible at roasting, so compensate.
        
               | dccoolgai wrote:
               | Hence Charbucks. Someone in the coffee industry once told
               | me their real innovation was recognizing most Americans
               | don't have the pallette necessary to distinguish "burned"
               | from "strong". So Starbucks just bought all the lowest-
               | quality beans for cheap, charred them and sold the coffee
               | at a premium.
        
               | frogpelt wrote:
               | I'm guilty. I have tried many light roasts and I always
               | come away thinking it tastes weak. Where can I get a new
               | palate?
        
               | atatatat wrote:
               | Tea.
        
               | klyrs wrote:
               | I love a good dark roast, brewed thick enough that it's
               | got mouthfeel. I dated a barista for a while, who was big
               | on light roast pourovers. I'm still not into them, but I
               | did find a preparation I like: a blonde cold brew with a
               | dash of lime juice. It's delightful and refreshing, so
               | far from my usual that it's almost in a different
               | category
        
               | eyelidlessness wrote:
               | I would recommend trying a few "natural process" (the
               | beans are dried before removing the fruit) light roasts.
               | They're often far richer in flavor, with much more
               | pronounced fruit notes. Then if you can find a natural
               | process dark roast (rare in my experience), compare.
               | You'll notice that while you may still taste the fruit
               | notes, they'll be masked pretty heavily by the roast.
               | 
               | It was a natural process roast that got me to even care
               | about the difference, and now I almost always go out of
               | my way for light roasts.
               | 
               | If you're in/near/visit Seattle or have access to any of
               | these roasters: Seattle Coffee Works specializes in light
               | roasts, most of Victrola's single origins are light, and
               | many of Ladro's are as well. All three often have at
               | least one natural process. They're all quite good!
        
           | ajmurmann wrote:
           | Also peachy and light like coffee grown at higher altitude
        
         | madaxe_again wrote:
         | It's not lost? It just isn't currently commercially viable.
         | 
         | Read the article carefully - they say "in the wild" about a
         | dozen times.
         | 
         | Stenophylla is known as Highland Coffee in Liberia and Leone
         | (distinct from Liberian coffee, Liberica), and is cultivated
         | and roasted on a small scale. Little to none is exported.
         | 
         | I've tried it. It's ok. Somewhere between arabica and Liberica.
         | Can't recommend Liberica though, I thought it tasted like
         | burning rubber.
        
           | bamboozled wrote:
           | How do we know what burning rubber tastes like ?
           | 
           | I know the flavour you describe.
        
             | durovo wrote:
             | Probably because what we perceive as taste is also related
             | to our sense of smell [0] and you have probably smelled
             | burning rubber before.
             | 
             | 0. https://flavourjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.118
             | 6/s1...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-05-22 23:02 UTC)