[HN Gopher] Kangaroos and Training Neural Networks (1994)
___________________________________________________________________
Kangaroos and Training Neural Networks (1994)
Author : optimalsolver
Score : 10 points
Date : 2021-05-17 10:39 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (webcache.googleusercontent.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (webcache.googleusercontent.com)
| jmmcd wrote:
| > In standard backprop, the most common NN training method, the
| kangaroo is blind and has to feel around on the ground to make a
| guess about which way is up. A major problem with standard
| backprop is that the distance the kangaroo hops is related to the
| steepness of the terrain. If the kangaroo starts on a gently
| sloping plain instead of a mountain side, she will take very
| small hops and make very slow progress. When she finally starts
| to ascend a mountain, her hops get longer and more dangerous, and
| she may hop off the mountain altogether. If the kangaroo ever
| gets near the peak, she may jump back and forth across the peak
| without ever landing on it.
|
| The first part of this is bad. In backprop we know the gradient
| just fine. And no analogy has been offered for the aspect that
| makes backprop distinct from every other algorithm mentioned.
| LeegleechN wrote:
| The gradient we want is the gradient with respect to the
| process which generated the dataset. The gradient we get is an
| estimate based on only a handful of samples from that process
| at a time. The analogy holds up fine.
| CyberShadow wrote:
| I understand the fragment you quoted to be accurate, and the
| problem described is mostly ameliorated by optimizers. But, I
| don't understand your criticism of the quoted text. Would you
| mind elaborating?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-05-18 23:02 UTC)