[HN Gopher] Are we screening too much for skin cancer? It's comp...
___________________________________________________________________
Are we screening too much for skin cancer? It's complicated
Author : laurex
Score : 12 points
Date : 2021-05-05 18:32 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (undark.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (undark.org)
| Vecr wrote:
| As far as I can tell, all cancer is being screened for too much,
| except possibly colorectal cancer, mostly just because there's
| other stuff that can be found in the same exam. If better
| treatments existed, it might become more worthwhile.
| bricemo wrote:
| This is a complicated space to get right. Prostate cancer is the
| opposite: The government used to screen for it (PSA blood test)
| and so people would see their doctor at stage 1 or 2 cancer, when
| it can be easily tested. But the problem was that the positivity
| rate was about 45:1, and the test is too expensive at that scale.
| So now PSA tests are not routine. As a result, people are now
| coming in to their doctors with prostate cancer at stage 3 or 4.
| Might be the right choice for society, but the wrong choice for
| the individual.
| google234123 wrote:
| It's definitely complicated because most of these older men
| with stage 1/2 prostate cancer will not actually die from it
| since it's so slow. However, getting the treatment for it
| leaves a huge number with erectile dysfunction or other issues.
|
| Is it really worth screening/treating a disease with a small
| chance to kill you if that treatment has a huge chance to make
| you impotent?
| im3w1l wrote:
| Depends on your values. Some people may think it's worth it
| for them, and that's valid.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-05-05 23:01 UTC)