[HN Gopher] The origin of "tweet" at Twitter (2013)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The origin of "tweet" at Twitter (2013)
        
       Author : pcr910303
       Score  : 58 points
       Date   : 2021-05-05 03:16 UTC (19 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (furbo.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (furbo.org)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | jonny_eh wrote:
       | It's amazing how much of Twitter wasn't created by the company,
       | but by its users. "Tweets", "hashtags", "@replies", all created
       | by users. "Tweet" has since been trademarked by the company. [0]
       | 
       | [0] https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/update-twitter-finally-
       | lan...
        
         | LasangaCode wrote:
         | The same goes for all social medias. They're all-user generated
         | content.
        
           | dang wrote:
           | I don't think the GP was talking about content so much as how
           | Twitter's features were shaped in the early years, by
           | formalizing how users were creatively adapting the site.
           | Twitter stood out that way.
        
           | codemac wrote:
           | Not true at all - stories ala Snapchat were not invented by
           | users.
           | 
           | Twitter was (but no longer) awesome by allowing folks to
           | consume plain text with socially agreed upon meaning rather
           | than features of the client. It's my feeling that instead of
           | piling on more metadata into the posts, they could have done
           | something more similar to RES on reddit, and expanded the
           | text limit.
        
         | Workaccount2 wrote:
         | I wanna know who supplanted PM with DM.
         | 
         | It's PM god damnit!
        
           | hbosch wrote:
           | PMs imply privacy.
        
             | nkozyra wrote:
             | They're also known as "Personal" Messages
        
               | simlevesque wrote:
               | Never heard this before, but personal seems like another
               | word for private in this case.
        
         | nextstep wrote:
         | It's too bad the system isn't collectively owned by the users.
        
       | Graffur wrote:
       | What I like about this story is that it shows you don't have to
       | be perfect at launch. In fact, launching instead of over
       | perfecting everything is probably better.
        
       | ivanche wrote:
       | They have got to be kidding! "Tweet" as a word appeared at least
       | in 1952. [1]
       | 
       | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tweety
        
         | rossitter wrote:
         | The word "tweet" wasn't added to the OED, just a new meaning of
         | it.
         | 
         | Two entries for "tweet" (one for the verb, one for the noun and
         | interjection) have been in the OED since 1916, with citations
         | going back to the 16th century.
        
         | chipotle_coyote wrote:
         | Come on. You can understand _from context_ that Craig is
         | talking about using  "tweet" to mean "a post on Twitter", not
         | claiming that he literally invented the word "tweet".
        
       | twobitshifter wrote:
       | I wonder if Twitter compensated the icon factory for coming up
       | with the bird mascot?
        
       | jonny_eh wrote:
       | His tweet at the end that is supposed to be the first to be
       | tagged with a source other than web... says web?
        
       | slver wrote:
       | Looking back at old Twitter rather reminds me how simplicity was
       | its main selling point. No threads, no images, no long tweets,
       | and so on.
       | 
       | They've since doubled their length and add bunch of meta
       | information on every post, rendering it basically
       | indistinguishable from any other social network.
       | 
       | Twitter today is running on network effects and brand
       | recognition, not core value. That core value is gone.
        
         | bena wrote:
         | I mean originally, it was supposed to be mass SMS. I send a
         | message and anyone who wanted to receive it did so. It was sort
         | of like proto-group SMS messaging.
        
           | slver wrote:
           | Let's make a 32 char Twitter...
        
       | minikites wrote:
       | Twitter gained almost all of their value from third party clients
       | and once they had that value, they told those developers to go
       | jump in a lake. Don't help companies for free, they will never
       | repay you.
        
         | donohoe wrote:
         | Sure, but in this case it was a Twitter developer, Blaine Cook,
         | that suggested the word "tweet"
        
         | cbozeman wrote:
         | I don't know enough to know if that's true, but I do believe
         | you, and:
         | 
         | > Don't help companies for free, they will never repay you.
         | 
         | Is apparently not true, because Rockstar paid that guy for
         | speeding up GTA Online's loading time... but a sample size of 1
         | is pretty bad data, I'll freely admit.
        
           | filmgirlcw wrote:
           | It is completely true. The term tweet, the @ sign, the
           | hashtag, the bird imagery, the concept of the retweet and the
           | quote tweet. Hell, the original Twitter for iOS client was
           | Tweetie (which Twitter acquired), which introduced features
           | like pull-to-refresh (a parent that now belongs to Twitter
           | but is licensed freely to others).
           | 
           | And Twitter did obliterate its relationships with its dev
           | community. Totally killed it. The motives were sort of
           | understandable in the abstract, Twitter wanted to control its
           | experience and the sheer number of third party clients really
           | went against that. Hell, the whole reason they bought
           | Tweetdeck was defensive, because another company wanted to
           | buy it and Tweetdeck had such huge usage in the brand
           | management/large account Twitter space.
           | 
           | The problem was by going scorched earth, Twitter gave the
           | middle finger to not just developers like Iconfactory and
           | others that created core features, but it really had the add-
           | on effect of abruptly killing all the innovation that
           | happened on top of their platform.
           | 
           | The good news is that over the years, Twitter as a company
           | has changed. The new API isn't going to be a return to the
           | pre-2013 days, but it does give developers a lot more options
           | and freedom than before. Twitter smartly is still charging
           | for API calls past a certain number and for broader access to
           | the firehose -- and it should, to be honest -- and that means
           | the days of being able to make good money off of a Twitter
           | client are over for good (even Iconfactory and Tweetbot had
           | to go subscription, which I think is fair for what are now
           | very niche apps), but the new API is huge improvement and I
           | do think the current team is really working to build good
           | relationships with devs going forward, even if they can't
           | rectify the past.
        
             | nceqs3 wrote:
             | *patent not parent
        
           | nielsbot wrote:
           | "probably almost never" :)
        
           | bigth wrote:
           | I say it is true. There used to be a lot of very popular
           | twitter desktop apps that were used by the early adopters who
           | brought lot of traffic to the platform.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-05-05 23:00 UTC)