[HN Gopher] Show HN: Checklist.video - Research backed tips for ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Checklist.video - Research backed tips for great video
       calls
        
       Author : jeztek
       Score  : 70 points
       Date   : 2021-04-26 16:26 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (checklist.video)
 (TXT) w3m dump (checklist.video)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | Mulpze15 wrote:
       | >Make sure your face is well lit
       | 
       | To do this, make sure you have your window in front of you, and
       | certainly not behind you (backlighting is awful)
       | 
       | If you are on a call at night, or in a dark place, make sure your
       | laptop screen is not your main source of light: if someone shows
       | a red slide, you will look red.
        
         | mdu96 wrote:
         | > make sure your laptop screen is not your main source of
         | light: if someone shows a red slide, you will look red.
         | 
         | Haha, this is such a great point - thanks for noting this!
        
       | npilk wrote:
       | Glad to see "hide self view" on this list - that's made a huge
       | difference for me in the last few months.
       | 
       | I'd suggest removing the need to click through the "read now"
       | button - seems like if I'm on the page, I want to read the tips.
        
         | blablabla123 wrote:
         | Self-view together with this semi formal workspace environment
         | makes this whole video experience really unnatural. Although I
         | doubt it can be deactivated on many video conferencing
         | platforms.
        
           | mdu96 wrote:
           | Yeah, as we point out in the Checklist.video site,
           | unfortunately only Zoom, Google Meets, and WebEx give you the
           | option to turn off self-view. (Notable lack of this ability
           | in Microsoft teams!)
        
       | swyx wrote:
       | > Keep an arm's length away from your camera
       | 
       | > Eye contact is incredibly important for showing others you're
       | engaged and paying attention. Taking a small step back from the
       | camera will decrease the angle between your eyes and the camera,
       | making it seem more like you're making eye contact.
       | 
       | this is actually a really great trick! and straightforward
       | explanation.
       | 
       | thank you, nice project, wondering why you made it a standalone
       | site. are you intending to build on this further?
        
         | mdu96 wrote:
         | Thanks swyx, we're glad you enjoyed the site!
         | 
         | It's a standalone site because we wanted people to be able to
         | easily share it with their teammates right before important
         | video calls.
         | 
         | A few people have given us really helpful feedback about more
         | information to include (e.g. setups for different types of
         | remote workers). But we haven't decided how we'd like to build
         | on it further yet. If we did, what would you like to see from
         | the site? / what would be most helpful to you?
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | stonogo wrote:
       | It's interesting to me that nobody's really taken the initiative
       | to come out with a high-quality video-only UVC camera yet. I have
       | in mind something like Arducam's offerings* but with autofocus.
       | Even taking a Raspberry Pi high-quality camera and trying to make
       | a webcam out of it is difficult.
       | 
       | I have no interest in buying a thousand-dollar mirrorless camera
       | for this purpose, and even less interest in taking Michael Lopp's
       | advice and buying a $4,000 BlackMagic camera for this. All the
       | pieces are in place for a decent autofocus dedicated UVC camera
       | with good color imaging, but for some reason the market hasn't
       | landed there, and I'm curious why.
       | 
       | The closest is probably the Logitech Brio, but even that camera
       | is horrible in lighting environments in which the Arducam's
       | manual-focus larger lens excels.
       | 
       | * https://www.arducam.com/product/arducam-high-quality-complet...
        
         | mdu96 wrote:
         | the other maker of Checklist.video here :)
         | 
         | stonogo -- you've hit the nail on the head! we asked ourselves
         | the exact same questions.
         | 
         | There was a really great HN thread about it a few months back,
         | did you see it? link here:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25504771&p=3
        
         | swyx wrote:
         | noob question - what is the difference between a typical webcam
         | (i have the logitech c925) and a "UVC camera"? i mean i get
         | theres a price difference and i can _see_ the difference, I
         | just don 't exactly know what causes it and why i need to pay
         | $1k for it.
        
           | mdu96 wrote:
           | hey swyx! a "UVC camera" simply refers to a camera that
           | connects to your device over USB. most "typical webcams" are
           | actually UVC cameras. the ones that are not, are the fancy
           | SLR set-ups that you have to jerry-rig to your computer with
           | multiple connectors and hubs. these are the setups that
           | typically cost at least $1k.
        
             | swyx wrote:
             | ahhh ok ok. yeah. i want the dslr quality without the fuss
             | and at maybe 1/3 the price tag. haha.
        
             | Domenic_S wrote:
             | I use one of those fancy video setups. It consists of a
             | tripod, the camera body & lens, dummy battery for power,
             | and USB-C cable from camera to the mac, no jerry-rigging
             | required. It's a Canon EOS R (a mirrorless camera). Modern
             | cameras have gotten extremely good at this, there's no need
             | for HDMI video cap boxes and so forth anymore.
        
               | mdu96 wrote:
               | Ooo awesome :) What lens do you use with your EOS R?
        
         | notJim wrote:
         | It seems like cameras with decent sensors start around $500,
         | though most cluster around $700+. I sort of wonder if no one
         | has had the chutzpah to test whether there's a market for $500
         | webcams. I was personally a little surprised when I went remote
         | three years ago that a "premium" webcam only costs $200, and
         | looks like shit. Based on the number of people with fancy
         | mirrorless setups now, I suspect a $500+ turnkey webcam could
         | do well.
         | 
         | For your specific situation, a used Panasonic G7 and a $20
         | Chinese capture card would probably work if you're interesting.
        
         | crummy wrote:
         | Apparently you can use Android and iPhones as webcams (e.g. see
         | https://reincubate.com/camo/ ).
        
           | mdu96 wrote:
           | have you used these apps before? what's the experience like?
        
             | crummy wrote:
             | I have not, though my coworker does sometimes (Camo) and
             | the video quality is quite good.
        
       | tomg wrote:
       | I would add to the reasons for "Use wired headphones or speakers"
       | is that many (all? not sure) combination "bluetooth headphones
       | with mic" hardware will bottleneck at the bluetooth link. You end
       | up sounding like you're on an old landline (and incoming audio is
       | equally low-fi).
       | 
       | I ended up using my bluetooth headphones just for incoming audio;
       | and a dedicated mic on my desk for my speech. It improved both my
       | voice and everyone elses' dramatically.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bluetooth_profiles#Han...
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bluetooth_profiles#Hea...
       | 
       | https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40951060/how-to-make-a2d...
       | 
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/techsupport/comments/44sxms/bluetoo...
        
         | singold wrote:
         | I've also noticed in my case that bluetooth headphones
         | interfere with my laptops wifi, but am not sure why. And the
         | hardware bottleneck makes a lot of sense for me because those
         | headphones didn't interfere when weren't connected to the
         | laptop (the same happens to me with my phone)
        
         | jimbogr77 wrote:
         | Ended up with the same setup.
         | 
         | Qc35 + Razer seiren mini work great together.
        
       | jeztek wrote:
       | It's been a whole year since the pandemic started and video calls
       | are still terrible. We've been doing a lot of research into how
       | to make them better and wanted to share what we've learned.
       | 
       | We were aiming for something whimsical and easy to read so the
       | tips primarily focus around illustrations that were inspired by
       | IKEA instructions. For people who are interested in delving into
       | the details we put the meat of the advice behind a "Why?" button.
       | 
       | This was also our first foray into writing a responsive site that
       | renders well on mobile and desktop, built using Next.js and
       | Tailwinds CSS.
       | 
       | What are some of your favorite video call hacks or tips?
        
         | Wowfunhappy wrote:
         | > It's been a whole year since the pandemic started and video
         | calls are still terrible.
         | 
         | Because it's hard. Just going through the list in the article:
         | 
         | > Use a cable to connect to the Internet
         | 
         | Difficult if your house isn't wired for ethernet and the modem
         | is in an inconvenient spot, or in a room which contradicts tip
         | #4. Do you let a long cable drift along the floor?
         | 
         | Powerlines will work in some houses, but not others, and can
         | occasionally introduce their own connectivity problems.
         | 
         | > Make sure your upload speed is >3 Mbps
         | 
         | And if your ISP doesn't offer that much upload bandwidth, well
         | then I guess you're SOL.
        
           | mdu96 wrote:
           | The other maker of Checklist.video here :)
           | 
           | Yeah, definitely agreed with you that it's difficult if your
           | house isn't wired for ethernet. I actually do let a long
           | cable drift along my floor :P Having a strong upload speed is
           | crucial to letting others be able to hear you without any lag
           | - and that's one of the most important factors to having a
           | great video conference. This is why we wanted to emphasize a
           | wired connection, but we also provided the specific
           | upload/download speeds that could get you the high quality
           | call as well.
        
           | CryptoBanker wrote:
           | You can setup Ethernet through your power outlets with
           | something like this https://www.amazon.com/TP-Link-
           | AV600-Powerline-Ethernet-Adap...
        
             | Wowfunhappy wrote:
             | Yep, I mentioned those! They're great when they work, but
             | it depends on how your house is wired.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | supermatt wrote:
         | Does "research backed" mean studies were done, or does it mean
         | that you read a bunch of stuff and called it research?
         | 
         | If the former, can you link to any relevant papers, etc? I was
         | looking for specifics on this for a project myself.
        
           | jeztek wrote:
           | Hey supermatt, thanks for the feedback, that's good to know!
           | Is there an alternative wording you would suggest? We meant
           | to imply that the tips were primarily derived from findings
           | from published research.
        
             | supermatt wrote:
             | I'd be interested in the links to the published research!
             | 
             | If it's actual research, I think the naming is fine. If
             | it's reading a bunch of "top 10 tips for looking great on
             | webcam" then it's not.
             | 
             | When I clicked on "why" I was expecting some actual
             | information. As is, it just reads like an opinion piece
             | IMHO
             | 
             | For example, you state an arms length as the optimal
             | distance - but this would be different based on FoV, etc.
             | There's no real data I can see that would lead to make that
             | statement.
        
               | jeztek wrote:
               | Ah, okay I'm trying to understand your recommendation. Is
               | it because not every tip has a research finding tied to
               | it, which seems incongruous with the title? Or is it that
               | the research finding doesn't explicitly tie to the
               | recommendation?
               | 
               | Most of the tips do reference research findings, and you
               | can find the reference by clicking on the subscript
               | numbers or scroll down to the references section.
               | 
               | Some tips are more common sense and/or geared towards
               | addressing a research finding. In the "arm's length" tip
               | for example, the referenced paper discusses the
               | importance of eye contact in computer mediated
               | communications but doesn't explicitly say you should keep
               | an arm's length to achieve the best eye contact. Was your
               | expectation that the tip should link to research
               | determining the optimal distance from the camera to
               | achieve good eye contact?
        
               | sodality2 wrote:
               | It's at the bottom of the page:
               | https://checklist.video/checklist/#references
        
         | aborowie wrote:
         | I really like this, a few comments
         | 
         | Why not have the homepage be the checklist? Seems odd to have a
         | page that says click here to see the checklist
         | 
         | Can you send this to the one guy on our Zoom calls who logs in
         | 3 minutes after meeting starts, futzes around with
         | camera/microphone/sound for 5 minutes and then 8 minutes into
         | the call announces he's online and wants to be filled in on
         | what he missed?
         | 
         | From video production the one takeaway I have is key light vs
         | backlight, webcams like key light and webcams struggle with
         | back light
        
           | mdu96 wrote:
           | Lolol!!! Happy to send this to that guy if you somehow
           | provide us his contact information :) I'm on Twitter here if
           | you wanna DM me: https://www.twitter.com/melissadooo.
           | 
           | And yes, absolutely. Webcams - and actually cameras in
           | general - REALLY struggle with back-lighting. Having a key
           | light pointed at a wall so it's more diffuse and so it can
           | cast a softer glow onto your face is ideal.
           | 
           | Videographers learn about 3-point lighting for ideal lighting
           | situations in film school:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-point_lighting.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-26 23:01 UTC)