[HN Gopher] The feeling of disgust, and where it comes from
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The feeling of disgust, and where it comes from
        
       Author : dnetesn
       Score  : 37 points
       Date   : 2021-04-24 11:07 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (nautil.us)
 (TXT) w3m dump (nautil.us)
        
       | TaupeRanger wrote:
       | lmfao...loose, nebulous terminology being applied to a mysterious
       | aspect human experience we know next to nothing about. Why waste
       | the effort?
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | wolfretcrap wrote:
       | I've never experienced this "disgust" for anything in life.
       | 
       | Is it possible in some people it's absent?
        
         | nate_meurer wrote:
         | Have you ever, say, had to clean a dog who's rolled in feces on
         | a hot day? Or cleaned up after a toddler who's vomited a
         | cheeseburger they ate hours before?
         | 
         | If so, and you didn't experience anything you'd call disgust,
         | I'd say it's possible the answer is yes.
        
         | dorkwood wrote:
         | Do you ever accidentally eat rotting meat or sour milk because
         | their smells don't illicit disgust?
        
       | ajarmst wrote:
       | Readers of this would likely find some of Jonathan Haidt's (viz.
       | "Positive Psychology") research on _disgust_ and _elevation_ --as
       | extremes of the same emotional continuum and potentially linking
       | moral emotional reactions to evolutionary mechanisms around food
       | selection and aversion.
       | 
       | Edit: I now note that seneca made the same point before I did, in
       | particular citing "The Righteous Mind" as a good source on this.
        
       | ComputerGuru wrote:
       | The entire article is premised around this assumption:
       | 
       | > Since disgust arrives in middle childhood (ages five to nine),
       | right around the time when social biases are formed,
       | 
       | That has not been my experience with my own kids. Disgust for
       | both tangible (foods) and intangible (fashion/clothing) was
       | certainly evident in children as young as two, and not yet
       | exposed to the world.
       | 
       | In fact, I have vivid memories of our experience with what they
       | apparently call "baby-led weening" and distinctly recall the
       | trademark "disgusted face" when our kid tried certain foods for
       | the first time (at quite a bit younger than one).
        
       | seneca wrote:
       | This article is a little light. If you're actually interested in
       | scholarship around the topic, Jonathan Haidt has a lot of great
       | writing around how deep seated "gut" feelings like disgust drive
       | our moral judgements. I would highly recommend his books and
       | papers.
       | 
       | The Righteous Mind is a good starting place for this topic.
        
         | User23 wrote:
         | This reminds me of the finding that viewing homosexual male
         | activity triggers serious physiological stress to heterosexual
         | men independently of prejudice[1]. The response is entirely
         | involuntary.
         | 
         | I've also heard that people on the political right have a much
         | higher disgust sensitivity than people on the left, but I
         | suspect that's not nearly as meaningful as it first sounds due
         | to the artificiality of forcing the diversity of moral and
         | political opinions along a single axis based on French politics
         | at the time of the Revolution.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19419899.2017.13...
        
       | zwkrt wrote:
       | Jordan Peterson (red flag, I know!) talks about how disgust is
       | actually one of the oldest emotional centers in the brain and is
       | an incredibly distinct emotion from fear. He mentions that most
       | people think that reactionary conservative thinking is driven by
       | fear, but he thinks it is actually driven by people's innate
       | ability to feel disgusted and how that emotion pours over from
       | physical disgust of feces, rot, maggots, etc. to more social and
       | abstract forms. Some people innately feel this more strongly than
       | others, but you can also train yourself to be less disgusted. It
       | bears out if you have ever seen someone who is what I might call
       | "physically bigoted", i.e. their body seems to have an intense
       | physical reaction to people of different races or classes. Think
       | about how fundamentalists really hate gay sex (or even slightly
       | kinky "adultery")-- their actions aren't driven by a logical
       | process, the thought of it is so disgusting that they are
       | repulsed by it's very existence.
       | 
       | I find this interesting because of how disgust has been used in
       | the past and present as a rhetorical device for various social
       | movements. Hitlers speeches about keeping a strong aryan race
       | centered around analogies of disease, filth, and purity. Covid
       | and covid coverage certainly latches onto people's deep desires
       | to stay away from the diseases as well. There are logical reasons
       | to want people to wear masks but I think the feeling goes deeper
       | for some. A certain kind of lefty thinks right wing states are a
       | plague ship full of untouchables. On the other hand, right
       | wingers have latched on to the "Chinese virus" narrative, and
       | attempt to humanize Asian people is seen as naively/maliciously
       | allowing disease spreaders into the community by conservatives.
       | 
       | I guess my point is that we might be better off to be
       | intentionally and rationally disgusted wherever possible, and
       | should be aware that this incredibly strong emotion can be used
       | to manipulate us.
        
         | patcon wrote:
         | Not sure why you were downvoted, but thanks. I'm no Jordan
         | Peterson fan, but I appreciate your thoughtful comment :)
        
           | zwkrt wrote:
           | Thanks. I try to take the medicine from the poison with
           | regards to JP. Maps of Meaning really helped me fling myself
           | out of a depression as an aspie-kind of a guy. I had such
           | calm and reasoned thoughts of meaninglessness, a kind of zen-
           | depression-nihilist-nothingness. I wasn't crying or staying
           | in bed all day, but I couldn't be bothered to care about any
           | aspect of my life. I already don't like people, hobbies were
           | pointless, work a sisyphantian task, etc. His book was great
           | because it was an academic look into why meaning is important
           | at the basest level of existence, and how it is basically
           | ones responsibility to have a full life by /injecting/
           | meaning into the world--the more the better! Then I kind of
           | saw through to the anti-progressive undertones and hung up
           | the phone as it were, but I owe him a lot.
        
             | goldenchrome wrote:
             | What is it about the anti-progressive undertones, to use
             | your language, that caused you to stop reading him?
        
           | proc0 wrote:
           | People have that feeling of disgust towards JP.
        
             | throwaway3699 wrote:
             | I don't understand how. JP is best known for being a
             | (believe it or not, relatively left-wing) psychologist
             | teaching young adults the virtue of responsibility. What is
             | wrong with that?
        
               | zwkrt wrote:
               | Progressives don't like responsibility because it is
               | complicated to balance talk of personal responsibility
               | with that of social justice. The hardest part of being a
               | minority is that one can blame almost all of ones ills on
               | the state of society, and be correct to do so, but in
               | doing so one loses personal control over ones life in the
               | day-to-day. We have to act as if we have responsibility
               | even if we don't, just to be sane. It's the same line of
               | thinking as believing in free will. If you don't believe
               | in it deep down you will almost certainly fall into a
               | depression.
               | 
               | But right-wing rhetoric flips the script and says of
               | course we have to act with responsibility, because we
               | /really are/ responsible at the lowest level of reality.
               | If your life isn't going well then that's your
               | responsibility to fix it and yours alone. Minorities and
               | poor people hear this and either beat themselves up or
               | reject it outright, since it is a half-truth at best.
               | 
               | So now talking about responsibility is tied up with
               | bigotry, which I think is really unfortunate.
        
               | watwut wrote:
               | Conservatives don't like responsibility for themselves
               | tho. Only for those they perceive as others.
        
           | watwut wrote:
           | The Hitlers speaches about aryan strength centered on aryan
           | strenght and history and such. They had feel good and feel
           | powerfuly strong element. They were motivating to target
           | audience. He was in business of building powerful Reich, that
           | required vision of strength and victory, not just threat.
           | 
           | He did had also speeches about Jews being Marxists and pest
           | and disease. That was favourite topic too.
           | 
           | But the sentence itself is just something someone who is
           | bluffing and hoping for best would say.
           | 
           | I kind of suspect that part about disgust being oldest center
           | of brain turns out similar "sounds good but not really"
           | nonsense.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | wombatmobile wrote:
       | TFA uses the terms "disgust" and "moral repugnance", without
       | defining them, as if we all know and agree what they are, then
       | "discusses" their historical cultural aetiological development
       | without evidence.
       | 
       | This is story telling.
        
         | guerrilla wrote:
         | How is it possible that you don't know what disgust is?
        
         | patcon wrote:
         | > This is story telling.
         | 
         | I get so disappointed that this is such a common mic drop
         | pejorative on HN. Of COURSE it's story-telling. That's the
         | point of science communication. Stories penetrate and bridge
         | silos. Data wrapped in narrative happens to be the most
         | effective way to penetrate that vast majority of human
         | neurotypes
         | 
         | Also, I find your requirement for an upfront definition of
         | disgust (and your discount of the content for it not being
         | present) to feel very much like trolling.
         | 
         | EDIT: fwiw, this description of disgust is very much like the
         | story of laughter: how it was repurposed over evolutionary
         | history as we become more social creatures (converting
         | something reflexive into something under social control), and
         | we still see relics of this "migration" in our psychology and
         | musculature (re: duchenne's laughter). So this tracing of the
         | history of disgust is very par for the course in how
         | professionals who study such things talk about this stuff. Your
         | comment is frankly ignorant and dismissive for no good reason.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | " _Please don 't post shallow dismissals, especially of other
         | people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something._"
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
       | lainga wrote:
       | Has anyone noticed that almost all mammals have the same
       | "disgust" expression with the wrinkled snout?
        
         | tolbish wrote:
         | I was surprised to find there had been no overarching study on
         | mammalian facial interactions until recently [0]. Supposedly
         | the first review of mammalian facial interactions and their
         | neurobiology took place in 2011.
         | 
         | [0]
         | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095943881...
        
         | ermir wrote:
         | Disgust is intimately tied to the defense against disease and
         | pathogens, and the wrinkled snout/nose serves the function of
         | closing down the airways to prevent pathogens from getting
         | inside.
         | 
         | Jordan Peterson has an excellent series of lectures regarding
         | disgust sensitivity, here's a sample:
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiDmfb6M4Vk
        
           | throwaway0xa wrote:
           | It really is a great series of lectures that cover a wide
           | range of human phenomenon and ties the pieces together in one
           | coherent story.
           | 
           | Hope you're prepared for the downvotes though. We can't have
           | thinking that goes against the narrative here, and Peterson
           | might as well be Goebbels.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | watwut wrote:
           | Wrinkled snout/nose does not close the airways nor prevents
           | pathogens from getting inside.
           | 
           | I have to admit that if it would, covid would be way funnier.
           | But, it does not. J
        
           | steve_adams_86 wrote:
           | This isn't actually known to be true though, is it? It seems
           | like a compelling hypothesis, but rejection of external
           | objects is only universal as far as our physical responses
           | rather than emotional.
           | 
           | For example, something threatening might be purged from the
           | mouth, stomach, or intestines. This is something all humans
           | do.
           | 
           | Something undesirable to eat or drink won't universally
           | trigger a specific facial expression, sound, or feeling.
           | 
           | Further, if I wrinkle my nose in disgust it actually flairs
           | my nostrils, seemingly making it easier to breathe and smell.
           | I suspect this is the same for most humans, but I'm open to
           | correction. It simply has no limiting effect on my ability to
           | breathe or smell, though.
           | 
           | These are important distinctions, and distinctions which make
           | Peterson's claim less than factual from my point of view.
           | 
           | There's a great conversation about this on the Making Sense
           | podcast. It touches on this idea exactly, and why we really
           | don't understand what emotional elements of expression truly
           | mean or where they come from. Things like disgust contain a
           | cultural or environmental element which appear to lack
           | attachment to solely genetic origins.
           | 
           | https://samharris.org/subscriber-rss/?uid=PNISESQukqqj4q8
        
         | freeslave wrote:
         | I think you're referring to the Flehmen response:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flehmen_response
        
           | 7373737373 wrote:
           | Seems to be similar to the "bass face" of appreciation:
           | https://i.imgur.com/uVSSTSD.png
        
       | iandanforth wrote:
       | This article contains no science, feel free to ignore.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-25 23:01 UTC)