[HN Gopher] A strange determinant - Timothy Gowers solves a prob...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A strange determinant - Timothy Gowers solves a problem [video]
        
       Author : dls2016
       Score  : 36 points
       Date   : 2021-04-23 15:40 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | schaefer wrote:
       | I see he's using the program "write" by stylus labs[1]. It's an
       | absolute favorite of mine (Especially on the ipad), and deserves
       | to be more popular than it is.
       | 
       | It's not without rough edges, but it's killer feature: You can
       | quickly reflow your handwritten text to add more blank space in
       | the middle of a sentence, in the middle of a paragraph, in the
       | middle of your paper. Or arbitrarily reorder anything at any
       | time.
       | 
       | To me, it really is the features of the word processor finally
       | come to handwritten text.
       | 
       | [1] http://www.styluslabs.com/
        
         | doomrobo wrote:
         | This looks awesome. But wow wow wow they're serving executables
         | over HTTP and the website doesn't load if you try HTTPS. I wish
         | I could try this out
        
       | c3534l wrote:
       | I'm just starting this and I'm sure its over my head, but I love
       | that he's cited Twitter as a source of inspiration immediately.
        
       | klelatti wrote:
       | All credit to Tim Gowers for doing this. He tweeted the quote
       | "Being good at maths is being good at being stuck" from this
       | video a little while ago
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kenf8E1RuoA
       | 
       | But of course he wouldn't be doing a voice-over in a real non-
       | recorded attempt to solve a problem and I think it's notable that
       | he falls silent when focusing at times. Interesting that he
       | solves it by sleeping on the problem.
       | 
       | He's quite active on Twitter: a friend of mine has had some good
       | debates with him on particular problems using Twitter.
        
       | dan-robertson wrote:
       | Some context:
       | 
       | Tim growers follows the pedagogical style of producing the proofs
       | on the blackboard in front of you without notes. This is
       | reasonably possible in the kind of pure mathematics where his
       | interests lie. The idea is that it forces the kind of
       | straightforward proofs which have few ideas and are mostly doing
       | only the obvious thing. It also means the audience get to see
       | someone actually doing it rather than just presenting some notes.
       | Morally, I want to say this style is good, but I don't really
       | have any idea if it's the best way to lecture something.
       | 
       | I saw an attempt at something similar to this video--trying to
       | solve a mostly unseen problem in real-time--from him about 5
       | years ago. In that case it was some attempt at an IMO problem and
       | I think he got stuck at the end which relied on some weird
       | equivalence classes of functions which were apparently quite
       | common in IMO questions at the time but hard to derive if you'd
       | not seen them before.
       | 
       | He has a reasonably popular blog at growers.wordpress.com where
       | he has run some "polymath projects" which were attempts to prove
       | or disprove certain conjectures through wide scale collaborative
       | mathematics over the internet.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | ajkjk wrote:
         | * https://gowers.wordpress.com/
         | 
         | His surname is 'Gowers'!
        
         | yissp wrote:
         | I had a combinatorics prof who taught this way, and I found it
         | really effective. There's usually some key insight, and then
         | you can just follow you nose through the rest of the proof.
        
         | dls2016 wrote:
         | > Morally, I want to say this style is good, but I don't really
         | have any idea if it's the best way to lecture something.
         | 
         | I think the entire point is that it's _not_ a lecture. The
         | internet allows us to share a video showing how the sausage is
         | made, instead of the usual  "definition, theorem, example"
         | cadence of what many people consider a good math lecture.
        
       | jhncls wrote:
       | Some programmers might enjoy that he introduces zero-based
       | indices for these determinants.
        
       | jonnybgood wrote:
       | The OP[0] in r/math provides good description of the video:
       | 
       | "This video is Gowers showing us that the false starts and silly
       | mistakes we normal people make when first attempting a problem do
       | not disappear at his "level". Watching his fumbles and
       | frustrations might provide discouraged older students with some
       | much-needed perspective on being "gifted", while watching him
       | think out-loud might help unsure younger students learn what it
       | means to "attack" a problem.
       | 
       | Gowers fails to solve the problem in this video. He tries again a
       | few hours later and succeeds in this second video[1], but then
       | tries and fails to find an "elegant" proof. The next morning, he
       | wakes with an idea and figures out an elegant proof in a third
       | video[2]."
       | 
       | [0]
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/mwxkso/timothy_gowers...
       | 
       | [1] https://youtu.be/frvBdaqLgLo
       | 
       | [2] https://youtu.be/m8R9rVb0M5o
        
         | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-23 23:01 UTC)