[HN Gopher] Semantic Satiation
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Semantic Satiation
        
       Author : annowiki
       Score  : 106 points
       Date   : 2021-04-23 15:30 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org)
        
       | adamrezich wrote:
       | anyone have any favorite examples of one-word variable or method
       | names that have caused this for you? (where you type it over and
       | over and eventually you start to question if it's really a word
       | at all)
        
         | dsr_ wrote:
         | The word "lunch" does it for me within five repetitions or so.
        
         | rzzzt wrote:
         | Thunk in Redux. Thunk, thunk, thunk. It's just an onomatopoeia
         | for me at this point.
        
         | aaronbrethorst wrote:
         | I don't have this problem with variables or method names, but
         | the type "double" does this to me.
        
         | Jtsummers wrote:
         | In college (undergrad and grad school) I did a _lot_ of
         | graphics programming and _color_ lost all meaning on many
         | occasions. It wasn 't the whole variable name (well, typically,
         | maybe on occasion but not normally) but often things like
         | _BackgroundColor_ or _ForegroundColor_ and so on. On many busy
         | coding days at some point I 'd just see this word scattered
         | about the screen and have to convince myself that it was in
         | fact the correct word and used correctly and spelled correctly
         | (though perhaps British English speakers would disagree on the
         | spelling).
         | 
         | I haven't experienced it in quite a while, though. And I don't
         | do any graphics programming anymore anyways so when that word
         | shows up in my code it's usually in the very minimal bit of GUI
         | programming I touch anymore. I'm not sure any other word ever
         | gave me quite as much trouble.
        
         | Igelau wrote:
         | Oh my god yes. I had a Jasper Report I was working on once that
         | had totals, subtotals, totals of those subtotals...
         | 
         | Suddenly I just froze wondering "wtf is a total?!"
        
         | dgritsko wrote:
         | Roads. Ro-ads. Row-ads.
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT3vOCWA-J0
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | At $WORK the word "leverage" is used as a verb so frequently,
         | usually with no meaning other than "use", that it begins to
         | sound like noise. A sort of grunt that must be periodically
         | uttered, from time to time, to indicate the speaker is a member
         | of the glorious tribe of passionate, devoted $WORK employees,
         | like a radio callsign periodically interrupting a transmission
         | to assure the listener of the station's identity. What scraps
         | of meaning it still clung to -- even as a buzzword -- began to
         | fade.
         | 
         | I have resolved to assiduously use "use" when I mean "use".
        
           | themodelplumber wrote:
           | Damn, that's a shame. Leverage deserves much better treatment
           | than that. It's an amazing concept. "To use" has some
           | interesting points to it as well, but eh...
        
       | kgeist wrote:
       | Now, after 25 years or so, I finally know how it's called! I
       | remember, as a kid, I found out that if I repeat a word often
       | enough, it stops being registered as a word, suddenly it's just a
       | bunch of unrelated sounds. It amused me but I never shared it
       | with anyone, and, turns out, there's even a term for it (and a
       | lot of research). It's one of those things that happen to many
       | people but rarely talked about; post-nasal drip and blue field
       | entoptic phenomenon also come to mind.
        
       | milesward wrote:
       | Sorta like this?
       | 
       | Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
       | Yes Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
        
         | milesward wrote:
         | oh sure, fine, thanks hackernews formatting for turning my rad
         | ASCII art "NO" into just a string of Yes
        
           | twic wrote:
           | Built-in memetic defences. Take your low-tier basilisks
           | elsewhere.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | Jtsummers wrote:
           | YesYes    Yes     YesYes       Yes Yes   Yes   Yes    Yes
           | Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes      Yes       Yes   Yes Yes   Yes    Yes
           | Yes    YesYes     YesYes
           | 
           | My best effort to recreate. You need 2 spaces in front of
           | each line in order to get code blocks which will preserve
           | your ASCII art.
           | 
           | If you can still edit your original, your line breaks and
           | spacing should be preserved in the raw form so you'd only
           | need to add the spaces in front of each line to get your
           | version showing correctly.
        
       | yantrams wrote:
       | Thank you for sharing this. I read about this on Wikipedia a
       | decade or so ago and for the life of me couldn't find it again.
       | All I could remember was that G.K.Chesterton was mentioned in the
       | Wikipedia article and tried many times to google his name with
       | different keywords ('Chesterton words repetition' etc)to no luck
       | whenever this phenomena happened with me.
       | 
       | PS: Chesterton isn't mentioned in the current version of this
       | article but I see a lot of hits when I search his name with
       | semantic satiation.
        
       | slver wrote:
       | That seems to be an example of our general tendency of treating
       | all stimuli relative to their surroundings (both spatially, in
       | time, and in abstract sense). A word's meaning only matters in
       | contrast to other words combining it into some composite
       | expression. If no such expression comes up, the brain tries to
       | break down the word and look at a lower level.
        
         | bluetomcat wrote:
         | Exactly. Say you are standing on the side of an empty road.
         | You'll certainly notice the first car that passes, maybe the
         | second and the third. As the traffic intensifies, you'll
         | eventually stop noticing the individual cars and assume they
         | are part of the background.
        
         | pjc50 wrote:
         | Seems naturally very close to Shannon's theory of information;
         | a symbol has meaning in proportion to how unexpected it is.
        
           | guerrilla wrote:
           | Also to de Saussure's original structuralism.
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_de_Saussure
        
         | annowiki wrote:
         | This makes sense, but it reminds me a lot of how we filter out
         | sensations after so long (i.e., we can't smell a bad odor after
         | a certain amount of time, or we stop noticing a certain
         | annoying sound after so long).
         | 
         | I cannot remember or find the term for this but iirc it's Psych
         | 101.
         | 
         | I found these though:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocktail_party_effect
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_auditory_attention
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stimulus_filtering
        
           | slver wrote:
           | I think it's the same basic process.
           | 
           | Lay down in bed, looking at the ceiling, the main light just
           | to the side of your central vision. And the lamp disappears
           | (until your move your eyes) :-)
        
           | asplake wrote:
           | Habituation? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habituation
        
             | annowiki wrote:
             | Yes! That's exactly what I was thinking of!
        
         | ironmagma wrote:
         | I would add that it's almost all stimuli. One could only wish
         | that pain worked this way (unfortunately, no matter how many
         | body parts hurt, it doesn't mean only the one that hurts the
         | worst is the only one that appears to hurt).
        
       | anon_tor_12345 wrote:
       | illustration of this that was clear enough that i got it at age
       | 10
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KT3vOCWA-J0
        
       | johnghanks wrote:
       | How is linking a wikipedia page considered a good submission?
        
       | hooande wrote:
       | This happens to me when programming. A common term like "array"
       | will jump out at me and I'll think "...that doesn't look right"
       | 
       | I saw a term for it many years ago and have googled for it many
       | times since then. Thanks to annowiki for posting this!
        
         | annowiki wrote:
         | Enough people have expressed difficulty googling for it so I
         | thought I'd share my google search to find it:
         | 
         | https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=word+do...
         | 
         | Sometimes the simplest search is the most effective!
         | 
         | And you're welcome. (I was taking a complicated job application
         | test where you had to recognize the color of a word and click
         | the word that spelled the color. Everything was red or blue. As
         | you can imagine...)
        
       | topherjaynes wrote:
       | Hope this came up from watching Ted Lasso... if not go watch Ted
       | Lasso! Plan? Plan... no Plan!
        
       | evanb wrote:
       | My satirical take on this phenomenon in physics:
       | https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12201
        
       | kazinator wrote:
       | I've noticed that, when replaying an audio clip of a word or
       | phrase repeatedly (like when "deciphering" something in a foreign
       | language), after a few repetitions it no almost longer sounds
       | like speech, but just some rhythmic sound.
        
       | th0ma5 wrote:
       | I've read the title of this post so many times I don't even know
       | what it means anymore.
        
       | layer8 wrote:
       | This is also called Gestaltzerfall.
        
       | onorton wrote:
       | My all time favourite example of this
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DySPDmCHgw
        
       | emkee wrote:
       | finally. I have a wikipedia page to reference when my friends
       | think I'm being stupid lmao
        
       | mcguire wrote:
       | I've seen this while reading text, but does anyone have examples
       | in any other sense? Verbally?
        
         | yantrams wrote:
         | Verbally is how I experience it exclusively as in not like
         | saying it aloud but more like uttering it to myself internally
         | if that makes sense. I should log this when it happens next
         | time. Usually I happen to be mentally reciting/picturing* a
         | word syllabically and not alphabetically and for a span of 3-4
         | seconds it feels utterly alien. Happens with the simplest words
         | like colour, market etc.
        
       | jcims wrote:
       | I wonder if this has anything to do with that phenomenon where
       | you look at the word, and suddenly doesn't look like it's spelled
       | correctly.
        
         | anuragvermakhn wrote:
         | Hi jcims
         | 
         | Sorry I am trying to contact you in a non traditional way but I
         | need your advice on something very important. My mom (53Y) got
         | diagnosed with stage 3c ovarian cancer recently. The surgery
         | has been done and chemo started 3 days back.
         | 
         | I saw your comment on the HN post which is around 3 years old
         | where you mentioned your wife took part in clinic trial for
         | atezolizumab.
         | 
         | Fingers crossed. I hope you guys are doing ok. I need to learn
         | more about the treatment. I would be grateful to you for any
         | advice/help you can give me. I don't know your email id. My
         | email id is anuragvermaknn@gmail.com.
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16279856
        
           | jcims wrote:
           | Hey buddy I'll send you a note out of band tonight. This
           | space moves incredibly quickly and I don't know what things
           | look like these days in terms of trials. We didn't have a
           | good outcome ultimately but there is some evidence that my
           | wife should have been staged at IV not IIIC. I'm still
           | incredibly confident in the role that immunotherapy will play
           | in cancer therapy, and it's likely that there have been
           | advances since we had a go at it.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | annowiki wrote:
         | https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/6170/is-there-a-...
        
       | hendzen wrote:
       | Somebody watched Ted Lasso recently
        
         | taliesinb wrote:
         | Just thought the same thing. Funny that they spent probably an
         | entire minute worth of skit on it.
        
           | dointheatl wrote:
           | I was listening to a podcast with Jason Sudeikis and he said
           | that they specifically brought it up several times because
           | they knew that later in the same episode they would be doing
           | a riff on the Allen Iverson "we talking about practice"
           | speech.
        
       | motohagiography wrote:
       | Literally every conversation I have about blockchain.
       | 
       | Only half joking. Having worked in security and crypto, the
       | solutions are often based on an opaque idea of fantastic
       | complexity, which becomes a kind of mantra. It's like being in a
       | movie called blockchain john malkovitch.
        
         | jamiehall wrote:
         | Ha, that's interesting. But have you come across the AI-linked
         | crypto, ML Blockchain? It's completely distributed and secure
         | blockchain through crypto. The ML is blockchain which
         | blockchain crypto blockchain, blockchain sec blockchain
         | distributed blockchain blockchain AI blockchain blockchain.
         | Blockchain blockchain blockchain, blockchain bLoCkChAiN
         | BlOcKcHaIn bLoCkChAiN BlOcKcHaIn bLoCkChAiN BlOcKcHaIn
         | bCkOlcAnIh
        
           | motohagiography wrote:
           | Was just trying to parse that as a new brainfuck dialect
           | called blockchain, which encodes the 8 brainfuck instructions
           | in camelcase strings of the word blockchain, but just
           | resembles a normal conversation about blockchain.
           | 
           | I recently wrote a song that took a brainfuck program and set
           | it as lyrics to a dance track because I had a suspicion
           | Daftpunk's 'Work It' was a similar program. It started as a
           | way to encode bf programs as lines from Rick Astley's 'never
           | gonna give you up,' but I got lazy.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | TuringNYC wrote:
       | Reminds me of when all bugs and all features become "Top
       | Priority" simultaneously.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-23 23:01 UTC)