[HN Gopher] The idea that everything is conscious is gaining aca...
___________________________________________________________________
The idea that everything is conscious is gaining academic
credibility (2018)
Author : herbertl
Score : 13 points
Date : 2021-04-20 21:59 UTC (1 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (qz.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (qz.com)
| ncmncm wrote:
| In other news, academia is coming to accept that "consciousness"
| can have no objective definition. Users of outlying definitions
| that appear useful in their field thus have no need to invent a
| new word for their particular choice. In some cases the entire
| lack of any meaningful definition is the whole point of using the
| word.
|
| Lack of a definition, or agreement on a definition, has never
| been seen to be an impediment to publication, and that is
| ultimately all that matters.
| strofcon wrote:
| Seems they're playing fast and loose with the word "credibility".
| fighterpilot wrote:
| I got paywalled, can someone share an archive or outline link?
| Avshalom wrote:
| https://outline.com/8z79aN
|
| though the article isn't really anything more than a
| description of panpsychism,
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism#Arguments_in_favor...
| and the Arguments Against section below that are basically a
| better version of the article
| milesvp wrote:
| I think it's important to think of consciousness as a spectrum.
| Having studied artificial life, the conclusion I came to is that
| something needs to be situated and have some degree of nervous
| system to be conscious. A rock is not concious, but a tree might
| be. A fly is less concious than a dog. A robot may be concious if
| it has enough sensors to react and significantly change it's
| behavior due to processing (rather than simple bump or range
| sensors acting as limiters).
|
| But really at the end of the day, it's sort of a bullshit word
| people tend to use to imply that humans are somehow special
| beyond just having an insane number of neurons pound for pound.
| spiritplumber wrote:
| Reminds me of Gaia from Asimov's Foundation.
| charliebreslau wrote:
| Whaaaaat... bs
| zeeshanqureshi wrote:
| Wrong ideas can often hold academic credibility. Not saying this
| particular idea is right or wrong, just that academic credibility
| may not mean much when it comes to matters of mind of which we
| know very little about.
|
| Uncertainty is the only certainty.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-04-20 23:01 UTC)