[HN Gopher] SBA executives 'beyond doubt' that teleworking emplo...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       SBA executives 'beyond doubt' that teleworking employees are more
       productive
        
       Author : dtmmax33
       Score  : 78 points
       Date   : 2021-04-16 11:52 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (federalnewsnetwork.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (federalnewsnetwork.com)
        
       | sb_student wrote:
       | If we gave managers/business owners the choice of
       | 
       | (1) a traditional in-office, no WFH environment and a smaller
       | profit, OR (2) a partial/full WFH setup and a larger profit,
       | 
       | my gut sense (I can't back it up) is that a huge percentage of
       | businesses would forgo profit for the psychological benefit of
       | seeing their employees daily. Maybe it makes them feel more in
       | control, or more important, or just loneliness.
        
       | tick_tock_tick wrote:
       | I am more productive but my team as a whole is less productive.
       | Highly individual tasks are great for this whole setup but
       | anything requiring high degrees of coordination seems to have
       | suffered.
        
         | m463 wrote:
         | I think coordination was terrible in the beginning. But over
         | time folks have worked out lots of things.
         | 
         | I've seen gradual, but sustained improvement in WFH skills.
         | 
         | For example, teleconferencing skills. People have learned to
         | share their screens, then people gradually adapted to have an
         | agenda on-screen to show and step through, people figured out
         | how to send links and files during a meeting. Even silly stuff
         | like how to contact someone who forgot about a meeting.
         | 
         | And some of it is more democratized. Regular folks are figuring
         | out how to do peer-to-peer meetings, which were normally
         | organized and driven by managers. This also goes for other
         | tools like wiki, shared documents, teams, calendars, email,
         | slack.
         | 
         | Another thing is a gradual spool up of WFH support. It took a
         | while for people to figure out a webcam that works, or a
         | microphone or headset. Or a chair, or a room setup, or just a
         | rhythm.
        
         | sologoub wrote:
         | I've experienced the opposite - as others have noted, making
         | communication just a bit more structured and accessible to
         | others in our org helped get clearer on what/how/why AND
         | incorporate voices often left out because they are not the
         | loudest in the room (or don't want to speak up in a large
         | public setting). Just on the merits of inclusion, video
         | conferencing has been a big win for me.
         | 
         | Yes, there are adjustments and downsides, but net net, I feel a
         | lot more confident that my team are being heard and no one is
         | overlooked because of social tendencies, etc.
        
       | addicted wrote:
       | The big thing they seem to have done is a good job scaling up.
       | 
       | But likely the primary reason they were able to scale up so
       | rapidly was that in the midst of a pandemic, there were millions
       | of workers looking for jobs and after the twin impacts of the
       | Great Recession and the pandemic in less than a decade, a much
       | larger cohort who were likely more predisposed towards the safety
       | of a government job than pretty much anytime in the past half
       | century.
        
       | znpy wrote:
       | The biggest changes I've seen is that whenever I meet something
       | new that I'm not familiar with, I learn way faster in the
       | tranquility of my home than in the office.
       | 
       | That means I get productive more quickly and thus more
       | productive. In the last year I was able to pick up a lot of
       | technologies that I've been putting off for years because I
       | couldn't find quiet time to sit down and bang my head against the
       | documentation.
        
       | passivate wrote:
       | People around the world are different, companies are structured
       | differently, work cultures vary. We should not try to
       | "homogenize" everything. And as such, why use data from a global
       | set to apply it to a local set?
       | 
       | If teleworking works for your company, great keep doing it! If it
       | doesn't, don't do it. And lets not demonize when a company makes
       | a decision that is right for them in their particular case.
       | 
       | For our company, we've made the decision to not allow
       | teleworking, and it is only approved temporarily on a strict case
       | by case basis. I think it has helped our work culture and
       | productivity over the many years.
        
       | 01100011 wrote:
       | Oh great, we can have this debate again.
       | 
       | WFH is either the greatest thing ever, or the worst, depending on
       | many factors(kids, quiet space, your need for socialization, your
       | career positioning, etc).
       | 
       | WFH part time is either the greatest thing ever or the worst,
       | depending on if you need to maintain an extra office and remain
       | living in an expensive tech hub.
        
       | someonehere wrote:
       | Reading this makes me happy. I almost read this as the door is
       | open for more people to apply and work remote. That to me means
       | someone who would have never considered working for SBA or moving
       | to work there, can now be employed from anywhere there is
       | internet.
       | 
       | Maybe this is how we revitalize towns that were wiped out by
       | outsourcing the labor pool (read China manufacturing)?
        
         | emodendroket wrote:
         | If nobody ever needs to be in an office it would seem like
         | there is more temptation to hire outside the US for these jobs
         | too.
        
       | dleslie wrote:
       | I am _ridiculously_ more productive at home.
       | 
       | When I hear folks complain about the pains of working from home,
       | what I often hear are their stories about how they were
       | needlessly disruptive to their coworkers.
       | 
       | Having impromptu hallway meetings mean that your peers, and
       | subordinates, must keep an ear open for such events should they
       | risk being left out of important decision making processes.
       | 
       | Having watercooler conversations means that your office-mates
       | must take effort to overcome their human desire for social
       | communication in order to focus on their task at hand.
       | 
       | And so on.
       | 
       | Generally, I find having a team that works wholly remote means
       | that we schedule communications clearly and are able to maintain
       | the focus on our work before us.
        
         | Guest42 wrote:
         | I think WFH works well because it takes extra effort to reach
         | out to someone and therefore is used more as a necessity. For
         | me, the office has lent itself to a number of one-off tasks
         | that didn't end up being important that distracted working on
         | the recurring production items that make a larger impact.
         | Removing the starting and stopping lends itself to more
         | productivity and being able to answer the phone as opposed to
         | having to step out of the office after going down the elevator
         | has been great.
        
           | dleslie wrote:
           | I agree! Having a _minimal_ barrier to communication acts as
           | a filter, in a similar way that requiring registration acts
           | as a quality filter for a forum. Folks must gather interest
           | in the meeting, rather than interrupt and demand focus; this,
           | at minimum, gives them some time to reconsider the concepts
           | that they want to raise with their coworkers.
        
             | biomcgary wrote:
             | Not just any minimal barrier. Extroverts wired to speak
             | spontaneously (i.e., have high Foxp2 gene expression) are
             | the most likely to disrupt others for non-functional
             | reasons. Requiring verbal communication to be initiated
             | through written means is a great way to increase the
             | signal-to-noise threshold for communication. Meanwhile,
             | those who are not spontaneously verbal have a relatively
             | low barrier (a sentence in chat).
        
               | dleslie wrote:
               | Interesting! Do you have further reading I might be able
               | to consume?
        
               | Guest42 wrote:
               | Thank you, I have never seen that explanation and it
               | certainly maps to behaviors that I've seen.
        
         | c3534l wrote:
         | There are a _lot_ of people who don 't have nice home
         | situations. Screaming babies, cramped spaces, constant
         | interruptions - that sort of thing. For a programmer/tech
         | worker that has a decent place to live, I'm not surprised you
         | think it's easy.
        
         | darksaints wrote:
         | That seems pretty dismissive of the people who have trouble
         | working from home because they have _more_ distractions at
         | home. Not everybody can be child free, single, and live in a
         | quiet place.
        
           | dleslie wrote:
           | I have a wife and two children six and under. Working from
           | home has far less distractions than any office I've ever been
           | in.
        
         | pmarreck wrote:
         | It may depend on the person and the job.
         | 
         | Pre-pandemic I lasted only 4 months at a remote job. I kept
         | asking to meet them (they were in Atlanta, me in Long Island,
         | but most of them were scattered), meeting stakeholders in
         | person gives me a charge which aids my focus and overall
         | productivity. Anyway they kept deferring, and then one day sort
         | of out of the blue and without warning (literally... the day
         | prior the supervisor's supervisor did a call with me and it
         | went well), the supervisor and a longstanding coworker both
         | just started grilling me hard and when they didn't like my
         | answers (note that I was still learning the very complex
         | application codebase at this point) the supervisor basically
         | decided it's not working out.
         | 
         | This past year has terrified me with the idea that all tech
         | work will now be done remotely. Fortunately I'm working on my
         | own projects directly for clients but unfortunately it's not
         | paying very well at the rate I'm being productive (which is
         | "not very"). I am FAR more productive when working physically
         | with other people (who also know intuitively when to not
         | interrupt because they're also programmers).
        
           | exotree wrote:
           | Why did you take a job that you knew was remote but insist on
           | meeting the stakeholders in person? You shouldn't have taken
           | that job with that expectation.
        
           | dleslie wrote:
           | I'm roughly 6 years into working from home; the pandemic
           | isn't really a new experience for me.
           | 
           | The first year was concerning because it was different and
           | weird, but it rapidly became normal. Now, I reflect on how
           | _slow_ office work was and find myself frustrated for my past
           | self.
        
         | thelean12 wrote:
         | Your description of ideal working conditions sounds so robotic
         | to me. Schedule everything! No off the cuff conversations!
         | Screw the human desire for socializing, we've got shit to do!
         | 
         | Right now my team is comprised of no one that I've met in
         | person. I feel absolutely no connection to them and feel so
         | incredibly disconnected from my work. Like I've been playing
         | the same video game for 8 hours a day for a year and nothing
         | I'm doing is real.
         | 
         | I'm quite scared of hybrid or full remote solutions for my
         | company. I don't want to switch companies right now but if they
         | go full or hybrid WFH I might have to, just to keep my sanity.
        
           | dleslie wrote:
           | We actively talk over slack. There's a #random channel, a
           | #stonks channel, et al. There's plenty of banter.
           | 
           | But _anyone_ can mute those and focus. I _cannot_ mute a
           | coworker talking loudly next to my desk.
        
           | exotree wrote:
           | What is disconcerting about hybrid? This seems to be the
           | solution that strikes a good balance between your needs and
           | the needs of your other coworkers who probably appreciate the
           | increased flexibility.
        
             | dleslie wrote:
             | Have you ever tried to have a party at two locations?
             | 
             | It doesn't work.
        
               | exotree wrote:
               | That's... not at all the same concept. There are a lot of
               | companies pre-pandemic that had hybrid offices. Many
               | global companies have had zoom rooms and other
               | teleconferencing solutions for years.
        
           | gregmac wrote:
           | Curious:
           | 
           | Do you do regular video calls? Do you ever discuss anything
           | aside from work? Even during a "work" discussion, do people
           | make jokes, laugh, etc?
           | 
           | Do you have chat (slack) channels, and are they active? Does
           | anyone ever spontaneously post something like "hey, anyone
           | feel like talking about x that I'm trying to sort out?" Is
           | chat pure business or do people ever discuss anything else?
           | 
           | These are all kind of leading questions, but the things that
           | I think are key to making it work.
        
         | heavyset_go wrote:
         | > _When I hear folks complain about the pains of working from
         | home, what I often hear are their stories about how they were
         | needlessly disruptive to their coworkers._
         | 
         | What I hear are complaints about the consequences of the
         | pandemic. That people have to work _and_ babysit their kids
         | during school. That both they and their partner are forced to
         | share a workspace. That they miss changes of scenery, or that
         | their home workspace isn 't adequate enough to get work done.
         | 
         | Before the pandemic, I would regularly rotate venues for where
         | I got my work done. I'd go to different coffee shops and
         | libraries. If I got bored of those places, I'd make it a point
         | to go into different venues in different neighborhoods. When it
         | was nice and warm out, I'd get work done in beach towns and
         | enjoy the sea breeze. Several times a year, I'd book a hotel or
         | short-term rental and work from a completely different city. At
         | one point I rented a co-working space.
         | 
         | During the pandemic, most of those places are closed. I can't
         | travel, and I don't want to. If I want to enjoy the sea breeze,
         | I better have enough battery life and reception to get my work
         | done in a park. Yet I'm lucky in that I'm not forced to share
         | my personal work space at home with others, and I'm not forced
         | to be a babysitter on top of the job I'm paid to do.
        
           | 908B64B197 wrote:
           | Quarantine work from home isn't work from home.
           | 
           | https://www.hanselman.com/blog/quarantine-work-is-not-
           | remote...
        
             | heavyset_go wrote:
             | I agree.
        
         | newusr415 wrote:
         | I advocated for remote work pretty aggressively. I've been
         | doing it now for about a year due to the pandemic, with the
         | option of doing it permanently at my current employer.
         | 
         | I'm not sure I'm that enthusiastic about it anymore. Life just
         | seems a lot more boring to me. Every day is the same and it's
         | become incredibly repetitive. I've been getting somewhat
         | depressed about having this repetitive lifestyle for the next N
         | years. I hadn't really felt this way before. It could be
         | unrelated to remote work of course.
        
       | PragmaticPulp wrote:
       | The SBA is referring specifically to their own employees doing
       | SBA work, not necessarily telework in general.
       | 
       | Interestingly, they attribute the additional productivity to the
       | fact that their telework employees are simply working more hours:
       | 
       | > "It doesn't matter to me where your eight-, 10-, 12-hour day
       | is, but as long as we're getting coverage from that perspective,"
       | Rivera said.
       | 
       | > While some federal managers have expressed skepticism with
       | telework productivity, Deputy CIO Luis Campudoni said employees
       | are, if anything, putting in longer hours than they normally
       | would working in the office.
       | 
       | > "From an eight-hour workday that you would normally experience
       | in the office, now, without asking the workforce, certainly get
       | 10-12 hours of work done on a daily basis. It's because of that
       | flexibility, people appreciate that," Campudoni said.
       | 
       | I would also expect productivity to go up if everyone was working
       | 25-50% more hours under the new system. I don't know if that's
       | sustainable though. If these jobs are paid hourly and the extra
       | hours aren't mandatory then the employees aren't necessarily
       | getting a bad deal. However, if the extra hours are unpaid or the
       | 12-hour days become mandatory, this could fall apart fast.
        
         | lostcolony wrote:
         | I think a lot of it has to do with the nature of the work.
         | 
         | I know where I currently am, my hours have smeared to cross 12
         | hours of the day. I have meetings as early as 8 AM, and as late
         | as 7 PM, routinely (sometimes even later). That's to
         | accommodate people in other timezones.
         | 
         | But, my middle of the day is oftentimes empty. I'll use that
         | time to go out to a botanical garden, or play a game, or work
         | on personal pursuits, or nap.
         | 
         | It's hard to say whether I'm more productive or not; I changed
         | jobs mid-pandemic and so I don't have much to compare to (and I
         | left my prior job because I was bored; I'm a manager, and
         | wasn't feeling productive, but that's because everything I was
         | empowered to change I had running so smoothly it didn't need my
         | attention, and all I was doing was small boring implementation
         | stuff so the team could have the interesting work).
         | 
         | But I can say that the extra hours aren't really helpful toward
         | being productive (and that I've taken steps to keep them from
         | being harmful). So I'm not sure that people doing stuff across
         | 12 hours of the day really equates to 12 hours of work.
        
         | VectorLock wrote:
         | I'm okay with spending the X% percent of hours I would be
         | commuting doing productive work, and double-okay with my
         | employer reaping the productivity benefits from it.
        
           | gnicholas wrote:
           | People who have an unenjoyable commute, like stop-and-go-
           | traffic, probably feel this way. But people who commute while
           | exercising (bicycle riders) or consume books/podcasts/news
           | while commuting probably wouldn't be so inclined.
        
             | heavyset_go wrote:
             | I'm perfectly capable of consuming books/podcasts/news on
             | my own and not because of a mandatory, tiring, expensive
             | and dangerous commute.
        
       | Someone1234 wrote:
       | Does it matter though?
       | 
       | I mean that literally, does actual data matter? The data in
       | support of telecommuting has been around for years if you want to
       | find it, heck you even pay employees less in some circumstances
       | as they can live in lower COL areas (plus cost savings in fewer
       | offices/smaller offices/rental instead of ownership/etc).
       | 
       | But the reality is that a certain type of employee rises through
       | the ranks: Those who have a strong aptitude towards interpersonal
       | connection (i.e. extraverts). They're also a loud[er] group. They
       | benefit more from in-person than telecommuting, and they also
       | often make the decisions.
       | 
       | Do you really expect a group of decision makers, who gained power
       | via their interpersonal skills, wanting to give up that skill
       | advantage and potential turn their business into a meritocracy?
       | 
       | COVID was a rare blip, because it tipped the scales just enough
       | to make their position untenable, but in five years I do not
       | anticipate any broad change in landscape. Heck even before a lot
       | of people had a chance to get vaccinated many businesses are
       | RUSHING back into the office, why? The same inexplicable reason
       | we're there to begin with.
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | It was a world-wide pre/post test to be sure. I think that most
         | companies will be better off to go back into the offices
         | because the alternative is to carefully think through the work
         | and write a lot of things down.
         | 
         | People would rather talk than write, on average.
        
           | solosoyokaze wrote:
           | > _It was a world-wide pre /post test to be sure. I think
           | that most companies will be better off to go back into the
           | offices because the alternative is to carefully think through
           | the work and write a lot of things down._
           | 
           | Companies that do this will be at a distinct advantage over
           | companies that rely on informal, ad-hoc, in-person
           | conversations. There are many companies that have been
           | started during the pandemic that are remote first and have
           | the process to back it up. I don't think in-person companies
           | can compete between lack of access to talent, undocumented
           | communication, office politics, employee stress and fatigue
           | due to commuting, living in a high cost of living area and
           | the previously mentioned politics...
           | 
           | I'd also say a lot of management is actually unneeded, which
           | also comes to light in remote first companies.
        
             | dleslie wrote:
             | It's strange that you're being down-voted, considering how
             | important business intelligence is to success, and the
             | concerns about commuting, housing costs et al are likewise
             | well-founded.
             | 
             | I think there's folks who simply miss the social
             | environment of an office, and are loathe to consider that
             | perhaps they were counter-productive for their coworkers.
        
       | ping_pong wrote:
       | Both Yahoo and IBM rolled back their very flexible WFH
       | strategies. I don't think super flexible WFH is a lasting trend,
       | because it's obvious that is doesn't work for most of the people.
       | I personally love WFH and I know a lot of HN do too, but I think
       | human nature is that it probably won't work very well for most
       | companies.
        
         | e40 wrote:
         | Doesn't work for "most of the people" is highly dependent on
         | the company and position.
         | 
         | It works very well for 80% of the positions at my company. I'm
         | sure there are companies for which it only works for a small
         | percentage. The ultimate YMMV.
        
         | emodendroket wrote:
         | I find most of my work goes well but anything that requires
         | coordination a lot of time gets wasted waiting to hear from
         | people.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-16 22:01 UTC)