[HN Gopher] Marbles (2016)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Marbles (2016)
        
       Author : aphrax
       Score  : 120 points
       Date   : 2021-04-13 15:55 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.erasmatazz.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.erasmatazz.com)
        
       | neilv wrote:
       | > _But one day in the far future, I hope, somebody will notice
       | one of my little marbles, pick it up, and wonder what it is, how
       | it was made and even -- if we're very, very lucky and tales of a
       | glorious civilization somehow persist that long -- who put it
       | there._
       | 
       | That's much more optimistic than Steinbeck:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pearl_(novel)#Summary
        
       | bombcar wrote:
       | The "civilization will collapse and the remainders will be
       | hunter-gatherers" seems some weird form of the "dark ages" mythos
       | that is certainly attractive to many. I wonder why that is.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | In the back of my mind, not seriously more on the your top 10
         | friends are your zombie apocalypse team mind, that learning
         | non-techy skills are worth while. Won't need any damn lawyers
         | except to sacrifices when the zombie hordes get too close, but
         | doctors would be good. Knowing how to grow food would be
         | useful. Making clothes would be nice as well as being able to
         | build things. Still trying to decide if at that point UI/UX
         | people are lumped in with the lawyers, but marketing/PR people
         | might go before the lawyers.
         | 
         | In otherwords, learn some hobbies that might just be a fun
         | thing now, but makes you invaluable when civilization
         | collapses.
        
       | holoduke wrote:
       | I am gonna melt some pictures and USB sticks inside a marble.
       | Must be doable without destroying it.
        
         | teddyh wrote:
         | Unpowered flash memory can only hold data for a _maximum_ of 10
         | years or so, and can be as low as _three months_.
        
         | notum wrote:
         | We could 3D laser etch data inside glass, now that would be
         | both pretty and durable!
        
       | maskedinvader wrote:
       | I thought micro plastics and chicken bones were going to be the
       | lasting remnants of our current civilizations see [1] and [2].
       | [1] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/chicken-bones-
       | may-... [2] https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/chicken-bones-
       | and-plast...
        
         | dnautics wrote:
         | Microplastics are too tempting of a carbon source for bacteria.
         | I would be surprised if polystyrene and polyethylene
         | degradation genes don't start to run rampant in the global
         | bacterial pangenome via horizontal transfer in the next 100
         | years
        
       | yamrzou wrote:
       | > Let us start with an assumption that most of us already suspect
       | to be true: that civilization will not survive more than a few
       | centuries into the future.
       | 
       | If no big new innovations are made (e.g. finding a way to exploit
       | previousely unused raw materials), how long will the current
       | earth reserves allow technology to last?
        
         | kwhitefoot wrote:
         | Forever I think. Global population is projected to peak at
         | about 10 billion and technology is getting more efficient all
         | the time. The planet receives vastly more energy than we need
         | even if everyone on the planet has a European standard of
         | living. Everything we make can be recycled even with the
         | technology we already have so long as we can expend enough
         | energy. If our species dies out it will not be for want of
         | stuff but because we are unwilling to work together.
        
       | jar3624 wrote:
       | That's a big deep hole for one small marble. looks like a hole
       | for a concrete pier... dug 8 of those last year. that's some back
       | breaking work ...
        
       | jl6 wrote:
       | There's really no need to make an extra effort to bury anything.
       | The world's landfills surely already contain more than enough
       | weird durable objects to puzzle future archaeologists.
       | 
       | Also, pessimism is so lazy.
        
         | kleer001 wrote:
         | > Also, pessimism is so lazy.
         | 
         | "There is no sadder sight than a young pessimist, except an old
         | optimist."
         | 
         | -- Mark Twain
         | 
         | ;)
         | 
         | Optimism takes faith or creativity, but both are pretty
         | expensive.
        
       | m463 wrote:
       | We should figure out how to combine CD/DVD technology with
       | marbles and then bury spherical data containers.
        
         | tyingq wrote:
         | Microsoft has Project Silica: https://www.microsoft.com/en-
         | us/research/project/project-sil...
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | Ashanmaril wrote:
         | Wasn't that kinda the idea with the Github arctic code vault?
        
         | dumbfoundded wrote:
         | Done: https://www.zmescience.com/research/technology/quartz-
         | disk-5...
        
       | Exuma wrote:
       | Nothing like a warm cup of suffocating existential angst to start
       | the day!
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | meowster wrote:
       | Interesting, but I fear they'll be too small and buried by too
       | much sediment. Unless he burries a hundred of them in the same
       | location, it will probably never be found, or if found, just an
       | insignificant oddity.
        
       | tenebrisalietum wrote:
       | Ok, how do I get a data stream on a marble (lasers?) and how
       | dense can I make it - or how big can I make a marble?
       | 
       | Bonus points if I can simply make a glass CD, DVD, Blu-Ray, etc.
        
       | diplodocusaur wrote:
       | TLDR: Man loses his marbles from imagined doomsday
        
       | guhcampos wrote:
       | I love the idea of trolling future generations and have thought
       | about a couple methods in the past.
       | 
       | Yet, it makes me think: are we being trolled by past generations?
       | What inexplicable wonders of archeology might just be someone
       | thinking "whoever finds this will be so confused they'll go
       | crazy".
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | notional wrote:
         | How many cave paintings were just some whiteboard equivalent of
         | hashing out an idea
        
           | pletnes wrote:
           | Alright guys, so we've got the herd, say, over here. I'll
           | just sketch'em real quick on the wall so we're on the same
           | rock here. So at first, a couple of the youngsters chase them
           | down the ravine, which is this crack in the rock over there.
           | Now, after they round the corner, some of our more
           | experienced guys flank them with spears. After running uphill
           | over there, they won't be rested and we should have a nice
           | meal tonight. Thoughts?
        
             | jcassee wrote:
             | So if this is what remained on the cave wall ... it was the
             | plan that killed the whole tribe?
        
               | pletnes wrote:
               | Or maybe they didn't have whiteboard markers, only
               | permanent ones.
        
               | kalonis wrote:
               | They had both, but some new hire confused them.
        
             | throwaway894345 wrote:
             | Nah, it was a prehistoric whiteboard interview.
        
               | m463 wrote:
               | "What is the best way to climb a tree to hunt or gather
               | food..."
        
               | ALittleLight wrote:
               | I prefer agile
        
               | booleandilemma wrote:
               | I see you have 10 years experience hunting antelope.
               | 
               | We hunt gazelles here. Do you have any experience hunting
               | gazelles?
        
             | KineticLensman wrote:
             | "And this end is called the Thagomizer. After the late Thag
             | Simmons".... [0]
             | 
             | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thagomizer#/media/File:Th
             | agomi...
        
         | twic wrote:
         | Mentioned here recently i think:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dodecahedron
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | The trick to trolling the future is effort.
         | 
         | The more effort something obviously took, the harder it is to
         | suspect it's just a troll.
         | 
         | And this is why I think our generation of Internet people are
         | perfect for the job.
        
           | m463 wrote:
           | It will be like the explanation of 20th century history in
           | from the 31st century in Futurama.
        
         | oasisbob wrote:
         | People are diverse enough that with a few millennia, probably
         | no need to troll.
         | 
         | There's an archaeological site near here, vaguely described in
         | most publications. If you can get your hands on some of the
         | original field reporting, you learn that one of the finds was a
         | burial site where the head of the deceased was replaced with
         | that of a canine.
         | 
         | Not a known practice, apparently.
        
         | api wrote:
         | Even better: lets seed Mars with life and leave an actual
         | mysterious buried or maybe orbiting artifact for future
         | intelligences to find should any evolve there.
         | 
         | Then the Martian equivalent of Giorgio Tsoukalos, the Ancient
         | Aliens guy with the crazy hair, would be _right_.
        
         | anaerobicover wrote:
         | I doubt this was all that common, because it requires the
         | pranker to have the idea of actual archaeologists to play the
         | prank on, and that isn't something that's been present in all
         | societies across history.
        
           | throwaway316943 wrote:
           | Archaeologists no but grave robbers have been around a long
           | time.
        
             | Tuna-Fish wrote:
             | Archaeologists aren't that new either. The oldest museum we
             | know of was curated by Ennigaldi-Nanna, the daughter of
             | Nabonidus, the last king of the Neo-Babylonian Empire.
             | 
             | Why do we think she created a museum? When the palace was
             | excavated, dozens of neatly displayed artifacts from widely
             | different eras and places were found. That alone wouldn't
             | be conclusive, except for the fact that the artifacts had
             | labels detailing their origins. In three languages.
             | 
             | Ennigaldi-Nanna lived in the 6th century BCE.
        
       | SamBam wrote:
       | Manages to be both extremely sweet and extremely pessimistic at
       | the same time.
       | 
       | I wouldn't put even money on the chances that homo sapiens will
       | go back to pre-modern times within ten thousand years. However,
       | the probability of some civilization-ending event within that
       | time (nukes, viruses, aliens, a giant asteroid) are certainly not
       | zero either.
        
       | SavantIdiot wrote:
       | I can't recall the source (SciAm?), but I recall reading an
       | article claiming that the longest impact humans can make is 16
       | million years. And that refers to radioactive isotopes. We do not
       | have the technology to make anything that can last longer than
       | that.
       | 
       | (I can't even figure out how to phrase the question to google for
       | the article.)
        
         | zimpenfish wrote:
         | This might be relevant:
         | https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/08/arroganc...
         | 
         | > But the longest-lived radioisotope from radioactive fallout,
         | iodine-129, has a half-life of less than 16 million years. If
         | there were a nuclear holocaust in the Triassic, among warring
         | prosauropods, we wouldn't know about it.
        
           | SavantIdiot wrote:
           | YES! That is it. Thank you.
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | I don't see how Voyager II is not going to last longer than 16
         | millions years - what exists to change it?
        
           | monocasa wrote:
           | How long will it take to evaporate into a metallic cloud?
        
           | Turing_Machine wrote:
           | Even outside the solar system there are still _some_
           | particles about, most of which are moving at high velocities.
           | 
           | At a minimum, I would expect it to look quite thoroughly
           | sandblasted after 16 million years.
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | I suspect the size of the particles and number is very very
             | low - effectively zero once you're far enough away from the
             | Oort Cloud.
        
           | SavantIdiot wrote:
           | Good question. The author didn't explore deep space. I
           | believe it was related to terrestrial objections, but that is
           | an interesting thought. Since nothing has ever been that far
           | out I think it is quite impossible to say for certain, but I
           | guess there's no reason to assume the microparticles per
           | cubic meter are any different than inside the solar system.
           | 
           | NASA talks about space dust here [1] and how it literally
           | tore apart Mariner. But maybe that is just dust orbiting the
           | sun and not something interstellar.
           | 
           | [1] https://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/watchtheskies/meteor
           | _cl...
        
         | camjohnson26 wrote:
         | Couldn't we just make a fossil?
        
           | SavantIdiot wrote:
           | The problem is that fossils are incredibly statistically
           | rare. It is highly unlikely we could pick the right
           | geological location over that time scale? How do you know
           | where a continent is going to be in 10's of millions of
           | years? Perhaps we could map out where plates are moving, but
           | are we accurate enough to avoid tectonic plate subduction,
           | erosion, volcanoes, floods, ice ages...? I think we take the
           | statistical rarity of fossils for granted because they
           | permeate culture: the chances of something being fossilized
           | for hundreds of millions of years are practically nil. But
           | not zero.
           | 
           | Here's the article:
           | 
           | https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/08/arroganc.
           | ..
        
       | lxe wrote:
       | I think information and civilization has progressed far beyond
       | the possibility of a total loss of all our knowledge, barring a
       | complete extinction or a destruction of earth.
        
         | astorgard wrote:
         | But destruction of Earth is inevitable!
         | 
         | Even if we manage not to destroy ourselves in the next hundred
         | thousand years, we still have to deal with some "soft" and
         | "hard limits".
         | 
         | First we have comets/asteroids impacts. I guess we might have
         | the technology to deflect them in the next 5000 years or so, so
         | this shouldn't be a problem.
         | 
         | Gamma ray burst, close super nova explosions and glacial
         | periods would severely damage half of Earth, but, again, as
         | long as this doesn't happen in the next 5000 years or so, I
         | think we will develop the technology to recover from that also.
         | 
         | Let's fast forward to 600 million years where things start to
         | get interesting: the level of carbon dioxide will fall below
         | the level needed to sustain photosynthesis... So no more
         | plants. But if we are still around here by then, I guess this
         | should also not be a problem as we will be able to synthesize
         | whatever chemical we need.
         | 
         | In 1000 million years the solar luminosity will be 10% higher
         | than at present. This will cause the atmosphere to become a
         | "moist greenhouse", resulting in a runaway evaporation of the
         | oceans. Hmmm... 1000 million years is enough for us to come
         | with a solution for this, but who knows?
         | 
         | In 2500 million years Earth will lose its magnetosphere.
         | 
         | In 4000 million years the surface of Earth will melt from heat.
         | 
         | In 7500 million years the Sun will absorb Earth.
         | 
         | So... if we want to preserve man kind I would say that, in
         | order to "play it safe" before things get more complicated, we
         | have around 500 million years to escape Earth and ten times
         | that to escape the solar system.
         | 
         | I'm quite convinced that we will manage to do both. I'm also
         | pretty sure _we_ will be there to witness it: we just have to
         | hang on for ~50 years or so until we get functional cryogenic
         | chambers; from there it is just a matter to tell the operators
         | to wake us up in 5000 years once immortality is achieved.
         | 
         | Who is with me? :)
        
           | modeless wrote:
           | See How To Destroy The Earth by QNTM:
           | https://qntm.org/destroy
        
       | gopalv wrote:
       | > if we're very, very lucky and tales of a glorious civilization
       | somehow persist that long -- who put it there.
       | 
       | I just finished reading "Motel of the Mysteries" [1] and the
       | Treasures section of that talks about the sacred seal of "Do Not
       | Disturb" & the pendant made or rubber (it's a tub stopper).
       | 
       | At best, this is just going to confuse the hell out of every
       | archaeologist who interprets this as a "religious act".
       | 
       | [1] - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/act-
       | four/wp/2016/07/15/i...
        
         | miglmj wrote:
         | A teacher read us this book in elementary school and I've
         | unsuccessfully been trying to track this book for years. Such
         | an interesting way to think about the world around us, how it
         | will be perceived, and the degree to which we cannot be sure of
         | the accuracy of our perceptions of the past.
        
           | dekhn wrote:
           | Here ya go: https://www.amazon.com/Motel-Mysteries-David-
           | Macaulay/dp/039...
           | 
           | David Macaulay's illustrations are fantastic.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | the_af wrote:
       | FYI, the author of this piece is Chris Crawford, author of
       | groundbreaking classic videogames such as Eastern Front (1941)
       | and Balance of Power.
       | 
       | His outlook on modern videogames and life in general seems pretty
       | pessimistic.
        
       | oasisbob wrote:
       | > So now let's go back to our marble. It is completely impervious
       | to any chemical attack
       | 
       | Isn't this a wildly misguided assertion? As any antique bottle
       | collector will tell you, bottles underground WILL corrode, and
       | the corrosion is very obvious in less than a century, depending
       | on soil conditions.
       | 
       | Granted that's soda-glass, and there are many types of glass, but
       | just because a bottle can hold sulfuric acid for a few decades
       | doesn't mean all glass will last centuries.
        
         | Pulcinella wrote:
         | Yeah glass is not that resistant to alkaline conditions over
         | long periods of time. You can, of course, perform chemical
         | reactions in them using highly concentrated base, but you don't
         | want to leave important features in contact with it for long
         | periods of time. E.g. you can wash your scientific glassware
         | with base, but you don't want to leave it in there to soak.
         | Otherwise the ground-glass joints (rough patches of etched
         | glass used to help connect glassware together) can be corroded
         | and smoothed out.
        
           | Turing_Machine wrote:
           | Right. He says that glass is the same as quartz, but it
           | isn't. It's got other stuff in it to reduce the melting point
           | and improve other working characteristics. Most everyday
           | glass is soda-lime glass or (less commonly than in the past)
           | lead glass ("crystal"). Lab glass is often borosilicate
           | glass. All are pretty durable, but not anything remotely
           | approaching pure quartz.
        
       | jnellis wrote:
       | Marbles are buried in every yard that had children and will not
       | be rare to future civilizations. They were very popular. Keys are
       | the second most found item buried in yards. This was a recent
       | discussion in r/gardening.
       | 
       | I can attest to this as I've torn out an entire front lawn and
       | topsoil from a 1964 tract home, sifted every square inch of it
       | through 1/4" hardware cloth to build raise beds for vegetables.
       | The findings were, in order, so many marbles, over half dozen
       | keys, little plastic dinosaurs or other toys, two 9mm slugs
       | (likely from people shooting up into the air as they were not
       | deformed.)
        
         | m463 wrote:
         | In the old days it was arrowheads or civil war bullets.
         | 
         | I wonder if keys are a blip in the timeline, like analog radio
         | transmissions, which gradually are replaced by high-information
         | signals that are akin to random noise.
        
       | elicash wrote:
       | > Well, the pyramids will last a long, long time. If there were
       | more rain in Egypt, they'd erode away in a few tens of thousands
       | of years, but no matter what, they're going to be here for a
       | long, long time. Most of our other stuff, however, won't last a
       | thousand years. Except for marbles.
       | 
       | I remember reading a piece about a decade ago about how the last
       | trace of human civilization that will (likely) survive, for
       | BILLIONS of years, are our satellites. Actually, just found it:
       | https://www.wired.com/2012/10/the-last-pictures/
       | 
       | This isn't to detract from a great piece. Just adding this
       | thought.
        
         | ericbarrett wrote:
         | Interesting proposition regarding satellites. I have to wonder,
         | though. What about:
         | 
         | Debris from satellites breaking up, causing a very slow
         | Kessler-type syndrome--over these time scales there will
         | certainly be millions of close encounters with random objects
         | 
         | Kinetic changes from similar gravity perturbations, leading to
         | highly eccentric orbits which then decay into the atmosphere
         | 
         | Solar flares--I imagine in the next few hundred million years
         | we'll get some doozies, with similar kinetic effects
         | 
         | Solar expansion--in about a billion years, the Sun will have
         | expanded enough that liquid water can't exist on Earth's
         | surface anymore. Won't that massively expand the atmosphere and
         | drag satellites down a lot faster, even at geosynchronous
         | orbits?
         | 
         | I can definitely see "millions," but "billions" feels
         | hyperbolic.
        
           | pixl97 wrote:
           | I think that you thinking of near earth sats. There are many
           | others like the solar observatory that are much farther out
           | and are unlikely to be disturbed by anything in the gigayear
           | range.
        
             | ericbarrett wrote:
             | You mean the SDO [0]? It's still in geostationary orbit.
             | Which, of course, is much farther out than LEO, and orders
             | of magnitude less affected by the Earth's atmo, but still
             | interacts with it. Heck, even the Moon is probably affected
             | by it [1].
             | 
             | Perhaps a solar orbit--I didn't consider that when I wrote
             | my first comment. But the plates described in the article
             | aren't going there, they're going to GEO.
             | 
             | [0]
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Dynamics_Observatory
             | 
             | [1] https://phys.org/news/2020-09-earth-oxygen-rusted-moon-
             | billi...
        
         | dumbfoundded wrote:
         | That's a cool thought. I always imagined it be something like a
         | the K-T boundary (1), a thin layer of rock that looks different
         | than all of the other layers.
         | 
         | (1)
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous%E2%80%93Paleogene_b...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-13 23:00 UTC)