[HN Gopher] An industry based on missed calls helped bring India...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       An industry based on missed calls helped bring India online
        
       Author : lifeisstillgood
       Score  : 38 points
       Date   : 2021-04-10 12:07 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (restofworld.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (restofworld.org)
        
       | walrus01 wrote:
       | I would encourage any North American or European interested in
       | this sort of thing to go buy a $45 Android phone from aliexpress
       | (or two or three different models, if you're really interested)
       | to see first hand what the very low end of the mobile data
       | smartphone market looks like these days.
       | 
       | There are some things out there based on reference mediatek
       | chipset designs that are _remarkably not terrible_ relative to
       | their price. Create a new fake named gmail /google account on
       | one, install some apps from the play store, mess around with it.
       | 
       | randomly chosen example:
       | https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005001470142781.html?spm=a2...
       | 
       | https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005001586490693.html?spm=a2...
        
         | baybal2 wrote:
         | The problem is cellphone sellers on Aliexpress frequently are
         | simple scams.
         | 
         | I.e. you buy something from a seemingly not complete scam
         | seller with few hundred of reviews, you get your tracking
         | number, but nothing actually arrives despite tracking showing
         | somebody in your country claiming the package.
        
       | gumby wrote:
       | Pre mobile phones (but post caller I'd) my wife and I called each
       | other several times a day just to say mushy things to each other.
       | It was ok to ignore the call but an immediate second call meant
       | "actually I need to speak with you". I'm sure others must have
       | invented the same system.
       | 
       | But I love ZipDial's idea to take it to another level.
       | 
       | The European idea to make _receiving_ GSM calls free was
       | brilliant. The US's idea that "the person with the radio pays the
       | extra fee" held back mobile adoption in the US by a decade.
        
       | colorboy wrote:
       | Clogged 30% of national operators capacity without giving a penny
       | That's hell of a deal
        
       | phoe-krk wrote:
       | I remember the same being the case in Poland years ago. "Sending
       | an arrow" was a cheap way of communicating with other people, and
       | it was a savoir-vivre violation to answer a phone that rung for
       | less than five seconds because it could charge someone for a full
       | minute of voice connection even if it was only meant to be an
       | "arrow".
        
       | aj7 wrote:
       | My family used a 1-bit missed call signaling system in Brooklyn
       | in the 1950's. Both -one and -two ring missed calls indicated
       | prearranged messages, generally "arrived safely" or "leaving
       | now." Back then, poorer families had party telephone lines, too.
        
       | drfuchs wrote:
       | In my experience even many decades ago in the US, the "ring" that
       | the caller hears in their handset before the recipient picks up
       | is not actually from the "bell" of the recipient's handset;
       | rather, I understand, it is generated at the caller's local
       | switching station. And there's no system-wide synchronization of
       | these ring signals. So, if the recipient hears N actual rings,
       | the caller may have heard N-1, N, or N+1. Does anybody who used
       | these signaling schemes have experiences where the wrong message
       | (or none at all) got communicated?
        
         | inetknght wrote:
         | That's been my experience too. It "works" for local calls but
         | it completely breaks down across a nation.
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | It can be generated more or less anywhere along the path. I
         | don't think it was typically generated at the caller's local
         | switching station, because often there's some delay before it
         | starts, and I didn't think that level of information was
         | communicated. However, sometimes you would get some ringing and
         | before a final signal tone (busy, fast busy, call cannot be
         | completed as dialed, etc).
         | 
         | The phone system has almost always been a heterogeneous
         | distributed system with lots of different capabilities though,
         | so lots of possibilities.
         | 
         | I have a hard time listening to podcasts or audiobooks, but I
         | like to try to listen to Evan Doorbell's Telephone Tapes, a
         | bunch of old (mostly 1970s) recordings of the phone system with
         | recent commentary from the person who made most of the
         | recordings. http://www.evan-doorbell.com/production/group1.htm
        
         | unishark wrote:
         | In the US, I recall the ringing sound for the caller being
         | different depending on who you were calling. I understood it to
         | be generate by the remote station, powering their ringer via
         | the line. Presumably you could still get different ring counts
         | in such a setup if one side hasn't been connected to the call
         | yet.
        
       | jakub_g wrote:
       | It's 2021 and I'm in Europe, and I still use missed calls for
       | calling my family abroad. Typically goes like this:
       | 
       | - I call them on Whatsapp, but their Android phone is sleeping so
       | they don't receive the call notif on Whatsapp
       | 
       | - I send a missed call via GSM to wake their phone
       | 
       | - They call back on Whatsapp
       | 
       | International calls are still expensive even within EU, while
       | huge data packages are included in even cheap monthly subs. I
       | can't comprehend the GSM operators' logic.
        
         | ThePowerOfFuet wrote:
         | > I call them on Whatsapp, but their Android phone is sleeping
         | so they don't receive the call notif on Whatsapp
         | 
         | Is Android really that terrible?
        
           | zwayhowder wrote:
           | No, I receive Whatsapp call notifications when the phone is
           | off. But it's also a setting that can be disabled. The
           | scenario described doesn't remotely match the user experience
           | I have with Whatsapp calls.
        
           | kiwijamo wrote:
           | iOS is the same. My husband has an iPhone and I frequently
           | find he doesn't receive WhatsApps notifications in good time.
           | So for urgent messages I now SMS him. And if I send him
           | photos etc I SMS him to check his WhatsApp. Perhaps it's more
           | something to do with WhatsApp's infrastructure than
           | iOS/Android?
        
           | maven29 wrote:
           | Most Android phones let you turn off mobile data and Wi-Fi
           | while the screen is off. Something similar might be at play,
           | since FCM is pretty reliable, even with the most brutal doze
           | parameters and additional power optimization measures imposed
           | by manufacturers.
        
           | bellyfullofbac wrote:
           | https://dontkillmyapp.com
           | 
           | Pretty much, and I say this as an Android user. The OEMs brag
           | about "long battery life!" but they're fucking up by
           | hibernating apps in the background.
        
             | TeMPOraL wrote:
             | Interesting how things turned around on their head.
             | 
             | Until recently, one thing I hated in smartphones was task
             | management. There was no way to kill an app and _keep it
             | dead_ , no way to manage what processes are running on the
             | phone at any given moment. There were third-party task
             | managers that sorta, kinda sometimes worked, but the phone
             | fought you hard.
             | 
             | I'm kind of sympathetic to the phone vendors here - the app
             | ecosystem is a mess, every app vendor feels _way_ too
             | entitled to their users ' resources.
        
           | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
           | Not consistently - _most_ of the time it works, but it still
           | happens often enough.
        
           | fxtentacle wrote:
           | WhatsApp is. My wife has the same issue on her iPhone.
        
       | cosmodisk wrote:
       | We even had a term for this: 'beacon': the phones were
       | expensive,the tariffs even more so and most kids had very low
       | call credit most of the time. So if you have almost no credit
       | left, you call someone, hang up quickly and they suppose to call
       | you back.
        
         | ljf wrote:
         | We called it a 'drop call' in the UK in the early 2000s (or at
         | least my friends did).
        
       | lifeisstillgood wrote:
       | I bring this up because I remember arranging similar things with
       | my parents as a child. The walk home from school was moderately
       | long for a kid (4 ish miles) and if it was raining it was
       | uttterly miserable. So I could shelter in the railway station and
       | call home for a lift - but I rarely had the money and hell it was
       | two bags of crisps for a single call. So two missed calls in a
       | row while it was raining was signal to my mum "come get me at the
       | station!"
       | 
       | I think I am saying that I am old enough that I span generational
       | shifts in wealth.
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | We did collect calls...
         | 
         | Would you like to accept a collect call from senior lot? Meant
         | please pick me up from the senior lot. At some point, collect
         | calling became possible for third parties, and they let the
         | caller hear the other party answer so you knew you got the
         | information to them.
        
           | drdeadringer wrote:
           | Remember the TV ads regarding telephone calls and collect
           | calls?
           | 
           | "You have a collect call from ... 'we-had-a-baby-it's-a-boy'
           | ... do you accept the charges?"
           | 
           | "No." [Hangs up]
           | 
           | "Who was it?"
           | 
           | "Jimmy and Susan. They had a baby. It's a boy."
           | 
           | [Buy our better value telephone service!]
        
             | pcthrowaway wrote:
             | Actually, it was warning about not cheating the phone
             | company, and saving money by buying Geico instead.
        
         | markdown wrote:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V04bh-G4-qU
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | jamiek88 wrote:
         | Same here. Three rings meant I was home safe when riding bike 6
         | miles from nans or to nans. Now all my nieces and nephews have
         | iPhones.
         | 
         | Happy for them but something has been lost in independence.
        
         | bengale wrote:
         | I'd completely forgotten this but I remember always keeping a
         | small amount of credit on my phone so I could 'dead ring' home
         | and I'd get a call back.
        
         | banana_giraffe wrote:
         | My father had a car phone (that is, for those that may not
         | know, one of the early mobile phones you had to have installed
         | in your car).
         | 
         | We also had caller ID at home. We knew if he called us at home
         | and hung up before we answered he was just calling to let us
         | know he was stuck in traffic and would be late for dinner.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-10 23:01 UTC)