[HN Gopher] My Son, the Organ Donor
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       My Son, the Organ Donor
        
       Author : dsr12
       Score  : 120 points
       Date   : 2021-04-09 17:54 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (kimmoldofsky.medium.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (kimmoldofsky.medium.com)
        
       | aaomidi wrote:
       | Organ donor should be opt out, not opt in.
        
         | lordnacho wrote:
         | IIRC I heard they were doing this in the UK, at least I heard
         | something about it on the radio.
         | 
         | I think it's the right default, most people won't mind donating
         | and those who do are generally more motivated to fill out the
         | opt out docs.
        
         | newbie578 wrote:
         | Absolutely agreed! Make it whenever people get their driver's
         | license, they must make an opt out form.
        
         | thepete2 wrote:
         | I disagree. Instead it should be mandatory to choose. Make it a
         | condition for getting a driver's license or even your ID.
        
           | AdamJacobMuller wrote:
           | > mandatory to choose
           | 
           | That's a contradiction. If it's mandatory, it's not a choice.
           | 
           | What makes you feel you have the right to tell others they
           | should be forced to donate their organs?
        
             | Zanni wrote:
             | Not mandatory to donate. Mandatory to make an explicit
             | choice of whether to donate or not (neither opt-out nor
             | opt-in).
        
             | jimmyswimmy wrote:
             | I believe GP was suggesting that making a decision should
             | be mandatory at some point. While I personally prefer the
             | default here be to opt in as a donor, GP suggested merely
             | that a decision as to yes or no should be required.
             | 
             | Where I live, one must state organ donor preference when
             | obtaining a driver's license. I believe the default answer
             | is no if you choose not to choose.
        
             | [deleted]
        
       | renewiltord wrote:
       | I am glad there are people like this. For my part, I am not an
       | organ donor intentionally. I stopped being one when I realized I
       | (and my kin) would be the only ones not getting paid in the
       | following chain:
       | 
       | 1. Me (body)
       | 
       | 2. Organ Procurement Organization
       | 
       | 3. Hospital + Insurer
       | 
       | 4. Organ Transplant Team
       | 
       | Each time I get a new licence I check the box in a moment of
       | weakness and have to go opt-out again. Over the next year, I hope
       | to write down a fee schedule and a quick-to-sign contract that
       | will hopefully bring down the friction to get my organs down to
       | 15 min after my death for someone who can pay appropriately.
       | 
       | If anyone else is working on ways to bypass anti-organ-sale laws,
       | I'd love it if we could work together. Email in profile.
        
         | weird-eye-issue wrote:
         | What the
        
           | renewiltord wrote:
           | Is it irrelevant or something? It felt relevant on this
           | article and considering this is a startup site.
           | 
           | I don't mean to diminish the benefit of watching another
           | young man being able to run and live with the heart of one's
           | child in him but merely to ensure that some part of the value
           | chain comes to rest where the person providing a crucial
           | piece intended.
           | 
           | EDIT-Response since I'm now rate-limited.
           | 
           | User psychometry: I am not complaining about the downvotes,
           | to be clear. I don't mind being voted down by people who
           | disagree with me since that is how this platform is intended
           | to be used. I would prefer not to because it makes what I say
           | hard to see but if the community believes it doesn't fit,
           | then it doesn't fit. This comment was intended to be a
           | request for clarification from this guy, but if no one wants
           | to share that's also okay. I won't be very upset. It is a
           | sunny day in San Francisco with no traffic. I will go for a
           | ride and if I am to die on my motorcycle, my organs will rot.
           | That is unfortunate, but perhaps if that happens a year from
           | now, they will instead be of use, and my family will be
           | wealthier by some small measure.
        
             | psychometry wrote:
             | You're getting downvoted into oblivion because you wrote an
             | astonishingly selfish and moronic screed because of some
             | kind of weird financial code you apparently live by. Truly
             | bizarre.
        
         | aketchum wrote:
         | I'm sorry, what? Are you saying aren't an organ donor because
         | your family would not get paid for it? How would you value the
         | organs? Do you believe having the ability to pay for an organ
         | makes one more morally deserving to live?
        
         | exolymph wrote:
         | I think your motivations are different from most who are open
         | to having their organs used to save others' lives.
        
         | Blahah wrote:
         | All the other entities are doing work - of course they need to
         | be paid. You are dead, you're doing nothing. Why would you be
         | paid?
        
           | renewiltord wrote:
           | Ah, for the same reason that you pay someone's estate for
           | their land rather than just take it for the good of everyone.
           | We do not consider one's remains the property of one's
           | estate, strictly. We only recognize one's right to interment
           | or alternative disposal to be executed by one's kin etc. I
           | believe this is wrong. I have spent quite a few decades
           | growing me and ownership of this body must rest more strongly
           | with my estate than any other possession I have.
           | 
           | In keeping with that, I intend to retain the right to
           | disposal of this possession as I see fit.
           | 
           | EDIT-response:
           | 
           | user munk-a: I think I am content to have my body treated
           | just as other property that I have owned in my life. If
           | inheritance laws prohibit inheriting property but permit
           | putting it in a never-dying trust, then I will prefer that my
           | body be treated as such. If all property is transferred to
           | the state upon death, then so be it for my body. I am not
           | anti-social. I merely have this one (apparently peculiar)
           | view on ownership of one's body.
        
             | munk-a wrote:
             | Actually, personally, I despise all inheritance related
             | laws - I understand the historical origin of them and they
             | did make quite a bit of sense but in this modern world I
             | think the only thing that inheritance does is degrade any
             | attempts we might make at moving more toward a meritocracy.
             | 
             | Then again I was strongly influenced by Longhouse
             | traditions growing up and also feel rather neutral on
             | private property ownership in general.
        
         | ProAm wrote:
         | I'd love to see the social media or technology you willingly
         | use and donate information to that allows others to get rich
         | off your non-compensated usage.
        
         | dougmwne wrote:
         | Good lord. A capitalist to the end. Do your next of kin even
         | want the proceeds from the sale of your remains?
        
           | renewiltord wrote:
           | I intend to set it up so that, should they refuse the
           | proceeds, the money is spent in a manner I feel is optimal.
           | For instance, if I were to be able to sell my heart for $100k
           | to a rich industrialist's son, then that's 101 lives saved (1
           | from the heart, 100 from GiveWell's current best).
           | 
           | I believe that I will spend the money better than the rich
           | industrialist, so it makes sense for me to back me over him.
           | 
           | EDIT-response:
           | 
           | User dougmwne: Thank you. I do actually have life insurance.
           | That is only sensible considering I ride a motorcycle. I do
           | not disagree that professionals performing a professional
           | duty should be permitted the right to charge for their
           | services.
           | 
           | I think, if transplant surgery were not a protected
           | employment category I would be content to give my organs for
           | free to those not operating in the for-profit system and
           | charge (as raw materials) those who operate in the for-profit
           | system. It's no different from your surgeon charging you for
           | your hip implant. Someone gets paid for manufacturing that
           | hip implant. I merely want to get paid for manufacturing this
           | heart.
        
             | dougmwne wrote:
             | Or you could buy life insurance like the rest of us!
             | Upvotes for the lateral thinking though and since your
             | downvoters are treating it like the disagree button. I
             | don't think you deserved to have the post deleted. My
             | fundamental disagreement is that I think the staff and
             | professionals that carry out the donation process and
             | medical procedures are completely worthy of their pay and
             | that the recipients pay for the medical procedure, not the
             | materials. If they paid market rate for the organs, these
             | lifesaving procedures would be even more out of reach.
        
         | ThePowerOfFuet wrote:
         | That sounds like an incredibly selfish decision; for-profit
         | healthcare is the reality in the United States (where I'm
         | guessing you're from), so why deny others that benefit just
         | because of the system?
        
         | eCa wrote:
         | If you were in a life-or-death situation, would you accept an
         | organ without paying the donor's family an appropiate fee?
        
         | temp667 wrote:
         | It's very interesting - sort of like college athletics.
         | Everyone makes good to insane money - except the people taking
         | the big health risks and/or putting in the hours.
         | 
         | A lot of moral outrage at the idea here though usually from
         | folks getting rich off the industry.
         | 
         | There have been proposals to do something like $10 - $20K for a
         | liver. The way to get around the outrage mob is usually to
         | point out the health risks, impacts on life a quality of life
         | etc.
         | 
         | In short, if you were in a car crash and lost a liver, you'd be
         | getting a big pay day for those things.
         | 
         | Normal split is 1/3 or so to hospital, and 2/3 kept by donor
         | network admins I think for the fees they charge for Organ
         | acquisition. Donor Network West in CA does $90M a year or so I
         | think? I'm not sure what annual fees are nationally, I'd expect
         | in the 100's of millions range (this does not include all the
         | costs to actual do the transplant).
         | 
         | That said, any discussion on this type of topic tends to
         | attract of one liner type attacks from the outrage folks - so
         | not usually worth having.
         | 
         | But folks are thinking about how to dramatically increase donor
         | rates because it is so impactful. Other options have been to
         | pay $100 - 500/year you list as a donor etc which would save
         | incredible numbers of lives at what is relatively low cost. I
         | heard one funny idea which was to do this for folks who get M
         | class licenses (motorcycles). The idea was to both scare them
         | about the risks of riding a motorcycles and of course they
         | really are more likely to be a donor per mile riden (I'm a
         | rider, and the stats are actually terrible in contrast to other
         | things people worry about)
        
           | bigwavedave wrote:
           | > The way to get around the outrage mob is usually to point
           | out the health risks, impacts on life a quality of life etc.
           | 
           | I'm confused- we're talking about post-mortem organ
           | donation... What quality of life are you referring to?
           | Quality of life for living donors? How does that apply in a
           | discussion where the donors have passed away?
        
             | temp667 wrote:
             | Post mortem the arguments are even easier then.
             | 
             | More organ donors would be a good thing, give folks $100
             | one time gift card for signing up - you'd have a ton of
             | folks do that and the cost is tiny.
             | 
             | Maybe $2,500 to help with funeral expenses if you scoop all
             | their organs out and sell them for $2.6M (that's probably
             | average billed charges for a heart / kidney transplant).
             | 
             | Reality - the folks with the money (transplant surgeons,
             | athletic directors in colleges) and their supporters here
             | will NEVER share with the folks running around on courts
             | and fields (college athletes) or providing the organs or
             | whatever. You actually see this pattern over and over,
             | usually with a fair bit of suffering on the side (folks not
             | able to get transplants, injured college athletes etc).
        
         | thanatos519 wrote:
         | What an American sentiment.
        
           | brbsix wrote:
           | I don't think that's an American sentiment. I've heard people
           | cite religious reasons or conspiratorial suspicions about
           | being left to die in the hospital after suffering a serious
           | injury, but nothing even remotely echoing what OP posted.
           | 
           | I'd prefer not to name specific countries, but there are
           | certain overseas markets with thriving black market organ
           | trades. That is what first came to mind when OP expressed the
           | desire that his family be compensated for his organs.
           | Considering some of these cultures have arguably similar
           | existing customs (e.g. intentionally killing a pedestrian
           | that you have accidentally injured but offering the family a
           | large sum of money in exchange for silence) what the OP
           | stated may not be considered unreasonable to someone looking
           | at the world through that lens.
        
           | renewiltord wrote:
           | Certainly I would have found this position harder to justify
           | when I was covered by the NHS. It is likely that I would
           | remain an organ donor there since everyone is pulling
           | together and I wouldn't want to be the one getting in the
           | way.
           | 
           | EDIT: Oh and some of you have asked me questions. This
           | platform has now blocked me from responding for some
           | duration, presumably to stop flamebait or troll threads
           | (neither of which is what I was up to). I am happy to
           | continue this conversation over email (in profile) or
           | alternatively I can have a vaccinated representative meet you
           | in person in San Francisco to discuss over coffee.
        
           | munk-a wrote:
           | I was hoping the OP comment would be flagged dead rather
           | quickly, but this was essentially my response too. I
           | emigrated from the US to Canada purely because of this
           | pervasive mentality that "I can't suffer you to benefit
           | unless I'm getting something out of the deal". It isn't held
           | by everyone in America or even the majority as far as I've
           | seen - but what's weird is that in the US that view is
           | socially acceptable and that's pretty horrifying to me.
           | 
           | Not everything in life is a transaction where you're either
           | the winner or the loser. Trying to measure things in that
           | manner will lead you to lose out on a lot of joy.
        
             | temp667 wrote:
             | The issue is that you are supporting a bunch of for profit
             | businesses making an absolute killing, while not even
             | throwing table scraps to the key players, the donors.
             | 
             | If someone is going to harvest my Organs and get paid
             | $800K+ per year (California Transplant Surgeon's probably
             | average $750K and some are making $2-3M/year) it's really
             | hard to swallow your and their morally superior tone.
        
               | munk-a wrote:
               | Hey - I absolutely applaud you if you're going to help
               | tear down the private portions of the organ trade
               | business. It should be a publicly managed service like
               | healthcare in general - but for now this is what we're
               | stuck with and a lot of innocent lives are on the line.
               | 
               | I think that, in the long run, it's pretty immoral to
               | throw table scraps at the donors since it'll create some
               | very perverse market incentives to make certain your
               | organ isn't "being wasted" on some penniless orphan
               | somewhere.
               | 
               | I decided to leave insane American wages behind for a
               | society that cares more about egalitarianism - that isn't
               | solving the problem but it's the best contribution I can
               | personally make.
        
         | particulars02 wrote:
         | Whoa. To each their own, I guess. Maybe next time just say it
         | conflicts with your beliefs?
        
         | antattack wrote:
         | That's why it's called donation.
        
         | crummy wrote:
         | > Over the next year, I hope to write down a fee schedule and a
         | quick-to-sign contract that will hopefully bring down the
         | friction to get my organs down to 15 min after my death for
         | someone who can pay appropriately.
         | 
         | Folks, this a joke. Take it easy.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | pseudolus wrote:
       | Remarks from his memorial service by his mother:
       | 
       | https://themakermom.com/2020/02/isaac-moldofsky-mom-eulogy.h...
        
       | annoyingnoob wrote:
       | I wasn't expecting the emotional response I just got from that.
       | Thank you for your story, sorry for your loss.
       | 
       | My father was the recipient of a lung transplant. It saved his
       | life and enabled him to meet all of his grandchildren. We are
       | forever grateful to the donor that allowed Dad to live.
        
       | cloud5ir wrote:
       | I'm so sorry for your loss. Thank you so much for sharing. Love
       | seeing stuff like this on HN. You can also be a living donor and
       | donate part of your liver, lung, etc.
       | 
       | https://instagram.com/kevinsjourneytolivertransplant,
       | https://www.facebook.com/kmprue/
       | 
       | https://www.ynhh.org/services/transplantation/become-an-orga...
        
       | asadlionpk wrote:
       | I checked that box on my recent DL renewal (against my family's
       | wish). The moving send off photo in the article confirms I made
       | the right choice.
        
         | WalterBright wrote:
         | I figure the worms will eat me anyway, so why not be an organ
         | donor?
         | 
         | I don't find any comfort in visiting the gravesites of
         | relatives, either. Whatever made them what they were isn't
         | there. My father once told me that a dead body is like a house
         | with nobody home. That's how I feel about it, too.
        
           | asadlionpk wrote:
           | Your father is right. I would still visit the gravesite to
           | remind myself of death in general. I imagine it helps ground
           | me, prioritize things, etc.
        
         | input_sh wrote:
         | > (against my family's wish)
         | 
         | Where I'm from they're gonna ask my family for confirmation
         | regardless. Fortunately for me they're okay with it.
        
           | asadlionpk wrote:
           | They will still honor it. But it's understandably hard for
           | them to even think about at it right now.
        
         | munk-a wrote:
         | There is a lot of mysticism around our bodies once we pass on -
         | and when that happens we've lost all the ability to bask in the
         | honor of our act or receive the appreciation - but our bodies
         | are also quite worthless to ourselves at that point and can be
         | of an immense value to others.
         | 
         | Organ donation is a very sensitive subject since it can be
         | viewed as losing the coherence of all that remains of someone,
         | but the benefits to others can be extreme. This particular
         | story involved someone getting a heart transplant and, while it
         | was surely a loss that this individual died, after they died
         | they enabled another person who had a limited lease on life to
         | get a lot more time out of something that would have decayed in
         | the ground or be cremated.
        
           | piyh wrote:
           | I'm all for organ donation, but it's something we'll look
           | back on in 60 years and marvel at how complicated and crude
           | it was compared to growing new ones with the patient's own
           | cells. In the mean time it's definitely a silver lining for
           | those left behind.
        
         | gumby wrote:
         | Why would your family object? Among other reasons it's your
         | body, not theirs, but apart from that by what basis would
         | anyone choose to object to helping others in this way?
         | 
         | Genuinely curious.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | asadlionpk wrote:
           | Death is already a difficult thing to think or talk about for
           | your loved ones let alone harvesting the organs from your
           | body.
        
       | cortesoft wrote:
       | > I grew those organs in my body, for my son. And now they're
       | working inside the bodies of total strangers, supporting the
       | lives of people I will probably never meet. Or possibly never
       | hear from.
       | 
       | Damn.
        
         | Blahah wrote:
         | I surprised myself by spontaneously shedding a tear as I read
         | that sentence.
        
         | NotSammyHagar wrote:
         | That's a moving article. Hard to imagine facing this for my own
         | kid.
         | 
         | >I also learned that the care team doesn't just wheel the donor
         | away. They send them off with an Honor Walk. The doctors and
         | nurses who worked to keep my son's organs functioning at
         | optimal levels joined local family, friends, and colleagues,
         | packed shoulder-to-shoulder (pre-COVID) to line the short
         | corridor from the ICU to the surgical suite for the ceremonial
         | transport of my son's body.
        
           | rideontime wrote:
           | Anybody browsing the comments to get the gist of the article
           | should click through to see this photo.
        
             | mrclark411 wrote:
             | I was going to just skip over this by reading the comments.
             | Thank you for suggesting I go look. Extremely moving.
        
       | gambiting wrote:
       | "and managing hospital bills that would soon follow. The donor
       | network takes over medical costs once a patient officially enters
       | the program, but there was still the matter of the pricey care
       | that preceded it."
       | 
       | It never occurred to me that the American healthcare system is so
       | ruthless that even if someone dies your family has to pay for
       | your care. How absolutely cruel and awful.
        
         | rectang wrote:
         | Through inflicting financial pain, the US healthcare system is
         | supposed to motivate consumers to seek out higher value,
         | leading to competition and efficiency. But since medical
         | services are a classic example of "market failure", all that's
         | left is unavoidable pain.
        
           | ncpa-cpl wrote:
           | The country I live in has three healthcare systems: Public
           | (Free), Social security (Payroll funded) and Private (Paid by
           | yourself or your optional private insurance).
           | 
           | The private one has the shortest waiting times and doctors
           | are assigned less patients.
           | 
           | Some things that have happened to me in the private system
           | and I didnt like were:
           | 
           | - Having to pay my bill about two hours after waking up from
           | anesthesia. Literally signing the credit card receipts while
           | on my hospital bed.
           | 
           | - Another time, having to sign an IOU before being admitted,
           | on the emergency room bed.
           | 
           | - One of my doctors throwing away all my medical records,
           | because "they were old and took too much space".
        
         | munk-a wrote:
         | DNRs are very common in America for a reason separate from the
         | rest of the world - elsewhere they tend to be mostly a
         | philosophical choice to minimize your own personal pain and
         | cost on society. In America they primarily exist to shield
         | family members from cost - it isn't uncommon for a funeral to
         | be accompanied by a lot of additional stress because your
         | father was kept alive for five additional days at a cost of
         | 50k/day and suddenly the surviving family is trying to sort out
         | grief, finding a quarter of a million dollars (or potentially
         | sending the entire estate into bankruptcy) and the additional
         | tens of thousands of dollars funerals cost.
         | 
         | Death in America is pretty darn expensive.
         | 
         | Edit: I'd clarify something - in the US (like almost
         | everywhere) debt cannot be inherited alone. An estate can be
         | declared bankrupt when someone dies and then debtors are
         | limited to just taking chunks out of the estate to the best of
         | their ability - but if shared property is held by the deceased
         | then it can cause serious harm to inheritors. My favorite
         | example is a multi-generational house which can force
         | inheritors into debt to keep the roof over their head.
        
           | gambiting wrote:
           | >> in the US (like almost everywhere) debt cannot be
           | inherited alone
           | 
           | In Poland(where I'm from) it can. When my father died I
           | basically had to make a choice within a few weeks of his
           | death - either refuse the inheritance entirely, or accept it
           | with all his known and unknown debts. The second options
           | meaning that if someone comes to me in 10 years time saying
           | "hey I have this paper signed by your dad 20 years ago saying
           | he owes me a million dollars" well, I now legally owe this
           | person a million dollars. There is no concept of an estate of
           | the deceased that gets settled first before any inheritance
           | is given out(if anything remains). No, you have to make a
           | choice whether you accept everything(including debts) or
           | literally nothing at all. And you have to make the choice
           | quickly because you cannot manage _anything_ owned or related
           | to the deceased(their bank accounts, mortgages etc) until you
           | make the decision.
        
         | stagger87 wrote:
         | In general, in America, parents are not responsible for adult
         | children's medical bills, even when on shared insurance.
         | Managing != paying for out of her own pocket.
        
         | MattGaiser wrote:
         | I am kinda surprised at that part. Why would the family be
         | responsible for his costs beyond what insurance would cover? It
         | is not their debt.
        
           | BugsJustFindMe wrote:
           | > _Why would the family be responsible for his costs_
           | 
           | I think for the same reason that your family gets control of
           | your assets. Neither transfer is deserved, but if you allow
           | one then you have to also allow the other.
        
             | kahrl wrote:
             | No. Debt is never transferred from one family member to
             | another unless agreed to contractually.
             | 
             | If no will is drawn up, the estate will be transferred to
             | the next-of-kin after all debts are settled.
        
               | russh wrote:
               | This may come as a surprise to you, as it did me...
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filial_responsibility_laws
        
               | munk-a wrote:
               | _Sorta_ - this issue is a bit more complex when it comes
               | to shared property. If you live in a multi-generational
               | home technically owned by your grandfather and he passes
               | away then the house may be seized during any debt
               | resolution or bankruptcy filing.
               | 
               | Debts don't get passed on but they can eliminate the
               | value of estates being transferred.
               | 
               | I think it's perfectly legitimate to question whether any
               | assets or debts should be transferred on death but right
               | now society is such that some people will be depending on
               | that inheritance since they're inheriting the roof that
               | they've been living under all their life.
        
               | shard wrote:
               | Depends on the locale. As I understand it, in Korean law,
               | both assets and debts are transferred to next of kin when
               | one dies. Relatives of debtors have to go through a legal
               | procedure to make sure that they don't become next-in-
               | line for the debt when the debtor dies.
        
           | kahrl wrote:
           | I'm assuming she's referring to managing the bills which will
           | need to be paid out of the son's estate.
        
           | altcognito wrote:
           | If you're over 18, the bill belongs to the adult, even if
           | they are on their parents insurance.
        
             | MattGaiser wrote:
             | That is my thought. They can get what insurance will pay
             | for but the dead person is the one who legally owes them.
        
           | 65C816 wrote:
           | Oh, you sweet, innocent child...
        
         | chemeng wrote:
         | Yeah, it's a complete mess too. It really depends on the
         | situation. For adults, with their own coverage, most medical
         | debts are covered by the deceased's estate until it is
         | insolvent. Family members are not required to pay the debt
         | (unless a spouse in a community property state) though the
         | hospital/insurance companies will absolutely try to get you to
         | pay.
         | 
         | However, some states have laws that require adult children to
         | pay the debts of their parents should they end up in a nursing
         | home or similar.
        
         | CobrastanJorji wrote:
         | Wait until you hear about our funerary system.
        
       | hycaria wrote:
       | I opted out. For the sole reason that I don't think this planet
       | lacks humans enough to justify prolonging some lifes more than
       | their own bodies allowed them to.
       | 
       | Also this article was too mellow for my taste.
        
         | Chris2048 wrote:
         | Why do you think the planet has too many humans? And why is a
         | grown adult the best thing to eliminate?
        
       | input_sh wrote:
       | I signed up to become a donor a few months ago!
       | 
       | I don't know if my organs will be used when I die, but I sure
       | hope so. There's some sort of zen feeling knowing that my death
       | may result in someone's life being saved or made easier. The
       | decision was quite easy to make. That initial talk with my family
       | was a bit of an awkward subject to bring up, but that's about the
       | only unpleasant side to it.
        
       | jerkstate wrote:
       | Proud to be a registered organ donor after reading this. If you
       | want to do something right now, you can donate blood every 8
       | weeks. I just got a text message notification that my most recent
       | donation (last Thursday) was just sent to a hospital, between
       | reading the article and making this comment.
        
       | zuppy wrote:
       | full article: https://outline.com/t2H493
        
       | dvirsky wrote:
       | The part about the honor walk is really great. My father was
       | killed in a terrorist attack 18 years ago and we were able to
       | donate his organs (he was shot in the head so was brain dead but
       | his body was mostly fine). It was in Israel and there wasn't
       | anything ceremonious about it at the time. I signed the consent
       | form, we were given some time to say goodbye, and that was it, we
       | just went home and left him. It was around noon, and IIRC by
       | evening his liver, lung and kidneys were already being
       | transplanted.
       | 
       | I have to say that it was comforting to know he saved lives. We
       | got to meet two of the families of the people he saved. One was a
       | Palestinian family, who came to visit us and were really
       | wonderful given the circumstances. The other one we met was a 12
       | year old boy who got a kidney, and as far as I know is still
       | alive and kicking with part of my dad in him. That's incredible.
       | 
       | None of this makes up for how awful losing my dad was, but
       | knowing it also did some good in this world is a tiny comfort.
        
       | cheeze wrote:
       | I love articles like this. I wish there was an hn for articles.
       | Not tech. Not some random lisp interpreter, but things like "The
       | hunt for the death valley germans", the story about the nuclear
       | power device in the mountains in nepal, this post.
       | 
       | Anyone know any good resources?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-04-09 23:02 UTC)